Nominal Performance of Future Dual Frequency Dual Constellation GBAS

<table class="figure-group"><tr class="fig-image" id="a"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijae/volume-2016/6835282/figures/6835282.fig.003a.svgz" name="6835282.fig.003a" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(a) </b>Ratio between DOPs over elevation mask and DOPs for an elevation mask of <svg height="11.0031pt" id="M78" style="vertical-align:-0.2064009pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -10.7967 10.3778 11.0031" width="10.3778pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M153 550H386L412 615L406 623H120L82 318C104 327 142 338 184 338C294 338 347 275 347 187C347 112 305 39 221 39C160 39 119 71 97 89C88 97 80 96 71 90C59 80 50 67 49 57C48 45 52 36 66 23C80 9 123 -12 169 -12C221 -11 288 15 342 59C403 109 431 165 431 225C431 308 366 395 238 395C212 395 165 379 127 364L153 550Z" id="g113-54"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="480" vert-adv-y="480"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.24,-5.741)"><path d="M339 262C339 340 273 403 193 403S48 340 48 262S113 121 193 121S339 184 339 262ZM283 262C283 210 242 168 193 168S104 210 104 262S144 356 193 356S283 314 283 262Z" id="g54-73"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="385" vert-adv-y="385"></glyph.data></g></svg> in Braunschweig</td></tr><tr class="fig-image" id="b"><td><object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ijae/volume-2016/6835282/figures/6835282.fig.003b.svgz" name="6835282.fig.003b" type="image/svg+xml"></object></td></tr><tr class="fig-caption"><td><b>(b) </b>Ratio between VDOP over elevation mask and VDOP with <svg height="11.0031pt" id="M79" style="vertical-align:-0.2064009pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -10.7967 10.3778 11.0031" width="10.3778pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M153 550H386L412 615L406 623H120L82 318C104 327 142 338 184 338C294 338 347 275 347 187C347 112 305 39 221 39C160 39 119 71 97 89C88 97 80 96 71 90C59 80 50 67 49 57C48 45 52 36 66 23C80 9 123 -12 169 -12C221 -11 288 15 342 59C403 109 431 165 431 225C431 308 366 395 238 395C212 395 165 379 127 364L153 550Z" id="g113-54"></path><glyph.data ascent="3473" descent="-2876" horiz-adv-x="480" vert-adv-y="480"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.24,-5.741)"><path d="M339 262C339 340 273 403 193 403S48 340 48 262S113 121 193 121S339 184 339 262ZM283 262C283 210 242 168 193 168S104 210 104 262S144 356 193 356S283 314 283 262Z" id="g54-73"></path><glyph.data ascent="3443" descent="-2856" horiz-adv-x="385" vert-adv-y="385"></glyph.data></g></svg> elevation mask for different latitudes</td></tr></table>

<div>Influence of elevation masking on DOP values.</div>

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Nominal Performance of Future Dual Frequency Dual Constellation GBAS 