Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 4126807, 15 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4126807
Research Article

Cooperative Intercept Guidance of Multiple Aircraft with a Lure Role Included

1Xi’an Research Institute of Hi-Tech, Xi’an 710025, China
2Science and Technology on Electro-optical Control Laboratory, Luoyang 741000, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yang Guo; moc.liamxof@028gnayoug

Received 4 September 2017; Revised 17 January 2018; Accepted 21 January 2018; Published 10 April 2018

Academic Editor: Franco Bernelli-Zazzera

Copyright © 2018 Shuai Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Shaferman and T. Shima, “Cooperative optimal guidance laws for imposing a relative intercept angle,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, pp. 4909–4923, Minnesota, MN, USA, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. V. Shaferman and T. Shima, “Cooperative optimal guidance laws for imposing a relative intercept angle,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1395–1408, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. L. Boyell, “Defending a moving target against missile or torpedo attack,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-12, no. 4, pp. 522–526, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. L. Boyell, “Counterweapon aiming for defense of a moving target,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-16, no. 3, pp. 402–408, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Shima, “Optimal cooperative pursuit and evasion strategies against a homing missile,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 414–425, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. O. Prokopov and T. Shima, “Linear quadratic optimal cooperative strategies for active aircraft protection,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 753–764, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Weiss, T. Shima, and D. Castaneda, “Combined and cooperative minimum-effort guidance algorithms in an active aircraft defense scenario,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1241–1254, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Yamasaki and S. N. Balakrishnan, “Triangle intercept guidance for aerial defense,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, pp. 2010–7876, Toronto, Canada, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Ratnoo and T. Shima, “Line-of-sight interceptor guidance for defending an aircraft,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 522–532, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Y. Guo, X. Hu, F. He, H. Cheng, and Q. Gao, “Triangle interception scenario: a finite-time guidance approach,” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 2942686, 12 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Y. Guo, Y. Yao, S. Wang, B. Yang, F. He, and P. Zhang, “Maneuver control strategies to maximize prediction errors in ballistic middle phase,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1225–1234, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. V. Shaferman and T. Shima, “A cooperative differential game for imposing a relative intercept angle,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, pp. 1015–1040, Grapevine, TX, USA, 2017.
  13. R. Fonod and T. Shima, “Estimation enhancement by cooperatively imposing relative intercept angles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1711–1725, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Fonod and T. Shima, “Estimation enhancement by imposing a relative intercept angle for defending missiles,” in AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, pp. 1018–1032, Grapevine, TX, USA, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. H. Du and S. Li, “Attitude synchronization for flexible spacecraft with communication delays,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 3625–3630, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Li, H. Du, and P. Shi, “Distributed attitude control for multiple spacecraft with communication delays,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1765–1773, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Zhang, X. Wang, and H. Wu, “A distributed cooperative guidance law for salvo attack of multiple anti-ship missiles,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1438–1450, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Ratnoo and T. Shima, “Guidance strategies against defended aerial targets,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1059–1068, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Balhance, M. Weiss, and T. Shima, “Cooperative guidance law for intrasalvo tracking,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1441–1456, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. R. Kumar and T. Shima, “Cooperative nonlinear guidance strategies for aircraft defense,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 124–138, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Guo, S. Wang, Y. Yao, and B. Yang, “Evader maneuver on consideration of energy consumption in flight vehicle interception scenarios,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 519–525, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Guo, Y. Yao, S. Wang, B. Yang, K. Liu, and X. Zhao, “Finite-time control with H-infinity constraints of linear time-invariant and time-varying systems,” Journal of Control Theory and Applications, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 165–172, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Guo, Y. Yao, S. Wang, K. Ma, K. Liu, and J. Guo, “Input-output finite-time stabilization of linear systems with finite-time boundedness,” ISA Transactions, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 977–982, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. H. Du, C. Qian, S. Yang, and S. Li, “Recursive design of finite-time convergent observers for a class of time-varying nonlinear systems,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 601–609, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Golestani, I. Mohammadzaman, and A. R. Vali, “Finite-time convergent guidance law based on integral backstepping control,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 370–376, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Golestani and I. Mohammadzaman, “PID guidance law design using short time stability approach,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 71–76, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Dorato, “Short-time stability in linear time-varying systems,” in Proceedings of the IRE International Convention Record Part 4, pp. 83–87, New York, NY, USA, 1961.
  28. S. P. Bhat and D. S. Bernstein, “Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems,” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 751–766, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Y. Hong, Z. P. Jiang, and G. Feng, “Finite-time input-to-state stability and applications to finite-time control,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 2466–2471, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. H. Du, G. Wen, Y. Cheng, Y. He, and R. Jia, “Distributed finite-time cooperative control of multiple high-order nonholonomic mobile robots,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2998–3006, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Li, H. Du, and X. Lin, “Finite-time consensus algorithm for multi-agent systems with double-integrator dynamics,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1706–1712, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. X. Xi, M. He, H. Liu, and J. F. Zheng, “Admissible output consensualization control for singular multi-agent systems with time delays,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 353, no. 16, pp. 4074–4090, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. X. Xi, Z. L. Fan, H. Liu, and T. Zheng, “Guaranteed-cost consensus for multi agent networks with Lipschita nonlinear dynamics and switching topologies,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, pp. 1–12, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. F. Amato, M. Ariola, and P. Dorato, “Finite-time control of linear systems subject to parametric uncertainties and disturbances,” Automatica, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1459–1463, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. F. Amato, R. Ambrosino, C. Cosentino, and G. de Tommasi, “Input-output finite time stabilization of linear systems,” Automatica, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1558–1562, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. F. Amato, G. Carannante, G. De Tommasi, and A. Pironti, “Input-output finite-time stability of linear systems: necessary and sufficient conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 3051–3063, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. F. Amato, R. Ambrosino, M. Ariola, C. Cosentino, and G. De Tommasi, Finite-time stability and control, vol. 453 of Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Springer, London, UK, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. Amato, G. De Tommasi, and A. Pironti, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for input-output finite-time stability of impulsive dynamical systems,” in 2015 American Control Conference (ACC), pp. 5998–6003, Chicago, IL, USA, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. U. Shaked and V. Suplin, “A new bounded real lemma representation for the continuous-time case,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1420–1426, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus