Ripening Response of Sugarcane Varieties to Chemical Ripeners and Economic Benefits during the Early Period of Harvesting at Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations, Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

<div>Difference in sucrose content among sugarcane varieties B52-298, NCo334, C86-56, and SP70-1284 for the ripeners Ethephon<sup>™</sup> (E), Fusilade Forte<sup>™</sup> (FF), Moddus<sup>™</sup> (M), Moddus<sup>™</sup> + Fusilade Forte<sup>™</sup> combination (M + FF), and Ethephon<sup>™</sup> + Fusilade Forte<sup>™</sup> combination (E + FF) treatments. Mean values followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to HSD<sub>0.05</sub>. The bars indicate the mean standard deviations of six observations.</div>

International Journal of Agronomy

fig4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Ripening Response of Sugarcane Varieties to Chemical Ripeners and Economic Benefits during the Early Period of Harvesting at Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations, Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia 

Figure 4 | Ripening Response of Sugarcane Varieties to Chemical Ripeners and Economic Benefits during the Early Period of Harvesting at Wonji-Shoa and Metahara Sugarcane Plantations, Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia 