Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Agronomy
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 948605, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/948605
Research Article

Plant and Endophyte Effect on Fiber, N, and P Concentrations in Tall Fescue

1The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, 2510 Sam Noble Parkway, Ardmore, Ok 73401, USA
2Clemson University, 540 E. Main Street, Pendleton, SC 29670, USA

Received 8 February 2011; Accepted 27 March 2011

Academic Editor: Robert J. Kremer

Copyright © 2011 James K. Rogers et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. M. Ball and C. S. Hoveland, “Toxic fescue solution: fungus implicated; control likely soon,” Crops and Soils Magazine, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 12–14, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. S. Hoveland, S. P. Schmidt, and C. C. King Jr., “Steer performance and association of Acremonium coenophialum fungal endophyte on tall fescue pasture,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 75, pp. 821–824, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  3. J. C. Read and B. J. Camp, “The effect of the fungal endophyte Acremonium coenophialum in tall fescue on animal performance, toxicity, and stand maintenance,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 78, pp. 848–850, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. H. Bouton, G. C. M. Latch, N. S. Hill et al., “Reinfection of tall fescue cultivars with non-ergot alkaloid-producing endophytes,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 567–574, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. E. Nihsen, E. L. Piper, C. P. West et al., “Growth rate and physiology of steers grazing tall fescue inoculated with novel endophytes,” Journal of Animal Science, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 878–883, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. A. Hopkins, C. A. Young, D. G. Panaccione, W. R. Simpson, S. Mittal, and J. H. Bouton, “Agronomic performance and lamb health among several tall fescue novel endophyte combinations in the south-central USA,” Crop Science, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1552–1561, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. C. Burns, D. S. Fisher, and G. E. Rottinghaus, “Grazing influences on mass, nutritive value, and persistence of stockpiled jesup tall fescue without and with novel and wild-type fungal endophytes,” Crop Science, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1898–1912, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. R. Siegel, L. P. Bush, and D. D. Dahlman, “What am I losing by removing endophyte from tall fescue?” in Proceedings of the Southern Pasture and Forage Crop Improvement Association, pp. 41–44, Clemson, SC, USA, 1987.
  9. N. S. Hill, W. C. Stringer, G. E. Rottinhaus, D. P. Belesky, W. A. Parrott, and D. Pope, “Growth, morphological, and chemical component responses of tall fescue to Acremonium coenophialum,” Crop Science, vol. 30, pp. 156–161, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Arachevaleta, C. W. Bacon, C. S. Hoveland, and D. E. Radcliffe, “Effect of the tall fescue endophyte on plant response to environmental stress,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 81, pp. 83–90, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  11. L. P. Bush and P. B. Burrus Jr., “Tall fescue quality and agronomic performance as affected by the endophyte,” Journal of Production Agriculture, vol. 1, pp. 55–60, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  12. C. R. Funk, R. H. Hurley, J. M. Johnson-Cicalese, and D. C. Saha, “Association of endophytic fungi with improved performance and enhanced pest resistance in perennial ryegrass and tall fescue,” Agronomy Abstracts, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. O. Fritz and M. Collins, “Yield, digestibility, and chemical composition of endophyte free and infected tall fescue,” Agronomy Journal, vol. 83, pp. 537–541, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  14. L. P. Bush, S. G. Gay, and M. C. Johnson, “Growth and water use of endophyte-infected and endophyte-free tall fescue,” University of Kentucky, Agronomy Journal Abstracts, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. S. Rice, B. W. Pinkerton, W. C. Stringer, and D. J. Undersander, “Seed production in tall fescue as affected by fungal endophyte,” Crop Science, vol. 30, pp. 1303–1305, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  16. A. A. Elmi, C. P. West, R. T. Robbins, and T. L. Kirkpatrick, “Endophyte effects on reproduction of a root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne marylandi) and osmotic adjustment in tall fescue,” Grass and Forage Science, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 166–172, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. P. Malinowski and D. P. Belesky, “Tall fescue aluminum tolerance is affected by Neotyphodium coenophialum endophyte,” Journal of Plant Nutrition, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1335–1349, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. P. Malinowski and D. P. Belesky, “Adaptations of endophyte-infected cool-season grasses to environmental stresses: mechanisms of drought and mineral stress tolerance,” Crop Science, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 923–940, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. P. Malinowski, D. K. Brauer, and D. P. Belesky, “The endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum affects root morphology of tall fescue grown under phosphorus deficiency,” Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, vol. 183, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. P. Malinowski, G. A. Alloush, and D. P. Belesky, “Leaf endophyte neotyphodium coenophialum modifies mineral uptake in tall fescue,” Plant and Soil, vol. 227, no. 1-2, pp. 115–126, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. T. Roylance, N. S. Hill, and C. S. Agee, “Ergovaline and peramine production in endophyte-infected tall fescue: independent regulation and effects of plant and endophyte genotype,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 2171–2183, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. S. Shenk and M. O. Westerhaus, “Accuracy of NIRS instruments to analyze forage and grain,” Crop Science, vol. 25, pp. 1120–1122, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  23. SAS Institute, SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 2003.