Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 579343, 6 pages
Research Article

Sensitivity Analysis of Transonic Flow over J-78 Wings

St. Petersburg State University, 28 University Avenue, St. Petersburg 198504, Russia

Received 12 August 2014; Accepted 22 December 2014

Academic Editor: R. Ganguli

Copyright © 2015 Alexander Kuzmin. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. T. Whitcomb and L. R. Clark, “An airfoil shape for efficient flight at supercritical Mach numbers,” NASA Technical Memorandum X-1109, Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va, USA, 1965. View at Google Scholar
  2. Ch. D. Harris, “NASA supercritical airfoils. A matrix of family-related airfoils,” NASA Technical Paper no. 2969, Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  3. G. B. Cosentino, “Modifying a general aviation airfoil for supercritical flight,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 377–379, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Jameson, “Airfoils admitting non-unique solutions of the Euler equations,” AIAA Paper 91-1625, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Richter and P. Leyland, “Master-slave performance of unstructured flow solvers on the CRAY T3D,” in Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics 1995: Implementation and Results Using Parallel Computers, pp. 297–306, Elsevier Science, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Hafez and W. Guo, “Some anomalies of numerical simulation of shock waves—part II: effect of artificial and real viscosity,” Computers and Fluids, vol. 28, pp. 721–739, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  7. D. A. Caughey, “Stability of unsteady flow past airfoils exhibiting transonic non-uniqueness,” CFD Journal, vol. 13, pp. 427–438, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Jameson, J. C. Vassberg, and K. Ou, “Further studies of airfoils supporting non-unique solutions in transonic flow,” AIAA Journal, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2865–2881, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. G. Kuzmin, “Interaction of a shock wave with the sonic line,” in IUTAM Symposium Transsonicum IV, H. Sobieczky, Ed., vol. 73 of Fluid Mechanics and its Applications, pp. 13–18, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. V. Ivanova and A. G. Kuz'min, “Nonuniqueness of the transonic flow past an airfoil,” Fluid Dynamics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 642–648, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. A. Kuzmin, “Non-unique transonic flows over airfoils,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 63, pp. 1–8, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. A. Kuzmin and A. Ryabinin, “Transonic aerofoils admitting anomalous behaviour of lift coefficient,” Aeronautical Journal, vol. 118, no. 1202, pp. 425–433, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Kuzmin, “Transonic flow past a Whitcomb airfoil with a deflected aileron,” International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 210–214, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. Bassi, A. Crivellini, D. A. Di Pietro, and S. Rebay, “A high-order discontinuous Galerkin solver for 3D aerodynamic turbulent flows,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on ECCOMAS Computational Fluid Dynamics (ECCOMAS CFD '06), P. Wesseling, E. Oñate, and J. Périaux, Eds., Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2006.
  15. T. J. Barth and D. C. Jespersen, “The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes,” AIAA Paper 89-0366, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  16. F. R. Menter, “Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective,” International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 305–316, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. Geissler and L. P. Ruiz-Calavera, “Transition and turbulence modelling for dynamic stall and buffet,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, Corsica, France, 1999.