Research Article
Factors Associated with the Technical Efficiency of Maize Seed Production in the Mid-Hills of Nepal: Empirical Analysis
Table 5
Factors affecting technical efficiency using the Tobit model.
| Variables | Coefficient | Standard error | t value | value |
| Gender of the household head (male = 1, otherwise 0) | −0.83 | 2.26 | −0.37 | 0.713 | Age of the household head (year) | 0.20∗∗ | 0.08 | 2.42 | 0.017 | Schooling year of the household head | 0.70∗∗∗ | 0.24 | 2.94 | 0.004 | Occupation of the household head (agriculture = 1, otherwise 0) | 1.09 | 3.48 | 0.31 | 0.754 | Family type (joint = 1, otherwise 0) | 0.45 | 2.21 | 0.21 | 0.838 | Number of educated members in household | 0.50 | 0.42 | 1.17 | 0.244 | Experience in maize seed production | 0.49 | 0.25 | 1.97 | 0.050 | Migration of the household member (yes = 1, otherwise 0) | −2.54 | 1.94 | −1.31 | 0.193 | Type of seed produced (foundation seed = 1, otherwise 0) | 2.52 | 3.15 | 0.80 | 0.425 | Seed source (NMRP = 1, otherwise 0) | 4.76 | 2.18 | 2.19 | 0.030 | Access to extension service (yes = 1, otherwise 0) | 6.62 | 3.10 | 2.14 | 0.034 | Access to credit (easy = 1, otherwise 0) | 2.67 | 2.42 | 1.11 | 0.270 | Membership in social groups (cooperative = 1, otherwise 0) | −3.09 | 2.16 | −1.43 | 0.155 | Livestock holding (yes = 1, otherwise 0) | 9.01 | 3.70 | 2.43 | 0.016 | Share of a maize seed cultivation area in total cultivated area (%) | 0.26 | 0.11 | 2.39 | 0.018 | Constant | 27.93 | 9.32 | 3.00 | 0.003 |
| Number of observations | 182 | | | | LR chi2(15) | 40.61 | | | | Prob > chi2 | ≤0.001 | | | | Pseudo R2 | 0.028 | | | | Log likelihood | −704.998 | | | | Correctly predicted | 70.97 | | | |
|
|
Note. and indicate significance at 1% and 5% levels, respectively. |