International Journal of Agronomy

International Journal of Agronomy / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 581627 | 8 pages |

Effect of Rhizobium and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacterial Inoculants on Symbiotic Traits, Nodule Leghemoglobin, and Yield of Chickpea Genotypes

Academic Editor: J. K. Ladha
Received25 Jun 2013
Revised16 Sep 2013
Accepted17 Sep 2013
Published21 Oct 2013


A field experiment was carried out during the rabi season of 2004-05 to find out the effect of Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacterial (PSB) inoculants on symbiotic traits, nodule leghemoglobin, and yield of five elite genotypes of chickpea. Among the chickpea genotypes, IG-593 performed better in respect of symbiotic parameters including nodule number, nodule fresh weight, nodule dry weight, shoot dry weight, yield attributes and yield. Leghemoglobin content (2.55 mg g−1 of fresh nodule) was also higher under IG-593. Among microbial inoculants, the Rhizobium + PSB was found most effective in terms of nodule number (27.66 nodules plant−1), nodule fresh weight (144.90 mg plant−1), nodule dry weight (74.30 mg plant−1), shoot dry weight (11.76 g plant−1), and leghemoglobin content (2.29 mg g−1 of fresh nodule) and also showed its positive effect in enhancing all the yield attributing parameters, grain and straw yields.

1. Introduction

Pulses are the second most important group of crops after cereals. Developing countries contribute about 74% to the global pulses production and the remaining comes from developed countries. India, China, Brazil, Canada, Myanmar, and Australia are the major pulse producing countries with relative share of 25%, 10%, 5%, 5%, and 4%, respectively. In 2009, the global pulses production was 61.5 million tonnes from an area of 70.6 million hectares with an average yield of 871 kg/ha. Dry beans contributed about 32% to global pulses production followed by dry peas (17%), chickpea (15.9%), broad bean (7.5%), lentil (5.7%), cowpea (6%), and pigeonpea (4.0%). India is the largest producer and consumer of pulses in the world contributing around 25–28% of the total global production. About 75% of the global chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) area falls in India [1]. Chickpea is one of the major post rainy seasonpulse crops in Madhya Pradesh, which occupies 3.09 m ha with production of 3.30 mt and productivity of 1071 kg ha−1 [2]. The poor productivity of chickpea in this region is mainly due to imbalance application of nutrients and use of traditional varieties. Under such situations, use of Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) had shown advantage in enhancing chickpea productivity [3, 4]. Microbial inoculants are cost effective, ecofriendly, and renewable sources of plant nutrients [5]. Rhizobium and PSB assume a great importance on account of their vital role in N2-fixation and P-solubilisation. The introduction of efficient strains of P-solubilizing species of Bacillus megaterium biovar phosphaticum, Bacillus polymyxa, Pseudomonas striata, Aspergillus awamori, and Penicillium digitatum in the rhizosphere of crops and soils has been reported to help in increasing phosphorus availability in the soil [6]. Since the information on response of elite genotypes of chickpea to inoculation with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacterial inoculants is meager under such situation, therefore, an experiment was designed to assess the productivity of chickpea genotypes in combinations with microbial inoculants in Malwa Region of Madhya Pradesh.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

The field experiment was conducted at the Experimental Farm of College of Agriculture, Indore, Madhya Pradesh (2243′ N, 7556′ E and 555.7 m above mean sea level). The soil of the experimental site belongs to sarol series, which is a member of a fine montmorillonitic family of Vertic Ustochrept and Vertic Chromusters. The soil characteristics of the experimental site before start of the study were analysed and presented in Table 1.

Soil parameterValue

pH 7.8
Electrical conductivity, dS m−10.23
Soil organic carbon, %0.45
Available nitrogen, kg ha−1204
Available phosphorous (Olsen’ P), kg ha−19.58
Available potassium, kg ha−1576
Available sulphur, kg ha−112.88

2.2. Treatments Details and Crop Culture

The experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) season of 2004-05. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with three replications. The experiment was conducted with twenty treatment combinations comprising five genotypes, namely, IG-226, IG-370, IG-379, JG-412, and IG-593, in main plots and four microbial inoculants (no inoculum, Rhizobium, PSB, and Rhizobium + PSB) in sub-plots. The chickpea genotypes were collected from college of Agriculture, Indore and microbial inoculants from JNKVV, Jabalpur. The gross plot size was 5 m × 2.40 m2. Chickpea crop was sown on a fine seed bed prepared after presown irrigation with a seed rate of 100 kg ha−1. Rhizobium inoculant at 5 g kg−1 seed was applied as seed treatment, whereas, phosphate solubilizing bacterial inoculants were applied in soil at 3 kg ha−1 prior to sowing. The chickpea crop was given irrigation at 40 days after sowing.

2.3. Soil Analysis

Soil samples from surface soil (0–15 cm) were taken for chemical analysis after harvesting of rice crop. Random cores were taken from each plot with a 5 cm diameter tube auger and bulked. The moist soil samples were sieved (2 mm) after removing plant material and roots. Similarly, initial soil samples were collected from 10 random places of experimental site before start of study. All chemical results are means of triplicate analyses and are expressed on oven-dry basis. Soil was analyzed for pH in 1 : 2.5 soil : water suspension [7], SOC by the method of Walkley and Black [8], Kjeldahl N by FOSS Tecator (Model 2200), available P following the method of Bray and Kurtz [9], available K by 1 N NH4OAc using a flame photometer [7], and available S by using 0.15% CaCl2 [10]. Rhizobium population in the soil samples was enumerated by plant infection technique of Toomsan et al. [11] and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) by dilution plate count method as described by Sundara Rao and Sinha [12].

2.4. Nodulation, Growth, and Yield of Crops

Five plants were randomly selected and removed from each plot and recorded the nodule fresh weight at 35, 55, and 75 days after sowing (DAS). After removal of nodules, the plants were first sun dried for 3 days and then oven dried at 65°C for 48 hours to obtain dry weight. Leghemoglobin content in nodular tissues collected at 35, 55, and 75 DAS was determined by the procedure outlined by Beau [13]. The nodules were dried in oven at 65°C for 78 hours for dry weight of nodules. Plants were harvested at physiological maturity and plant height, and number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, and number of seeds per pod and test weight (1000 seed weight) were recorded from 10 randomly selected plants at the time of harvest. Total dry matter and grain yield were also recorded for each plot.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Effect of treatments were evaluated by split-plot analysis of variance (ANOVA) with chickpea genotypes as main and microbial inoculants as subfactors. Analysis of variance was performed using the program SPSS 11.0 for windows. The significance of the treatment effect was determined using F-test. When ANOVA indicated that there was a significant value, multiple comparisons of mean value were performed using the least significant difference method (LSD).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Symbiotic Traits

The data on mean nodule number, nodule fresh weight, nodule dry weight, and shoot dry weight at 35, 55 and 75 days after sowing (DAS) are presented in Figures 1(a), 1(b), 1(c), 1(d) and Table 2. The analysis of data revealed that among the genotypes, IG-593 exhibited the highest nodule number, namely, 19.91, 27.04, and 25.29 plant−1, nodule fresh weight, namely, 86.79, 127.48, and 100.16 mg plant−1 and dry weight of nodules, namely, 46.16, 67.29, and 65.68 mg plant−1 at 35, 55, and 75 DAS, respectively.

Chickpea genotypesNodule number plant−1Nodule fresh weight (mg plant−1) Nodule dry weight (mg plant−1) Shoot dry weight (g plant−1) Nodule leghemoglobin (mg g−1 of fresh nodule)
Days after sowingDays after sowingDays after sowingDays after sowingDays after sowing

Chickpea genotype
LSD ( )

Microbial inoculants
Rhizobium 18.925.424.767.1120.9102.140.364.663.12.210.824.
Rhizobium + PSB20.727.726.795.1144.9120.446.674.370.52.311.826.
LSD ( )

PSB: phosphate solubilising bacteria.

Genotype IG-593 recorded maximum shoot dry weight, namely, 2.56, 12.55, and 25.53 g plant−1 and the minimum in IG-370, namely, 1.67, 8.03, and 14.98 g plant−1 at 35, 55, and 75 DAS, respectively. The data on symbiotic traits of chickpea genotypes indicated that shoot dry weight increased progressively and nodule number, nodule fresh weight, nodule dry weight also followed the similar trend at 35 and 55 DAS, but the decline was noted in nodule number, fresh weight, and dry weight of nodules at 75 DAS. This was mainly due to decay of nodular tissues at pod formation, which start from 60 to 65 DAS.

Coinoculation of Rhizobium and PSB recorded significantly higher nodule number and its fresh as well as dry weight than Rhizobium and PSB alone. The increase in nodulation might be due to synergistic effect of the two types of microorganisms for biological nitrogen fixation as against their individual application. Results of the similar kind have also been reported by Rudresh et al. [4]. It is also due to the fact that phosphate solubilizing bacteria by virtue of their property of producing organic acids solubilize insoluble or fixed form of phosphorus in the rhizosphere and make it available to the growing plants, which promotes root development in plants [14]. In the present study, a significant response of dual inoculation with Rhizobium and PSB was observed with respect to shoot dry weight per plant. Observations of the similar kind have been recorded by Gupta and Namdeo [15] and Barea et al. [16].

3.2. Leghemoglobin Content in Root Nodules

The results given in Figure 1(e) and Table 2 showed that the leghemoglobin content in chickpea root nodules increased with the advancement of crop age and was maximum at 55 DAS and thereafter decline at 75 DAS. Among the genotypes, IG-593 possessed the highest nodule leghemoglobin of 2.10, 2.55, and 2.47 mg g−1 of fresh nodule and lowest 1.07, 1.23, and 1.45 mg g−1 of fresh nodule in IG-370 at 35, 55 and 75 DAS, respectively. In the present study, coinoculation of Rhizobium and PSB performed better than Rhizobium and PSB alone with respect to leghemoglobin content in the nodular tissues of chickpea crop. In case of microbial inoculants, higher leghemoglobin content in nodular tissues was observed in Rhizobium + PSB in comparison to their individual inoculation. The better nodulation under chickpea genotype IG −593 might be resulted in higher content of leghemoglobin in nodular tissues. Similarly, higher leghemoglobin content in Rhizobium + PSB was mainly due to better root and nodules development [17].

3.3. Yield Attributes

The significant differences were found in yield attributing parameters due to genotypes and microbial inoculants, while their interaction effect was nonsignificant (Table 3). Among the genotypes, IG-593 exhibited the highest mean number of branches and pods per plant and seeds per pod, that is, 15.95, 63.96 plant−1 and 1.59 pod−1, respectively, and the lowest values were recorded in IG-370, that is, 10.23, 34.71 plant−1 and 1.13 pod−1, respectively. It was further noted that among the genotypes, IG-593 produced the tallest plant (42.07 cm), while the genotype IG-370 had shortest plant (30.63 cm). Variation in the above parameters is bound to occur due to difference in genetic makeup and inherited characters in different genotypes. The results corroborate with the findings of Singh et al. [18] and Tiwari et al. [19].

Chickpea genotypes Plant height
Number of
branches plant−1
Number of pods plant−1Number of seeds pod−1Test weight (g)Mean yield (Kg ha−1)

Chickpea genotype
LSD ( )

Microbial inoculants
Rhizobium + PSB37.
LSD ( )

PSB: phosphate solubilising bacteria.

The data further indicated that IG-593 had highest test weight (333.80 g) followed by JG-412 (249.13 g), IG-379 (191.48 g), IG-370 (158.68 g), and IG-226 (152.34 g). The variation in test weight among the genotypes is likely to occur due to difference in seed size of the individual genotype. A high value of test weight indicated the boldness of seeds, while the lower values indicated small seeds. Large/small seed size of chickpea is basically a genotypic character [19]. In the present study, seed inoculation with Rhizobium + PSB significantly increased the plant height, number of branches, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and 1000 seed weight (test weight) over no inoculation. The higher growth and yield attributes under Rhizobium + PSB inoculation were mainly due to more availability of N, P, K, and S in the soil for chickpea plants [2022]. Moreover, growth promoting substances (phytohormones) are produced by these organisms which further promote plant growth [2325]. Further, inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB alone produced significantly higher number of pods per plant and test weight. These results are in close agreement with Takankhar et al. [26] and Khoja et al. [27].

3.4. Grain and Straw Yield

Critical examination of the data in Table 3 revealed that genotype IG-593 produced the highest grain and straw yields (2 286 and 2 728 Kg ha−1) followed by JG-412 (1 995 and 2 291 Kg ha−1) and lowest in IG-370 (1 475 and 1 613 Kg ha−1). The observed variation in seed and straw yields in the present investigation seems to be due to genetic difference in yield potential of different genotypes and also due to variable response of different genotypes to microbial inoculants [19, 28].

Significant differences in grain and straw yields were also recorded due to microbial inoculation. The grain and straw yields increased due to microbial inoculation, and the highest seed and straw yields were obtained in inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB, that is, 2 150 and 2 461 Kg ha−1, and the lowest in the case of control, that is, 1 587 and 1 901 Kg ha−1, respectively. The increase in grain and straw yield might be attributed to the increased availability of N and P in soil which resulted in higher growth and development and finally yields [20, 23, 2931].

3.5. Soil Characteristics

Soil pH and EC remain unaffected under different chickpea genotypes and microbial inoculation. However, highest value of soil organic carbon (SOC) was observed under IG-593 (0.53%) and the lowest under IG-370 (0.47%). The significant variations in available N, P, K, and S were also recorded due to chickpea genotypes and microbial inoculation. The highest value of available N (219.25 kg ha−1), available P (12.18 kg ha−1), available K (568.6 kg ha−1), and available S (13.6 kg ha−1) was recorded after harvest of chickpea genotype 1G-593 and the lowest values of available N, P, K and S were recorded in IG-370. In case of microbial inoculation, the highest values of available N (220.3 kg ha−1), available P (14.1 kg ha−1), available K (556.9 kg ha−1), and available S (13.41 kg ha−1) were recorded under inoculation of both Rhizobium and PSB; however, the lowest values of available N, P, K, and S were under no-inoculation (control). The variations in available nutrients under different genotype might be due to variations in compatibility between soil microflora and chickpea genotypes. However, Rhizobium and PSB inoculation had resulted in better plant growth, nodulation, and rhizospheric environment which finally resulted in more availability of plant nutrients (NPKS) in the soil [28, 32, 33].

3.6. Microbial Population

The data on Rhizobium and phosphate solubilising bacterial counts are given in Table 4. Significant variations in Rhizobium and phosphate solubilising bacteria (PSB) was observed due to both chickpea genotypes and microbial inoculation; however, their interactions were nonsignificant. Among chickpea genotypes, significantly highest Rhizobium population was recorded in IG-593 (10.99 × 104 g−1 of soil) followed by JG-412 (10.60 × 104 g−1 of soil) and least in IG-370 (9.29 × 104 g−1 of soil). Similarly, PSB population was significantly higher in 1G-593 (5.09 × 105 g−1 of soil) over rest of genotypes. In case of microbial inoculation, the highest values of Rhizobinum (10.86 × 104 g−1 of soil) and PSB (4.80 × 105 g−1 of soil) were recorded in 1G-593 and lowest under control (no-inculcation). The highest values of microbial counts in 1G-593 might be due to greater compatibility of this genotype with inoculated microbial strains. However, inoculation of both Rhizobinum and PSB might have given added advantage over native microbial population [34].

Chickpea genotypespH EC
dS m−1
SOC (%)Available nutrients in soil (kg ha−1)Rhizobium population
 g−1 of soil)
PSB population
(  g−1 of soil)

Chickpea genotype

Microbial inoculants
Rhizobium + PSB7.810.370.54220.314.1556.913.410.864.80

SOC: soil organic carbon, EC: electrical conductivity.
Initial rhizobial count:  g−1 of soil and phosphate solubilizing bacterial (PSB) count:  g−1 of soil.

4. Conclusion

Based on above results, it can be concluded that the chickpea genotype IG-593 is superior over the remaining genotypes with respect to nodulation, yield attributing parameters, nodule leghemoglobin content, and yield under limited irrigation in vertisols of Malwa Region. Use of Rhizobium and PSB inoculation had also shown advantage over no-inoculation. Thus, chickpea genotype IG-593 and inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB may be recommended to realize higher yield of chickpea in this region.


  1. FAOSTAT, Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, 2010.
  2. Govt. of M.P., Agricultural Statistics, Department of Agriculture. Govt of M.P., Bhopal, India, 2011.
  3. P. C. Jain, P. S. Kushawaha, U. S. Dhakal, H. Khan, and S. M. Trivedi, “Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to phosphorus and biofertilizer,” Legume Research, vol. 22, pp. 241–244, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  4. D. L. Rudresh, M. K. Shivaprakash, and R. D. Prasad, “Effect of combined application of Rhizobium, phosphate solubilizing bacterium and Trichoderma spp. on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of chickpea (Cicer aritenium L.),” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. S. Khan, A. Zaidi, and P. A. Wani, “Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture—a review,” Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 29–43, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. C. Gaur, Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms as Biofertilizer, Omega Scientific Publishers, New Delhi, India, 1990.
  7. M. L. Jackson, Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India, Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, 1967.
  8. A. Walkley and I. A. Black, “An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents,” Soil Science, vol. 63, pp. 251–263, 1934. View at: Google Scholar
  9. R. H. Bray and L. T. Kurtz, “Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorous in soils,” Soil Science, vol. 59, pp. 39–45, 1954. View at: Google Scholar
  10. L. Chesnin and C. H. Yein, “Turbiditymetric determination of available sulphur in soil,” Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, vol. 15, pp. 149–151, 1951. View at: Google Scholar
  11. B. Toomsan, O. P. Rupela, S. Mittal, P. J. Dart, and K. W. Clark, “Counting Cicer-Rhizobium using a plant infection technique,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 503–507, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  12. W. V. B. Sundara Rao and M. K. Sinha, “Phosphate dissolving organisms in the soil and rhizosphere,” Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 33, pp. 272–278, 1963. View at: Google Scholar
  13. A. F. Beau, “A method for hemoglobin in serum and urine,” Technical Bulletin of the Registry of Medical Technologists, vol. 32, pp. 111–112, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
  14. N. S. Subba Rao, Soil Microorganisms and Plant Growth, Oxford and IBH Pub. Co. Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, India, 1986.
  15. S. C. Gupta and S. L. Namdeo, “Fertilizer economy through composts and bio-fertilizer in chickpea,” Annals of Plant and Soil Research, vol. 2, pp. 244–246, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  16. J.-M. Barea, M. J. Pozo, R. Azcón, and C. Azcón-Aguilar, “Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 56, no. 417, pp. 1761–1778, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G. S. Sidhu, N. Singh, and R. Singh, “Symbiotic nitrogen fixation by some summer legumes in Punjab. Role of leghemoglobin in nitrogen fixation,” Journal of Research, Punjab Agricultural University, vol. 4, pp. 244–248, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  18. R. C. Singh, M. Singh, R. Kumar, and D. P. Tomer, “Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes to row spacing and fertility under rainfed conditions,” Indian Journal of Agronomy, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 569–572, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  19. K. P. Tiwari, L. N. Yadav, and U. S. Thakur, “Relative performance of gram varieties under different dates of sowing,” Crop Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 127–130, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  20. N. Togay, Y. Togay, K. M. Cimrin, and M. Turan, “Effects of Rhizobium inoculation, sulfur and phosphorus applications on yield, yield components and nutrient uptakes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 776–782, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  21. R. K. Sharma, S. K. . Dubey, R. S. Sharma, and J. P. Tiwari, “Effect of irrigation schedules and fertility levels of nodulation yield and water use efficiency in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” JNKVV Research Journal, vol. 28, no. 1-2, pp. 8–10, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. Namvar, R. S. Sharifi, M. Sedghi, R. A. Zakaria, T. Khandan, and B. Eskandarpour, “Study on the effects of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield components, and nodulation state of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1097–1109, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. S. Jat and I. P. S. Ahlawat, “Effect of vermicompost, biofertilizer and phosphorus on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by gram (Cicer arietinum) and their residual effect on fodder maize (Zea mays),” Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 74, no. 7, pp. 359–361, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  24. M. Geneva, G. Zehirov, E. Djonova, N. Kaloyanova, G. Georgiev, and I. Stancheva, “The effect of inoculation of pea plants with mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium on nitrogen and phosphorus assimilation,” Plant, Soil and Environment, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 435–440, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  25. H. Öǧütçü, Ö. F. Algur, E. Elkoca, and F. Kantar, “The determination of symbiotic effectiveness of Rhizobium strains isolated from wild chickpeas collected from high altitudes in Erzurum,” Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 241–248, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  26. V. G. Takankhar, S. S. Mane, B. G. Kamble, and B. S. Indulkar, “Grain quality of chickpea as influenced by phosphorus fertilization and Rhizobium inoculation,” Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 394–396, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  27. J. R. Khoja, S. S. Khangarot, A. K. Gupta, and A. K. Kulhari, “Effect of fertilizer and biofertilizers on growth and yield of chickpea,” Annals of Plant and Soil Research, vol. 4, pp. 357–358, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  28. N. R. N. Reddy and I. P. S. Ahlawat, “Response of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) genotypes to irrigation and fertilizers under late-sown conditions,” Indian Journal of Agronomy, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 95–101, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  29. K. N. Meena, R. G. Pareek, and R. S. Jat, “Effect of phosphorus and biofertilizers on yield and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” Annals of Agricultural Research, vol. 22, pp. 388–390, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  30. S. C. Gupta, “Response of gram (Cicer arietinum) to types and method of microbial inoculation,” Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 73–75, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. Erman, S. Demir, E. Ocak, Ş. Tüfenkçi, F. Oĝuz, and A. Akköprü, “Effects of Rhizobium, arbuscular mycorrhiza and whey applications on some properties in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under irrigated and rainfed conditions 1-yield, yield components, nodulation and AMF colonization,” Field Crops Research, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 14–24, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. K. Jain, P. Singh, and P. Singh, “Growth and nutrient uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as influenced by biofertilizers and phosphorus nutrition,” Crop Research, vol. 25, pp. 410–413, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  33. Reddy, B. Gopal, and M. Suryanarayan Reddy, “Effect of organic manures and nitrogen levels on soil available nutrients status in maize-soybean cropping system,” Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, vol. 46, pp. 474–476, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  34. J. P. Singh and J. C. Tarafdar, “Rhizospheric microflora as influenced by sulphur application, herbicide and Rhizobium inoculation in summer mung bean (Vigna radiata L.),” Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, vol. 50, pp. 127–130, 2002. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 G. S. Tagore et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

5465 Views | 2711 Downloads | 16 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder