Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 740253, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/740253
Research Article

Dynamics of the Space Tug System with a Short Tether

1Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, China
2Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

Received 25 February 2015; Revised 12 June 2015; Accepted 2 July 2015

Academic Editor: Paul Williams

Copyright © 2015 Jiafu Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Xu, B. Liang, B. Li, and Y. Xu, “A universal on-orbit servicing system used in the geostationary orbit,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 95–119, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. A. Smith, C. Martin, M. Kassebom et al., “A mission to preserve the geostationary region,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1214–1218, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Piergentili and F. Graziani, “SIRDARIA: a low-cost autonomous deorbiting system for microsatellites,” Tech. Rep. IAC-06-B6.4.07, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Kassebom, D. Koebel, C. Tobehn et al., “ROGER—an advanced solution for a geostationary service satellite,” in Proceedings of the 26th American Control Conference, Chicago, Ill, USA, June 2000.
  5. B. Bischof, L. Kerstein, J. Starke et al., “Roger-robotic geostationary orbit restorer,” in Proceedings of the 54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation (IAC '03), pp. 1365–1373, IAF, Bremen, Germany, September-October 2003.
  6. C. Pardini, T. Hanada, and P. H. Krisko, “Benefits and risks of using electrodynamic tethers to de-orbit spacecraft,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 64, no. 5-6, pp. 571–588, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Pardini, T. Hanada, P. H. Krisko, L. Anselmo, and H. Hirayama, “Are de-orbiting missions possible using electrodynamic tethers? Task review from the space debris perspective,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 60, no. 10-11, pp. 916–929, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. Lappas, L. Visagie, N. Adeli, T. Theodorou, J. Ferndnez, and W. H. Steyn, “CubeSail: a low cost small cubesat mission for solar sailing and deorbiting LEO objects,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Solar Sailing (ISSS '10), New York, NY, USA, July 2010.
  9. C. Lucking, C. Colombo, and C. Mcinnes, “A passive high latitude deorbiting strategy,” in Proceedings of the 25th Annual IAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, Utah, USA, August 2011.
  10. G. Zhai, Y. Qiu, B. Liang, and C. Li, “System dynamics and feedforward control for tether-net space robot system,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 137–144, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. W. Xu, B. Liang, C. Li, Y. Liu, and X. Wang, “A modelling and simulation system of space robot for capturing non-cooperative target,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 371–393, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. A. Bonometti, K. F. Sorensen, J. W. Dankanich, and K. L. Frame, “Status of the momentum eXchange electrodynamic re-boost (MXER) tether development,” in Proceedings of the 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Sacramento, Calif, USA, July 2006.
  13. G. Khazanov, A. L. Huntsville, E. Krivorutsky, and K. Sorensen, “Analyses of bare-tether systems as a thruster for MXER studies,” in Proceedings of the 41st AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Tucson, Ariz, USA, July 2005.
  14. Y. Ishige, S. Kawamoto, and S. Kibe, “Study on electrodynamic tether system for space debris removal,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 917–929, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Kim and S. R. Vadali, “Modeling issues related to retrieval of flexible tethered satellite systems,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 1169–1176, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Bergamaschi, F. Bonon, and M. Legnami, “Spectral analysis of tethered satellite system-mission 1 vibrations,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 618–624, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Bergamaschi, P. Zanetti, and C. Zottarel, “Nonlinear vibrations in the tethered satellite system-mission 1,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 289–296, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Pasca, M. Pignataro, and A. Luongot, “Three-dimensional vibrations of tethered satellite system,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tethers in Space-Toward Flight, San Francisco, Calif, USA, May 1989.
  19. S. Pradhan, V. J. Modi, and A. K. Misra, “Simultaneous control of platform attitude and tether vibration using offset strategy,” in Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Conference, San Diego, Calif, USA, July 1996.
  20. P. Williams, C. Blanksby, P. Trivailo, and H. A. Fujii, “Libration control of flexible tethers using electromagnetic forces and moveable attachment,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Austin, Tex, USA, August 2003.
  21. P. Williams, “Energy rate feedback for libration control of electrodynamic tethers,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 221–223, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Williams, “Electrodynamic tethers under forced-current variations part 1: periodic solutions for tether librations,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 308–319, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. P. Williams, “Electrodynamic tethers under forced-current variations. Part 2. Flexible-tether estimation and control,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 320–333, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Inarrea and J. Pelaez, “Libration control of electrodynamic tethers using the extended time-delayed autosynchronization method,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 923–933, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Kojima and T. Sugimoto, “Stability analysis of in-plane and out-of-plane periodic motions of electrodynamic tether system in inclined elliptic orbit,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 65, no. 3-4, pp. 477–488, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Kojima and T. Sugimoto, “Stability analysis of periodic motion of electrodynamic tether system in elliptic orbit,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, August 2008.
  27. S. Pradhan, V. J. Modi, and A. K. Misra, “Tether-platform coupled control,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 44, no. 5-6, pp. 243–256, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. K. Kumar and K. D. Kumar, “Pitch and roll attitude maneuver of twin-satellite systems through short tethers,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 287–290, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. D. Kumar and K. Kumar, “Satellite pitch and roll attitude maneuvers through very short tethers,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 44, no. 5-6, pp. 257–265, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Pradhan, V. J. Modi, and A. K. Misra, “On the offset control of flexible nonautonomous tethered two-body systems,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 783–801, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. E. Stevens and W. P. Baker, “Optimal control of a librating electrodynamic tether performing a multirevolution orbit change,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1497–1507, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. E. L. M. Lanoix, A. K. Misra, V. J. Modi, and G. Tyc, “Effect of electrodynamic forces on the orbital dynamics of tethered satellites,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1309–1315, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. Williams, “Optimal orbital transfer with electrodynamic tether,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 369–372, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. T. Watanabe, T. Makida, H. A. Fujii, H. Kojima, and W. Singhose, “An application of input shaping for electrodynamic tether system,” in Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, pp. 1442–1453, Providence, RI, USA, August 2004. View at Scopus
  35. H. J. Pernicka, M. Dancer, and A. Abrudan, “Simulation of the dynamics of a short tethered satellite system,” in Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Providence, RI, USA, August 2004.
  36. J. Valverde, J. L. Escalona, J. Mayo, and J. Domínguez, “Dynamic analysis of a light structure in outer space: short electrodynamic tether,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 125–146, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus