Review Article
Lights and Shadows about the Effectiveness of IVF in HIV Infected Women: A Systematic Review
Table 2
Summary of ovarian stimulation and IVF outcomes of study and control groups.
| Study | Cancellation rate (%) | Mean gonadotrophin dose/stimulation (IU) | Mean number of oocytes/retrieval | Mean number of embryos replaced | Implantation rate | PR/cycle (%) | PR/ET (%) | Study | Control | Study | Control | Study | Control | Study | Control | Study | Control | Study | Study | Control |
| Ohl et al. 2003 [14] | NM | NM | 2893 | 1972 | 8.6 | 9 | 1.9 ± 0.6 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | NM | NM | 6.7 | 9.1 | 48.8 | Ohl et al. 2005 [15] | 9,7 | NA | 2793 | NA | 8.4 | NA | 1.8 ± 0.6 | NA | 11.8 | NA | 15.8 | 23.9 | NM | Terriou et al. 2005 [16] | 15,2 | 4.9 | 2898 | 2429 | 10.6 | 8.3 | 2 | 2.4 | NM | NM | 16.1 | NM | NM | Coll et al. 2006 [17] | 26 | 20 | 3721 | 3743 | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | NM | 12 | 16.2 | 37.5 | Martinet et al. 2006 [18] | 18.5 | 14.29 | 4200 | 3348 | 6.55 | 8.27 | 1.3 | 1.94 | NM | NM | 11 | 14 | 24 | Manigart et al. 2006 [19] | 42.9 | 24.2 | NM | NM | 6 | 8 | NM | NM | NM | NM | 16.1 | NM | NM | Douglas et al. 2009 [20] | 17.2 | NM | NM | NM | 11.2 | 12.4 | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 3 ± 0.2 | 15 | 19 | 24.1 | 33 | NM | Prisant et al. 2010 [21] | 5.7 | 4.9 | NM | NM | 6.4 | 7.3 | 1.96 ± 0.5 | 1.94 ± 0.3 | 10.8 | 7.1 | 15.96 | 17.65 | 11,5 | Santulli et al. 2011 [22] | 16.2 | 9.5 | 2408 | 2283 | 8.3 | 9.6 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 21.9 | 27.4 | NM | 26.3 | 36.3 | Nurudeen et al. 2013 [23] | 20 | NM | <35 y: 2105 ≥35 y: 3677 | 3103 4318 | <35 y: 13.7 ≥35 y: 10.7 | 20.3 11.1 | <35 y: 2.6 ± 0.8 ≥35 y: 2.7 ± 1.5 | 2.1 ± 0.6 2.9 ± 1.7 | NM | NM | NM | <35 y: 63 ≥35 y: 17 | 57 25 |
|
|
value < 0.05. PR per oocyte retrieval. NA: not available. NM: not mentioned.
|