Research Article
Autonomous Landing of a Micro Aerial Vehicle on a Moving Platform Using a Composite Landmark
Table 2
Landing comparison experiment results (20 experiments).
| Motion model | Parameters | Bias | AVT | AVT | LR/SR | LR/SR | (Encoder 1) | (R2D-MPL) | (Method 3) | (R2D-MPL) | (Method 3) |
| Line | | 0.00 m/s | 12.4 s | 14.2 s | 0.18 m/90% | 0.25 m/85% | Line | | 0.00 m/s | 13.2 s | 15.7 s | 0.21 m/85% | 0.27 m/75% | Line | | 0.15 m/s | 13.6 s | 22.4 s | 0.22 m/80% | 0.38 m/25% | Line | | 0.30 m/s | 14.1 s | 25.1 s | 0.25 m/85% | 0.40 m/5% | Circle | | 0.00 m/s | 15.7 s | 23.2 s | 0.21 m/80% | 0.42 m/40% | Circle | | 0.00 m/s | 17.4 s | 27.4 s | 0.24 m/85% | 0.41 m/30% | Circle | | 0.15 m/s | 18.1 s | Fail | 0.28 m/75% | Fail | Circle | | 0.30 m/s | 19.5 s | Fail | 0.32 m/80% | Fail |
|
|