Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 8092824, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8092824
Research Article

Proper Orthogonal Decomposition as Surrogate Model for Aerodynamic Optimization

DIMEAS, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Received 18 December 2015; Revised 9 June 2016; Accepted 26 June 2016

Academic Editor: Ratneshwar Jha

Copyright © 2016 Valentina Dolci and Renzo Arina. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Mohammadi and O. Pironneau, Applied Shape Optimization for Fluids, Oxford University Press, 2nd edition, 2009.
  2. K. Boopathy and M. P. Rumpfkeil, “Unified framework for training point selection and error estimation for surrogate models,” AIAA Journal, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 215–234, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. Veroy and A. T. Patera, “Certified real-time solution of the parametrized steady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations: rigorous reduced-basis a posteriori error bounds,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 47, no. 8-9, pp. 773–788, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Maday, O. Mula, A. T. Patera, and M. Yano, “The generalized empirical interpolation method: stability theory on Hilbert spaces with an application to the Stokes equation,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 287, pp. 310–334, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  5. G. Berkooz, P. Holmes, and J. Lumley, “The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 25, pp. 539–575, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Y. C. Liang, H. P. Lee, S. P. Lim, W. Z. Lin, K. H. Lee, and C. G. Wu, “Proper orthogonal decomposition and its applications—part I: theory,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 252, no. 3, pp. 527–544, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  7. J. L. Lumley, “The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows,” in Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Propagation, A. M. Yaglom and V. I. Tatarski, Eds., pp. 166–178, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  8. C. W. Rowley, T. Colonius, and R. M. Murray, “Model reduction for compressible flows using POD and Galerkin projection,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 189, no. 1-2, pp. 115–129, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. B. I. Epureanu, “A parametric analysis of reduced order models of viscous flows in turbomachinery,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 971–982, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. A. LeGresley and J. J. Alonso, “Airfoil design optimization using reduced order models based on proper orthogonal decomposition,” in Proceedings of the Fluids 2000 Conference and Exhibit, June 2000. View at Scopus
  11. T. Bui-Thanh, M. Damodaran, and K. Willcox, “Aerodynamic data reconstruction and inverse design using proper orthogonal decomposition,” AIAA Journal, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1505–1516, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. J. Mifsud, S. T. Shaw, and D. G. MacManus, “A high-fidelity low-cost aerodynamic model using proper orthogonal decomposition,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 468–494, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. L. Tang, P. C. Chen, D. D. Liu et al., “Proper orthogonal decomposition and response surface method for tps/rlv structural design and optimization: X-34 case study,” in Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, pp. 14295–14304, 2005.
  14. R. H. Myers, D. C. Montgomery, and C. M. Anderson-Cook, Response Surface Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 2009. View at MathSciNet
  15. M. D. Buhmann, Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003.
  16. T. B. Thanh, Proper orthogonal decomposition extensions and their applications in steady aerodynamics [Ph.D. thesis], MIT Alliance, Singapore, 2003.
  17. S. Volkwein, “Proper orthogonal decomposition: theory and reduced-order modelling,” Tech. Rep., University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany, 2013, http://www.math.uni-konstanz.de/numerik/personen/volkwein/teaching/POD-Vorlesung.pdf. View at Google Scholar
  18. L. Sirovich, “Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures, part 1: coherent structures,” Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 561–590, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Keane and P. Nair, Computational Approaches for Aerospace Design: The Pursuit of Excellence, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
  20. D. S. Broomhead and D. Lowe, “Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptive networks,” Complex Systems, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 321–355, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  21. T. Krishnamurthy, Comparison of Response Surface Construction Methods for Derivative Estimation Using Moving Least Squares, Kriging and Radial Basis Functions, NASA Technical Reports Server, 2005.
  22. B. Ruck and B. Makiola, “Flow separation over the inclined step,” in Physics of Separated Flows-Numerical, Experimental, and Theoretical Aspects, vol. 40, pp. 47–55, Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Germany, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  23. T. U. München, “Drivaer model,” 2015, http://www.aer.mw.tum.de/en/research-groups/automotive/drivaer.