Research Article
TEMPO-Functionalized Nanoporous Au Nanocomposite for the Electrochemical Detection of H2O2
Table 1
Comparison of recent Au nanomaterials and nitroxide derivatives for H2O2 detection.
| Electrode design | L. R. (M) | D.L. (μM) | Stability | Reference |
| HRP/Cys/AuNP/ITO | 8.0×10~3.0×10 | 2.00 | 83% (12 weeks) | [6] | HRP/CaCO3-AuNPs/ATP/Au | 5.0×10~5.2×10 | 0.10 | 96.4% (30 days) | [36] | HRP-nano-Au | 1.2×10~1.1×10 | 6.10 | 75% (5 weeks) | [37] | HRP/AuNPs/poly(St-co-AA) | 8.0×10~7.0×10 | 4.00 | 97.8 % (60 days) | [38] | Au/CeO2 nanocomposite | 0~3.0×10 | 5.00 | - - - | [9] | AuNPs-N-GQDs/GC | 2.5×10~1.3×10 | 0.12 | 89%, 3 weeks | [10] | Poly(BCB)/Au-NPs/GCE | 6.0×10~1.0×10 | 0.23 | 95 %(2 week) | [39] | GC/MTMOS-Au73Ag27 | 1.0×10~7.0×10 | 1.00 | - - - | [40] | Hb/Au nanoflowers/CNTs/GCE | 1.0×10~6.0×10 | 7.30 | - - - | [41] | TEMPO/GCE | 1.0×10~1.0×10 | 0.05 | 100%,3 months | [22] | ChOx/TEMPO/GCE | 2×10~ 2.5 ×10 | 20.0 | - - - | [23] | TEMPO-MA-np-AuNPs/GCE | 2.5×10~5.0×10 | 0.78 | 98.6%(30 days) | This work |
|
|