Increasing the Bioavailability of Phosphate by Using Microorganisms

Aberathna, A. A. A. U.; Satharasinghe, D. A.; Jayasooriya, A. P.; Jinadasa, R. N.; Manopriya, S.; Jayaweera, B. P. A.; Fernando, C. A. N.; Weerathilake, W. A. D. V.; Prathapasinghe, G. A.; Liyanage, J. A.; Premarathne, J. M. K. J. K.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4305501

International Journal of Agronomy

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 4305501 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4305501

Increasing the Bioavailability of Phosphate by Using Microorganisms

A. A. A. U. Aberathna,¹D. A. Satharasinghe,²A. P. Jayasooriya,²R. N. Jinadasa,³S. Manopriya,¹B. P. A. Jayaweera,¹C. A. N. Fernando,⁴W. A. D. V. Weerathilake,¹G. A. Prathapasinghe,¹J. A. Liyanage,⁵and J. M. K. J. K. Premarathne¹

Academic Editor: Francesca Degola

Received22 Apr 2022

Revised21 Sept 2022

Accepted03 Nov 2022

Published17 Dec 2022

Abstract

Phosphorous (P) is a nonrenewable and one of the most important macronutrients for all living organisms. The formation of complexes with cations such as Al, Fe, and Ca reduces the solubility of P leading to limiting the absorption of P by plants. Therefore, we need to apply excessive amounts of P through conventional fertilizers. However, plants can use only a small portion of P of these added fertilizers whenever those become unavailable. Therefore, utilizing excess amounts of phosphate as fertilizers can lead to various environmental issues like eutrophication. Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms (PSM) have the ability to solubilize soil phosphate through the production of organic acids, inorganic acids, enzymes, protons, siderophores, and exopolysaccharides resulting in the absorption of P by plants. The application of PSM has the potential to be used as an efficient, eco-friendly, and sustainable approach that can replace traditional fertilizers. This review aimed to give an overview of the diversity of PSM, methods of P solubilization, current trends, and technological advances that can assist in using PSM to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

1. Introduction

Phosphorous (P) is an essential macronutrient in biomass [1–3] and is the 11^th most abundant element in the Earth’s crust, representing 0.12% of its composition [4, 5]. P is available in organic and inorganic forms within P sources [3, 6–8] which are nonrenewable [5, 9, 10]. Among soil, clay, plant and animal matter, and other resources, rock phosphate (apatite) is the best P source [5], and the one which is commonly used for phosphate fertilizer production [11]. The less bioavailability of phosphates is the major issue to be used as fertilizer [11]. PSM has a huge potential to develop and a gap to address in developing as an efficient phosphate biofertilizer by increasing the bioavailability other than the currently used products. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to elaborate the details of PSM and its potential usage as an effective agent for sustainable utilization of phosphate.

2. Functions of Phosphorous in Biomass

Phosphorous is involved in common biological functions for all living organisms [2, 3, 12], as mentioned in Table 1. In particular, P is the second most limiting macronutrient for plant growth, representing 0.2% of plant dry weight [15, 18] and acting as a key element in the animal body [7, 13, 16]. Therefore, P has become a critical and essential element for the wellbeing of human beings [20].

The world population is expected to reach 9,400 million in 2050 [21] and global food production needs to be increased by 50% compared to the demand in 2012 [22]. Due to the low solubility of phosphate, its use has been severely limited [20]. Additionally, the wastage of phosphate that plants and animals cannot utilize causes additional problems such as eutrophication [14, 23]. Low bioavailability of phosphate is directed to the high utilization, and the peak extraction of phosphate will take place in 2030 [24]. Therefore, the sustainable utilization of phosphate is highly required by increasing its bioavailability to avoid wastage of phosphate [5, 24]. A new trend that is emerging is to use microorganisms to solubilize the insoluble forms of phosphates and increase its bioavailability [6, 14, 25]. This review is intended to provide a comprehensive description of the occurrence of lower bioavailability of phosphate, phosphate solubilizing potential of microorganisms and their diversity, and isolation techniques and phosphate solubilizing mechanisms of those microorganisms as well as future trends.

3. Reasons for Lower Bioavailability of Phosphate

Soil is a significant source of phosphate that contains around 400–1000 mg·kg⁻¹ of total phosphates [26]. However, only around 1.00–2.50% of phosphate is available for plants due to the high insolubility of phosphate compounds [2, 26, 27]. Orthophosphate is the only soluble of the three types of phosphates contained in the soil while the insoluble organic phosphate and insoluble inorganic phosphates are unavailable for plants [4, 12, 14]. Therefore, orthophosphates such as and can be absorbed by plants [1, 14, 15, 17, 28, 29], while insoluble inorganic phosphates and insoluble organic phosphates are reserved in soil without being absorbed by the plants [1]. Approximately 52.3 billion tons of phosphate-related fertilizers are added annually to maintain the optimum soluble phosphate level in soil. However, plants use approximately 0.2% of this vast amount through absorption via roots [30]. Around 80% of phosphates added into the soil are rapidly converted into an insoluble state and fixed in the soil due to its adsorption, precipitation, or conversion to organic compounds [2, 15, 27, 30, 31]. Phosphorous is highly reactive and not freely available in the elemental form [14]. Phosphate gets immobilized through precipitation or sorption by reactions with Fe³⁺ and Al³⁺ in acidic soils and Ca²⁺ in calcareous soils [2, 11, 14, 17, 21, 26, 28, 31] and forms ferrous phosphate (FePO₄), aluminium phosphate (AlPO₄), and calcium phosphate (Ca₃ (PO₄)₂), respectively [14, 17, 31]. Continuous addition of phosphates into the soil due to this immobilization is not sustainable as it rapidly depletes the natural phosphate resources [11] whilst causing environmental problems such as soil fertility depletion and eutrophication [14].

4. Phosphate Solubilizing Potential of Microorganisms

At present, P management is a necessity to minimize phosphate loss and increase agricultural production [2]. Using microorganisms to solubilize phosphate is cost-effective and eco-friendly compared to chemical and physical methods [31]. According to Shin et al., 2015 [32], chemically synthesized organic acids such as salicylic, citric, phthalic, and oxalic leach the phosphates from the mineral sources. That potential also holds microorganisms, which secrete organic acids [13, 33], such as citric, gluconic, ketogluconic, oxalic [31, 32] acetic, lactic, tartaric, succinic [31] phthalic, salicylic, and malic [32]. For example, Jones and Oburger, 2011 [34] explain that Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus can immobilize phosphate because it produces gluconic and ketogluconic acids. However, the mutant strain of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus is unable to solubilize phosphate because those mutations would cause a loss of production of organic acids. Jones and Oburger, 2011 [34] reported that tricarboxylic anions such as citrate (salt of citric acid) have a higher potential to immobilize phosphate than dicarboxylic acids such as oxalate and gluconate (salts of oxalic and gluconic acids). Furthermore, various enzymes such as phytase [35] and phosphatase [2, 33, 35] that are secreted by microorganisms induce the PSM to produce exopolysaccharides under stress conditions such as phosphorous deficiency. Exopolysaccharides have an ability to form metal complexes (order of potential of ions to form complexes is Al³⁺ > Cu²⁺ > Zn²⁺ > Fe³⁺ > Mg²⁺ > K⁺) in the soil and to induce the release of phosphates [34]. This phosphate solubilizing potential of microorganisms converts the insoluble phosphates into soluble form through biochemical processes such as mineralization and transformation [11, 36]. Phosphate solubilizing potential is affected by the applications of organic amendments including composts, plant residue, and animal manure through accelerating the phosphate immobilization process [31, 34] and promoting the phosphate absorption and growth of plants [12, 21, 29, 35].

Furthermore, this phosphate solubilizing potential of microorganisms is naturally applied in mineral weathering [35] and remediation of polluted sites such as heavy metal-contaminated water and soil [33, 37]. In addition, the phosphate-solubilizing potential of microorganisms is more important in the natural phosphorus cycle [33].

5. Diversity of Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms (PSM)

The basal habitat of PSM is soil [7, 14]. The average bacteria number in 1 gram of fertile soil is 101 to 1010 cells and their live weight may exceed 2,000 kg·ha⁻¹ [14, 38]. The highest number of PSM accumulates at the rhizosphere of plants, and those organisms are metabolically very active [14, 38]. The soil properties such as phosphate content, chemical/physical properties, and organic matter affect the population of the phosphate solubilizing bacteria [7, 38]. Those phosphate-solubilizing bacteria are coccus, bacillus, or spirillum in shape, while the bacillus is the most abundant and the spirillum is the least abundant form [7, 38]. In addition, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria represent 1–50% and phosphate-solubilizing fungi represent 0.1–0.5% of the whole population of PSM in the soil [14, 38]. However, there is a high diversity of PSM in the soil. Among these microbial species; Bacillus and Pseudomonas are the most abundant bacterial genera and Penicillium and Aspergillus are the notable fungal genera. The foremost PSM and the countries for relevant research studies are listed in Table 2.

6. Isolation and Characterization of Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms

6.1. Culture Media

Isolation of PSM is required for the sustainable utilization of phosphates. The two major culture media that are currently being used for the isolation process are known as the Pikovskaya (PVK) medium and National Botanical Research Institute Phosphate (NBRIP) medium [4, 15].

6.2. Isolation of PSM

The pour plate or spread plate methods on PVK or NBRIP media can be used in isolation [2, 13, 41]. The incubation period and temperature vary with research expectations and requirements whilst usually a temperature of 30°C [3, 21, 39] and 7 days incubation period are used [2, 13, 15, 27]. PSM form a clear zone (halo zone) by solubilizing phosphate around their colonies, reflecting their basic function [2–4, 21, 39, 41, 63]. Isolated halo zone-forming microorganisms can be picked and purified on solid media for several rounds to obtain purified sole microbial colonies [13].

6.3. Evaluation of the Phosphate-Solubilizing Ability

Qualitative and quantitative methods are used to evaluate the phosphate solubilizing ability of PSM. Qualitative evaluation is based on HD/CD value [13, 27, 64] and solubilization index (SI) [2, 3, 15, 16, 27, 41, 52, 63, 65]; while the measurement of phosphate concentration is a quantitative approach [2, 13, 23, 39, 41, 52, 64, 65].

6.3.1. Qualitative Evaluation

(1) HD/CD Value. The phosphate solubilizing ability of PSM is evaluated using the ratio between HD (halo zone diameter) and CD (colony diameter) [13, 27, 64]. If HD/CD ≥ 1.5, it indicates a strong ability. The HD/CD value between 1.0 and 1.5 indicates a weak ability to solubilize phosphate [13].

(2) Solubilization Index (SI). The ratio between the total diameter and colony diameter (Colony diameter + Halo diameter/Colony diameter) is also used in the evaluation of phosphate solubilizing ability [2, 3, 15, 16, 27, 41, 52, 63, 65].

6.3.2. Quantitative Evaluation

(1) Measuring the Phosphate Concentration. The phospho molybdate blue method is usually used to measure the solubilized phosphate concentration. Autoclaved NBRIP or PVK broth media are inoculated with PSM, and those broths that were not inoculated are used as controls. Broth media are incubated by shaking, while the usual incubation period and temperature are 7 days and 28 ± 2°C, respectively [2, 31, 41, 52, 64]. Each test and control broths are centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 15 min [23, 31] to obtain the supernatant, which is used to measure solubilized phosphate. The colorimetric method (molybdenum blue method) is used to measure optical density by using UV-VIS spectrophotometer [2, 31, 41, 52, 64]. In addition, ICP-MS and ICP-OES methods are used to measure the solubilized phosphate concentrations [66].

6.4. Identifying Isolated Strains

6.4.1. Morphological Characterization

Morphological identification is the basic step to characterize PSM [15, 21, 23, 67]. It is achieved by assessing the shape, color, edge, and elevation of the colony. Furthermore, the Gram staining test was used to observe the microbial cells [21, 63].

6.4.2. Biochemical Characterization

Biochemical tests such as Gram staining, starch hydrolysis capability, gelatin hydrolysis, catalase activity, IMViC test, casein hydrolysis, oxidase, carbohydrate fermentation (glucose and sucrose), urease activity, Hugh−Leifson (O/F) reaction, H₂S production, NO₃^- reduction, gelatine liquefaction, and growth at 5% NaCl are important in the characterization process of PSM, and the motility test is also required [3, 21, 67]. A combination of the results of all biochemical tests characterizes the microorganism up to a particular taxonomic level [21, 67]. The Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology is used for biochemical identification and morphological characterization [23].

6.4.3. Molecular Characterization

16s rRNA gene sequencing technique is used to characterize and identify the exact bacterial species [3, 21, 23, 31, 41], and ITS sequence analysis is used for the characterization of fungal species [68] of PSM. Universal primers are used for the gene amplification [3, 39]. Agarose gel electrophoresis is used to check the amplified PCR product [3, 13, 21]. Sequencing of the PCR products of the genes is needed to compare the similarity levels with other reference sequences using BLAST to identify the PSM species [2, 3, 13, 31].

7. Phosphate Solubilizing Mechanisms of Microorganisms

Due to the high reactivity of phosphorous, it is available in the soil as organic and inorganic compounds that are unavailable for plants [69]. Microorganisms immobilize these insoluble phosphates through solubilizing via secreting complex compounds such as protons, organic acid anions, exopolysaccharides, siderophores, and hydroxyl ions, secreting extracellular enzymes, or releasing the phosphates by the degradation of substrates [70] (Figure 1). The phosphate-solubilizing mechanism can be discussed under two major forms, namely, inorganic phosphate solubilization and organic phosphate solubilization based on the substrate [4].

7.1. Inorganic Phosphate-Solubilization Mechanisms

The inorganic phosphates solubilizing process involves organic acids, inorganic acids, siderophore and exopolysaccharide production. and proton extrusion by the PSM [4]. These mechanisms can be described as follows:

7.1.1. Organic Acid Production

Secretion of the organic acids that result from the metabolic activities of PSM is the key mechanism of phosphate solubilization [4, 38]. These organic acids decrease the pH and chelate the cations (such as Al³⁺, Fe³⁺, Ca²⁺) bound to phosphate ions to release the phosphate [4, 38, 45]. Here, organic acids compete with the phosphate-binding sites of the medium and allow phosphates to be available in free form (as and [14, 17]. Among the all-organic acids released by PSM, gluconic acid is the most prominent one [4, 14, 17, 38, 69]. Most common organic acids secreted by PSM are listed in Table 3.

7.1.2. Inorganic Acid Production

Some PSMs act as nitrifying and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria that produce inorganic acids such as sulfuric acid, nitric acid, carbonic acid [4], and hydrochloric acid [38] in the process of phosphate solubilization. Nitric acid-producing bacteria such as Nitrosomonas, Nitrobacter, Nitrosovibrio, Nitrosospira [75], and sulfuric acid-producing bacteria such as Thiobacillus thiooxidans [76] may have a considerable ability to solubilize phosphate. Further studies on these abilities are highly warranted. The released inorganic acids may cause the acidification of the media and H⁺ substitution reactions to release the phosphates by converting insoluble phosphates to soluble form [38]. However, the effectiveness of phosphate immobilization by inorganic acids is lower than the efficiency of organic acids [4, 38, 45].

7.1.3. Proton Extrusion

Solubilization of the phosphate without the secretions of acids is also a possibility [4]. In excretion of H⁺ through H₂CO₃ production, NH⁴⁺ assimilation and liberation of organic acid anions are other options for the solubilization of phosphates by acidifying the media [4, 14, 38, 45]. Pseudomonas fluorescens [77], Pseudomonas sp., Bacillus sp., and Azospirillum sp. [78] significantly exhibit this mechanism of proton extrusion in the process of phosphate solubilization.

7.1.4. Exopolysaccharide Production

Microorganisms release exopolysaccharides under stress conditions that exhibit an ability to promote the phosphate solubilization [4, 79]. Exopolysaccharides bind with the metal ions in the soil, which formed the complexes with phosphates and subsequently resulted in the release of those phosphates. Exopolysaccharide concentration has a positive correlation with the rate of phosphate solubilization [4].

7.1.5. Siderophore Production

Siderophore production is a common ability of microorganisms, although it is used by PSM as the another alternative method to solubilize the phosphates [4, 14, 17, 45]. Siderophores have a strong affinity with chelated iron and release phosphate. Furthermore, it contributes to the release of phosphates from organic phosphates [4].

7.2. Mechanisms of Organic Phosphate Solubilization

7.2.1. Enzyme Production

Organic compounds in the soil such as phosphonates, phytic acid, polyphosphonates, sugar phosphates [4], phosphomonoesters, phosphodiesters, phosphotriesters [45], and phospholipids and nucleic acids [4, 45] are high molecular-weight compounds and are resistant to chemical hydrolysis. Therefore, these organic phosphates should be converted into a soluble form by a biological method such as microbial solubilization [45].

PSM secretes the enzymes to solubilize the organic phosphate [45]. There are three groups of enzymes that are secreted by PSM [4, 45, 69, 70]. These enzymes are as follows:(1)Nonspecific phosphatases(2)C-P Lyases and Phosphonatases(3)Phytases

Phosphatase enzymes cause the hydrolysis of ester phosphate bonds and convert high-molecular-weight organic phosphates into low-molecular-weight compounds to ease off the release of phosphate ions. Phytic acid or myo-inositol phosphate compounds are hydrolyzed by phytase enzyme while ester bonds of phosphonates (e.g., phosphoenolpyruvate, phosphonoacetate) are hydrolyzed by phosphonatase and CeP lyase to form phosphate ions [4, 45, 70].

Due to the potential to solubilize organic and inorganic phosphates, there is a trend to use and improve PSM as biofertilizers [7, 14, 45]. Biofertilizers are microbiologically active, eco-friendly, low-cost products, and are applied to soil for growth promotion of plants [14, 17]. Though currently used chemical fertilizers fulfill the phosphate requirement of plants, it damages the soil health and fertility. Nevertheless, the PSM increases the available phosphates in the soil without harming its biochemical composition [14, 17]. Furthermore, these biofertilizers are not crop-specific and can be used for any type of plant, expecting the increment of growth, yield, and crop quality through the high phosphate absorption [14].

According to Satyaprakash [17], biofertilizers can substitute 50% of chemical fertilizers without any reduction of the yield. However, some other studies report that biofertilizers sometimes increase the yield. For example, it was reported that there was a 12.6% yield increment of sugarcane and 30% increment of wheat with Azotobacter and Bacillus inoculants [14]. Furthermore, the combinations of PSM with other PSMs give a better output of the yield. For example, there was a 10–20% yield increment with the combination of Bacillus megaterium and Azotobacter chroococcum. The Bacillus circulans, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus subtilis, and Pseudomonas striata have been recognized as common and effective biofertilizers [14].

The utilization of biofilm inoculants and nano-bio inoculants are the newest techniques in the biofertilizer formulation technology. Biofilm inoculants are a combination of two microorganisms; one microorganism (usually used bacteria) colonizes over the other microorganism (bacteria or fungi can be used). The second microorganism can be a biotic surface to the first microorganism to form a metabolically enhanced biofilm rather than to a single culture [4, 80]. The density of these biofilms is very low in the soil, although it affects high phosphate solubilization and promotes growth in plants [4, 81]. Therefore, utilization of these biofilms as biofertilizers through artificial formulation is beneficial in agriculture [4]. Bahu et al., 2017 explained that Pleurotus ostreatus, Xanthoparmelia mexicana, and Penicillium spp. could be used in biofilms to achieve a significant output.

PSM integrates with nanoparticles or nanostructures to form nano-bio inoculants that can be regarded as another novel technique in the production of biofertilizers. PSM encapsulating with micronutrient nanoparticles or nanoparticles used as delivery agents is the strategy that is used in the formulation of nano-bio inoculants. These nano formulations resist UV inactivation, heat, and desiccation, which allow an efficient application [4]. Silver, copper, gold, platinum, iron, and lead are the commonly used nanoparticles to formulate nano-bio inoculants [4, 82]. According to Shukla et al. [82], significant growth promotion is exhibited by the nano-bio inoculants using gold nanoparticles with Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Paenibacillus elgii, and Bacillus subtilis.

Another remarkable trend of PSM is the ability to utilize for bioremediation and phytoremediation. Phytoremediation is an efficient, eco-friendly and economical method that removes metal contaminations from soil [4]. PSMs such as Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, and Klebsiella have an ability to bioremediate metals by phytostabilization or by phytoextraction in metal contaminated soil [83]. Using a consortium of PSM than single cultures is more efficient in bioremediation. During the process of bioremediation, PSM produces organic acids, protons, siderophore, and exopolysaccharides [4, 84].

PSM has the potential to be used as biological substances to promote plant growth, yield, and crop quality and to be used for bioremediation. Therefore, the development and the application of these eco-friendly biological methods are required to limit the usage of chemical fertilizers and other remediating chemicals as well as to promote the sustainable utilization of available phosphates on Earth [17].

9. Drawbacks in Using PSM

The major drawback that can occur in the usage of PSM as biofertilizers is competition with native microbial species and reduction of PSM population in biofertilizers. Among other constraints, there are insufficient nutrient amounts in the soil to produce adequate amounts of organic acids and enzymes, incompatible nature around the rhizosphere that is specific to particular plant species, the survival of PSM in biofertilizers [85], and necessity of aseptic conditions during packaging of manufactured biofertilizers [86]. Though the microorganisms perform well under laboratory and greenhouse conditions, it would not be performed in the field due to the harsh environmental conditions [30, 87].

Furthermore, the poor quality and less consistency are other issues of biofertilizers. Most of the biofertilizers are local productions, and information of the production process is rare. The production cost of biofertilizers also must be competitive compared to chemical fertilizers [30].

Several particular minerals associated with natural phosphate resources also mobilize parallelly with phosphate during the solubilization process. Among those minerals, F⁻, Cl⁻, Al³⁺, and Ca²⁺ limit the solubilization of phosphate and naturally decrease the rate of phosphate solubilization [66].

Gluconic acid has a major responsible role in phosphate solubilization. However, recovery and purification of gluconic acid in conventional production methods are big challenges [88]. Not only that, undesirable by-products and unsatisfactory yields result in chemical methods are even under carefully controlled and optimized conditions [89].

Phytoremediation is an additional advantage of PSM. However, there are some drawbacks in practical applications. Limitations of stress tolerating [90], slow and seasonally applicable treatment due to the changing environmental conditions [91], and limitations of applicable compounds according to the degradation ability are some of them [90].

10. How to Improve PSM

There are various PSM that are found in the soil. In order to utilize the resource at the maximum level, it is necessary to explore phosphate-solubilizing ability by using biotechnology. At present, the scientific knowledge of phosphate solubilization is limited. Thus, it is essential to conduct new studies to explore this area. It is believed that several genes are related to phosphate solubilization. Thus, it is necessary to characterize these genes by genetic engineering and molecular biotechnological studies to obtain highly efficient PSM. At the initial stages, the napA phosphatase gene was transferred to Burkholderia cepacia IS-16 strain from Morganella morganii strain to produce an effective biofertilizer [92].

As previously described, gluconic acid is the frequently produced organic acid by PSM, which performs the major phosphate solubilizing mechanism. Oxidative glucose, catalyzed by glucose dehydrogenase enzyme, results in gluconic acid when pyrroloquinoline quinine (PQQ) acts as a cofactor [85]. Thus, there is a potential to clone the gene that causes the synthesis of PQQ and transfer to other microbial strains to produce highly efficient PSM with the ability to produce gluconic acid. Especially, most abundant microorganisms associated with the rhizosphere are able to be used for this gene transformation, because those strains are the most competent organisms (Rhizobium spp., Pseudomonas spp.) around the rhizosphere which decrease the phosphate solubilization of applied biofertilizers in some cases. Improving the phosphate solubilizing ability of PSM by using biotechnology needs to be essentially focused, because pesticide usage in agriculture has also been limited by microbial biotechnology [92]. In addition, the microorganisms, expected to be used as biofertilizer must have vast potential to tolerate harsh environmental conditions in the field application. Selecting the most tolerable PSMs for harsh conditions and improving the gene compositions to increase the phosphate solubilizing ability is far better to obtain expected outcomes. The genes responsible for phosphate solubilizing enzymes and organic acids have to be considered here. Further research studies are open to developing stress tolerating, which is highly efficient PSMs.

Selecting a carrier material that provides required nutrients and a favorable environment for the PSM while producing biofertilizers would enhance effectiveness up to the expected higher outcomes. In addition, it will strengthen the PSM to compete with native microorganisms and reflect the result of high-quality biofertilizers [30, 86]. High quality and low-cost phosphate biofertilizers still have a huge gap to fulfil in the international market [30]. An internationally recognized strong quality control framework has to be established to improve the quality of phosphate biofertilizers to achieve the economic goals.

Furthermore, parallel solubilization of associated minerals that decrease the phosphate solubilization has to be declined or to mask those minerals. Further research studies are needed to investigate a method to solubilize only phosphate or limit the solubilization of other interfering minerals.

Moreover, some essential macro and micronutrients for plants such as Mg, K, Cu Mn, and Zn parallelly mobilize during the phosphate solubilization process [12, 30]. This added advantage has to be considered in the biofertilizer production and price decision process.

Aspergillus sp., Penicillium sp, and Gluconobacter sp. [89, 93, 94] are adaptable to commercial production of gluconic acid as phosphate biofertilizer due to their huge potential for the natural synthesis of gluconic acid. There is a gap in developing a method to synthesize gluconic acid with high purity by using an eco-friendly and cost-effective substrate. Abovementioned microbial species have a huge opportunity to represent the frontline.

As the option for the issues of phytoremediation, a combination of other remediation methods with phytoremediation may give a significant positive outcome, and this also needs to be studied further.

11. Contribution of PSM for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)

Increasing bioavailability of phosphate by microorganisms contributes towards sustainable development in a broad range of key areas (Figure 2). Proper plant growth, food security, industrial growth, environmental sustainability, and water security are directly affecting key areas with the microbial solubilization of phosphate [95].

Continuous addition of phosphate fertilizers to provide optimum requirement of phosphate for crops due to the low bioavailability is not the proper way and it is a waste of the resource [96]. Potential of PSM to solubilize available phosphate in soil makes responsible consumption of the resource (SDG 12). It creates the pathway to reduce the addition of excess phosphate with associated other chemicals as fertilizers to soil and contribute to build up sustainable terrestrial ecosystems with reverse land degradation to halt biodiversity loss (SDG 15) [85, 97]. On the other way, excess addition of phosphate to soil causes eutrophication by disrupting valuable aquatic resources and polluting the water [98]. Development of PSM as bio fertilizers by reducing the excess utilization of phosphate fertilizers ensures the sustainable conservation of aquatic resources (SDG 14) and of sustainable management of available clean water (SDG 06) [99]. Bioavailability of phosphate accelerates the proper growth of plants with sufficient production of food [100]. Contribution of PSM for food security through sustainable agriculture promotes public nutrition and end hunger (SDG 02) [101]. Development of crop production by PSM promotes the sustainable agricultural industry (SDG 09) which ensures the sustainable economic growth (SDG 08) with moving forward to reduction of poverty (SDG 01) [102]. Economically developed society with less poverty, zero hunger, and better living environment promotes sustainable peaceful society, which provides access to justice (SDG 16) [103]. In this context, PSM contributes significantly to achieve SDG directly and indirectly within the framework of the 2030 agenda of the United Nations.

12. Conclusion

The application of PSM to solubilize phosphate is an efficient and eco-friendly method. Bacillus and Pseudomonas are the frequent bacterial genera while Penicillium and Aspergillus are the major fungal genera of PSM. A consortium of PSM other than single cultures improves the output significantly. Among the different solubilizing methods followed by PSM, organic acid production is notable, and gluconic acid is the foremost organic acid involved in the phosphate immobilization process. Because of this potential, there is a new trend to use more diverse and much more potent PSM for the formulation of biofertilizers. Genetic engineering and molecular biotechnology can be used to develop the phosphate solubilization of PSM. These applications and developments in methods would sustainably enhance the utilization of phosphate. Therefore, PSM contributes directly and indirectly to achieve the SDG, especially the goals of no poverty, zero hunger, clean water and sanitation, decent work and economic growth, industry innovation and infrastructure, responsible consumption and production, life below water, life on land and peace justice, and strong institutions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The paper was supported by the research grant of “Accelerating Higher Education and Development” (AHEAD) under Development-Oriented Research (DOR) of STEM grant number AHEAD/RA3/DOR/WUSL/LAS No.57 funded by the World Bank.

References

M. Suleman, S. Yasmin, M. Rasul, M. Yahya, M. Atta, and M. S. Mirza, “Phosphate solubilizing bacteria with glucose dehydrogenase gene for phosphorus uptake and beneficial effects on wheat,” PLoS One, vol. 13, pp. 1–28, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Z. Aliyat, M. Maldani, M. E. Guilli, L. Nassiri, and J. Ibijbijen, “Isolation and Characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria from phosphate solid Sludge of the Moroccan phosphate mines,” The Open Agriculture Journal, vol. 14, pp. 16–24, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Chawngthu, R. Hnamte, and R. Lalfakzuala, “Isolation and Characterization of rhizospheric phosphate solubilizing bacteria from Wetland isolation and Characterization of rhizospheric phosphate solubilizing bacteria,” Geomicrobiology Journal, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 366–375, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Prabhu, S. Borkar, and S. Garg, “Phosphate solubilization by microorganisms: overview, mechanisms, applications and advances,” Advances in Biological Science Research, pp. 161–176, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Samreen and S. Kausar, “Phosphorus fertilizer: the Original and commercial sources,” in Phosphorus - Recovery and Recycling, pp. 81–92, IntechOpen, Aligarh, India, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Dipak and S. N. Sinha, “Bacteria showing phosphate solubilizing efficiency in river sediment,” Electron. J. Biosci., vol. 01, pp. 1–5, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Anand, B. Kumari, and M. A. Mallick, “Phosphate solubilizing microbes: an effective and alternative approach as biofertilizers,” International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 37–40, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. Sharon, L. T. Hathwaik, G. M. Glenn, S. H. Imam, and C. C. Lee, “Isolation of efficient phosphate solubilizing bacteria capable of enhancing tomato plant growth,” Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, vol. 16, pp. 0–536, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ahuja, S. B. Ghosh, and S. D’Souza, “Isolation of a starch utilizing , phosphate solubilizing fungus on buffered medium and its characterization,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 98, no. 17, pp. 3408–3411, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Sarikhani, B. Khoshru, and R. Greiner, “Isolation and identification of temperature tolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria as a potential microbial fertilizer,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 126–210, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Ameen, S. A. Alyahya, S. Alnadhari, H. Alasmari, F. Alhoshani, and M. Wainwright, “Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and fungi in desert soils: species, limitations and mechanisms,” Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1446–1459, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Chen and S. Liu, “Identification and characterization of the phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Pantoea sp . S32 in Reclamation soil in Shanxi, China,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 10, pp. 2171–2212, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Li, J. Zhang, J. Zhang, W. Xu, and Z. Mou, “Characteristics of inorganic phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from the Sediments of a eutrophic lake,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2141–2215, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Kalayu, “Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms: Promising approach as biofertilizers,” International Journal of Agronomy, vol. 2019, Article ID 4917256, 7 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. I. El-hamshary, O. I. M. El-hamshary, F. M. Bohkari, L. A. Al-aklouk, S. O. Noor, and A. A. Najjar, “Molecular Characterization of some phosphate solubilizing microorganisms,” Pharmacophore, vol. 10, pp. 37–51, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Pande, P. Pandey, S. Mehra, M. Singh, and S. Kaushik, “Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their efficiency on the growth of maize,” Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 379–391, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Nikitha, E. R. Sadhana, and S. S. Vani, “Phosphorous and phosphate solubilising bacteria and their role in plant nutrition,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2133–2144, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Fenta, “Isolation and Characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria from tomato (Solanum l) rhizosphere and their Effect on growth and phosphorus uptake of the Host plant under green House Experiment,” International Journal of Advanced Research, pp. 1–49, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Yuliantia and R. Anna, “Screening and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria from isolate of thermophilic bacteria,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1868, Article ID 090015, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Someus and M. Pugliese, “Concentrated phosphorus recovery from food Grade Animal Bones,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 2349–2417, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Azaroual, Z. Hazzoumi, N. E. Mernissi, A. Aasfar, I. Meftah Kadmiri, and B. Bouizgarne, “Role of inorganic phosphate solubilizing Bacilli isolated from Moroccan phosphate rock mine and rhizosphere soils in wheat (Triticum aestivum L) phosphorus uptake,” Current Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 2391–2404, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. Hii, C. Y. San, S. W. Lau, and M. K. Danquah, “Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology Isolation and zcharacterization of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms from peat,” Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, vol. 26, Article ID 101643, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Paul and S. N. Sinha, “Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa KUPSB12 with antibacterial potential from river,” Annals of Agrarian Science, vol. 15, pp. 130–136, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rosemarin, G. D. Bruijne, and I. Caldwell, Peak phosphorus: The Next Inconvenient Truth, Brok, 2009.
S. Banerjee, R. Palit, C. Sengupta, and D. Standing, “Stress induced phosphate solubilization by Arthrobacter sp . and Bacillus sp . isolated from tomato rhizosphere,” Australian Journal of Crop Science, vol. 4, pp. 378–383, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Adnan, Z. Shah, S. Fahad et al., “Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria Nullify the Antagonistic Effect of soil Calcification on bioavailability of phosphorus in alkaline soils,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, pp. 16131–16213, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. Mazrou, A. H. Makhlouf, E. R. Elbealy et al., “Molecular characterization of phosphate solubilizing fungi Aspergillus Niger and its correlation to sustainable agriculture,” Journal of Environmental Biology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 592–599, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cao, D. Fu, T. Liu, G. Guo, and Z. Hu, “Phosphorus solubilizing and releasing bacteria screening from the rhizosphere in a natural Wetland,” Water, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 195–215, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kumar, V. Kumar, and R. Prasad, Phyto- Microbiome in Stress Regulation, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, Bihar, India, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site
A. Soumare, K. Boubekri, K. Lyamlouli, M. Hafidi, Y. Ouhdouch, and L. Kouisni, “From isolation of phosphate solubilizing microbes to their formulation and Use as biofertilizers: Status and needs,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 7, pp. 425–514, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. C. Walpola and R. Hettiarachchi, “Organic manure amended with phosphate solubilizing bacteria on soil phosphorous Availability,” Journal of Agricultural Sciences – Sri Lanka, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 142–153, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Shin, J. Kim, B. S. Kim, J. Jeong, and J. C. Lee, “Use of phosphate solubilizing bacteria to leach Rare earth elements from Monazite-Bearing ore,” Minerals, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 189–202, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wang, C. Xiao, B. Feng, and R. Chi, “Phosphate rock solubilization and the potential for lead immobilization by a phosphate-solubilizing bacterium (Pseudomonas sp.),” Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 411–420, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Jones and E. Oburger, “Solubilization of phosphorus by soil microorganisms,” in Phosphorus in Action, E. K. Bunemann, Ed., pp. 169–197, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Lee, A. Adhikari, S. M. Kang et al., “Isolation and Characterization of the high Silicate and phosphate solubilizing novel strain Enterobacter ludwigii GAK2 that promotes growth in Rice plants,” Agronomy, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 144–212, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. X. Zheng, M. Ibrahim, D. P. Zhang et al., “Identification and characterization of inorganic - phosphate - solubilizing bacteria from agricultural fields with a rapid isolation method,” AMB Express, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 47, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Teng, W. Shao, K. Zhang, Y. Huo, and M. Li, “Characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolated from heavy metal contaminated soils and their potential for lead immobilization,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 231, pp. 189–197, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Khan, A. Zaidi, J. Musarrat, and M. Technology, Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms, New York, 2014.
S. Nacoon, S. Jogloy, N. Riddech, W. Mongkolthanaruk, T. W. Kuyper, and S. Boonlue, “Interaction between phosphate solubilizing bacteria and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi on growth promotion and Tuber Inulin Content of Helianthus tuberosus L,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, p. 4916, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Qian, J. Shi, Y. Chen et al., “Characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria in Sediments from a Shallow eutrophic lake and a Wetland: isolation, molecular identification and phosphorus release ability Determination,” Molecules, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 8518–8533, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kaur and S. Kaur, “Variation in the phosphate solubilizing bacteria from Virgin and the agricultural soils of Punjab,” Current Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 2118–2127, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Tallapragada and U. Seshachala, “Phosphate-solubilizing microbes and their occurrence in the rhizospheres of Piper betel in Karnataka , India,” Turkish Journal of Biology, vol. 36, pp. 25–35, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Gupta, R. Singal, A. Shankar, R. C. Kuhad, and R. K. Saxena, “A modified plate assay for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms,” Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 255–260, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Babana, A. H. Dicko, K. Maïga, and D. Traoré, “Characterization of rock phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms isolated from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rhizosphere in Mali,” J. Mıcrobıology Mıcrobıal Res., vol. 1, pp. 1–6, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
E. T. Alori, B. R. Glick, and O. O. Babalola, “Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for Use in sustainable agriculture,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, pp. 971–978, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. P. Agnihotri, “Solubilization of insoluble phosphates by some soil fungi isolated from nursery seedbeds,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 877–880, 1970.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Nahas, “Factors determining rock phosphate solubilization by microorganisms isolated from soil,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 567–572, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Nopparat, M. Jatupornpipat, and A. Rittiboon, “Isolation of phosphate solubilizing fungi in soil from Kanchanaburi , Thailand,” KMITL Sci. Tech. J., vol. 7, pp. 137–146, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Jayadi, “In Vitro Selection of rock phosphate solubility by microorganism from Ultisols in south Sulawesi, Indonesia,” American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 68, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Elias, D. Woyessa, and D. Muleta, “Phosphate solubilization potential of rhizosphere fungi isolated from plants in Jimma zone , Southwest Ethiopia,” International Journal of Microbiology, vol. 2016, Article ID 5472601, 11 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. R. Sitepu and Y. Hashidoko, Potent phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria Isolated from Dipterocarps Grown in peat Swamp forest in central Kalimantan and Their possible Utilization for Biorehabilitation of Degraded peatland, Academia, 2014.
T. Karpagam and P. K. Nagalakshmi, “Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing microbes from agricultural soil,” Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 601–614, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Delvasto, A. Valverde, A. Ballester et al., “Diversity and activity of phosphate bioleaching bacteria from a high-phosphorus iron ore,” Hydrometallurgy, vol. 92, no. 3-4, pp. 124–129, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Teng, Z. Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Yao, M. Song, and M. Li, “Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria from rhizosphere soils of the Yeyahu Wetland in Beijing, China,” Environmental Science & Pollution Research, vol. 26, no. 33, pp. 33976–33987, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Teshome, M. Wassie, and E. Abatneh, “Isolation, screening and biochemical Characterization of phosphate- solubilizing rhizobacteria associated with Coffea arabica L,” J. Fertil. Pestic., vol. 08, no. 03, pp. 1–6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Nautiyal, “An efficient microbiological growth medium for screening phosphate solubilizing microorganisms,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 265–270, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Pe´rez, M. Sulbara´n, M. M. Ball, and L. A. Yarzabal, “Isolation and characterization of mineral phosphate-solubilizing bacteria naturally colonizing a limonitic crust in the south-eastern Venezuelan region,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2905–2914, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Birhanu, T. Zerihun, T. Genene, A. Endegena, W. Misganaw, and A. Endeshaw, “Phosphate solubilizing fungi isolated and characterized from Teff rhizosphere soil collected from North Showa zone , Ethiopia,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 11, no. 17, pp. 687–696, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Gupta, J. Sabat, and R. Parida, “Solubilization of tricalcium phosphate and rock phosphate by microbes isolated from chromite, iron and manganese mines,” Acta Botanica Croatica, vol. 66, pp. 197–204, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
M. C. Bardiya and A. C. Gaur, “Isolation and screening of microorganisms Dissolving low-Grade rock phosphate,” Folia Microbiologica, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 386–389, 1974.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fenice, L. Selbman, F. Federici, and N. Vassilev, “Application of encapsulated Penicillium variabile P16 in solubilization of rock phosphate,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 157–162, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Singh and M. S. Reddy, “Effect of inoculation with phosphate solubilizing fungus on growth and nutrient uptake of wheat and maize plants fertilized with rock phosphate in alkaline soils,” European Journal of Soil Biology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 30–34, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. I. Jaya, S. N. H. Utami, J. Widada, and W. A. Yusuf, “Characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from acidic Ultisol soil, South Borneo,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 449, pp. 012005-012006, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Q. Liu, Y. H. Wang, W. L. Kong, W. H. Liu, X. L. Xie, and X. Q. Wu, “Identification, cloning and expression patterns of the genes related to phosphate solubilization in Burkholderia multivorans WS - FJ9 under different soluble phosphate levels,” AMB Express, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 108, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Sanjotha and S. Manawadi, “Isolation, screening and Characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria from Karwar Costal region,” Int. J. Res. Stud. Microbiol. Biotechnol, vol. 2, pp. 1–6, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. d. O. Mendes, N. B. Vassilev, V. H. A. Bonduki, I. R. da Silva, J. I. Ribeiro, and M. D. Costa, “Inhibition of aspergillus Niger phosphate solubilization by fluoride released from rock phosphate,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 79, no. 16, pp. 4906–4913, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Paul and S. N. Sinha, “Biological removal of phosphate using phosphate solubilizing bacterial Consortium from synthetic wastewater: a laboratory sale,” Environ. Asia, vol. 8, pp. 1–8, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Yang, L. Li, B. Wang et al., “Isolation, Mutagenesis, and organic acid secretion of a highly efficient phosphate-solubilizing fungus,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 13, pp. 793122–793211, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Liang, J. Liu, P. Jia et al., “Novel phosphate-solubilizing bacteria enhance soil phosphorus cycling following ecological restoration of land degraded by mining,” The ISME Journal, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1600–1613, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. P. Ingle and D. A. Padole, “Phosphate solubilizing microbes: an overview,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 844–852, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Sharma, R. Z. Sayyed, M. H. Trivedi, and T. A. Gobi, “Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils,” SpringerPlus, vol. 2, pp. 587–614, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Sane and S. K. Mehta, “Isolation and evaluation of rock phosphate solubilizing fungi as potential bio- fertilizer,” J. Fertil. Pestic., vol. 06, no. 02, pp. 1–6, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. B. Selvi, J. J. Paul, V. Vijaya, and K. Saraswathi, “Analyzing the Efficacy of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms by Enrichment Culture techniques,” Biochem. Mol. Biol. J., vol. 03, no. 01, pp. 1–7, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kumar, A. Kumar, and H. Patel, “Role of microbes in phosphorus Availability and Acquisition by plants,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 05, pp. 1344–1347, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Sand, B. Ahlers, and E. Bock, “The Impact of microorganisms - Especially nitric acid producing bacteria - on the Deterioration of natural Stones,” Science, Technology and European Cultural Heritage, pp. 481–484, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L. Liu, Y. W. Lan, and Y. C. Cheng, “Optimal production of sulphuric acid by Thiobacillus thiooxidans using response surface methodology,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1953–1961, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Park, C. Y. Lee, and H. J. Son, “Mechanism of insoluble phosphate solubilization by Pseudomonas fluorescens RAF15 isolated from ginseng rhizosphere and its plant growth-promoting activities,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 222–228, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Öğüt, F. Er, and G. Neumann, “Increased proton extrusion of wheat roots by inoculation with phosphorus solubilising microorganims,” Plant and Soil, vol. 339, no. 1-2, pp. 285–297, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ionescu and S. Belkin, “Overproduction of exopolysaccharides by an Escherichia coli K-12 rpoS mutant in response to Osmotic stress,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 483–492, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. V. Babu, S. Triveni, R. S. Reddy, and J. Sathyanarayana, “Persistence of PSB-fungi biofilmed biofertilizer in the soils and its Effect on growth and yield of maize,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1812–1821, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Taktek, M. St-arnaud, Y. Piché, J. A. Fortin, and H. Antoun, “Igneous phosphate rock solubilization by biofilm-forming mycorrhizobacteria and hyphobacteria associated with Rhizoglomus irregulare DAOM 197198,” Mycorrhiza, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Shukla, R. Kumar, R. K. Mishra et al., “Prediction and validation of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) on plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a step toward development of nano-biofertilizers,” Nanotechnology Reviews, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 439–448, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ahemad, “Phosphate-solubilizingbacteria-assisted phytoremediation of metalliferous soils: a review,” 3 Biotech, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Gupta and V. Kumar, “Value added phytoremediation of metal stressed soils using phosphate solubilizing microbial consortium,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 33, no. 1, p. 9, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Khan, A. Zaidi, and P. A. Wani, “Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture – a review,” Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 29–43, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Sahu and G. Brahmaprakash, “Formulations of biofertilizers–Approaches and advances,” in Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity: Vol. 2: Functional Applications, pp. 1–308, Springer, New Delhi, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Vassilev, B. Eichler-Löbermann, and M. Vassileva, “Stress-TolerantP-solubilizing microorganisms,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 851–859, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Banerjee, R. Kumar, and P. Pal, “Fermentative production of gluconic acid: a membrane-integrated Green process,” Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, vol. 84, pp. 76–84, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ramachandran, S. Nair, C. Larroche, and A. Pandey, Gluconic Acid, Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Production, Isolation and Purification of Industrial Products, Elsevier, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site
H. Farraji, N. Q. Zaman, R. M. Tajuddin, and H. Faraji, “Advantages and Disadvantages of advantages and Disadvantages of,” Int. Res. J. India, vol. 1, pp. 1–3, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Chintakovid, P. Visoottiviseth, S. Khokiattiwong, and S. Lauengsuchonkul, “Potential of the hybrid marigolds for arsenic phytoremediation and income generation of remediators in Ron Phibun District, Thailand,” Chemosphere, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1532–1537, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pradhan, A. Pahari, S. Mohapatra, and B. B. Mishra, “Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture: genetic mechanism and application,” in Advances in Soil Microbiology: Recent Trends and Future Prospects, pp. 81–97, Springer, Singapore, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Ahmed, S. S. Farag, I. A. Hassan, and H. W. Botros, “Production of gluconic acid by using some irradiated microorganisms,” Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 374–380, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Pal, R. Kumar, J. Nayak, and S. Banerjee, “Fermentative production of gluconic acid in membrane-integrated hybrid reactor system: analysis of process intensification,” Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, vol. 122, pp. 258–268, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Timmis, W. M. de Vos, J. L. Ramos et al., “The Contribution of microbial biotechnology to sustainable development goals,” Microbial Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 984–987, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Chen, X. Yan, M. Wang et al., “Long-term excessive phosphorus Fertilization Alters soil phosphorus Fractions in the acidic soil of Pomelo Orchards,” Soil and Tillage Research, vol. 215, p. 105214, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. T. P. Thuy, N. M. Hoa, and W. A. Dick, “Reducing phosphorus fertilizer Input in high phosphorus soils for sustainable agriculture in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam,” Agriculture, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 87, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Oliveira and A. V. Machado, “The role of phosphorus on eutrophication: a Historical review and future Perspectives,” Environmental Technology Reviews, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 117–127, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Wimalawansa and S. J. Wimalawansa, “Protection of Watersheds, and control and responsible Use of Fertiliser to prevent phosphate eutrophication of Reservoirs,” International Journal of Research in Environmental Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2015, http://www.arcjournals.org.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Abel, “Effects of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on the growth, Photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake of,” Forests, vol. 10, no. 348, pp. 1–10, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
H. El Bilali, C. Callenius, C. Strassner, and L. Probst, “Food and nutrition security and sustainability Transitions in food Systems,” Food and Energy Security, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1544–e220, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Musvoto, K. Nortje, B. De Wet, B. K. Mahumani, and A. Nahman, “Imperatives for an agricultural green Economy in South Africa,” South African Journal of Science, vol. 111, no. 1/2, pp. 1–8, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Selvarathinam, “Peace and economic growth in developing countries: pooled data cross-country empirical study,” in International Conference on Applied Economics–ICOAE, pp. 807–814, ICOAE, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 A. A. A. U. Aberathna et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1100

Downloads

707

Citations

International Journal of Agronomy

Increasing the Bioavailability of Phosphate by Using Microorganisms

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Functions of Phosphorous in Biomass

3. Reasons for Lower Bioavailability of Phosphate

4. Phosphate Solubilizing Potential of Microorganisms

5. Diversity of Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms (PSM)

6. Isolation and Characterization of Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms

6.1. Culture Media

6.2. Isolation of PSM

6.3. Evaluation of the Phosphate-Solubilizing Ability

6.3.1. Qualitative Evaluation

6.3.2. Quantitative Evaluation

6.4. Identifying Isolated Strains

6.4.1. Morphological Characterization

6.4.2. Biochemical Characterization

6.4.3. Molecular Characterization

7. Phosphate Solubilizing Mechanisms of Microorganisms

7.1. Inorganic Phosphate-Solubilization Mechanisms

7.1.1. Organic Acid Production

7.1.2. Inorganic Acid Production

7.1.3. Proton Extrusion

7.1.4. Exopolysaccharide Production

7.1.5. Siderophore Production

7.2. Mechanisms of Organic Phosphate Solubilization

7.2.1. Enzyme Production

8. Current Trends and Advances Related to Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms

9. Drawbacks in Using PSM

10. How to Improve PSM

11. Contribution of PSM for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)

12. Conclusion

Conflicts of Interest

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright