Lipid Profiles Obtained from MALDI Mass Spectrometric Imaging in Liver Cancer Metastasis Model

Kwon, Hee Jung; Oh, Joo Yeon; Lee, Kwang Seon; Lim, Hyun Kyung; Lee, Jisun; Yoon, Hye-Ran; Jung, Joohee

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6007158

International Journal of Analytical Chemistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 6007158 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6007158

Lipid Profiles Obtained from MALDI Mass Spectrometric Imaging in Liver Cancer Metastasis Model

Hee Jung Kwon,^1,2Joo Yeon Oh,³Kwang Seon Lee,³Hyun Kyung Lim,^1,2Jisun Lee,¹Hye-Ran Yoon,¹and Joohee Jung^1,2

Academic Editor: Charles Wilkins

Received04 May 2022

Revised30 Sept 2022

Accepted12 Oct 2022

Published27 Oct 2022

Abstract

Liver cancer metastasis is known to be a poor prognosis and a leading cause of mortality. To overcome low therapeutic efficacy, understanding the physiological properties of liver cancer metastasis is required. However, the metastatic lesion is heterogeneous and complex. We investigate the distribution of lipids using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) in an experimental metastasis model. We obtained the differentially expressed mass peaks in comparison between normal sites and metastatic lesions. The relationship of mass to charge ratio (m/z) and intensity were measured, m/z-indicated species were analyzed by MALDI-MS/MS analysis, and identification of these mass species was confirmed using the METASPACEannotation platform and Lipid Maps®. MALDI-MSI at m/z 725.6, 734.6, 735.6, 741.6, 742.6, 744.6, 756.6, and 772.6 showed significantly higher intensity, consistent with the metastatic lesions in hematoxylin-stained tissues. Sphingomyelin SM [d18:0/16:1], phosphatidylcholine (PC) [32:0], PC [31:0], PC [31:1], and PE [36:2] were highly expressed in metastatic lesions. Our results could provide information for understanding metastatic lesions. It suggests that the found lipids could be a biomarker for the diagnosis of metastatic lesions.

1. Introduction

Liver cancer is common and is a leading cause of mortality worldwide [1] and in South Korea [2]. Liver cancer metastasis is one of the causes of death in patients with liver cancer and shows in the lungs, portal vein, and portal lymph nodes [3]. To develop a strategy for liver cancer treatment, an understanding of the liver cancer progression is required. However, heterogeneous cancer is complex. In addition, the microenvironment of liver cancer plays a key role in cancer progression [4]. To explicate the properties of liver cancer, histological, and cytopathological investigation were performed using biomarkers by specialists. Thus, many researchers investigate to figure out the biomarker and elucidate the relationship of the biomarker to liver cancer progression. Nevertheless, it is an unmet need in the liver cancer field.

Various analytical methods have been applied to cancer research. One of them, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-mass spectrometric imaging (MSI) is a powerful technique for showing molecular distributions in tissue sections. MALDI-MSI reveals the profiles of peptides, lipids, or metabolites onto tissue slides [5]. A recent report suggests that this method could analyze the chemical communication between tissues and cells [6]. Especially, lipid profiles using MALDI-MSI were investigated in colorectal cancer metastasis [7] and metastatic breast cancer [8] as well as primary cancers. However, the lipid distribution in liver cancer metastasis was not reported. In this study, we observed the lipid profiles in the liver cancer metastatic model using MALDI-MSI.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Cultures

SK-Hep1_Luc cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA) including 10% fetal bovine serum (GW Vitek, Seoul, Korea) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (GenDEPOT, TX, USA). The cells were incubated in a 5% CO₂ incubator at 37°C.

2.2. Liver Cancer Metastasis Animal Model

The animal experiment was performed following the protocol approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Duksung Women’s University (2019-003-009). Extremely immune-deficient (NRGA) mice (male, 5-week-old) were purchased from JA BIO (Suwon, Korea). Mice were acclimatized for 1 week before the experiment. One million SK-Hep1_Luc cells were intravenously injected into the mice [9]. For monitoring, D-luciferin (PerkinElmer, EU) was intraperitoneally injected into the metastasis animal model and the luminescence was detected by an in vivo imaging system (VISQUE in vivo Elite, Vieworks, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) [10].

2.3. Tissue Preparation

At 30 days after transplantation, mouse liver tissues were isolated. The tissues embedded into the OCT compound (Leica FCS22, Nussloch, Germany) were cut into a 10 μm-thick section using a cryotome (Leica CM1520, Leica). Tissue sections were applied to indium tin oxide (ITO) coated slides. For the histological analysis of tissue sections, tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin (H staining) and observed using a microscope (Leica).

2.4. MALDI-MSI Analysis

Tissue sections were washed with ethanol and dried in a vacuum desiccator. The MALDI matrix at 1.1 mL DHB was used per tissue sample using a spraying device (ImagePrep, Bruker Daltonics, Inc., Bremen, Germany). MALDI-MSI was acquired with MALDI-time of flight (TOF)-based mass spectrometer (IDSys Premier, ASTA Inc., Korea) [11] detecting positive ions in a mass range between m/z 600 and m/z 1,500 with 50 μm of the spatial solution, 50 shots per pixel, and 1 kHz laser frequency. MSIviewer (ASTA Inc.) was used to acquire mass imaging and spectra of the region of interest. Identification of ions in specific lesions was analyzed in MS/MS and searched by the MassBank of North America database (MoNa, https://mona.firehnlab.ucdavis.edu), Lipid Maps® (https://lipidmaps.org), and METASPACE annotation platform (https://metaspace2020.eu).

2.5. Statistics

The intensity of metastasis and normal tissues was compared and represented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was calculated by Student’s t-test. A probability value of <0.005 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Imaging of Liver Cancer Metastasis

To observe lipid profiles in metastasis, the liver cancer metastasis was produced by the experimental metastasis models. We monitored metastasis using the in vivo imaging system. Human liver cancer SK-Hep1 cells got mainly settled in mouse liver (Figure 1(a), red box). The liver cancer metastasis could be observed in the isolated mouse liver tissues (Figure 1(b), black arrows). Our result of the experimental metastasis model mimicked how liver cancer cells induce metastasis in patients. Metastatic lesions in our model were similar to sites of metastasis in liver cancer patients [3].

(a)

(b)

3.2. Lipid Profiles of Metastatic Lesions and Normal Tissues

The spectrum of MALDI-MS analysis in liver tissues obtained from the liver cancer metastasis model is shown in Figure 2. Intensity (y-axis) represented the average in each m/z value. Metastatic lesions showed higher intensity than normal tissues between m/z 700 and m/z 800. The range of molecular weight from 700 to 800 is composed of sphingomyelin (SM) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) [12]. Our results also demonstrated that common daughter ion m/z 184 (phosphocholine as the fragment of SM and PC) was detected by MALDI-MSI and UHPLC-MS/MS (Supplementary Figure 1). To select and identify m/z species, the ratio of the metastatic lesions and normal tissues (M/N ratio) was calculated. The M/N ratio was summarized in Table 1. The lists showed that the M/N ratio is over 2.5 or below 0.5 with . To identify these mass species, open access database (MoNa, Lipid Maps®, and Metaspace annotation platform) was utilized. The expected formulas of these masses are shown in Table 1.

The spectrum of molecular species is in the m/z 700∼850 range. Four slides of each sample were determined by MALDI-MS. Five spots per slide were selected.

Eight m/z showed higher intensity in metastatic lesions than in normal tissues and three m/z decreased intensity. As shown in Figure 3, MALDI-MSI was correlated with H-stained histological images. Selected mass species showed remarkable differences in MALDI-MSI (Figure 3(a)). Red or yellow spots represented high intensity coincided with the metastatic lesions observed in the H-stained tissue section. On the other hand, m/z 796.6, 844.7, and 845.7 showed a small ratio (M/N). Blue spots were observed in the metastatic lesions (Figure 3(b)).

(a)

(b)

3.3. Sphingomyelins and Phosphatidylcholines as Biomarkers of Liver Cancer Metastasis

The large M/N ratio was selected and analyzed to identify these species using MALDI-MS/MS (Table 2). Analyzed MS/MS data were compared with mass spectrum in the MoNA database, Lipid Maps®, and METASPACE annotation platform. We figured out five expected lipids of mass species: SM [d18:0/16:1], PC [32:0], PC [31:1], PC [31:0], and PE [36:2]. Interestingly, SM[d18:0/16:1] and PC [32:0] were observed in the formula of sodium salt (Na⁺) and potassium salt (K⁺).

Sphingolipids control the signaling for fundamental cellular processes in various cancer [13]. Sphingosine as a backbone of sphingolipids is metabolized to ceramide, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), SM, and so on [14]. Especially, the balance of S1P and C18-ceramide regulates cancer cell survival [15]. SM is well known to inhibit apoptosis and induce proliferation [16]. Thus, SM plays a key role in cancer progression [17]. Our results indicated that SM [d18:1/16:0] was remarkable in liver cancer metastatic lesions. The high intensity of m/z 741.6 (SM [d18:1/16:0]) also shows in thyroid papillary cancer [18], HER2-positive breast cancer [19], and gastric cancer [20]. However, the expression of SM [d18:1/16:0] is low in prostate cancer [21]. In addition, the high intensity of m/z 725.6 (SM) shows in lung cancer [22].

PC and its metabolites regulate proliferation, survival, migration, and drug resistance [23]. Thus, the regulation of phospholipid metabolism is a good target for cancer treatment [24]. Six breast cancer cell lines show different levels of PCs. PC [32:0] is commonly observed in the breast, lung, colorectal, esophageal, gastric, and thyroid cancer [25]. Lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells and PC9 cells also show the expression of PC[32:0] [26].

The mainly observed two lipids in liver cancer metastasis, SM [d18:1/16:0] and PC [32:0] indicate different aspects in several cancers compared with normal cells. These lipids are considered to contribute to liver cancer progression. In this study, our results firstly reveal that these lipid molecules are significantly expressed in liver cancer metastasis.

4. Conclusions

Some m/z showed higher intensity in metastatic lesions than normal tissues from MALDI-MSI analysis. These results suggest that MALDI-MSI could diagnose liver cancer metastasis. Among several species identified from MALDI-MS/MS, cations of SM [d18:0/16:1] and PC [32:0] were mainly expressed. There are expected to be biomarkers for liver cancer metastasis.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within this article and the supplementary information files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Hee Jung Kwon and Joo Yeon Oh contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NRF grant funded by MIST (NRF-2021R1A2C2004535) and the Priority Research Centers Program through NRF (2016R1A6A1A03007648).

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: UHPLC-MS/MS and MALDI-MSI analysis data. (Supplementary Materials)

References

H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R. L. Siegel et al., “Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. W. Jung, Y. J. Won, S. Hong, H. J. Kong, J. S. Im, and H. G. Seo, “Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea,” Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 316–322, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. T. M. Lee and D. A. Geer, “Primary liver cancer: pattern of metastasis,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 26–31, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Li and Z. H. Ye, “Microenvironment of liver regeneration in liver cancer,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 555–560, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jung, “Recent advances of MALDI-mass spectrometry imaging in cancer research,” Mass Spectrometry Letters, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 71–78, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. E. Zink, M. Dean, J. E. Burdette, and L. M. Sanchez, “Capturing small molecule communication between tissues and cells using imaging mass spectrometry,” Journal of Visualized Experiments, vol. 146, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shimma, Y. Sugiura, T. Hayasaka, Y. Hoshikawa, T. Noda, and M. Setou, “MALDI-based imaging mass spectrometry revealed abnormal distribution of phospholipids in colon cancer liver metastasis,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 855, no. 1, pp. 98–103, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. R. Amstalden van Hove, T. R. Blackwell, I. Klinkert, G. B. Eijkel, R. M. Heeren, and K. Glunde, “Multimodal mass spectrometric imaging of small molecules reveals distinct spatio-molecular signatures in differentially metastatic breast tumor models,” Cancer Research, vol. 70, no. 22, pp. 9012–9021, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Kwon, S. Lee, H. H. Lee, H. Cho, and J. Jung, “Korean red ginseng enhances immunotherapeutic effects of nk cells via eosinophils in metastatic liver cancer model,” Nutrients, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 134, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Kim and J. Jung, “Upregulation of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor by chrysin-nanoparticles inhibits tumor proliferation and metastasis in triple negative breast cancer xenograft model,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 11, Article ID 560605, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Jang, H. Yang, H. Lee et al., “A sensitive environmental forensic method that determines bisphenol S and a exposure within receipt-handling through fingerprint analysis,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 424, Article ID 127410, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Schiller, O. Zschornig, M. Petkovic, M. Muller, J. Arnhold, and K. Arnold, “Lipid analysis of human HDL and LDL by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and (31)P-NMR,” Journal of Lipid Research, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1501–1508, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Ogretmen, “Sphingolipid metabolism in cancer signalling and therapy,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 33–50, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Pralhada Rao, N. Vaidyanathan, M. Rengasamy, A. Mammen Oommen, N. Somaiya, and M. R. Jagannath, “Sphingolipid metabolic pathway: an overview of major roles played in human diseases,” Journal of Lipids, vol. 2013, pp. 1–12, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ponnusamy, M. Meyers-Needham, C. E. Senkal et al., “Sphingolipids and cancer: ceramide and sphingosine-1-phosphate in the regulation of cell death and drug resistance,” Future Oncology, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1603–1624, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. D’Angelo, S. Moorthi, and C. Luberto, “Role and function of sphingomyelin biosynthesis in the development of cancer,” Advances in Cancer Research, vol. 140, pp. 61–96, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tallima, H. M. E. Azzazy, and R. El Ridi, “Cell surface sphingomyelin: key role in cancer initiation, progression, and immune evasion,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 150, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ishikawa, I. Tateya, T. Hayasaka et al., “Increased expression of phosphatidylcholine (16:0/18:1) and (16:0/18:2) in thyroid papillary cancer,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 11, Article ID e48873, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. C. Kim, J. H. Lee, G. Bang et al., “Lipid profiles for HER2-positive breast cancer,” Anticancer Research, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 2467–2472, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Y. Kwon, S. H. Choi, Y. S. Park et al., “Lipid MALDI MS profiles of gastric cancer,” The Open Proteomics Journal, vol. 7, pp. 1–4, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Goto, N. Terada, T. Inoue et al., “Decreased expression of lysophosphatidylcholine (16:0/OH) in high resolution imaging mass spectrometry independently predicts biochemical recurrence after surgical treatment for prostate cancer,” The Prostate, vol. 75, no. 16, pp. 1821–1830, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ouyang, J. Liu, B. Nie et al., “Differential diagnosis of human lung tumors using surface desorption atmospheric pressure chemical ionization imaging mass spectrometry,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 88, pp. 56044–56053, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. F. Saito, L. N. Andrade, S. O. Bustos, and R. Chammas, “Phosphatidylcholine-derived lipid mediators: the crosstalk between cancer cells and immune cells,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 13, Article ID 768606, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Cheng, Z. M. Bhujwalla, and K. Glunde, “Targeting phospholipid metabolism in cancer,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 6, p. 266, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Guo, Y. Wang, D. Zhou, and Z. Li, “Significantly increased monounsaturated lipids relative to polyunsaturated lipids in six types of cancer microenvironment are observed by mass spectrometry imaging,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 5959, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. G. Mernie, M. C. Tseng, W. T. Wu, T. M. Liu, and Y. J. Chen, “Nanoprobe-based mass spectrometry and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy for rapid phospholipid profiling,” Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 94–106, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Hee Jung Kwon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

365

Downloads

458

Citations