Research Article
Can Scalable Design of Wings for Flapping Wing Micro Air Vehicle Be Inspired by Natural Flyers?
Table 3
Power functions of wing dimensions and flight parameters vs. body mass.
| | (mm) | (Hz) | (mm2) | (N/m2) | | |
| All species | 43.31m0.39 | 40.63 m−0.29 | 430.29m0.77 | 10.85m0.25 | 7.16 ± 1.47 | 0.48 ± 0.13 | Brachycera (fly) | 27.16m0.27 | 140.83 m−0.054 | 93.06m0.39 | 54.68m0.62 | 8.48 ± 2.81(a) | 0.45 ± 0.10 | Coleoptera (beetle) | 71.10m0.43 | 14.12 m−0.48 | 459.17m0.61 | 3.31m0.037 | 8.31 ± 1.62 | 0.44 ± 0.12 | Nematocera (mosquito) | 17.38m0.14(b) | 99.02 m−0.30 | 97.90m0.39 | 33.72m0.41 | 7.35 ± 1.90(c) | 0.39 ± 0.04 | Bee | 19.41m0.14 | 48.46 m−0.13 | 230.68m0.33 | 10.40m0.75 | 4.4 ± 1.94 | 0.37 ± 0.12(d) | Odonata (dragonfly) | 57.13m0.36 | 40.93m0.036 | 964.24m0.71 | 3.56m0.23 | 7.79 ± 4.52 | 0.70 ± 0.29 | Butterfly | 74.39m0.53 | 19.16 m−0.090 | 3825.99m0.83 | 1.60m0.095 | 2.23 ± 0.87 | 0.64 ± 0.14 | Hawkmoth | 42.32m0.42 | 29.34 m−0.20 | 56.94m5.71 | 7.07m0.20 | 5.19 ± 0.91 | 0.47 ± 0.09(e) | Bats | 60.16m0.36 | 15.59 m−0.19 | 862.71m0.76 | 4.55m0.29 | 6.65 ± 0.97 | 0.53 ± 0.10 | Hummingbird | 21.07m0.62 | 88.25 m−0.57 | 133.42m1.15 | 38.27 m−0.16 | 7.86 ± 0.56 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | Bird | 36.98m0.41 | — | 349.11m0.80 | 9.71m0.27 | 8.41 ± 2.98 | — |
|
|
The accuracy of average value of (a), (c), (d), (e), and formula (b) will be low due to the less survey numbers. The data in and are displayed as . |