Research Article
Nectarine Fruit Ripening and Quality Assessed Using the Index of Absorbance Difference ()
Table 5
Average fruits diameters in the hand-thinned and unthinned fruit densities in the bottom (B), middle (M), and top (T) canopy layers at 68, 75, 82, and 89 DAFB (“SF26”).
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Small letters represent significant differences between fruit densities within the same canopy layer (B, M, and T) at . yCapital letters represent significant differences between canopy layers within the same fruit density (hand thinned or unthinned) at . |