Evaluation of Rhizosphere Bacterial Antagonists against <i>Ralstonia solanacearum</i> Causing Tomato (<i>Lycopersicon esculentum</i>) Wilt in Central Ethiopia

Gashaw, Tsigie; Sitotaw, Baye; Yilma, Solomon

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6341555

International Journal of Agronomy

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 6341555 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6341555

Evaluation of Rhizosphere Bacterial Antagonists against Ralstonia solanacearum Causing Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Wilt in Central Ethiopia

Tsigie Gashaw,¹Baye Sitotaw,¹and Solomon Yilma²

Academic Editor: Francesca Degola

Received04 Jan 2022

Revised12 Mar 2022

Accepted21 Mar 2022

Published11 Apr 2022

Abstract

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) is one of the most commonly grown vegetables in Ethiopia. However, diseases such as bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum have been limiting the production. The rhizosphere is an important source of antagonistic bacteria against soilborne pathogens. This study aimed to investigate the antagonistic potential of rhizosphere bacteria against R. solanacearum in vitro. The pathogen was isolated from wilted tomato plants and tested for hypersensitivity reactions to ascertain the virulent R. solanacearum. Antagonistic rhizobacteria were also isolated from the rhizosphere of healthy tomatoes. Isolates were identified based on cultural characteristics and biochemical tests. The antagonistic effect of rhizobacteria against R. solanacearum was tested in vitro. In addition, the growth of rhizobacterial isolates was determined at different levels of temperature, pH, and NaCl. Of the 36 randomly collected colonies, 7 isolates were identified as Ralstonia spp., all of which were grouped under R. solanacearum biovar III. Similarly, 57 rhizobacteria were isolated, and only 14 had shown antagonistic effects against R. solanacearum. The antagonistic rhizobacteria were identified as Pseudomonas or Bacillus species. Significantly higher ( ≤ 0.05) antagonistic activity (14.66 mm inhibition zone) was recorded by Pseudomonas isolate (P6) than recorded by the rest of the isolates and the positive control. Nine rhizobacterial isolates (out of 14) demonstrated higher or equal inhibition zones recorded by the positive controls. All isolates grew at temperatures ranging 15–45°C, pH 5–9, and 2–5% NaCl. The Bacillus spp. grew at all conditions except at pH 3, showing that they can tolerate wide range of growth conditions. The results of this study showed the presence of potential antagonistic bacteria against R. solanacearum in the study area, which can be used for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato as an alternative management option. Further study is required to determine the efficacy at greenhouse and field conditions.

1. Introduction

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) belongs to the Solanaceae family, which contains several valuable agricultural food crops. It is one of the most commonly grown vegetables with a global production of over 5 million hectares [1]. In 2019 alone, about 180.48 million tons of tomatoes were produced in the world [2]. Tomato grows at altitudes ranging from 700 to 2000 meters above the sea level; agroecological zones that are characterized by warm and dry days are favorable for the optimum growth and development of tomatoes.

Tomato is grown in many parts of Ethiopia and is among the most commonly cultivated vegetable crops. Small-scale farmers, commercial growers, and state farm enterprises grow the crop for its fruits in different regions of Ethiopia. Most intensive production is found in the rift valley, mainly along Awash River valley and the lakes region. It is grown under supplemental irrigation, particularly during dry seasons [3]. Its production has shown a marked increase as it is among the most profitable vegetable crops and generates higher incomes for small-scale farmers compared to other vegetable crops. However, Ethiopia’s national average tomato fruit yield was yet low compared with the world average productivity and even when compared with neighboring African countries such as Kenya [4].

The tomato fruit contains abundant and well-balanced nutrition consisting of minerals (calcium, iron, and phosphorus), vitamins (vitamin A and vitamin C), various micronutrients, antioxidants, protein (essential amino acids), sugar, dietary fiber (pectin), and citric acid [1]. Furthermore, the tomato’s red pigment, lycopene, has a high antioxidant capacity against oxygen radicals, which are thought to cause cancer, aging, arteriosclerosis, and other diseases [5].

Vegetable crops including tomatoes are extremely prone to soilborne pathogens which result in significant yield and quality deterioration. Bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum is one of the most devastating plant pathogens [6]. This bacterium affects economically important crops, mainly solanaceous family such as tomato, potato, pepper, and eggplant [7]. R. solanacearum possesses a high broad host range globally; it has over 450 host species representing 54 plant families [8, 9], and this pathogen is responsible for severe crop losses worldwide. This pathogen ranked as the second most important bacterial pathogen among the top ten economically important soilborne pathogens that cause severe yield losses on different solanaceous crops in various parts of the world [10]. R. solanacearum causes tomato bacterial wilt, which causes major damage to tomato crops in tropical, subtropical, and temperate climates [11, 12].

Tomato is one of the most susceptible crops, and R. solanacearum can completely destroy tomato harvest [13, 14]. The presence of R. solanacearum in small-holder farms can discourage farmers from planting vegetables and may result in a significant reduction in food supply [13]. This pathogen causes substantial yield losses depending on cultivar, climate, soil type, cropping practices, and pathogen strain [14].

The bacterial wilt of tomato is generally difficult to manage due to several reasons [15, 16]. Chemical soil treatment, commonly applied management options, presents the risk of soil and water contamination. Bactericide residues are toxic to human, plant, and soil health as well as contribute to the emergence of pesticide-resistant varieties [17]. Particularly, applying the chemical method in the field is difficult because the bacterium is located inside the plant xylem and at depth in the soil [18]. In addition, there is no effective chemical product available for Ralstonia-induced wilt. A comprehensive review by Sharma et al. [19] outlined multiple advantages of biocontrol methods. Biological control agents are thus known to be effective alternatives to control this pathogen as well and are increasingly being applied in the field.

Rhizosphere soils of the host plant are an important source of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), such as antagonistic bacteria against R. solanacearum [20]. PGPR are potential biological control agents, as they are known for growth promotion as well as disease reduction in crops [20]. Rhizobacteria use a wide range of mechanisms involved in the suppression of plant pathogens. For example, PGPR benefit the host plant through the expression of multiple activities that act directly and indirectly to inhibit the activities of pathogens and promote plant health [21].

The occurrence of bacterial wilt disease in Ethiopia was reported in 1956 for the first time and has been known to cause significant yield loss on tomatoes [22]. Since then, it has been one of the most important and widespread bacterial plant pathogens in Ethiopia, mainly in the off-cropping season. Disease incidences of R. solanacearum have reached as high as 55% on tomatoes in major tomato-producing areas of Ethiopia [23].

Biological control of bacterial wilt could be achieved using various species of antagonistic rhizobacteria, such as Bacillus and Pseudomonas species, which have been frequently isolated from potato and tomato rhizosphere samples in Ethiopia [24]. However, limited studies have been conducted in Ethiopia regarding the exploration of the biological control potential against tomato wilt disease. Therefore, this study was initiated to screen and evaluate the antagonistic potential of rhizosphere bacteria against tomato bacterial wilt causing R. solanacearum in vitro.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of Study Area

Tomato fields that are heavily infected with bacterial wilt disease were identified from Toke Kutaye district (Guder) area of farmer’s field in the Oromia region where it is located 126 km from Addis Ababa and 12 km west of Ambo. This area has a latitude and longitude of 8°58′N and 37°46′E, respectively, with an elevation of 2101 meters above the sea level. It receives an annual mean rainfall of 812–1699 mm and the average temperature is 16.22°C. It is famous for its Guder River Falls and year-round fruit production, using plentiful water resources in the surrounding area where it promotes tomato production using irrigation activities [25].

2.2. Study Design and Period

The study was experimental aiming at evaluating the antagonistic efficacy of rhizosphere bacteria against tomato disease causing R. solanacearum in vitro. The study was conducted from November 2020 to June 2021.

2.3. Sample Size and Sampling Techniques

Thirty infected tomato plants and other 30 rhizosphere soil samples (from healthy tomato rhizosphere) were collected from farmers’ field. The tomato samples were selected purposively by observing the visible symptoms of infected tomato plants with wilt for R. solanacearum and healthy tomato plant rhizosphere for rhizosphere bacteria.

Furthermore. field diagnosis was done by critically observing the visible symptoms of bacterial wilt, presence of adventitious roots that were starting to appear on the stem, the collapse of the stem and milky-white, and slimy ooze exudates from the stem [26]. Tomato plant samples that showed wilt symptoms were collected from five farmers’ fields and brought to the laboratory using polyethylene bags, and isolation of the target pathogen was performed within 72 h.

2.4. Streaming Test

Streaming tests were performed on the infected tomato plant to diagnose the presence of R. solanacearum ooze. Stems of infected tomato plants were cut above the soil level; the cut surfaces were suspended in a test tube containing clean water, and it appeared as cloudy streaming down [16].

2.5. Media Preparation

The media were prepared as described by Schaad et al. [27]. Nutrient agar (NA), King’ B media (KB), and triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TZC) agar were prepared for culturing of Bacillus, Pseudomonas, and R. solanacearum, respectively. TZC media contain (g/L) casamino acid 1, peptone 10, and glucose 5, and for solid media, agar 17 was used for culturing of R. solanacearum. The media pH was adjusted to 6.5–7.0 using NaOH and HCl and sterilized at 121°C for 15 minutes. The media was cooled to 55°C; 5 mL of 0.5% filter sterilized TZC stock solution was added and poured into Petri plates to solidify.

2.6. Isolation of Ralstonia solanacearum

Isolation of R. solanacearum was performed as described by Kelman [28]. One gram of infected tomato root and stem samples was washed with tap water, sequentially surface sterilized using 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 70% ethanol, and rinsed repeatedly in sterile distilled water. Samples were then aseptically crushed using a mortar and pestle and suspended in 10 mL of sterile distilled water for 30 minutes. Then, 0.1 mL of the suspension was spread onto the TZC agar and incubated at 30°C for 36 h. Typical colonies of R. solanacearum were isolated and purified on NA and preserved in 20% glycerol for the subsequent tests. Identification of R. solanacearum was done based on colony characteristics on TZC agar plate, Gram reaction, motility tests, cytochrome oxidase test, and other several biochemical tests [28, 29]. Moreover, virulent R. solanacearum colonies were differentiated from avirulent strains based on colony characteristics.

2.6.1. Hypersensitivity Test

The hypersensitivity test was conducted to determine the ability of the isolates to induce a hypersensitivity reaction. A single colony of R. solanacearum showing virulent characteristics was cultured in the NA medium. Approximately, 10⁸ CFU/mL of freshly cultured bacterial suspensions was prepared using 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards. The suspension of R. solanacearum was injected into the interveinal or leaf node areas of Pelargonium zonale leaves and placed under greenhouse conditions at 26°C and relative humidity of 60% [30]. The collapse of the tissue after 48–72 h was recorded as a positive result. Groups of tomato plants that did not receive the bacterial suspension were used as negative controls.

2.6.2. Biovar Determination

Categorization of the R. solanacearum isolates into biovars levels was done based on the degradation of disaccharides (sucrose, lactose, and maltose) and hexose alcohols (mannitol, sorbitol, and dulcitol) [29, 31, 32]. Standard biovar test medium (basal medium) was prepared by adding (g/L) 1 NH₄H₂PO₄, 0.2 KCl, 0.2 MgSO₄.7H₂O, 1.0 bactopeptone, 3.0 agar, and 0.03 bromothymol blue into a final volume of 1 L of distilled water [27]. 10 mL of each of 10% solutions of dulcitol, mannitol, and sorbitol was separately added to conical flasks containing basal media. The mix was boiled, and the pH was adjusted to 7.0. Five mL of each mix was poured into test tubes and autoclaved at 121°C for 15 minutes. Similarly, 10 mL of each of the 10% filter sterilized lactose, maltose, and cellobiose solutions was separately added to sterilize and unsolidified basal media aseptically and mixed gently. Five mL solution of this mix was added into sterilized test tubes and allowed to solidify at room temperature. Fresh cultures of R. solanacearum isolates were inoculated and incubated at 30°C and for 2–5 days. Control groups were kept without bacterial inoculation. After incubation, the color change from olive green to orange (yellow) color was observed and recorded as a positive result.

2.7. Isolation of Rhizosphere Bacteria

Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from healthy tomato plants at a depth of 1–5 cm, as well as from highly tomato wilt infected farms. The samples were placed in polyethylene bags, maintained at 4°C, and transported to the Ambo Agricultural Research Center (AARC) bacteriology laboratory. One gram of sieved soil sample was added into test tubes containing 9 mL sterile distilled water and shaken with a vortex mixer for 5 minutes at 120 rpm. Then, ten-fold serial dilutions (from 10⁻¹ to 10⁻⁹) were prepared. A 0.1 mL of the suspension from 10⁻⁶ dilution (for Pseudomonas spp.) and 10⁻⁸ dilution (for Bacillus spp.) were spread on to King’ B and nutrient agar, respectively [33]. To be able to isolate spore-forming Bacillus spp., diluted samples were heat-treated (at 80°C) for 10 minutes to eliminate vegetative cells, nonspore-forming bacterial and fungal spores before dispensing them onto nutrient agar [34].

Finally, the plates were incubated at 30°C for 36 h. Distinct bacterial colonies were then transferred to nutrient broth (NB); repeated subculturing was done to obtain pure cultures, and the pure isolates were preserved at −20°C in 20% glycerol.

2.7.1. Identification of Rhizosphere Bacteria

Rhizosphere bacteria were identified based on colony morphology, Gram test, motility test, oxidase test, and other several biochemical tests as described in the literature [35–38].

2.8. Screening Antagonistic Potential of Rhizosphere Bacteria against R. solanacearum

Preliminary screening of the antagonistic effect of rhizosphere bacteria against R. solanacearum was done using the dual culture (cross-culture) method as described by Ganesan and Gnanamanickam [39]. In this method, the rhizosphere bacteria isolates were streaked across the Petri plates containing nutrient agar and incubated at 30°C for 4 days. Then, R. solanacearum cultures were streaked perpendicular to the rhizosphere bacteria isolates. The Petri dish inoculated with pathogen alone in the absence of the antagonist was serving as a control, and the experiment was done in triplicate. Isolates showing antagonistic effects (inhibition zones) against the tested pathogens were observed and selected for further experiments [40].

2.9. Evaluation of the Antagonistic Effects of Selected Rhizosphere Bacteria against R. solanacearum

Efficacy of the potential isolates against R. solanacearum was done by using the disc diffusion method [41]. The rhizosphere bacteria isolates were cultured on nutrient broth in conical flasks on a shaker and incubated at room temperature for 5 days. The culture was then centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was used to test the efficacy. R. solanacearum suspension of about 10⁸ CFU/mL was prepared using 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard and spread onto Mueller-Hinton agar using a cotton swap. Sterile 6 mm standardized paper disks were loaded with the supernatant and allowed to stay for 30 minutes. The discs were then placed on R. solanacearum cultured plates. The Petri dishes inoculated with the pathogen alone in the absence of the antagonist were used as negative controls, while cultures of B. subtilis were used as positive controls. Cultures were incubated at 30°C for 36 h, and the experiment was done in triplicate. After incubation, the radial growth inhibition of R. solanacearum was measured using a digital caliper.

2.10. Effect of Temperature, pH, and Salt on the Growth of Rhizosphere Bacteria Isolates

The effects of pH, NaCl, and temperature levels on the growth of Pseudomonas and Bacillus spp. were determined on basal nutrient broth media [42]. In the basal media, the desired NaCl concentrations and pH values were adjusted prior to autoclaving. The pH values were adjusted at 3, 5, 7, and 9; the NaCl concentrations at 2, 5, and 10%; and the temperature at 15, 25, 35, 45, and 80°C. An equal volume (0.1 mL) of the stock cultures of selected isolates was inoculated into each of the desired pH, NaCl, and temperature levels and incubated for 1–3 days. Before and after incubation, ten-fold serial dilutions (from 10⁻⁵–10⁻⁹) depending on the bacterial growth (cell turbidity) were prepared and bacterial colony counts were made on nutrient agar. The experiments were done in triplicate.

2.11. Data Analysis

The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20. Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) were used to present the inhibition zone due to each rhizosphere bacterial isolate against R. solanacearum. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Duncan’s multiple range test was used to compare the means of the three replications of inhibition zones of rhizosphere bacteria with a level of significance considered as ≤ 0.05. The results are given in tables.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Virulent Strains of R. solanacearum

A total of 36 bacterial colonies were isolated from the samples collected from wilted tomato plants, out of which 7 isolates exhibited the characteristic feature of R. solanacearum colony (Table 1, Figure 1). Virulent R. solanacearum colonies (large irregular shaped, fluidal and opaque colonies, white to cream color, slimy to pink or red color in the center, and elevated) were then differentiated from the avirulent strains (smaller, off-white, dark red margin, and nonfluidal or less fluidal colonies) on TZC agar media [28]. All of the 7 isolates possessed cultural features of virulent R. solanacearum [16, 28, 29, 43] (Additional file 1).

3.2. Hypersensitivity Test of R. solanacearum

Except isolates designated as RS1 and RS 13, all others showed localized cell necrosis and distinct color changes at the spreading edge on the leaves of Pelargonium zonale after 48 and 72 h of injection. There was variation in the extent of the reaction (from heavy to collapse of infiltrating areas) between the five isolates (Table 1). Isolates RS3 and RS7 were relatively more virulent and caused collapse after 72 h of inoculation.

3.3. Identification of R. solanacearum Using the Biochemical Test

All the tested isolates had similar test results on the tested parameters except H₂S production, where only two isolates produced H₂S gas (Additional file 1).

3.4. Differentiation of R. solanacearum into Biovars

Change of the initial olive green media to yellow color indicates the ability of inoculated isolates to digest the given substrate. Accordingly, all the tested isolates were set to biovar III (Additional file 1).

3.5. Identification of Rhizosphere Bacteria

A total of 57 bacteria were isolated from healthy tomato rhizosphere soil. Fourteen isolates demonstrated antagonistic activity against R. solanacearum. The 14 isolates were identified based on different colony characteristics on King’ B media or nutrient agar and biochemical tests (Additional files 2(a)–2(c)). Eight of the 14 isolates were tentatively identified as Pseudomonas spp., while the rest were as Bacillus spp. (Additional file 2(b)).

3.6. In Vitro Evaluation of Antagonistic Activity of Rhizosphere Bacteria against R. solanacearum

R. solanacearum isolate designated as RS3 was selected for this test. The antagonistic activity of the 14 isolates is given in Table 2 and Figure 2. The observed radial inhibition zone for the isolates ranged 7–14.66 mm, and there were significant variations in the mean diameter of the inhibition zones ( < 0.05). Isolates designated as P6 (14.66 mm), B28 (13.33 mm), P23 (12.33 mm), B1 (12.33 mm), P5 (12 mm), P2 (11.33 mm), B13 (11.33 mm), and P7 (11 mm) have shown better performances to inhibit the growth of R. solanacearum in vitro. The maximum zone of inhibition (14.66 mm) was recorded by isolate P6, which was significantly higher even from the positive control.

3.7. Effects of Temperature, pH, and NaCl Levels on the Growth of Selected Rhizosphere Bacteria Isolates

The growth of eight isolates showing high antagonistic activity against R. solanacearum was observed at different levels of temperature, pH, and NaCl concentration, and all of them grew at temperatures ranging 15–45°C, pH values 5–9, and NaCl concentrations 2–5% (Table 3). The selected three Bacillus spp. grew at all conditions except at pH 3. However, the five selected Pseudomonas spp. did not grow at the highest values of temperature and pH (80°C and pH 10), but most (4 out of 5) grew at pH 3 as well (Table 3).

4. Discussion

Globally, tomato production provides nutritional, economical, and health benefits to the wider society. However, its productivity has always been challenged by several factors including bacterial wilt, a disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. This study aims to contribute scientific information to the continued efforts addressing the potential use of indigenous (rhizosphere) bacteria to control bacterial wilt disease of tomatoes. Accordingly, virulent R. solanacearum (from wilted tomato plants) and antagonistic bacteria (from the rhizosphere of healthy tomato plants) were isolated from tomato farms in central Ethiopia. The antagonistic activities of the rhizobacteria were tested against the virulent R. solanacearum isolated.

All isolated R. solanacearum showed more or less similar characteristics, except for some colony features and H₂S production. Variations among strains of R. solanacearum in the production of H₂S were also reported [16]. Such physiological differences may have a direct influence on the pathogenicity potential among strains of R. solanacearum. In addition, all R. solanacearum isolates were found to be biovar III type. In line with this, biovar III types were reported as the major causative agent of tomato wilt [44, 45]. R. solanacearum isolated in this study also showed a variable degree of hypersensitivity reaction (Table 1). Pathogenicity variations among virulent strains of R. solanacearum were also reported by Popoola et al. [43] and Seleim et al. [46]. Environmental drivers (factors) could be the causes for the emergence of genetically diverse types among strains.

The isolated rhizobacteria were closely related to Pseudomonas and Bacillus species based on biochemical and cultural characteristics (Additional files 2(a)–2(c)). A number of previous studies also documented several members of Pseudomonas and Bacillus species having antagonistic activities against R. solanacearum [21, 47, 48]. Bacillus and Pseudomonas species are well-known bacterial antagonists that have the ability to suppress the growth of bacterial phytopathogens including R. solanacearum [49]. Various species of antagonistic rhizobacteria, such as Bacillus cereus, B. subtilis, Paenibacillus macerans, Serratia marcescens, B. pumilus, Pseudomonas putida, and P. fluorescens against bacterial wilt, were isolated from rhizosphere soil samples collected from potato and tomato in Ethiopia [21, 23, 24]. Moreover, the potential use of Pseudomonas strains to develop active biocontrol against tomato bacterial wilt is documented in several studies. Pseudomonas is known to possess many traits that make them well suited as biocontrol and growth-promoting agents [50, 51]. Several Pseudomonas species were reported to be effective against a broad spectrum of plant pathogens [52]. A study by Mohammed et al. [53] showed that Pseudomonas species, which were isolated from the rhizospheres of tomato plants, had significantly reduced the incidence of bacterial wilt and promoted the growth of tomatoes. Regarding Bacillus spp., they have also been frequently isolated from the rhizosphere of tomato plants and found to possess antagonistic activity for several plant pathogens [45, 54]. Cao et al. [55] reported Bacillus species isolated from rhizosphere soil of tomatoes, which possessed strong antagonistic ability against R. solanacearum. Furthermore, another study in Nigeria by Akintokum et al. [56] demonstrated the effectiveness of Bacillus spp. against R. solanacearum in a greenhouse condition.

In this study, comparable antagonistic activities to the positive controls were recorded from 5 isolates (3 Pseudomonas and 2 Bacillus spp.). Even, a higher inhibition zone (14.67 mm) was recorded by a Pseudomonas isolate compared to the positive control (12.67 mm). A similar study by Huang et al. [57] reported inhibition zones ranging from 11.2 to 15.2 mm for bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of healthy tomatoes. A higher inhibition zone (up to 30.5 mm) was also recorded by bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of diseased tomatoes further ascertaining that the rhizosphere of healthy as well as wilted tomatoes are important sources of antagonistic bacteria against R. solanacearum.

The rhizobacteria isolated in this study exhibited variable optima in terms of temperature, pH, and salt levels. However, all of the isolates could grow in a wide range of temperature (15–45°C), pH values (5–9), and NaCl concentrations (2–5%), which are important features in terms of field application. Particularly, the Bacillus spp. grew at all conditions, except at pH 3, showing its high elasticity in terms of the tested environmental parameters. Similarly, Chari et al. [47] documented abiotic stress-tolerant plant growth-promoting Bacillus spp. isolated from different rhizospheric soils. The five selected Pseudomonas spp. in this study did not grow at the highest values of temperature and pH (80°C and pH 10), but most of them could tolerate pH 3, implying that they can be good candidates of biocontrol agents in acidic soils.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study extend the knowledge that the rhizosphere of the host plant can be an important source of antagonistic microorganisms against pathogenic bacterial plant diseases. Among the rhizobacteria, members of Bacillus and Pseudomonas species have been potential antagonistic bacteria against plant diseases, such as R. solanacearum. In this study, the isolated antagonistic rhizobacteria against R. solanacearum were identified as Bacillus or Pseudomonas species. The isolates demonstrated strong activity against R. solanacearum showing their potential use as a biocontrol agent against this tomato bacterial wilt [58]. Studies at greenhouse and field levels and strain-level identification of the isolates are required to get insights into the real application of the isolates in protecting the tomato field from such devastating pathogens.

Data Availability

The data generated or analyzed during this study are included within this article and its additional files.

Disclosure

The funding body does not have any role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

TG and SY conducted the experiment. BS prepared the manuscript. All authors conceived and designed the study and edited, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Bahir Dar University and is highly acknowledged. The authors also acknowledge Ambo Agricultural Research Center for hosting experimental works and providing reference bacterial strains.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1: characterization of R. solanacearum isolated from the wilted tomato plants, central Ethiopia, 2021. Additional file 2a: morphological characterizations of isolated bacteria from healthy tomato rhizosphere, central Ethiopia, 2021. Additional file 2b: biochemical characterization of the isolated bacteria from healthy tomato rhizosphere, central Ethiopia, 2021. Additional file 2c: characterization of the bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of healthy tomato plant against the different carbohydrate utilization, central Ethiopia, 2021. (Supplementary Materials)

References

R. Srinivasan, Safer Tomato Production Techniques: A Field Guide for Soil Fertility and Pest Management, AVRDC-World Vegetable Center, Tainan City, Taiwan, vol. 10, 2010.
F. AO, World Food and Agriculture Statistical Yearbook, FAO-Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, Rome, Italy, 2020.
L. Desalegne, Y. Zewdie, and E. Herath, Varietal Development on Vegetables, National Horticultural Research of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 1994.
A. A. Kader and R. S. Rolle, The Role of Post-Harvest Management in Assuring the Quality and Safety of Horticultural Produce, Food and Agriculture Org, Rome, Italy, vol. 152, 2004.
E. Giovannucci, “Tomatoes, tomato-based products, lycopene, and cancer: review of the epidemiologic literature,” JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 317–331, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Yin, S. H. Hulbert, K. L. Schroeder et al., “Role of bacterial communities in the natural suppression of Rhizoctonia solani bare patch disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.),” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 79, no. 23, pp. 7428–7438, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Lemma and E. Herath, “Varietal development of vegetables,” in Proceedings of the Second National Horticultural Workshop in Ethiopia, pp. 1–3, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, December 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Wicker, L. Grassart, R. Coranson-Beaudu et al., “Ralstonia solanacearum strains from Martinique (French West Indies) exhibiting a new pathogenic potential,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 21, pp. 6790–6801, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Norman, M. Zapata, D. W. Gabriel et al., “Genetic diversity and host range variation of Ralstonia solanacearum strains entering North America,” The American Phytopathological Society, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1070–1077, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Mansfield, S. Genin, S. Magori et al., “Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 614–629, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Ji, M. T. Momol, S. M. Olson, P. M. Pradhanang, and J. B. Jones, “Evaluation of thymol as biofumigant for control of bacterial wilt of tomato under field conditions,” Plant Disease, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 497–500, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Yabuuchi, Y. Kosako, I. Yano, H. Hotta, and Y. Nishiuchi, “Transfer of two Burkholderia and an Alcaligenes species to Ralstonia gen. nov.: proposal of Ralstonia pickettii (Ralston, Palleroni and Doudoroff 1973) comb. nov., Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith 1896) comb. nov. and Ralstonia eutropha (Davis 1969) comb,” Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 897–904, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Hayward, “Ralstonia solanacearum,” Encyclopedia of Microbiology, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 32–42, 2nd edition, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Edwards-Jones, “Do benefits accrue to “pest control” or “pesticides?”: a comment on Cooper and Dobson,” Crop Protection, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 965–967, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nguyen and S. Ranamukhaarachchi, “Soil-borne antagonists for biological control of bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato and pepper,” Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 395–405, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Chaudhry and H. Rashid, “Isolation and characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum from infected tomato plants of Soan Skesar valley of Punjab,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 2979–2985, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Gerhardson, “Biological substitutes for pesticides,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 338–343, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Pradhanang, P. Ji, M. T. Momol, S. M. Olson, J. L. Mayfield, and J. B. Jones, “Application of acibenzolar-S-methyl enhances host resistance in tomato against Ralstonia solanacearum,” Plant Disease, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 989–993, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sharma, V. D. Diwevidi, S. Singh et al., “Biological control and its important in agriculture,” International Journal of Biotechnology and Bioengineering Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 175–180, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Kurabachew and K. Wydra, “Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their potential as bioprotectant against tomato bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum,” Biological Control, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 75–83, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Hayat, S. Ali, U. Amara, R. Khalid, and I. Ahmed, “Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 579–598, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. B. Stewart and D. Yiroou, “Index of plant diseases in Ethiopia,” Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin, College of Agriculture, Haile Selassie I University, vol. 30, no. 95, p. 335, 1967.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Lemessa and W. Zeller, “Isolation and characterisation of Ralstonia solanacearum strains from Solanaceae crops in Ethiopia,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 40–49, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kuarabachew, A. Fasil, and H. Yaynu, “Evaluation of Ethiopian isolates of Pseudomonas fluorescens as biocontrol agent against potato bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia (Pseudomonas) solanacearum,” Acta Agriculturae Slovenica, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 125–135, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Subash, B. Kushnappa, A. Dhanasekaran, and A. Afiya, “Changes on physio-chemical properties of soil in agricultural land in Ambo-Guder Watershed, Ambo, Ethiopia–A case study,” International Journal of Civil Engineering & Technology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 667–675, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. C. Vanitha, S. R. Niranjana, C. N. Mortensen, and S. Umesha, “Bacterial wilt of tomato in Karnataka and its management by Pseudomonas fluorescens,” Biocontrol, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 685–695, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. W. Schaad, J. B. Jones, and W. Chun, Laboratory Guide for the Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, American Phytopathological Society (APS Press), St. Paul, MN, USA, 2001.
A. Kelman, “The relationship of pathogenicity of Pseudomonas solanacearum to colony appearance in a tetrazolium medium,” Phytopathology, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 693–695, 1954.
View at: Google Scholar
A. C. Hayward, “Characteristics of Pseudomonas solanacearum,” Journal of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 265–277, 1964.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Horita and K. Tsuchiya, “Genetic diversity of Japanese strains of Ralstonia solanacearum,” Phytopathology, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 399–407, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Eppo, “European and mediterranean plant protection organization,” Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, vol. 27, pp. 643-644, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Y. He, L. Sequeira, and A. Kelman, “Characteristics of strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum from China,” Plant Disease, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 1357–1361, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. O. King, M. K. Ward, and D. E. Raney, “Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin,” The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 301–307, 1954.
View at: Google Scholar
E. B. Ricker, H. A. S. Aljaafari, T. M. Bader, B. S. Hundley, and E. Nuxoll, “Thermal shock susceptibility and regrowth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms,” International Journal of Hyperthermia, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 168–176, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Garrity, Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology: Volume 2: The Proteobacteria, Part B: The Gammaproteobacteria, Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, Germany, vol. 2, 2007.
J. G. Holt, N. R. Krieg, and P. H. Sneath, Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacterology, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2013.
W. Ludwig, K.-H. Schleifer, and W. B. Whitman, Revised Road Map to the Phylum Firmicutes Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2009.
A. S. Kashyap, D. Singh, A. Kumar Kesharwani, and R. P. Singh, “Characterization of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolated from chilli rhizosphere of southern plateau and hills region,” International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 3473–3483, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Ganesan and S. S. Gnanamanickam, “Biological control of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. in peanut by inoculation with Pseudomonas fluorescens,” Soil Biology and Biochemistry, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 35–38, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Kashyap, N. Manzar, M. V. S. Rajawat et al., “Screening and biocontrol potential of rhizobacteria native to gangetic plains and hilly regions to induce systemic resistance and promote plant growth in chilli against bacterial wilt disease,” Plants, vol. 10, no. 10, Article ID 2125, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hudzicki, Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
H. K. Gulati, B. S. Chadha, and H. S. Saini, “Production and characterization of thermostable alkaline phytase from Bacillus laevolacticus isolated from rhizosphere soil,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Popoola, S. Ganiyu, O. Enikuomehin et al., “Isolation and characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum causing bacterial wilt of tomato in Nigeria,” Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Begum, M. I. Haque, T. Mukhtar, S. M. Naqvi, and J. F. Wang, “Status of bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in Pakistan,” Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Singh, D. Yadav, S. Sinha, and B. Upadhyay, “Utilization of plant growth promoting Bacillus subtilis isolates for the management of bacterial wilt incidence in tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum race 1 biovar 3,” Indian Phytopathology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. A. Seleim, F. A. Saead, K. M. H. Abd-El-Mon, and K. A. M. Abo-ELyous, “Biological control of bacterial wilt of tomato by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria,” Plant Pathology Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 146–153, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. D. Chari, R. S. Reddy, S. Triveni, N. Trimurtulu, C. V. Durga Rani, and M. Sreedhar, “Isolation and characterization of abiotic stress tolerant plant growth promoting Bacillus spp. from different rhizospheric soils of Telangana,” Biosciences, Biotechnology Research Asia, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 485–494, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Kipgen, L. C. Bora, G. Goswami, M. Barooah, P. K. Borah, and K. C. Puzari, “Isolation and characterization of fluorescent Pseudomonas with bio-control potential against Ralstonia solanacearum,” Indian Phytopathology, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 1055–1064, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Ramesh and G. S. Phadke, “Rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria for the suppression of eggplant wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum,” Crop Protection, vol. 37, pp. 35–41, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Weller, “Pseudomonas biocontrol agents of soilborne pathogens: looking back over 30 years,” Phytopathology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 250–256, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Kashyap, N. Manzar, S. M. Nebapure et al., “Unraveling microbial volatile elicitors using a transparent methodology for induction of systemic resistance and regulation of antioxidant genes at expression levels in chili against bacterial wilt disease,” Antioxidants, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 404, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. B. McSpadden Gardener, “Diversity and ecology of biocontrol Pseudomonas spp. in agricultural systems,” Phytopathology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 221–226, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. F. Mohammed, A. R. Oloyede, and A. O. Odeseye, “Biological control of bacterial wilt of tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum using Pseudomonas species isolated from the rhizosphere of tomato plants,” Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, vol. 53, no. 1-2, pp. 1–16, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Saputra, T. Arwiyanto, and A. Wibowo, “Antagonistic activity and identification of some isolates of Bacillus spp. against bacterial wilt diseases (Ralstonia solanacearum) in some varieties of tomato,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Masyarakat Biodiversitas Indonesia, vol. 1, no. 5, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Cao, Z. Zhang, N. Ling et al., “Bacillus subtilis SQR 9 can control Fusarium wilt in cucumber by colonizing plant roots,” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 495–506, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Akintokun, C. O. Ojesola, P. O. Akintokun, and A. R. Oloyede, “Antagonistic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill),” Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 94–102, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Huang, Z. Wei, S. Tan et al., “The rhizosphere soil of diseased tomato plants as a source for novel microorganisms to control bacterial wilt,” Applied Soil Ecology, vol. 72, pp. 79–84, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Singh, A. S. Kashyap, A. K. Kesharwani, and S. Tomar, “Biointensive management for soil borne diseases in cucurbitaceous crops. Bio-intensive approaches (applications and effectiveness in plant disease management) edition,” Biointensive Management for Soil Borne Diseases in Cucurbitaceous Crops, Today and Tomorrow’s Printers and Publishers, New Delhi, India, 1st edition, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Tsigie Gashaw et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1145

Downloads

941

Citations