International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 918280 | https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/918280

Nattinee Jantaratnotai, Jae K. Ryu, Claudia Schwab, Patrick L. McGeer, James G. McLarnon, "Comparison of Vascular Perturbations in an Aβ-Injected Animal Model and in AD Brain", International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, vol. 2011, Article ID 918280, 8 pages, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/918280

Comparison of Vascular Perturbations in an Aβ-Injected Animal Model and in AD Brain

Academic Editor: Jeff Kuret
Received07 Jun 2011
Revised21 Jul 2011
Accepted27 Jul 2011
Published29 Sep 2011

Abstract

The validity of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ1–42) intrahippocampal injection, as an animal model of Alzheimer's disease (AD), has previously been considered in terms of inflammatory reactivity and neuronal damage. In this work, we have extended the testing of the animal model to vasculature by comparison of selected properties of microvessels in vivo with those in human AD brain tissue. The injection of Aβ1–42, relative to control PBS (phosphate buffered saline), increased the mean number of microvessels and diminished the mean length of microvessels in the molecular layer of dentate gyrus. The animal model showed Aβ1–42, but not PBS, injection was associated with abnormalities in morphology of microvessels which were characterized as looping, fragmented, knob-like, uneven, and constricted. In particular, numbers of constricted microvessels, defined as vessels with diameters less than 3 μm, were considerably enhanced for Aβ1–42, compared to PBS, injection. In comparison, human AD brain demonstrated an elevated number of microvessels with a diminished mean length relative to nondemented (ND) brain. Additionally, microvessel perturbations in AD brain showed a similar pattern of morphological abnormalities to those observed in Aβ1–42-injected rat hippocampus. Constricted microvessels were a prominent feature of AD brain but were rarely observed in ND tissue. These results provide the first evidence that a peptide-injection animal model exhibits a commonality in perturbations of microvessels compared with those evident in AD brain.

1. Introduction

A host of animal models have been proposed with relevance to modeling the pathological features which characterize Alzheimer’s disease (AD) brain. In order to test the validity of the animal models, properties and predictions from animal models can be compared with the characteristic features present in AD brains. These features involve a broad spectrum of altered properties from those of control nondemented (ND) individuals including the presence of enhanced deposits of amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) [1], neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) [2], abnormalities in vasculature [35], evidence for ongoing chronic inflammation [6, 7], and loss of neurons and synaptic connectivity [8]. Advancement, fine tuning, or rejection of animal models involves a rigorous and complex comparative process concerning the testing of many variables.

Intrahippocampal injection of Aβ1−42 in rat brain has been suggested as an animal model which emphasizes the inflammatory reactivity present in human AD brain [9]. This model shows marked enhancement of microgliosis in response to peptide relative to control injections of PBS (phosphate buffered saline) vehicle or reverse peptide (Aβ42-1). In addition, hippocampal neuronal loss is significantly increased with Aβ1−42, compared to control, injection. Importantly, drug inhibition of microglial inflammatory responses has a demonstrated efficacy for conferring neuroprotection [1012]. Comparison at the molecular and cellular levels has included the finding that enhanced expression of the purinergic ionotropic P2X7 receptor in activated microglia occurred similarly both in the animal model and in AD brain tissue [13].

Another feature of the Aβ1−42 rat model is evidence for an inflammatory response involving altered vasculature including a leaky blood-brain barrier (BBB). In this case Aβ1−42 induced an increased permeability of BBB compared to control PBS injection allowing infiltration of plasma protein into parenchymal brain regions [12]. Elevated brain fibrinogen was suggested as an amplifying factor for microglial activation and inflammatory reactivity. Overall, the results from in vivo studies indicated that Aβ1−42 injection elicited microglial reactivity which may be associated with a weakened BBB. These findings enhanced creditability of the model for predicting vascular changes since evidence has suggested BBB in AD brain may be damaged [14].

The overall purpose of the present study was to test and extend the utility of Aβ peptide intrahippocampal injection as an animal model of AD. The present work was specifically designed to compare vascular perturbations in the animal model with specific microvessel changes and irregularities evident between AD and ND brain tissue. The comparison has included numbers and lengths of microvessels and abnormalities in microvessels including vessels with constricted diameters.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Model Study

All protocols involved studies on male Sprague-Dawley rats and were approved by the University of British Columbia Animal Care Ethics Committee. The relevance of using intrahippocampal Aβ1−42 as an animal model of AD has been reviewed [9], and the overall procedures employed in use of the model have been detailed in previous work from this laboratory [1013]. Briefly, stereotaxic injection of peptide (2 nmol of full length Aβ1−42; California Peptide, Napa, CA) or control (PBS) was performed into the dentate gyrus region of hippocampus (AP: −3.3 mm, ML: −1.6 mm, DV: −3.2 mm). Injection of peptide, compared with PBS, precipitates an enhanced microglial inflammatory response accompanied by substantial loss of hippocampal neurons.

2.2. Tissue Preparation and Immunohistochemistry

At one week postinjection brains were removed and postfixed and cryoprotected prior to cutting into 40 μm sections. Free-floating sections were processed for immunohistochemistry with sections incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies to rat endothelial cell antigen (RECA-1, 1 : 1000; Serotec, Oxford, UK) or laminin (1 : 1000; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The use of RECA-1 and laminin for staining of microvessels has been detailed in [12]. Sections were incubated in Alexa Fluor conjugated secondary antibodies (1 : 200; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for immunofluorescence staining. In immunostaining controls, primary antibody was omitted in all staining procedures. The tissues were examined under a Zeiss axioplan-2 fluorescent microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) using a DVC camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI) with Northern Eclipse software (Empix Imaging, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Quantitative assessment was performed under a constant predefined light setting. The digitized images were analyzed using NIH ImageJ 1.37 b software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD). Four coronal hippocampal sections (200 μm apart) were used for quantitative analysis (detailed procedures in [1013]). In each stained section, four nonoverlapping fields within the granule cell layer and molecular layer regions were selected (magnification of 40x). Density and lengths of microvessels were measured in molecular layer regions of dentate gyrus; mean values for these variables were found from averaged values over 1.3 mm2 areas. In some experiments numbers of microvessels with narrow diameters were measured. These microvessels are defined by diameters ≤3 μm and termed constricted.

2.3. Human Brain Tissue

Postmortem medial temporal cortical (MTC) tissue was obtained from the Kinsmen Laboratory brain bank at the University of British Columbia (Vancouver, BC, Canada). Protocols for use of human tissue were in accordance with ethical guidelines established by The University of British Columbia. Brain tissue from MTC was obtained from 9 ND cases (75–99 years of age; mean 83.0 ± 2.5) and 9 AD cases (65–90 years of age; mean 76.2 ± 2.8). Neuropathological criteria were used in the classification of brain tissue with ND cases showing no clinical or pathological history of dementia or other neurological disorders. AD cases were characterized by immunohistochemical assessment of the density of plaques and NFT in limbic and neocortical areas (including hippocampus, amygdala, and frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital cortex). All AD cases conformed to criteria provided by the National Institute on Aging and Reagan Institute [15].

2.4. Immunohistochemistry

The protocols used for laminin immunohistochemical staining in AD and ND brain tissue have been detailed [12, 16]. Briefly, free-floating sections with 40 μm thickness were cut from medial temporal cortical tissue. Sections were then transferred into PBS/Triton-X solution and incubated overnight at room temperature with laminin (1 : 1000, Sigma). Biotinylated secondary antibody was applied followed by incubation in avidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase complex with labeling visualized by incubation in diaminobenzidine (DAB) solutions. Sections were then washed and mounted on glass slides, air-dried, and coverslipped; immunostaining controls were performed using standard procedures omitting primary antibodies; under these conditions no control staining was observed for any marker. The images were acquired using a light microscope (Olympus BX51) and a digital DP71 camera (Olympus, Center Valley, PA). Detailed quantification method has been described previously [16]. Four sections in the grey matter of medial temporal cortex were used for analysis with fields separated by fixed distances to ensure no overlap between image areas. Laminin staining was used to measure numbers and lengths of microvessels in 1 mm2 cortical areas. Constricted microvessels, with diameters ≤3 μm, were also measured in the cortical brain regions. Quantitative assessment was performed under a constant predefined light setting. The digitized images were analyzed using NIH ImageJ 1.37 b software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Values are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test (GraphPad Prism 3.0). Significance was set at .

3. Results

3.1. Microvessels in the Aβ1−42 Intrahippocampal Injection Animal Model
3.1.1. Numbers and Lengths of Microvessels

Typical patterns of microvessel staining (RECA-1 marker) are shown for control PBS vehicle (Figure 1(a), left panel) and Aβ1−42 (Figure 1(a), right panel) at 7 d after injection in rat hippocampus. The area of staining was for the molecular layer of dentate gyrus. Although morphological differences were observed between the two animal groups (see below), the most evident difference was the increased number of microvessels in peptide-injected brain. The numbers of microvessels/mm2 for control and Aβ1−42 are presented in the bar graph of Figure 1(b). Also shown are the mean lengths of microvessels for the two animal groups (Figure 1(c)). Overall ( each for control and Aβ1−42 group), peptide-injected brain demonstrated a 42 ± 7% increase in numbers of microvessels, normalized to area, compared to control PBS injection. Mean length of microvessels was significantly decreased (by 27 ± 4%) in Aβ1−42, compared with PBS, injection. Although the increase in microvessel density could indicate angiogenesis, it should be noted that a specific angiogenic marker would be required to assess formation of new blood capillaries in peptide-injected brain.

3.1.2. Morphology of Microvessels in Aβ1−42-Injected Rat Hippocampus

Inspection of the morphology of microcapillaries indicated enhanced irregularities in vessels from peptide-injected hippocampus compared with control (Figure 2). For example, fragmented microvessels were much more common after Aβ1−42 compared with PBS, injection. Other microvessel abnormalities which were relatively abundant following peptide injection included constricted microcapillaries (see below) and microvessels with looping, knob-like, and uneven appearances (Figure 2). Although these morphological categories largely reflect subjective descriptions, such characteristics were not commonly observed in PBS-injected rat hippocampus.

3.1.3. Constricted Microvessels in Aβ1−42-Injected Rat Hippocampus

A general finding in peptide-injected hippocampus was the appearance of constricted microvessels. These narrow microcapillaries (laminin staining, Figure 3(a)) exhibited 3 μm or less in diameters and often showed attachment to larger width microvessels. In some cases the constricted microcapillaries formed a bridge between adjacent larger blood vessels. Overall ( , Figure 3(b)), 14 ± 3.1% of microvessels in Aβ1−42-injected rat hippocampus demonstrated constricted diameters; the corresponding value in PBS-injected brain was 4 ± 1.4%. At present, it is not known if the constricted microvessels represent angiogenic vessels or possibly a population of damaged vessels.

3.2. Microvessels in AD and ND Brain Tissue
3.2.1. Numbers and Lengths of Microvessels

Remodeling of microvasculature was examined in cortical tissue from ND and AD individuals. Representative laminin immunoreactivity (ir) for microvessels from the two categories of cases is presented in Figure 4(a) (ND, left panel; AD, right panel). Microvessels in ND showed a typical pattern of linear shape with little evidence for multiple branching from the primary vessel. A different pattern of microvasculature was manifest in AD tissue with microvessels commonly exhibiting considerable variability in length and diameter. In particular, AD tissue commonly demonstrated microvessels with short lengths (fragments) and sections with narrow and constricted diameters (see below); such properties were largely absent in ND cases. The number of microvessels/mm2 was determined for ND and AD cortical tissue. The results (Figure 4(b)) show that microvessel number was 72 ± 9% higher in AD, relative to ND, brain ( cases each for ND and AD); this difference was significant. Mean length of microvessels was significantly lower, by 18 ± 5%, in AD, relative to ND, tissue (Figure 4(c)).

3.2.2. Morphological Properties of Vessels in AD Tissue

A pattern of altered microvessel morphology was observed between vasculature in AD and ND brain tissue. In particular, AD microvessels demonstrated a considerable variation of morphological shapes including thin fragments and nonlinear segments. Examples of specific abnormalities in AD microvessels are presented in Figure 5. Fragmented and narrow (see below) microvessels were particularly evident in AD tissue with vessels exhibiting ring-like morphology. Additionally, AD microvessels often presented as uneven diameters with areas of dilation and formation of knob-like structures. Although ND cases demonstrated microvessels with similar features to those described in AD tissue, their frequency of appearance was scarce. Previous work has documented morphological features and abnormalities in microvessels in tissue obtained from AD individuals [1719].

3.2.3. Constricted Vessels in AD Tissue

A common finding in AD cases was the appearance of constricted microvessels in the temporal cortex as shown in the representative laminin staining (arrows, Figure 6(a)); examples of constricted microvessels were much less evident in ND cases. As for the animal model, microvessel constriction was defined as a diameter equal to, or less than, 3 μm. Overall (ND, ; AD, ), constricted microvessels in ND cases comprised only 3.9 ± 2.2% of total vessels (Figure 6(b)). The corresponding value in AD tissue was 23.6 ± 6.7% of microvessels exhibiting constriction. Thus microvessel constriction appears as a prominent characteristic in AD brain, a distinguishing feature differentiating vasculature in diseased tissue from ND cases.

4. Discussion

The primary aim of this work was to compare microvessel number, length, and morphological properties between Aβ1−42 and control PBS intrahippocampal injection in a rat model of AD with the same variables in human AD and ND brain tissue. The overall results show a similar pattern of microvessel perturbations in Aβ peptide-injected rat brain as present in AD brain. The changes include an increased mean number and diminished mean length of microvessels and prominent expression of microvessel abnormalities in peptide-injected rat and in AD brain tissue compared with PBS-injected and ND brain. The abnormal properties include the presence of constricted microvessels which were largely absent in controls. These results extend previous findings that the Aβ1−42 animal model exhibits characteristics similar to those in AD brain including an altered BBB permeability, enhanced inflammatory reactivity, and neuronal loss [12].

The increased density of microvessels in Aβ1−42 versus PBS (rat) and AD versus ND (human) could suggest angiogenic activity in AD brain. However, a proviso is that a specific marker for angiogenesis is not well defined. Although increased expressions of laminin [20, 21] and integrin αvβ3 [22, 23] have been suggested as indicators of angiogenesis they are not specific markers which differentiate between newly formed and existing capillaries. Nevertheless, a consistent enhancement in microvessel number was a common pattern of change with Aβ1−42 injection (versus PBS in the animal model) and in AD (versus ND) brain tissue. It is possible that angiogenic activity could be associated with increased leakiness of blood vessels. In this regard, extravasation of plasma proteins including albumin has been measured in the peptide-injected rat hippocampus [10].

The possibility of angiogenesis in AD brain is supported by the finding that a spectrum of proangiogenic factors is elevated in AD pathology [24]. One particular highly potent angiogenic agent is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Increased levels of VEGF are reported in microglia obtained from AD patients and in human microglia exposed to Aβ1−42 [11]. Furthermore, intrathecal levels of VEGF are increased in AD patients relative to controls [25]. In addition, APP23 transgenic mice show increased formation of new vessels which was inhibited using an antagonist for VEGF [26]. Taken together, accumulating evidence suggests appropriate conditions exist to support angiogenic activity in AD brain.

Particular morphological irregularities were evident in Aβ1−42-injected dentate gyrus and AD brain tissue and largely absent with PBS injection and in ND brain. These abnormalities were characterized as fragmented, looping, knob-like, uneven, and constricted. Typical representations of these features are shown for Aβ1−42 animal treatment (Figure 2) and for human AD cases (Figure 5). Since constricted microvessels (diameters ≤ 3 μm) were clearly definable compared with the other abnormal properties, it was possible to quantify their expression. Overall, about 4% of total vessels in controls were constricted compared with values of 14% in Aβ1−42-injected rat hippocampus and 23.6% in AD brain. It can be noted that other morphological abnormalities, such as small microvessel fragments, were evident in diseased tissue. The presence of fragments could underlie the diminished mean length of microvessels in AD brain. The altered morphology of microvessels suggests concomitant changes in cerebral blood flow in intact animals. Future studies are required to determine the effects of Aβ1−42 intrahippocampal injection on the hemodynamics of cerebral blood flow. Recent work using transgenic animals expressing elevated Aβ1−42 has reported impaired cerebral autoregulation of flow which is intact in human AD subjects [27, 28]. These studies also point out that extrapolation of animal results to describe similar processes in humans requires considerable caution.

Overall, this work provides evidence that an animal model of Aβ1−42 intrahippocampal injection reproduces some microvessel perturbations which are present in AD brain. Combined with measurements on BBB dysfunction [12], the Aβ1−42 animal model has demonstrated efficacy in simulating prominent vasculature changes evident in diseased tissue. Future testing of other abnormal processes characteristic of AD brain such as synaptic dysfunction will help assess the overall validity of the AD animal model. In addition, prolonged exposure of brain microenvironments to Aβ1−42 for durations in excess of 7 d will be relevant to testing the animal model for altered vasculature and microglial-vascular interactions [16] under conditions of chronic inflammation.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by grants from Canadian Institute of Health Research and Pacific Alzheimer Research Foundation.

References

  1. S. Oddo, A. Caccamo, M. Kitazawa, B. P. Tseng, and F. M. LaFerla, “Amyloid deposition precedes tangle formation in a triple transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1063–1070, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. D. J. Selkoe, “Alzheimer's disease: genes, proteins, and therapy,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 741–766, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  3. E. Farkas and P. G. M. Luiten, “Cerebral microvascular pathology in aging and Alzheimer's disease,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 575–611, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. N. Kalaria, “Small vessel disease and alzheimer's dementia: pathological considerations,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 48–52, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Shi, G. Perry, M. A. Smith, and R. P. Friedland, “Vascular abnormalities: the insidious pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 357–361, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  6. J. Rogers, R. Strohmeyer, C. J. Kovelowski, and R. Li, “Microglia and inflammatory mechanisms in the clearance of amyloid β peptide,” GLIA, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 260–269, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W. J. Streit, R. E. Mrak, and W. S. T. Griffin, “Microglia and neuroinflammation: a pathological perspective,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 1, article 14, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. T. DeKosky and S. W. Scheff, “Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: correlation with cognitive severity,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 457–464, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. G. McLarnon and J. K. Ryu, “Relevance of Aβ1-42 intrahippocampal injection as an animal model of inflamed Alzheimer's disease brain,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 475–480, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. K. Ryu and J. G. McLarnon, “Thalidomide inhibition of perturbed vasculature and glial-derived tumor necrosis factor-α in an animal model of inflamed Alzheimer's disease brain,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 254–266, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. K. Ryu, T. Cho, H. B. Choi, Y. T. Wang, and J. G. McLarnon, “Microglial VEGF receptor response is an integral chemotactic component in Alzheimer's disease pathology,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. K. Ryu and J. G. McLarnon, “A leaky blood-brain barrier, fibrinogen infiltration and microglial reactivity in inflamed Alzheimer's disease brain,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2911–2925, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. G. McLarnon, J. K. Ryu, D. G. Walker, and H. B. Choi, “Upregulated expression of purinergic P2X7 receptor in Alzheimer disease and amyloid-β peptide-treated microglia and in peptide-injected rat hippocampus,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 1090–1097, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. D. Zipser, C. E. Johanson, L. Gonzalez et al., “Microvascular injury and blood-brain barrier leakage in Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 977–986, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. “Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer disease from the National Institute on Aging and the Reagan Institute Working Group on diagnostic criteria for the neuropathological assessment of Alzheimer disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 18, no. 4, supplement, pp. S1–S2, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  16. N. Jantaratnotai, C. Schwab, J. K. Ryu, P. L. McGeer, and J. G. McLarnon, “Converging perturbed microvasculature and microglial clusters characterize Alzheimer disease brain,” Current Alzheimer Research, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 625–636, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  17. E. Farkas and P. G. M. Luiten, “Cerebral microvascular pathology in aging and Alzheimer's disease,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 575–611, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. R. N. Kalaria, “Small vessel disease and alzheimer's dementia: pathological considerations,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 48–52, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Bouras, E. Kövari, F. R. Herrmann et al., “Stereologic analysis of microvascular morphology in the elderly: Alzheimer disease pathology and cognitive status,” Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 235–244, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. T. B. Casella, A. Marcillo, M. B. Bunge, and P. M. Wood, “New vascular tissue rapidly replaces neural parenchyma and vessels destroyed by a contusion injury to the rat spinal cord,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. Zand, J. K. Ryu, and J. G. McLarnon, “Induction of angiogenesis in the β-amyloid peptide-injected rat hippocampus,” NeuroReport, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 129–132, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. S. Desai, J. A. Schneider, J. L. Li, P. M. Carvey, and B. Hendey, “Evidence of angiogenic vessels in Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 587–597, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. R. Somanath, N. L. Malinin, and T. V. Byzova, “Cooperation between integrin ανβ3 and VEGFR2 in angiogenesis,” Angiogenesis, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 177–185, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. I. Pogue and W. J. Lukiw, “Angiogenic signaling in Alzheimer's disease,” NeuroReport, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1507–1510, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. E. Tarkowski, R. Issa, M. Sjögren et al., “Increased intrathecal levels of the angiogenic factors VEGF and TGF-β in Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 237–243, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Schultheiss, B. Blechert, F. C. Gaertner et al., “In vivo characterization of endothelial cell activation in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” Angiogenesis, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 59–65, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. A. H. R. Claassen, R. Diaz-Arrastia, K. Martin-Cook, B. D. Levine, and R. Zhang, “Altered cerebral hemodynamics in early alzheimer disease: a pilot study using transcranial doppler,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 621–629, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. A. H. R. Claassen and R. Zhang, “Cerebral autoregulation in Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1572–1577, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Nattinee Jantaratnotai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views1016
Downloads507
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.