Research Article
Optimizing Irrigation Water and N Levels for Higher Yield and Reduced Blossom End Rot Incidence on Tomato
Table 1
Tomato fruit diameter, fruit length, and number of fruits per plant as affected by irrigation and N application levels.
| Treatment combinations | Fruit diameter (mm) | Fruit length (mm) | Total no. of fruits plant−1 |
| 50% ETc | 0 kg N ha−1 | 44.43 | 60.27 | 14.47 | 46 kg N ha−1 | 48.27 | 65.65 | 18.03 | 92 kg N ha−1 | 48.43 | 65.77 | 17.73 | 138 kg N ha−1 | 52.05 | 69.65 | 22.80 |
| 75% ETc | 0 kg N ha−1 | 48.93 | 64.37 | 15.20 | 46 kg N ha−1 | 53.37 | 68.77 | 18.60 | 92 kg N ha−1 | 51.68 | 65.80 | 19.93 | 138 kg N ha−1 | 56.10 | 71.60 | 22.73 |
| 100% ETc | 0 kg N ha−1 | 47.25 | 62.40 | 15.13 | 46 kg N ha−1 | 50.97 | 66.07 | 18.27 | 92 kg N ha−1 | 50.82 | 65.95 | 18.60 | 138 kg N ha−1 | 53.98 | 70.08 | 26.27 |
| LSD | 1.24 | 3.35 | 2.19 |
| CV (%) | 7.20 | 7.44 | 3.54 |
|
|
ETc = crop evapotranspiration; LSD = least significant difference at 5% level of probability; CV = coefficient of variation.
|