Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 4048386, 13 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4048386
Research Article

Application of a Cohesive Zone Model for Simulating Fatigue Crack Growth from Moderate to High Levels of Inconel 718

1School of Mechanics, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
2State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
3School of Aerospace Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Huan Li

Received 8 September 2017; Accepted 6 December 2017; Published 1 February 2018

Academic Editor: Roberto G. Citarella

Copyright © 2018 Huan Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Lemaitre and R. Desmorat, Engineering Damage Mechanics: Ductile, Creep, Fatigue and Brittle Failures, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.
  2. Y. Jiang and M. Feng, “Modeling of fatigue crack propagation,” Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Paris, M. Gomez, and W. Anderson, “A rational analytic theory of fatigue,” Trend in Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 9–14, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  4. R. O. Ritchie, “Mechanisms of fatigue-crack propagation in ductile and brittle solids,” International Journal of Fracture, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 55–83, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. F. Erdogan and M. Ratwani, “Fatigue and fracture of cylindrical shells containing a circumferential crack,” International Journal of Fracture Mechanics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 379–392, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. M. Beden, S. Abdullah, and A. Ariffin, “Review of fatigue crack propagation models for metallic components,” European Journal of Scientific Research, vol. 28, pp. 364–397, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. N. Dowling and J. Begley, “Fatigue crack growth during gross plasticity and the J-integral,” Mechanics of crack growth, vol. 590, pp. 82–103, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. V. Shlyannikov, N. Boychenko, A. Tumanov, and A. Fernandez-Canteli, “The elastic and plastic constraint parameters for three-dimensional problems,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 127, pp. 83–96, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. V. Shlyannikov, A. Tumanov, A. Zakharov, and A. Gerasimenko, “Surface flaws behavior under tension, bending and biaxial cyclic loading,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 92, pp. 557–576, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Metzger, T. Seifert, and C. Schweizer, “Does the cyclic J-integral ΔJ describe the crack-tip opening displacement in the presence of crack closure?” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 134, pp. 459–473, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. de-Andrés, J. Pérez, and M. Ortiz, “Elastoplastic finite element analysis of three-dimensional fatigue crack growth in aluminum shafts subjected to axial loading,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 36, no. 15, pp. 2231–2258, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. K. L. Roe and T. Siegmund, “An irreversible cohesive zone model for interface fatigue crack growth simulation,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 209–232, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. S. Dugdale, “Yielding of steel sheets containing slits,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 100–104, 1960. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. G. I. Barenblatt, “The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture,” Advances in Applied Mechanics, vol. 7, pp. 55–129, 1962. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Tryding and M. Ristinmaa, “Normalization of cohesive laws for quasi-brittle materials,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 178, pp. 333–345, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. Shor and R. Vaziri, “Application of the local cohesive zone method to numerical simulation of composite structures under impact loading,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 104, pp. 127–149, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. V. Tvergaard and J. Hutchinson, “The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids,” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1377–1397, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. R. Chen, O. Kolednik, J. Heerens, and F. D. Fischer, “Three-dimensional modeling of ductile crack growth: cohesive zone parameters and crack tip triaxiality,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 72, no. 13, pp. 2072–2094, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. V. Uthaisangsuk, U. Prahl, and W. Bleck, “Modelling of damage and failure in multiphase high strength DP and TRIP steels,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 469–486, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Li, C. Li, and H. Yuan, “Prediction of fatigue crack growth retardation using a cyclic cohesive zone model,” Archive of Applied Mechanics, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 1061–1075, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Park and G. Paulino, “Cohesive zone models: a critical review of traction-separation relationships across fracture surfaces,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, vol. 64, no. 6, article 060802, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. O. Nguyen, E. A. Repetto, M. Ortiz, and R. A. Radovitzky, “A cohesive model of fatigue crack growth,” International Journal of Fracture, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 351–369, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Maiti and P. Geubelle, “A cohesive model for fatigue failure of polymers,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 691–708, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Ural, V. Krishnan, and K. Papoulia, “A cohesive zone model for fatigue crack growth allowing for crack retardation,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 46, no. 11-12, pp. 2453–2462, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Li and H. Yuan, “Cohesive zone modelling of low cycle fatigue cracks in cracked and notched specimens,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1246–1257, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Jimenez and R. Duddu, “On the parametric sensitivity of cohesive zone models for high-cycle fatigue delamination of composites,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 82, pp. 111–124, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. X. Cao and M. Vormwald, “Application of a new cohesive zone model in low cycle fatigue,” Solids and Structures, vol. 2, pp. 31–40, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  28. D. Jha and A. Banerjee, “A cohesive model for fatigue failure in complex stress-states,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 155–162, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Li, H. Yuan, and X. Li, “Assessment of low cycle fatigue crack growth under mixed-mode loading conditions by using a cohesive zone model,” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 75, pp. 39–50, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. ABAQUS, Version 6.11, User Subroutines Reference Manual, Dassault Systémes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA, 2011.
  31. E. Lertora, C. Mandolfino, and C. Gambaro, “Mechanical behaviour of Inconel 718 thin-walled laser welded components for aircraft engines,” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 721680, 9 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. P. Beaurepaire and G. I. Schuëller, “Modeling of the variability of fatigue crack growth using cohesive zone elements,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 78, no. 12, pp. 2399–2413, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. L. Chaboche, “A review of some plasticity and viscoplasticity constitutive theories,” International Journal of Plasticity, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1642–1693, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Needleman, “Some issues in cohesive surface modeling,” Procedia IUTAM, vol. 10, pp. 221–246, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, 2011.
  36. Y. Yamada and J. C. Newman, “Crack closure under high load-ratio conditions for Inconel-718 near threshold behavior,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 209–220, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. J. Newman, S. Smith, S. Willard, and R. Piascik, A Comparison of Weld-Repaired and Base Metal for Inconel 718 and CRES 321 at Cryogenic and Room Temperatures, 2004, NASA/TM-2004-213,253 ARL-TR-3266.