Response of Mung Bean Varieties (Vigna radiata L.) to Application Rates and Methods of Blended NPS Fertilizer at Humbo
Table 5
Partial budget analysis of interaction effect of varieties and blended NPS rates with the application method on yield of mung bean during 2019 cropping season at Humbo.
Treatment
GAY
AJAY
GFP
TVC
NB
MRR (%)
Method
Rates
Varieties
Dr
0
Shewa Robit
953.7
858.33
30041.55
0
30041.55
-
50
Shewa Robit
1066.8
960.12
33604.2
800
32804.2
345
100
Shewa Robit
1315.4
1183.86
41435.1
1500
39935.1
1019
150
Shewa Robit
1367.6
1230.84
43079.4
2200
40879.4
135
Br
0
Shewa Robit
943.4
849.06
29717.1
0
29717.1
-
50
Shewa Robit
1040.4
936.36
32772.6
800
31972.6
282
100
Shewa Robit
1261.7
1135.53
39743.55
1500
38243.55
896
150
Shewa Robit
1347.3
1212.57
42439.95
2200
40239.95
285
Dr
0
N-26
1011
909.9
31846.5
0
31846.5
-
50
N-26
1274.2
1146.78
40137.3
800
39337.3
936
100
N-26
1537.6
1383.84
48434.4
1500
46934.4
1085
150
N-26
1539.2
1385.28
48484.8
2200
46284.8
D
Br
0
N-26
1000.1
900.09
31503.15
0
31503.15
0
50
N-26
1244.2
1119.78
39192.3
800
38392.3
861
100
N-26
1459.9
1313.91
45986.85
1500
44486.85
871
150
N-26
1468.4
1321.56
46254.6
2200
44054.6
D
Dr = drilled application method, Br = broadcasting, GAY = gross average yield, AJAY = adjusted average yield (−10%), GFP = gross field price (mung bean price = 35 ETB kg−1, TVC = total variable cost, and NB = net benefit (ETB ha−1).
