International Journal of Agronomy

International Journal of Agronomy / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 8875205 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8875205

Amandin Rutayisire, Geoffrey Lubadde, Alice Mukayiranga, Richard Edema, "Response of Sorghum to Cold Stress at Early Developmental Stage", International Journal of Agronomy, vol. 2021, Article ID 8875205, 10 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8875205

Response of Sorghum to Cold Stress at Early Developmental Stage

Academic Editor: Othmane Merah
Received18 Jul 2020
Revised06 Apr 2021
Accepted24 May 2021
Published15 Jun 2021

Abstract

Native and adapted to the semiarid tropical regions of Africa, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is generally sensitive to cold temperatures, especially during the early developmental stages. However, there is genetic variability within the existing germplasm in terms of tolerance to low temperatures. The highland regions of Africa possess important sources of germplasm with adaptation to cold stress, since they tend to be cooler than the low land regions. The goals of the study were to evaluate and identify sorghum lines with tolerance to cold temperature stress and make recommendations on varieties that may be planted in the East African highland regions or used in plant breeding programs for cold tolerance. Forty sorghum genotypes were evaluated for emergence, shoot, and root development at seedling stage under controlled environment in growth chambers and in the field. Significant genotypic differences were detected for all evaluated traits. Correlation between controlled environment experiments and field trial results was mostly significant, suggesting that the growth chambers can be used to predict and identify cold-tolerant genotypes. Results showed that emergence and vigor are the best surrogate traits for selecting cold-tolerant genotypes. Using rank summation index, we were able to identify the best cold-tolerant sorghum genotypes (IS 25557, IS 25558, IS 25546, BM6, BM 29, IESV 90042LT, and Cytanobe) that can be used in future breeding programs and enhance adaptation and expansion of sorghum production further into the highland regions of Africa.

1. Introduction

Chilling stress (0°–15°C) has been recognized among the major abiotic constraints to sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench) production, especially in the cool regions [1, 2]. Sorghum is a C4 plant that evolved under warm conditions in tropical Africa, where temperatures during the growing season generally remain above 20°C [3]. Therefore, cold stress, observed mostly in higher altitude regions, affects its growth and development [4]. Low temperature occurring during the crop growing season affects nearly all growth stages and consequently leads to yield reduction.

The adverse effects of low temperature stress are commonly visible during early development stages in most crops sensitive to low temperatures [57]. Low temperature stress can reduce germination and emergence rate, limit seedling establishment, stunt shoot and root development, negatively affect photosynthesis, and consequently decrease dry matter accumulation [810]. In young sorghum plants, survival rate and seedling vigor under low temperature stress have been suggested as indicators for chilling tolerance due to their relationship with emergence and dry matter accumulation [7, 11].

Several studies have indicated the presence of genetic variability in sorghum genotypes in response to low temperature stress at seedling stage, and some cold-tolerant sources have been identified [7, 1214]. The discovery of several quantitative trait loci (QTL) of interest provided valuable information about chromosomal hotspot regions involved in the performance of cold-related traits, which may be used in marker-assisted selection [7, 15, 16]. Research works on genetic, biochemical, and physiology have been conducted to dissect cold stress effects on emergence, shoot and root development, and dry matter accumulation [4, 9, 10]. However, the process of germination, emergence, and early developmental stages (shoot and root development) were found to be controlled by different genetic mechanisms [3, 4, 7, 8]. Additionally, the interaction of genotype and environment complicates the selection of best performing varieties, since the degree of cold stress can vary with severity, frequency, soil composition, and sunshine period.

In Uganda, sorghum is grown in almost all agricultural regions, including the higher altitude zones, which cover about 25 percent of the arable land, and is considered as an important food security crop. Nevertheless, the high-altitude regions are characterized by cold temperatures, specifically during the crop growing season. Temperatures tend to be low (<15°C) from the beginning up to the middle of the rainy season and gradually increase towards the end of the season. Owing to the lack of improved cold-tolerant sorghum varieties, farmers have adopted escaping strategies by planting sorghum 4–6 weeks before the starting of the rainy season, which begins in the end of February or early March. To help farmers avoid planting too early and synchronize planting with the start of the growing season, it is imperative to develop sorghum varieties with the ability to tolerate cold temperature stress at early growth stages. The objectives of this study were to evaluate and identify sorghum lines with tolerance to cold temperature stress and make recommendations on varieties that may be planted in the East African highland regions or used in plant breeding programs for cold temperature tolerance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Genetic Materials

The forty highland sorghum lines used in this study were provided by the International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT, Kenya) and included various breeding lines, released varieties, and local landraces. Names, origin, characteristics, and subspecies are given in Appendix.

2.2. Experimental Design
2.2.1. Field Trials

Field trials were conducted at two locations (Kachwekano and Zombo) in Uganda during the seasons 2017B and 2018A. Kachwekano (1° 15'S, 29° 57'E, 2,200 m.a.s.l.) located in the highland of South Western Uganda is characterized by a bimodal rainfall pattern and has a sandy clay loam soil with an annual mean temperature of 18°C. Zombo (2° 30’S, 30° 54’E; 1,705 m.a.s.l.) is located in the northwestern (West Nile) Uganda with heavy clay loam soil and has bimodal rainfall pattern (Table 1). At both sites, a 4 × 10 alpha lattice design with three replications was adopted. Each sorghum genotype was planted in four rows per plot, with 2.5 m row length. Spacing within plots was 60 cm × 25 cm. Field levelling and hand-weeding activities were performed following recommended agronomic practices. Seedlings were treated with insecticides to avoid distortion of results due to insect pests, especially shoot flies.


LocationSeasonTrial date (sowing-harvest)Mean temp. (°C)Mean max. temp. (°C)Mean min. temp. (°C)Precipitations (mm)

Kachwekano2017 BAugust 8–September 1016.322.412.369
2018 AFebruary 12–March 1315.221.611.583

Zombo2017 BAugust 11–September 1222.426.316.254
2018 AFebruary 15–March 1721.724.814.671

Thirty days after sowing, emergence rate was recorded as the percentage of emerged seedlings, and vigor was scored on scale of 1–9 (1 as poor, 5 as medium, and 9 as excellent). In addition, 10 representative plants per plot were hand-harvested (from the ground), measured for seedling height, and dried at 120°C to determine shoot dry weight per plant (SDW).

2.2.2. Soil-Based Assay

Forty sorghum lines were evaluated for cold tolerance (13°C/10°C) and at normal temperature (25°C/20°C), using a 12/12 h day/night cycle. Temperatures were chosen based on previous studies [11, 17]. A minimal of 300 µE/m2 light intensity was provided (Phillips HPI bulbs), and the day/night period was set at 12 h/12 h to reflect the Uganda’s day-neutral conditions (Table 2). Twenty seeds of each genotype were planted into pots of 35 × 25 × 16 cm at 2 cm sowing depth.


ExperimentRepsLightTemp (°C)Duration of experiment (days)Traits scored

Soil-based assay (cold temperature)412 h, 60 W, m−213/10°C30Emergence rate (E%), emergence index (EI), seedling length (SL), primary root length (PRL), vigor (V), shoot dry weight (SDW), and root dry weight (RDW)
Soil-based assay (normal temperature)312 h, natural light30/20°C15Emergence rate (E%), seedling length (SL), primary root length (PRL), shoot dry weight (SDW), and root dry weight (RDW)
Filter paper-based assay (chilling /optimum)212 h, constant dark12°C/25°C15/7Germination rate (%)

A randomized complete block design was used with various replications for each experiment (Table 2). After 30 days under cold stress, vigor (scale: 1 as poor, 5 as medium, and 9 as excellent) and emergence rate were assessed. Newly emerged seedlings were counted daily, while final emergence was determined on the 30th day after sowing. Emergence index was determined by using the following formula as described by Smith and Millet [18]:where Ej is the number of newly emerged seedlings on day j, Dj is the number of days after planting, and E is the final seedling stand.

Five randomly selected plants per pot were harvested and rinsed with distilled water to measure shoot length (SL) and primary root length (PRL). Shoot length was measured as the distance from the ground to the longest leaf tip, while the primary root length was determined as the length from the ground to the end of the primary root tip. Afterwards, the total shoot and root matter of the five previously selected plants were dried at 120°C and weighed to determine the average shoot dry weight (SDW) and root dry weight (RDW) per sorghum line.

2.2.3. Filter Paper-Based Assay

Filter paper assay was conducted in order to analyze germination of sorghum seeds under both optimum and cold stress conditions. The seeds of sorghum genotypes were surface sterilized with 70% ethanol, followed by 5% sodium hypochlorite, and washed with distilled water. One hundred seeds were then placed on 15 cm diameter Whatman filter paper in 16 × 2 cm Petri dishes. Two sets of experiments were prepared in the growth room under complete darkness, whereby the first set was placed in the controlled cold room at a constant day and night temperature of 12°C (cold treatment) and the second set at 25°C (optimum temperature). Five milliliters of distilled water were added in each Petri dish after every two days to permit seed germination and maintain the optimum moisture content [19, 20]. Both sets were randomized in a complete block (RCB) design with two replications. Data on germination were recorded on the 7th day for the optimum temperature and on the 14th day for the cold treatment. A germinated seed was recorded when the radicle or coleoptile had extended at least 1mm beyond the seed coat [13]. Germination percentage was determined by dividing the total number of germinated seeds by hundred. The data for germination were transformed by applying arcsine transformation methods [21].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

For the field experiment, restricted maximum likelihood (REML) analysis was used to generate analysis of variance (ANOVA) by utilizing GenStat 18th edition (VSN International, England). Replications, locations, and seasons were considered as random and lines as fixed effects. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to determine the level of association between all traits recorded for both controlled experiments and field trials. A correlation heat map was generated by using GenStat 18th edition.

A rank summation index [22] was used to rank the performance of all genotypes and determine the best cold-tolerant sorghum genotypes. Entries were ranked separately from controlled environment and field experiments. Since emergence rate, seedling length, seedling dry weight, and vigor were common in both controlled environment and field experiments, they were used in creating the rank summation index. In addition to that, percentage germination, emergence index, and shoot and root dry weight were used to construct rank summation index for controlled environment. This index was obtained by first ranking genotypes based on their performance on a scale of 1–40, with 1 representing the line with the highest mean of that trait. Afterwards, the rankings of both the growth chamber and field trials were summed for the traits under study. Therefore, the index value obtained by this method characterize rankings from the first (lowest value) to the last (highest value) cold-tolerant sorghum genotype.

3. Results

3.1. Evaluation of Chilling Stress in the Field Trials

Results of the ANOVA for emergence rate, seedling vigor, shoot length, and shoot dry weight under field locations (Zombo and Kachwekano), during two seasons (2017B and 2018A), are presented in Tables 3 and 4. Except the interaction of location x season for emergence rate in the first season, significance differences of genotypes, locations, seasons, and their interactions were observed for all traits recorded. This significant difference observed in the field trials indicated the existence of genetic variability among the tested sorghum genotypes. Since Zombo and Kachwekano had different weather and soil conditions, locations and seasons significantly affected all traits recorded (Table 4).


Source of variationd.f.Emergence (arcsine)VigorShoot lengthSeedling dry weight

Location (L)17,453.62102.952,429.5536.95
Season (S)12,503.0120.6329.3510.46
L × S137.76 ns2.17240.1313.98
L × S/Rep831.650.302.510.02
Genotype (G)39887.4013.2024.580.18
G × L3940.820.783.700.05
G × S3948.260.711.960.04
G × L × S3936.520.592.810.04
Pooled error31218.550.261.130.01

C.V. (%)8.849.389.664.92

ns, nonsignificant. Significant at ; significant at ; significant at .

Source of variationd.f.Season 2017BSeason 2018A
Emergence (arcsin)VigorSeedling lengthShoot dry weightEmergence (arcsin)VigorSeedling lengthShoot dry weight

Location (L)13215.1737.60571.032.7394276.2167.522098.6448.19
Location/Rep431.680.213.010.00831.620.402.010.03
Genotype (G)39376.935.8813.480.080558.738.0313.070.15
L x S3912.94 ns0.491.650.01664.390.884.870.08
Pooled error15614.180.281.020.00222.910.241.230.02
C.V. (%)7.399.408.991.7410.329.3410.337.2
s.e.d.3.070.430.820.033.910.400.910.11
Source of variationd.f.ZomboKachwekano
Emergence (arcsin)VigorSeedling lengthShoot dry weightEmergence (arcsin)VigorSeedling lengthShoot dry weight
Season (S)1962.954.70450.780.1271577.8218.10218.7024.31
Season/Rep429.030.57183.270.00734.270.031.750.03
Genotype (G)39396.88.038.800.105531.425.9519.480.13
G x S3928.790.511.930.00255.980.792.850.09
Pooled error15613.670.2320.780.00123.420.281.480.02
C.V. (%)7.028.216.651.3610.8110.8413.97.80
s.e.d.3.020.390.720.033.950.430.990.11

ns, nonsignificant. Significant at ; significant at ; significant at .

Generally, Zombo had higher mean values for all traits recorded in both seasons (Table 5). This location was overall characterized by higher temperatures compared to Kachwekano (located in the high-altitude mountains) that endures low temperatures, especially at night. At Zombo, seedling emergence rate ranged from 33.50–72.67% with an average of 54.62% in season 2017B and 27.59–64.01% with an average of 50.61% in season 2018A (Table 5). At Kachwekano, seedling emergence rate ranged from 26.89–65.09% with an average of 47.3% in season 2017B and 4.17–60.06% with an average of 42.17% in season 2018A (Table 5).


TraitItemKachwekanoZombo
2017B2018A2017B2018A

Emergence (arcsin (%))Mean47.3042.1754.6250.61
Min.26.894.1733.5027.59
Max.65.0960.0672.6764.01
S.D.8.1711.367.958.87

Vigor (1–9)Mean5.234.686.025.74
Min.3.031.333.102.40
Max.7.336.737.977.80
S.D.0.961.161.101.28

Seedling length (cm)Mean9.707.7912.7813.70
Min.6.221.0710.5711.13
Max.14.1811.7015.6716.60
S.D.1.842.021.291.38

Seedling dry weight (log (mg))Mean2.151.512.362.40
Min.1.880.402.062.13
Max.2.351.812.652.70
S.D.0.120.240.130.13

Season 2017B registered relatively better emergence rate compared to 2018A at the two locations, and this could be partially explained by the generally lower temperatures and the lengthy heavy rain period that were recorded in the second season. Sorghum lines BM6, IS 11838, IS 25547, and IS 25557 had higher emergence rates, while the most vulnerable lines were IESV 91003LT, IESV 91054LT, IESV 91105LT, and IS 29376, in both locations (Supplementary Document S2).

Significant differences in vigor were observed among sorghum lines at Kachwekano in season 2017B and season 2018A. Vigor scores ranged from 3.03 to 7.33 and 1.33 to 6.73 for the two seasons, respectively. Seedling vigor at Zombo ranged from 3.10 to 7.97 (2017B season) and from 2.40 to 7.80 (2018A season) (Table 5). Lines BM6, IS 11838, and IS 25557 that had high seedling emergence percentage were also shown to be highly vigorous, while lines IESV 91003LT, IESV 91054LT, IESV 91105LT, and IS 29376 had poor performance in both traits (Supplementary Document S1).

3.2. Reaction to Cold Stress under Controlled Environments

Pooled analysis of the two temperature regimes in soil-based assays indicated that temperature had a highly significant effect on all traits measured (Table 6). The results indicated that sorghum lines reacted differently to chilling stress during the early developmental stages. Compared with the normal temperature regime, the overall mean germination percentage in the filter paper-based assay and the soil-based assay were reduced from 68.47% to 47.43% and from 73.92% to 53.04%, respectively, under cold stress. In the soil-based assay under cold stress, emergence percentage ranged from 17.21% to 69.83%, as compared to normal temperatures (where the range was from 59.16% to 82.14%). Across the lines, the mean vigor score was 5.24, while the genotypic values ranged from 2.68 for IESV 91105LT to 7.93 for IS11838 under cold temperature regime. IESV 91105LT, IESV 91054LT, N2, and IS 29376 had the poorest vigor under cold stress, while IS11838, IS25557, BM6, BM29, and IESV 90042LT were the most vigorous. As expected, these vigorous genotypes were also among the best for seedling height and primary root length under both cold and normal temperature regimes. Under normal temperature conditions, sorghum genotypes IESV 91105LT and N2 were the best performers for seedling length and primary root length, despite performing poorly under cold stress. Sorghum genotypes IESV 91054LT, IS 25563, and IS 29376 performed poorly under cold and normal temperature regimes.


Soil-based assay (cold temperature)
Source of variationd.f.Emergence (arcsin)Emergence index (days)Vigor (1–9)Shoot lengtd (cm)Shoot dry weight (mg)Primary root lengtd (cm)Root dry weight (mg)

Rep347.6511.430.231.750.600.050.30
Genotype39720.4824.507.4315.3119.8013.676.93
Error11722.864.910.190.360.500.560.17
C.V. (%)10.0812.718.359.8710.4312.4312.64
s.e.d.3.381.570.310.420.490.530.29

Soil-based assay (normal temperature)
Source of variationd.f.Emergence (arcsin)Seedling lengtd (cm)Shoot dry weight (mg)Primary root lengtd (cm)Root dry weight (mg)

Rep2330.5612.334.752.871.21
Genotype39105.3927.6414.0424.6412.01
Error7842.343.503.802.321.93
C.V. (%)9.509.787.936.417.41
s.e.d.5.311.531.591.251.39

Filter paper assay
Source of variationd.f.Germination % (optimum)Germination % (cold)

Rep15.8911.12
Genotype3958.17142.25
Error3915.919.28
C.V. (%)5.448.55
s.e.d.3.994.39

ns, nonsignificant. A significant mean square value at p-value <0.1%.

Compared with normal temperature, cold stress decreased both dry weight of shoot (from 24.59 to 6.76 g) and root (from 18.81 to 3.24 g). Additionally, under cold stress, large ranges in shoot dry weight (1.68–11.33 g) and root dry weight (1.33–6.75 g) were observed. Under the cold temperature regime, sorghum genotypes lines IESV 90042LT, BM6, BM29, IS11838, IS 25546, and IS25557 were the top ranking, while lines IS 25547, IS 25558, and IESV 91105LT were the best under normal temperature regime. The genotypes IS 29376 and IESV 91073LT had the lowest shoot and root dry weight under both cold and normal temperature regimes. These results indicated a significant negative effect of cold stress on both shoot and root dry weight, which impacts growth and development of seedlings at early developmental stage.

3.3. Association between Traits from Controlled Environment Experiments and Field Trials

Under controlled conditions, the Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant () correlation between traits evaluated in the soil-based assays (SBA) experiments. Moreover, medium-to-high correlations were also observed between soil-based assay and field trials at both locations (Figure 1).

Emergence rate, shoot length, and vigor (SBA) showed medium-to-high correlation with other traits evaluated under controlled experiments and field trials. As expected, emergence index (SBA) was significantly negatively correlated () with most traits. Germination rate under cold stress (filter paper-based assay) showed a medium correlation with most traits evaluated under cold stress conditions. Field experiments revealed high significant correlation between emergence and vigor at both locations, while shoot dry weight showed low-to-medium correlations with other traits. Interestingly, vigor at Zombo was closer related to root dry weight in the soil-based assay.

3.4. Rank Summation Index

A relative ranking of cold tolerance responses for all 40 sorghum genotypes was based on rank summation index values derived from traits recorded in both controlled environment and field trials (Table 7). In the soil-based assay, means for emergence percentage, emergence index, shoot length, root and shoot dry weight, as well as emergence rate, vigor, shoot length, and shoot dry weight, in the field trials (for one season of 2017B) were used to generate rank summation index values. The correlation between rank summation indices for performance in the soil-based assay and field trials was significant (r = 0.81), indicating that the rankings were almost similar in both experiments. Therefore, five sorghum genotypes (IS 25557, IS 11838, BM 6, BM 29, and IESV 90042LT) were ranked best across both the controlled environment experiments and field trials, while IESV 90015LT, IESV 91069LT, IESV 91071LT, IESV 91054LT, and IS 29376 were the worst. Genotype IS 25557 was ranked first in the field trials but second in the soil-based assay, while IS 118383 was first in the controlled experiments but ranked second in the field trial.


EntrySoil-based assayField trials
EEIVigorShoot lengthSDWRDWGerm. (cold)EVigorShoot lengthSDWRank summation index

IS 2555723242211114537
IS 1183819111354321242
BM 66855364528860
BM 2934464122643461
IESV 90042 LT4539843877664
IS 25546577267610911676
CYTANOBE8141531157765384
IS 25558122107712113891899
IS 255471015615910202562100
NDAMOGA7614859819172625144
BM 21913231218193015112914193
BM 162328122424151912121022201
BM 27131720191523142226311201
MB 301412211010172618302324205
IS 11442303729112511213141411206
IS 255611519182721322714192010222
N 12272130201713329152217223
ABALESHYA2123112220143125241521227
NYUNDO251626161218228213531230
AMASUGI112519293129924221328240
E 1291163093333302916132415248
IS 255631835133828281611181926250
S 87322727141683835341113255
IESV 91073 LT2926312534381517161723271
IS 255622020161730273520293029273
IS 294151918221827391827103837273
IS 116122236171314213623312735275
IESV 91075 LT3524332113353421201832286
IKINYARUKA2822242635241729252533288
IESV 91018 LT333834231922393335129297
IS 117211711253639362431271639301
IESV 91003 LT3733352823161238382819307
IS 25545243483129252834363920308
N 23839383422331326232127314
IESV 91105 LT40140393831104039337318
IESV 90015 LT2632283226263736283434339
IESV 91069 LT3129323032203330334036346
IESV 91071 LT3431363537372532323240371
IESV 91054 LT3640373736342339403630388
IS 293763910394040404037373738397

E, emergence; EI, emergence index; Germ., germination rate; SDW, shoot dry weight; RDW, root dry weight.

Accession nameOriginStatusSubspecies

ABALESHYARwandaFixed lineCaudatum
AMASUGIRwandaFixed lineDurra
BM 16UgandaFixed lineCaudatum
BM 21UgandaFixed lineBicolor-caudatum
BM 27KenyaFixed lineCaudatum
BM 29KenyaFixed lineBicolor-caudatum
BM 6KenyaFixed lineCaudatum
CYTANOBEUgandaFixed lineBicolor
NYUNDORwandaFixed lineCaudatum
E 1291KenyaFixed lineBicolor-caudatum
IESV 90015 LTKenyaBreeding lineBicolor
IESV 90042 LTKenyaBreeding lineCaudatum
IESV 91003 LTKenyaBreeding lineCaudatum
IESV 91018 LTKenyaBreeding lineKafir
IESV 91054 LTKenyaBreeding lineKafir
IESV 91069 LTKenyaBreeding lineCaudatum
IESV 91071 LTKenyaBreeding lineBicolor
IESV 91073 LTKenyaBreeding lineBicolor-caudatum
IESV 91075 LTKenyaBreeding lineCaudatum
IESV 91105 LTKenyaBreeding lineCaudatum
IKINYARUKARwandaFixed lineCaudatum
IS 11141KenyaBreeding lineBicolor
IS 11612KenyaBreeding lineBicolor
IS 11721KenyaBreeding lineCaudatum
IS 11838KenyaBreeding lineBicolor-caudatum
IS 25546KenyaBreeding lineCaudatum
IS 25547KenyaBreeding lineCaudatum
IS 25557KenyaBreeding lineBicolor-caudatum
IS 25558KenyaBreeding lineBicolor
IS 25561KenyaBreeding lineCaudatum
IS 25562KenyaBreeding lineDurra
IS 25563KenyaBreeding lineKafir
IS 29415KenyaBreeding lineKafir
IS 25545KenyaBreeding lineBicolor
MB 30KenyaFixed lineCaudatum
N 12UgandaFixed lineBicolor-caudatum
N 2UgandaFixed lineBicolor
NDAMOGAUgandaFixed lineCaudatum
S 87KenyaBreeding lineCaudatum
IS 11442KenyaBreeding lineBicolor

Source, Rutayisire et al. [34].

4. Discussion

4.1. Genetic Potential of Sorghum Genotypes Adapted to Highland Regions of Uganda

Low temperature has been listed among important abiotic stresses that interfere with plant growth and development, lowering productivity and limiting production of certain crops, especially cereals, to specific geographical locations [23]. Therefore, improved chilling tolerance in sorghum is an important trait for the long term outlook and consequently may increase production in high-altitude regions where the crop may be not grown currently. Interestingly, some highland regions of Eastern Africa are believed to harbor the origin of an important source of sorghum lines adapted to cold environmental conditions [12, 24]. In the present study, various phenotyping approaches were used to evaluate the effect of chilling stress at early developmental stages and to identify potential sources of tolerance to chilling stress among sorghum lines tested. Germination, emergence rate, and seedling vigor have proven their importance under cold stress and therefore can be used as potential surrogate traits for breeding and selection. In addition, the results indicated significant negative effects of cold stress on shoot and root dry weight, which hamper growth and development of seedlings at juvenile stage.

It was observed that genetic variability exists among evaluated sorghum genotypes for traits associated with early-stage chilling tolerance. Out of the 40 genotypes evaluated, 8 showed superior performance for emergence and biomass-related traits under both controlled environments and field trials, based on rank summation indices that were below 100 (Table 7). It is important that sorghum genotypes express high emergence rate and strong vigor under prolonged cold stress to compete with adapted weeds and therefore enable field establishment and further growth and developmental processes [11, 17, 25]. Therefore, the sorghum genotypes identified as the best performers under cold stress are potential parental materials that can be used in breeding programs aiming at improving cold tolerance.

4.2. Emergence and Seedling Vigor as Important Traits to Enable Adaptation of Sorghum in the Highland Regions

Crops such as sorghum, native in the warm temperature regions, are likely to be sensitive to chilling stress, especially during the emergence process and seedling growth and development at early developmental stages [7, 26, 27]. Therefore, for the crop to develop and reach adequate plant size, germination and emergence are critical target traits to enable adaptation to cold temperatures [28]. In the present study, correlations were observed between emergence rate with other traits (under controlled environment experiments) and field experiments. The finding that emergence index correlated with shoot and root biomass traits implies that cold-tolerant genotypes tend to emerge faster and therefore initiate the autotrophic phase earlier, which permits faster accumulation of dry matter [29]. However, larger values of emergence index were observed among evaluated sorghum genotypes, as well as longer duration to final sprouting of the seedlings, due to chilling stress in both field trials and cold treatment experiments. Similar results were reported by Balota et al. [24] and Bekele et al. [7] in seedling emergence tests.

Early-stage seedling vigor is an essential factor for crop growth in several temperature-related environments [12, 30, 31]. Seedling vigor is associated with crop performance and yield, through its relationship with vegetative growth resulting in adequate accumulation of dry matter into plant organs linked to production [17]. Vigor traits include seedling height, shoot and root dry weight, and growth rate. Therefore, vigor can be regarded as an important indicator of crop establishment in various chilling environments. However, chilling stress reduces vigor, even for the cold-tolerant genotypes, because the rate of biomass accumulation is significantly reduced [7, 9, 11, 25, 32]. In this study, significant correlations were found between vigor and biomass-related traits, indicating that highly ranked cold-tolerant genotypes tended to develop shoot and root organs better than susceptible ones. Similar results have been reported by other researchers [7, 11]. Although vigor score is a subjective measurement, it is cost-effective in the identification of cold-tolerant genotypes under chilling stress both in controlled environment and field experiments.

4.3. Controlled Environment Experiments Can Be Used for Preselection Prior to Field Trials

Selection of appropriate temperature for use in abiotic stress experiments is an important step for identifying cold-tolerant genotypes [9]. The range of 13°C (day)/10°C (night) has been reported as one of the best thresholds to evaluate sorghum under chilling stress [14, 17]. The highland regions in Uganda display a bimodal rainfall pattern, and in most cases, cold temperatures (below 15°C) are observed during the rainy period. The temperature regime (13°C/10°C) was almost similar to the field conditions, which resulted in the medium-to-strong correlation between controlled experiments and field trials. This indicates that controlled environmental conditions may be used for preselection prior to field testing, though field conditions can be biased due to daily temperature fluctuations and unpredictable climatic changes.

Emergence rate under controlled conditions was found to correlate with field emergence, indicating that growth rooms can be used to predict field experiment outputs. Similar results were observed by Windpassinger et al. [11] and Salas-Fernandez et al. [14] who found significant correlations between growth chamber and field experiments, though the temperature regimes used for cold stress were slightly different. Similar trends were observed for other traits in the screen house, such as vigor, shoot length, and root dry weight that showed high correlation with field vigor and field shoot dry weight. Therefore, the findings that genotypes with greater emergence rates are stronger and faster during the early development stages suggest that simultaneous multitrait improvement is feasible. Though days to onset of emergence and growth rate of shoots and roots are compromised under chilling stress during heterotrophic stage [7, 20], vegetative growth rate at autotrophic stage under field conditions is an important key factor that enables sorghum to survive under cold stress conditions when chlorophyll biosynthesis becomes important for the plant [8, 29, 33]. Nevertheless, temperatures in the field are varying and gradually rise towards the end of the growing season. Consequently, researchers may need to develop different strategies for efficiently evaluating cold tolerance in sorghum.

5. Conclusion

Cold tolerance at early developmental stages is a paramount goal for successful adaptation of sorghum in the highland of East Africa. Eight sorghum lines were identified as potential sources of cold tolerance based on their emergence and seedling development and thus can be used in sorghum breeding programs for this type of abiotic stress resilience. Our results demonstrated that controlled environmental conditions with low temperature imposed at seedling stages would be useful to screen and identify the best chilling tolerant sorghum genotypes. Additionally, the significant positive correlation observed between controlled environments and field trials indicated that the growth chambers set up at low temperatures can be used to select genotypes with the best cold tolerance characteristics at early developmental stages, since field experiments are subjected to unpredictable weather. In this era of climate change and unfavorable temperatures, further research studies are therefore needed to provide more insight for helping breeding to mitigate negative effects of this stressor.

Appendix

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the supplementary information files 1 and 2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to ICRISAT (Kenya) for providing sorghum lines used in this study. Furthermore, they thank Dr. Charles Kanobe for excellent comments. This research was funded by the Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Document 1. Cold-tolerant related traits in 40 sorghum genotypes evaluated under controlled conditions. Supplementary Document 2. Field trials at early developmental stages in two locations for two seasons. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. H. Z. Rihan, M. Al-Issawi, and M. P. Fuller, “Advances in physiological and molecular aspects of plant cold tolerance,” Journal of Plant Interactions, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 143–157, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. Tari, G. Laskay, Z. Takács, and P. Poór, “Response of sorghum to abiotic stresses: a review,” Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, vol. 199, no. 4, pp. 264–274, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. K. Yadav, “Cold stress tolerance mechanisms in plants: a review,” Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 515–527, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. Chopra, G. Burow, J. J. Burke, N. Gladman, and Z. Xin, “Genome-wide association analysis of seedling traits in diverse sorghum germplasm under thermal stress,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 17, no. 12, p. 12, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Hund, Y. Fracheboud, A. Soldati, and P. Stamp, “Cold tolerance of maize seedlings as determined by root morphology and photosynthetic traits,” European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 178–185, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Huang, L. Jiang, Y. Zou, and W. Zhang, “On-farm assessment of effect of low temperature at seedling stage on early-season rice quality,” Field Crops Research, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 63–68, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. A. Bekele, K. Fiedler, A. Shiringani et al., “Unravelling the genetic complexity of sorghum seedling development under low-temperature conditions,” Plant Cell Environment, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 707–723, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. Ortiz, J. Hu, and M. G. Salas Fernandez, “Genetic architecture of photosynthesis in sorghum bicolor under non-stress and cold stress conditions,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 68, no. 16, pp. 4545–4557, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Ercoli, M. Mariotti, A. Massoni, and I. Arduini, “Growth responses of sorghum plants to chilling temperatures and duration of exposure,” European Journal of Agronomy, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 93–103, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. V. Chinnusamy, J. Zhu, and J.-K. Zhu, “Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 444–451, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Windpassinger, W. Friedt, I. Deppe, C. Werner, R. Snowdon, and B. Wittkop, “Towards enhancement of early-stage chilling tolerance and root development in sorghum F1 hybrids,” Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, vol. 203, no. 2, pp. 146–160, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. F. Maulana, D. Weerasooriya, and T. Tesso, “Sorghum landraces collections from cooler regions of the world exhibit magnificent genetic differentiation and early season cool tolerance,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 8, p. 756, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. D. Franks, G. B. Burrow, and J. J. Burke, “A comparison of U.S. and Chinese sorghum germination for early season cold tolerance,” Crop Science, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 1371–1376, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. G. Salas-Fernandez, G. R. Schoenbaum, and A. S. Goggi, “Novel germplasm and screening methods for early cold tolerance in sorghum,” Crop Science, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2631–2638, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Knoll, N. Gunaratna, and G. Ejeta, “QTL analysis of early-season cold tolerance in sorghum,” Theoritical and Applied Genetics, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 577–587, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. Burow, J. J. Burke, Z. Xin, and C. D. Franks, “Genetic dissection of early-season cold tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench),” Molecular Breeding, vol. 28, pp. 391–402, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Parra-londono, K. Fiedler, M. Kavka et al., “Genome dissection of early-season cold tolerance in sorghum: genome-wide association studies for seedling emergence and survival under field and controlled environment conditions,” Theoritical and Applied Genetics, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 581–595, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. G. Smith and A. H. Millet, “Germinating and sprouting response of the tomato at low temperatures,” Journal of American Society of Horticulture Science, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 480–484, 1964. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. S. Brar and B. A. Stewart, “Germination under controlled temperature and field emergence of 13 sorghum cultivars,” Crop Science, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1336–1340, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. F. Maulana and T. T. Tesso, “Cold temperature episode at seedling and flowering stages reduces growth and yield components in sorghum,” Crop Science, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 564–574, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. A. Gomez and A. A. Gomez, Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., NY, USA, 1983.
  22. J. J. Mock and W. H. Skrdla, “Evaluation of maize plant introductions for cold tolerance,” Euphytica, vol. 27, pp. 27–32, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Janmohammadi, L. Zolla, and S. Rinalducci, “Low temperature tolerance in plants: changes at protein level,” Phytochemistry, vol. 117, pp. 76–89, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Balota, W. A. Payne, S. K. Veeragoni, B. A. Stewart, and D. T. Rosenow, “Respiration and its relationship to germination, emergence, and early growth under cool temperatures in sorghum,” Crop Science, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1414–1422, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. H. Kapanigowda, R. Perumal, R. M. Aiken, T. J. Heral, S. R. Bean, and C. R. Little, “Analyses of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] lines and hybrids in response to early season planting and cool conditions,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 773–784, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J. Knoll and G. Ejeta, “Marker-assisted selection for early-season cold tolerance in sorghum: QTL validation across populations and environments,” Theoritical and Applied Genetics, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 541–553, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. Mercer, H. M. Alexander, and A. A. Snow, “Selection on seedling emergence timing and size in an annual plant, Helianthus annuus (common sunflower, Asteraceae),” American Journal of Botany, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 975–985, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Fiedler, W. A. Bekele, W. Friedt et al., “Genetic dissection of the temperature dependent emergence processes in sorghum using a cumulative emergence model and stability parameters,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 125, no. 8, pp. 1647–1661, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J.-H. Ha, S.-H. Han, H.-J. Lee, and C.-M. Park, “Environmental adaptation of the heterotrophic-to-autotrophic transition: the developmental plasticity of seedling establishment,” Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 128–137, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. R. Aroca, R. Porcel, and J. M. Ruiz-Lozano, “Regulation of root water uptake under abiotic stress conditions,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 43–57, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. Chorpa, G. Burow, C. Hayes, Y. Emendack, Z. Xin, and J. Burke, “Transcriptome profiling and validation of gene based single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in sorghum genotypes with contrasting response to cold stress,” BMC Genomics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Podder, D. Samarappuli, J. V. Anderson, and M. T. Berti, “Phenotyping a diverse collection of forage sorghum genotypes for chilling tolerance,” Agronomy, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 1214, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. Fiedler, W. A. Bekele, R. Duensing et al., “Genetic dissection of the temperature-dependent sorghum growth during juvenile development,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 127, no. 9, pp. 1935–1948, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Rutayisire, A. Mukayiranga, J. C. Habineza, M. Avosa, R. Edema, and G. Lubadde, “Effect of low temperature stress on field performance of highland sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. (Moench)) at flowering stages,” Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Amandin Rutayisire et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views469
Downloads669
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.