Research Article

Detection of Ureaplasma Biovars and Subtyping of Ureaplasma parvum among Women Referring to a University Hospital in Morocco

Table 7

Ureaplasma biovars and U. parvum serovars according to geographical area.

Study, regionStudy groupPrevalence % ()
Ureaplasma spp.UUUPUU/UPSV UP
SV 1SV 3/14SV 6Multiple SV

Our study, Morocco1053: P and NP women25.4 (268/1053)12.1 (128/1053)7 (74/1053)6.3 (66/1053)20 (28/140)57.1 (80/140)17.9 (25/140)5 (7/140)
[21]; Italy806: P and NP women23 (186/806)14 (22/158)86 (136/158)None37 (50/136)39 (53/136)24 (33/136)None
[3]; Croatia1370: P and NP women34.4 (471/1370)7.4 (18/244×)92.6 (226/244×)NoneNDNDNDND
Our study, Morocco856: NP women24.3 (208/856)11.6 (99/856)6.8 (58/856)6 (51/856)26.6 29/10960.6 (66/109)15.6 (22/109)6.4 (7/109)
[22]; Brazil302: sexually active NP women76.2 (230/302)16.6 (50/302)60.6 (183/302)4.6 (14/302)23.6 (37/156)39.5 (62/156)40.8 (64/156)11.5 (18/156)
Our study; Morocco197: P women30.5 (60/197)14.7 (29/197)8.1 (16/197)7.6 (15/197)9.7 (3/31)64.5 (20/31)25.8 (8/31)None
[14]; Australia191: P women48 (91/191)13 (25/191)39 (74/191)ND15.3 (11/72#)SV3: 37.5 (27/72#)
SV14: 0 (0/72#)
43 (31/72#)
SV6.1: 1.4 (1/72#)
2.8 (2/72#)
[5]; Australia78: U from vaginal swabs of P women78 Ureaplasma positives19.2 (15/78)79.5 (62/78)1.3 (1/78)27 (17/63)49 (31/63)16 (10/63)8 (5/63)
[23]; United States169: U from vaginal swabs of P women169 Ureaplasma positives14 (24/169)81 (137/169)4 (7/169±)23 (33/144)SV3: 59.7 (86/144)
SV14: 4.2 (6/144)
28.5 (41/144)ND

P: pregnant; NP: nonpregnant; UU: Ureaplasma urealyticum; UP: Ureaplasma parvum; SV: serovar; ND: not determined. Total culture positive only for Ureaplasma urealyticum.×Only 244 samples were successfully genotyped to UU and UP. 76.2% (230/302) of the women studied were colonized by Mollicutes. 27 U. parvum positives were negative for all four known U. parvum serovars. #No amplification 1% (2/72). ±Negative Ureaplasma spp. 1% (1/169).