Research Article

Stability-Indicating HPLC Determination of Gemcitabine in Pharmaceutical Formulations

Table 8

Comparison between analytical methods.

S. numberAnalytical method (reference)DrugsColumnDetection ()Silent features and advantages.Disadvantage

1HPLC-PDA (Jansen et al., 2000) [3]Gemcitabine Zorbax C-8 (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm)275 nmSensitive, simple method applicable for separation of drug and degraded products. Degradated products were identified using spectroscopy.Gradient elution. Only the degradated products of acidic stress studies were separated. Run time: 20 min.

2HPLC (Rao et al., 2007) [6]Gemcitabine ODS column (5 µm, 4.6 × 250 mm)234 nmLinearity range: 1–300 µg/mL.High organic waste (70% acetonitrile). Stability studies not performed.

3HPLC (Xu et al., 2014) [7]Gemcitabine and curcuminPhenomenex C-18 (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm)270 nm (Gem.); 420 nm (curcumin)LOD: 0.012 µg/mL LOQ: 0.038 µg/mL.
Linearity range: 0.038–1.5 µg/mL.
Sensitive, accurate, and precise method, developed using design of experiment.
Gradient elution, narrow range of linearity, run time: 15 min. Nonstability indicating method (effect of pH and oxidation, exposure to sunlight or UV light, was not studied).

4HPLC (Mastanamma et al., 2010) [11]GemcitabineC-18 (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm)270 nmLinearity range: 10–60 µg/mL. Simple and rapid stability indicating method.Organic waste (40%, methanol) and low sensitivity.

5HPLC (Kudikala et al., 2014) [12] GemcitabineEnable C18G column (5 µm, 4.6 × 250 mm)285 nmLOQ: 1 µg/mL. Linearity range: 1–45 µg/mL. Simple stability indicating method.Hydrolytic (aq.) and oxidative degraded products not studied. Gemcitabine shows high tailing factor.

6HPLC (Devanaboyina et al., 2014) [13]GemcitabineKromasil (5 µm, 4.6 × 150 mm)247 nmLinearity range: 50–300 µg/mL.High organic waste (30% acetonitrile). Stability studies not performed.

7HPLC (Rajesh et al., 2011) [10]Gemcitabine CapecitabineIntersil 3, C-18 column (5 µm, 4.6 × 150 mm)260 nmLinearity range: 10–50 µg/mL.High organic waste (70% acetonitrile). Stability studies not studied.

8HPLC (Lanz et al., 2007) [14]GemcitabineC18 (3 µm particle size, 4.6 mm × 100 mm)276 nmLOQ: 0.02 µg/mL.
Linearity range: 0.02–20 µg/mL.
Sensitive method for analysis of drug in plasma and serum.
Gradient elution, run time: 17 min. Applicable only for serum and plasma samples. Effect of pH, oxidation, or light on stability of raw material/formulation is not studied.

9LC-MS-MS (Nussbaumer et al., 2010) [28]Gemcitabine and other anticancer drugsMass spectrometry (MS-MS)LOQ: 0.25.
Linearity range: 0.25–2 ng/mL.
Sensitive, simple method applicable for detection of several drugs.
Lower accuracy (85–110%) and precision (15%). Applicable for bioequivalence and pharmacokinetic studies where 15% precision is permitted. Gradient elution, run time: 21 min.

10HPTLC (Borisagar et al., 2012) [5]Gemcitabine268 nmLinearity range: 500–3000 ng/spot.
Rapid HPTLC method for analysis. Stability indicating method.

11Proposed HPLC method GemcitabinePhenomenex Luna C-18 column (5 µm, 4.6 × 250 mm)275 nmLOD: 0.15 µg/mL. Linearity ranges from 0.5 to 50 µg/mL.
Isocratic, economical (less organic waste), efficient stability indicating method. Capable of separating different hydrolytic and oxidative products of drug which can be estimated separately. Symmetrical peak shape.
Degraded products are separated but not quantized.