Table 3
The loadings and the scores for the first three rotated principal components.
| | Loadings | Scores | | [M–H]− | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | Sample number | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 |
| Aa | 213 | 0.369 | 0.204 | 0.881 | 1 | −0.815 | −0.509 | −0.424 | 217 | 0.288 | 0.313 | −0.186 | 2 | 2.601 | 0.080 | −1.040 | 219 | 0.785 | 0.284 | 0.505 | 3 | −0.517 | −0.796 | 0.465 | 229 | 0.276 | −0.082 | 0.944 | 4 | 0.322 | −0.553 | 0.069 | 245 | 0.604 | 0.214 | 0.668 | 5 | −0.366 | −0.416 | 0.076 | 249 | 0.948 | 0.166 | 0.208 | 6 | 0.979 | −0.282 | 3.289 | 261 | 0.774 | 0.394 | 0.385 | 7 | 1.163 | −0.454 | 0.784 | 263 | 0.914 | 0.154 | 0.255 | 8 | −0.809 | −0.796 | −0.608 | 265 | 0.892 | 0.259 | 0.312 | 9 | −0.014 | −0.823 | 0.381 | 279 | 0.912 | 0.207 | 0.269 | 10 | 0.011 | −0.542 | 1.410 | 295 | 0.861 | 0.289 | 0.35 | 11 | −1.280 | 0.620 | −0.498 | 311 | 0.838 | 0.331 | 0.379 | 12 | −0.484 | −0.508 | −0.076 | 313 | 0.941 | 0.207 | 0.115 | 13 | −0.806 | 0.929 | −0.510 | 314 | 0.944 | 0.254 | 0.072 | 14 | 0.684 | −0.222 | 1.563 | 329 | 0.703 | 0.164 | 0.259 | 15 | −0.407 | −0.676 | −0.343 |
| Bb | 253 | 0.434 | 0.678 | 0.321 | 16 | 0.864 | 0.101 | 0.168 | 255 | 0.050 | 0.760 | −0.096 | 17 | −0.785 | 0.286 | −0.419 | 269 | 0.390 | 0.652 | 0.175 | 18 | 1.384 | −0.364 | −0.742 | 271 | 0.089 | 0.742 | 0.284 | 19 | −1.438 | 0.040 | −0.618 | 283 | 0.615 | 0.508 | 0.154 | 20 | −0.799 | −0.866 | −0.424 | 247 | 0.890 | 0.129 | 0.320 | 21 | 0.371 | −0.746 | −0.318 | 303 | 0.574 | 0.718 | 0.317 | 22 | −0.647 | 0.805 | −0.018 | 267 | 0.772 | 0.446 | 0.295 | 23 | −0.675 | 0.732 | −0.481 | 285 | 0.449 | 0.482 | 0.414 | 24 | 1.967 | −0.363 | −1.688 |
|
|
Bold fonts indicate high correlation; athe most abundant ions for SDAPCI-MS fingerprints of samples in this study; bsome abundant ions of fingerprints of propolis samples by other MS methods (Pietta et al., [1] 2002; Sawaya et al., 2004 [27]).
|