Research Article

Influence of No-Tillage on Soil Organic Carbon, Total Soil Nitrogen, and Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Grain Yield

Table 3

Treatment means for grain yield, TSN, and SOC and single-degree-of-freedom orthogonal contrasts between CT and NT treatments at E502 (Lahoma), Oklahoma, USA, 2003–2018.

TreatmentTillageN rate (kg·ha−1)Grain yield (kg·ha−1)TSN (g·kg−1)SOC (g·kg−1)

Treatment means
2CT01.980.797.79
3CT22.52.510.828.06
4CT453.030.827.89
5CT673.330.858.47
6CT903.780.807.80
7CT1124.060.918.78
CV (%)4013.713.9
2NT01.740.858.64
3NT22.52.230.898.76
4NT452.540.919.12
5NT672.940.909.41
6NT903.250.949.47
7NT1123.391.039.84
CV (%)3523.87.6

Contrast value
2CT2 vs. NT200.39330.34710.0120
3CT3 vs. NT322.50.30950.24690.0381
4CT4 vs. NT4450.08020.15450.0003
5CT5 vs. NT5670.15110.42870.0052
6CT6 vs. NT6900.05880.0269<0.0001
7CT7 vs. NT71120.01780.04860.0017
AverageCT vs. NT0.00020.0006<0.0001

CV = coefficient of variation; CT = conventional tillage; NT = no-tillage; TSN = total soil nitrogen; SOC = soil organic carbon; treatment means for grain yield were obtained under CT (2003–2010) and NT (2011–2018); treatment means for TSN and SOC were obtained under CT (2007–2010) and NT (2011–2014).