Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 3527460, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3527460
Research Article

Steady Glide Dynamic Modeling and Trajectory Optimization for High Lift-to-Drag Ratio Reentry Vehicle

School of Astronautics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Received 13 March 2016; Accepted 30 June 2016

Academic Editor: Christian Circi

Copyright © 2016 Liang Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. A. Dukeman, “Profile-following entry guidance using linear quadratic regulator theory,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-located Conference, AIAA Paper 2002-4457, Monterey, Calif, USA, August 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Josselyn and I. M. Ross, “Rapid verification method for the trajectory optimization of reentry vehicles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 505–508, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. V. R. Rao and K. A. Clarke, “Performance optimization of a maneuvering re-entry vehicle using a legendre pseudospectral method,” AIAA Paper 2002-4885, AIAA International, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  4. T. R. Jorris and R. G. Cobb, “Three-dimensional trajectory optimization satisfying waypoint and no-fly zone constraints,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 551–572, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. Zhao and R. Zhou, “Reentry trajectory optimization for hypersonic vehicle satisfying complex constraints,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1544–1553, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Rahimi, K. D. Kumar, and H. Alighanbari, “Particle swarm optimization applied to spacecraft reentry trajectory,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 307–310, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Z. Shen and P. Lu, “Onboard generation of three-dimensional constrained entry trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 111–121, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. D. Mease, D. T. Chen, P. Teufel, and H. Schönenberger, “Reduced-order entry trajectory planning for acceleration guidance,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 257–266, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Lu, “Entry guidance: a unified Method,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 713–728, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. W. Yu and W. Chen, “Guidance scheme for glide range maximization of a hypersonic vehicle,” AIAA Paper 2011-6714, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. A. Patterson and A. V. Rao, “GPOPS-II: a MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive gaussian quadrature collocation methods and sparse nonlinear programming,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, vol. 41, no. 1, article 1, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. N. X. Vinh, A. Busemann, and R. D. Culp, Hypersonic and Planetary Entry Flight Mechanics, chapter 7, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Mich, USA, 1980.
  13. T. H. Phillips, A Common Aero Vehicle (CAV) Model, Description, and Employment Guide, Schafer Corporation for Air Force Research Laboratory and Air Force Command, Arlington, Va, USA, 2003.
  14. D. A. Benson, A gauss pseudospectral transcription for optimal control [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, MIT, 2004.
  15. D. Garg, M. A. Patterson, W. W. Hager, A. V. Rao, D. A. Benson, and G. T. Huntington, “A unified framework for the numerical solution of optimal control problems using pseudospectral methods,” Automatica, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 1843–1851, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. C. L. Darby, W. W. Hager, and A. V. Rao, “An hp-adaptive pseudospectral method for solving optimal control problems,” Optimal Control Applications & Methods, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 476–502, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  17. C. L. Darby, W. W. Hager, and A. V. Rao, “Direct trajectory optimization using a variable low-order adaptive pseudospectral method,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 433–445, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. E. Gill, W. Murray, and M. A. Saunders, “SNOPT: an SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization,” SIAM Review, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 99–131, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  19. J. T. Betts, Practical Methods for Optimal Control and Estimation Using Nonlinear Programming, Advance in Design and Control Series, SIAM, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2009.
  20. I. M. Ross and M. Karpenko, “A review of pseudospectral optimal control: from theory to flight,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus