Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 4258020, 21 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4258020
Review Article

Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Aerial Vehicles: A Review of Recent Advancements

Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping 58183, Sweden

Correspondence should be addressed to Athanasios Papageorgiou; es.uil@uoigroegapap.soisanahta

Received 1 February 2018; Accepted 6 May 2018; Published 23 May 2018

Academic Editor: Kenneth M. Sobel

Copyright © 2018 Athanasios Papageorgiou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski and R. T. Haftka, “Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments,” Structural Optimization, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Padula and R. Gillian, “Multidisciplinary environments: a history of engineering framework development,” in 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA, September 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. Z. Wang, W. Huang, and L. Yan, “Multidisciplinary design optimization approach and its application to aerospace engineering,” Chinese Science Bulletin, vol. 59, no. 36, pp. 5338–5353, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. A. C. Viana, T. W. Simpson, V. Balabanov, and V. Toropov, “Special section on multidisciplinary design optimization: metamodeling in multidisciplinary design optimization: how far have we really come?” AIAA Journal, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 670–690, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. R. R. A. Martins and A. B. Lambe, “Multidisciplinary design optimization: a survey of architectures,” AIAA Journal, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 2049–2075, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. W. Yao, X. Chen, W. Luo, M. van Tooren, and J. Guo, “Review of uncertainty-based multidisciplinary design optimization methods for aerospace vehicles,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 450–479, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Salas and J. Townsend, “Framework requirements for MDO application development,” in 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, St. Louis, MO, USA, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Belie, “Non-technical barriers to multidisciplinary optimization in the aerospace industry,” in 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, September 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Giesing and J. F. Barthelemy, “A summary of industry MDO applications and needs,” in 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, St. Louis, MO, USA, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. T. W. Simpson and J. R. R. A. Martins, “Multidisciplinary design optimization for complex engineered systems: report from a National Science Foundation workshop,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 133, no. 10, article 101002, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Agte, O. de Weck, J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, P. Arendsen, A. Morris, and M. Spieck, “MDO: assessment and direction for advancement—an opinion of one international group,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 40, no. 1–6, pp. 17–33, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Allison, C. Morris, J. Schetz et al., “A multidisciplinary design optimization framework for design studies of an efficient supersonic air vehicle,” in 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Indianapolis, IN, USA, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. W. Hurwitz, S. Donovan, J. Camberos, and B. German, “A systems engineering approach to the application of multidisciplinary design, analysis and optimization (MDAO) for efficient supersonic air-vehicle exploration (ESAVE),” in 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Indianapolis, IN, USA, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. S. S. Ghoman, R. K. Kapania, P. C. Chen, D. Sarhaddi, and D. H. Lee, “Multifidelity, multistrategy, and multidisciplinary design optimization environment,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1255–1270, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. Morrisey and R. McDonald, “Multidisciplinary design optimization of an extreme aspect ratio HALE UAV,” in 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO), Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Hilton Head, SC, USA, September 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. O. Gur, M. Bhatia, W. H. Mason, J. A. Schetz, R. K. Kapania, and T. Nam, “Development of a framework for truss-braced wing conceptual MDO,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 277–298, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. K. Rallabhandi and D. N. Mavris, “Simultaneous airframe and propulsion cycle optimization for supersonic aircraft design,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 38–55, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. A. Reuter, S. Iden, R. D. Snyder, and D. L. Allison, “An overview of the optimized integrated multidisciplinary systems program,” in 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA SciTech Forum, (AIAA 2016-0674), San Diego, CA, USA, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. L. Jaeger, C. Gogu, S. Segonds, and C. Bes, “Aircraft multidisciplinary design optimization under both model and design variables uncertainty,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 528–538, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. Cassidy, T. Gatzke, and C. Vaporean, “Integrating synthesis and simulation for conceptual design,” in 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Reno, NV, USA, January 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. N. V. Nguyen, J. W. Lee, Y. D. Lee, and H. U. Park, “A multidisciplinary robust optimisation framework for UAV conceptual design,” The Aeronautical Journal, vol. 118, no. 1200, pp. 123–142, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Dufresne, C. Johnson, and D. N. Mavris, “Variable fidelity conceptual design environment for revolutionary unmanned aerial vehicles,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1405–1418, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Sadraey, “A systematic approach in aircraft configuration design optimization,” in The 26th Congress of ICAS and 8th AIAA ATIO, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Anchorage, Alaska, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. D. Bianchi, T. H. Orra, and P. Paglione, “Monte Carlo based Robust MDO applied to aircraft conceptual design: a technical-financial coupling optimization strategy,” in 15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2015-2737), Dallas, TX, USA, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. J. Yoon, N. Nguyen, S.-M. Choi, J.-W. Lee, S. Kim, and Y.-H. Byun, “Multidisciplinary general aviation aircraft design optimizations incorporating airworthiness constraints,” in 10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Fort Worth, TX, USA, September 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. W. Lukaczyk, A. D. Wendorff, M. Colonno et al., “SUAVE: an open-source environment for multi-fidelity conceptual vehicle design,” in 16th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2015-3087), Dallas, TX, USA, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. S. Dean, J. Doherty, and T. Wallace, “MDO-based concept modelling and the impact of fuel systems on wing design,” in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Orlando, FL, USA, January 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. R. E. Perez, H. H. T. Liu, and K. Behdinan, “Multidisciplinary optimization framework for control-configuration integration in aircraft conceptual design,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1937–1948, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. C. Morris, D. Allison, C. Sultan, J. Schetz, and R. Kapania, “Towards flying qualities constraints in the multidisciplinary design optimization of a supersonic tailless aircraft,” in 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Indianapolis, IN, USA, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. S. Choi, J. J. Alonso, and I. M. Kroo, “Two-level multifidelity design optimization studies for supersonic jets,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 776–790, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. Ganguli and S. Rajagopal, “Multidisciplinary design optimization of an UAV wing using Kriging based multi-objective genetic algorithm,” in 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, Palm Springs, CA, USA, May 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. A. Gazaix, P. Gendre, E. Chaput et al., “Investigation of multi-disciplinary optimisation for aircraft preliminary design,” in SAE 2011 AeroTech Congress & Exhibition, Toulouse, France, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. D. D. Smith, A. T. Isikveren, R. M. Ajaj, and M. I. Friswell, “Multidisciplinary design optimization of an active nonplanar polymorphing wing,” in 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Nice, France, 2010.
  34. A. Ceruti, G. Caligiana, and F. Persiani, “Comparative evaluation of different optimization methodologies for the design of UAVs having shape obtained by hot wire cutting techniques,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 63–78, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Brezillon, A. Ronzheimer, D. Haar et al., “Development and application of multi-disciplinary optimization capabilities based on high-fidelity methods,” in 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. N. Kroll, M. Abu-Zurayk, D. Dimitrov et al., “DLR project Digital-X: towards virtual aircraft design and flight testing based on high-fidelity methods,” CEAS Aeronautical Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3–27, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N.-V. Nguyen, S.-M. Choi, W.-S. Kim et al., “Multidisciplinary unmanned combat air vehicle system design using multi-fidelity model,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 200–210, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. P. Henderson, J. R. R. A. Martins, and R. E. Perez, “Aircraft conceptual design for optimal environmental performance,” The Aeronautical Journal, vol. 116, no. 1175, pp. 1–22, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. P. T. J. Berends, M. J. L. Tooren, and D. N. V. Belo, “A distributed multi-disciplinary optimisation of a blended wing body UAV using a multi-agent task environment,” in 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, Newport, RI, USA, May 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. L. Iqbal and J. Sullivan, “Multidisciplinary design and optimization (MDO) methodology for the aircraft conceptual design,” in 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Nashville, TN, USA, January 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. Choi, J. J. Alonso, I. M. Kroo, and M. Wintzer, “Multifidelity design optimization of low-boom supersonic jets,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 106–118, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. P. W. Jansen and R. E. Perez, “Coupled optimization of aircraft design and fleet allocation with uncertain passenger demand,” in 2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2013-4392), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. E. Alyanak, R. Kolonay, P. Flick, N. Lindsley, and S. Burton, “Efficient supersonic air vehicle preliminary conceptual multi-disciplinary design optimization results,” in 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Indianapolis, IN, USA, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. A. Deblois and M. Abdo, “Multi-fidelity multidisciplinary design optimization of metallic and composite regional and business jets,” in 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, Fort Worth, TX, USA, September 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Laban and U. Herrmann, “Multi-disciplinary analysis and optimisation applied to supersonic aircraft part 1: analysis tools,” in 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. P. Piperni, A. DeBlois, and R. Henderson, “Development of a multilevel multidisciplinary-optimization capability for an industrial environment,” AIAA Journal, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2335–2352, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. C. Pak, “Aeroelastic tailoring study of an N+2 Low-boom supersonic commercial transport aircraft,” in 16th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2015-2791), Dallas, TX, USA, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. Q. Liu, S. B. Mulani, and R. K. Kapania, “Global/local multidisciplinary design optimization of subsonic wing,” in 10th AIAA Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Conference, AIAA SciTech Forum, (AIAA 2014-0471), National Harbor, MD, USA, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. S. Guo, D. Li, and Y. Liu, “Multi-objective optimization of a composite wing subject to strength and aeroelastic constraints,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 226, no. 9, pp. 1095–1106, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. N. V. Nguyen, J.-W. Lee, M. Tyan, and D. Lee, “Possibility-based multidisciplinary optimisation for electric-powered unmanned aerial vehicle design,” The Aeronautical Journal, vol. 119, no. 1221, pp. 1397–1414, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. C. Davies, M. Stelmack, P. S. Zink, A. De La Garza, and P. Flick, “High fidelity MDO process development and application to fighter strike conceptual design,” in 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Indianapolis, IN, USA, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. A. Suleman, F. Lau, J. Vale, and F. Afonso, “Multidisciplinary performance based optimization of morphing aircraft,” in 22nd AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference, AIAA SciTech Forum, (AIAA 2014-0761), National Harbor, MD, USA, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. R. Navaratne and J. Murugaiyan, “Multi disciplinary optimization of flight trajectories,” in 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–15, Big Sky, MT, USA, March 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. B. Yan, P. Jansen, and R. Perez, “Multidisciplinary design optimization of airframe and trajectory considering cost, noise, and fuel burn,” in 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Indianapolis, IN, USA, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. J. Longo, M. Sippel, G. Carrier, A. Loubeau, R. Jarlas, and D. Perigo, “Concept study for a Mach 6 transport aircraft,” in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Orlando, FL, USA, January 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. R. Perez and J. Martins, “pyACDT: an object-oriented framework for aircraft design modelling and multidisciplinary optimization,” in 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, Victoria, BC, Canada, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. K. Amadori, C. Jouannet, and P. Krus, “A framework for aerodynamic and structural optimization in conceptual design,” in 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Fluid Dynamics and Co-located Conferences, Miami, FL, USA, June 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. K. Geiselhart, L. Ozoroski, J. Fenbert, E. Shields, and W. Li, “Integration of multifidelity multidisciplinary computer codes for design and analysis of supersonic aircraft,” in 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Orlando, FL, USA, January 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. T. Zhang, Z. Wang, W. Huang, and L. Yan, “Parameterization and optimization of hypersonic-gliding vehicle configurations during conceptual design,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 58, pp. 225–234, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. F. Daoud, S. Deinert, R. Maierl, and Ö. Petersson, “Integrated multidisciplinary aircraft design process supported by a decentral MDO framework,” in 16th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2015-3090), Dallas, TX, USA, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. K. Alston, S. Doyle, T. Winter, H. Kim, and S. Ragon, “High fidelity multidisciplinary optimization (HFMDO),” in 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, Fort Worth, TX, USA, September 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. A. Morris, C. Allen, and T. Rendall, “Wing Design by Aerodynamic and Aeroelastic Shape Optimisation,” in 26th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-located Conferences, Honolulu, Hawaii, August 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. L. Cavagna, S. Ricci, and L. Travaglini, “NeoCASS: an integrated tool for structural sizing, aeroelastic analysis and MDO at conceptual design level,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 621–635, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. L. Travaglini, S. Ricci, and G. Bindolino, “PyPAD: a multidisciplinary framework for preliminary airframe design,” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 649–664, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. Ricci and M. Terraneo, “Application of MDO techniques to the preliminary design of morphed aircraft,” in 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, Portsmouth, VA, USA, September 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. F. Daoud, O. Petersson, S. Deinert, and P. Bronny, “Multidisciplinary airframe design process: incorporation of steady and unsteady aeroelastic loads,” in 12th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference and 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Indianapolis, IN, USA, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. L. Versiani Cabral, P. Paglione, and B. Silva de Mattos, “Multi-objective design optimization framework for conceptual design of families of aircraft,” in 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Reno, NV, USA, January 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. K. Reynolds and N. Nguyen, “Multi-objective wing shape optimization of an elastically-shaped aircraft concept,” in 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), TX, USA, January 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. K. S. Jeon, J. W. Lee, Y. H. Byun, and Y. H. Yu, “Multidisciplinary UCAV system design and optimization using repetitive response surface enhancement technique,” in 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, Honolulu, Hawaii, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. A. A. Mirzoyan, “Studies on MDO of engine design parameters with mission, noise and emission criteria at SSBJ engine conceptual design,” in 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2008.
  71. S. V. Subramanian and D. A. DeLaurentis, “Application of multidisciplinary systems-of-systems optimization to an aircraft design problem,” Systems Engineering, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 235–251, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. Y. Deremaux, N. Pietremont, J. Negrier, E. Herbin, and M. Ravachol, “Environmental MDO and uncertainty hybrid approach applied to a supersonic business jet,” in 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, Victoria, BC, Canada, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. U. Iemma and M. Diez, “Optimal conceptual design of aircraft including community noise prediction,” in 12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (27th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), Aeroacoustics Conferences, Cambridge, MA, USA, May 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. C. Werner-Westphal, W. Heinze, and P. Horst, “Multidisciplinary integrated preliminary design applied to unconventional aircraft configurations,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 581–590, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. S. Haghighat, J. R. R. A. Martins, and H. H. T. Liu, “Aeroservoelastic design optimization of a flexible wing,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 432–443, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. C. Jouannet and P. Krus, “Direct simulation based optimization for aircraft design including systems,” in 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, Portsmouth, VA, USA, September 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. A. Ning and I. Kroo, “Multidisciplinary considerations in the design of wings and wing tip devices,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 534–543, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. C. M. Meckstroth and W. B. Blake, “Control focused multidisciplinary design optimization of tailless fighter aircraft,” in 16th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2015-2324), Dallas, TX, USA, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. P. Piperni, M. Abdo, F. Kafyeke, and A. T. Isikveren, “Preliminary aerostructural optimization of a large business jet,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1422–1438, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. N. Davendraingam and W. Crossley, “Robust optimization of aircraft design and airline network design incorporating econometric trends,” in 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, September 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. R. E. Peoples and K. E. Willcox, “Value-based multidisciplinary optimization for commercial aircraft design and business risk assessment,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 913–921, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. P. S. Prakasha, P. D. Ciampa, L. Boggero, and M. Fioriti, “Assessment of airframe-subsystems synergy on overall aircraft performance in a collaborative design,” in 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2016-3667), Washington, D.C, USA, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. E. Safavi, M. Chaitanya, J. Ölvander, and P. Krus, “Multidisciplinary optimization of aircraft actuation system for conceptual analysis,” in 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), TX, USA, January 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. E. Safavi, M. Tarkian, H. Gavel, and J. Olvander, “Collaborative multidisciplinary design optimization: a framework applied on aircraft conceptual system design,” Concurrent Engineering, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 236–249, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. A. Tfaily, K. Huynh, P. Piperni, and S. Liscouet-Hanke, “Landing gear integration in an industrial multi-disciplinary optimization environment,” in SAE AeroTech Congress & Exhibition, Montreal, Canada, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. J. Neidhoefer, J. Ryan, B. Leahy, and V. Tripp, “Cooperative multi-disciplinary design of integral load bearing antennas in small UAVs,” in 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Orlando, FL, USA, January 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. D. Lee, L. F. Gonzalez, K. Srinivas, D. Auld, and J. Periaux, “Multi-objective / multidisciplinary design optimisation of blended wing body UAV via advanced evolutionary algorithms,” in 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Reno, NV, USA, January 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. T. Zill, P. D. Ciampa, and B. Nagel, “A collaborative MDO approach for the flexible aircraft,” in 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, (AIAA 2013-1677), 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. P. W. Jansen, R. E. Perez, and J. R. R. A. Martins, “Aerostructural optimization of nonplanar lifting surfaces,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1490–1503, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. K.-S. Zhang, Z.-H. Han, W.-J. Li, and W.-P. Song, “Coupled aerodynamic/structural optimization of a subsonic transport wing using a surrogate model,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 2167–2171, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. T. Long, L. Liu, S. Zhou, J. Wang, and L. Meng, “Multi-objective multidisciplinary optimization of long-endurance UAV wing using surrogate model in model center,” in 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, Victoria, BC, Canada, September 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. P. Gamboa, J. Vale, P. F. J. Lau, and A. Suleman, “Optimization of a morphing wing based on coupled aerodynamic and structural constraints,” AIAA Journal, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2087–2104, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. G. Kenway and J. R. Martins, “Multipoint high-fidelity aerostructural optimization of a transport aircraft configuration,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 144–160, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. R. P. Liem, G. K. W. Kenway, and J. R. R. A. Martins, “Multimission aircraft fuel-burn minimization via multipoint aerostructural optimization,” AIAA Journal, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 104–122, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. T. Kumano, S. Jeong, S. Obayashi, Y. Ito, K. Hatanaka, and H. Morino, “Multidisciplinary design optimization of wing shape for a small jet aircraft using Kriging model,” in 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Reno, NV, USA, January 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. P. D. Ciampa, T. Zill, and B. Nagel, “Aeroelastic design and optimization of unconventional aircraft configurations in a distributed design environment,” in 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. M. J. Muir, E. J. Kolb, A. T. Parkinson et al., “The use of MDO and advanced manufacturing to demonstrate rapid, agile construction of a mission optimized UAV,” in 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, (AIAA 2013-1675), Boston, MA, USA, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. G.-J. Park, T.-H. Lee, K. H. Lee, and K.-H. Hwang, “Robust design: an overview,” AIAA Journal, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 181–191, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. M. J. Daskilewicz, B. J. German, T. T. Takahashi, S. Donovan, and A. Shajanian, “Effects of disciplinary uncertainty on multi-objective optimization in aircraft conceptual design,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 831–846, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. D. Neufeld, N. Nhu-Van, J.-W. Lee, and S. Kim, “A multidisciplinary possibilistic approach to light aircraft conceptual design,” in 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials and Co-located Conferences, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. D. Neufeld, J. Chung, and K. Behdinian, “Aircraft conceptual design optimization considering fidelity uncertainties,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1602–1612, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. M. Tyan, N. V. Nguyen, S. Kim, and J.-W. Lee, “Database adaptive fuzzy membership function generation for possibility-based aircraft design optimization,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 114–124, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. S. Lehner, L. Lurati, G. Bower et al., “Advanced multidisciplinary optimization techniques for efficient subsonic aircraft design,” in 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Orlando, FL, USA, January 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. J. Allison, B. Roth, M. Kokkolaras, I. Kroo, and P. Papalambros, “Aircraft family Design using decomposition-based methods,” in 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conferences, Portsmouth, VA, USA, September 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. S. K. Moon, K. J. Park, and T. W. Simpson, “Platform design variable identification for a product family using multi-objective particle swarm optimization,” Research in Engineering Design, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 95–108, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. R. D. Falck, J. S. Gray, and B. Naylor, “Parallel aircraft trajectory optimization with analytic derivatives,” in 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, (AIAA 2016-3207), Washington, D.C., USA, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. M. Mane, W. A. Crossley, and A. Nusawardhana, “System-of-systems inspired aircraft sizing and airline resource allocation via decomposition,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1222–1235, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. C. Taylor and O. de Weck, “Coupled vehicle design and network flow optimization for air transportation systems,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1479–1486, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. N. V. Nguyen, M. Tyan, and J.-W. Lee, “A modified variable complexity modeling for efficient multidisciplinary aircraft conceptual design,” Optimization and Engineering, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 483–505, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. D. Bryson, B. Stanford, A. McClung et al., “Multidisciplinary optimization of a hovering wing with a service-oriented framework and experimental model validation,” in 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, Orlando, FL, USA, January 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. A. Iwaniuk, W. Wiśniowski, and J. Żółtak, “Multi-disciplinary optimisation approach for a light turboprop aircraft-engine integration and improvement,” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 348–355, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. T. Zill, D. Böhnke, and B. Nagel, “Preliminary aircraft design in a collaborative multidisciplinary design environment,” in 11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference, Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conferences, Virginia Beach, VA, USA, September 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. S. Ziemer, M. Glas, and G. Stenz, “A conceptual design tool for multi-disciplinary aircraft design,” in 2011 Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–13, Big Sky, MT, USA, March 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. T. Lefebvre, P. Schmollgruber, C. Blondeau, and G. Carrier, “Aircraft conceptual design in a multi-level, multi-fidelity, multi-disciplinary optimization process,” in 28th International Congress Of The Aeronautical Sciences, Brisbane, Australia, 2012.
  115. C. M. Liersch and M. Hepperle, “A distributed toolbox for multidisciplinary preliminary aircraft design,” CEAS Aeronautical Journal, vol. 2, no. 1–4, pp. 57–68, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. K. Amadori, D. Lundström, and P. Krus, “Automated design and fabrication of micro-air vehicles,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 226, no. 10, pp. 1271–1282, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. NASA Glenn Research Center, “openMDAO:an open-source MDAO framework written in Python,” December 2017, http://openmdao.org/.
  118. Dassault Systemes, “Isight & the SIMULIA execution engine,” December 2017, https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/isight-simulia-execution-engine/latest-release/.
  119. Phoenix Integration, “ModelCenter Integrate,” December 2017, https://www.phoenix-int.com/product/modelcenter-integrate/.
  120. PIDOTECH, “PIAnO: process integration automation and optimization,” December 2017, http://www.pidotech.com/en/product/PIAnO.aspx.
  121. ESTECO, “modeFRONTIER: process automation and optimization in the engineering design process,” December 2017, https://www.esteco.com/modefrontier.
  122. T. Melin, “Tornado: a vortex lattice method implemented in MATLAB,” December 2017, http://tornado.redhammer.se/.
  123. D. Raymer, Aircraft Design : A Conceptual Approach, American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2013.
  124. E. Torenbeek, Advanced Aircraft Design: Conceptual Design, Technology and Optimization of Subsonic Civil Airplanes, John Wiley & Sons, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. T. Megson, Aircraft Structures for Engineering Students, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2016.
  126. A. El-Sayed, Aircraft Propulsion and Gas Turbine Engines, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2nd edition, 2008.
  127. SIEMENS, “NX NASTRAN: the premier FEA solver for structural simulation,” December 2017, https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/en/products/simcenter/nastran/.
  128. ANSYS, “Fluent,” December 2017, http://www.ansys.com/Products/Fluids/ANSYS-Fluent.
  129. Southwest Research Institute, “NPSS: numerical propulsion system simulation,” December 2017, https://www.swri.org/consortia/numerical-propulsion-system-simulation-npss.
  130. NASA Software, “FLOPS: flight optimization system,” December 2017, https://software.nasa.gov/software/LAR-18934-1.