Research Article
Optimizing Irrigation Water and N Levels for Higher Yield and Reduced Blossom End Rot Incidence on Tomato
Table 2
Marketable yield and incidence of BER as affected by irrigation and N application levels.
| Treatment combinations | Incidence of BER (%) | Marketable yield (t ha−1) |
| 50% ETc | 0 kg N ha−1 | 21.91 | 8.44 | 46 kg N ha−1 | 17.67 | 11.14 | 92 kg N ha−1 | 7.79 | 14.79 | 138 kg N ha−1 | 18.66 | 11.61 |
| 75% ETc | 0 kg N ha−1 | 21.50 | 13.17 | 46 kg N ha−1 | 14.72 | 15.81 | 92 kg N ha−1 | 7.14 | 20.50 | 138 kg N ha−1 | 17.12 | 16.36 |
| 100% ETc | 0 kg N ha−1 | 20.21 | 9.28 | 46 kg N ha−1 | 16.94 | 12.53 | 92 kg N ha−1 | 7.03 | 17.67 | 138 kg N ha−1 | 17.35 | 14.17 |
| LSD | 1.24 | 3.35 |
| CV (%) | 7.20 | 8.27 |
|
|
ETc = crop evapotranspiration; BER = blossom end rot; LSD = least significant difference at 5% level of probability; CV = coefficient of variation.
|