Research Article
Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Missile Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm
Table 1
Differences between the numerical and experimental results [
8].
| Mach number | AoA | (Fluent) | (Exp) | Disc. % | (Fluent) | (Exp) | Disc. % |
| 1.4 | 3.96 | 0.688 | 0.6971 | 1.3 | 1.024 | 1.067 | 4.02 | 5.97 | 0.7977 | 0.8068 | 1.12 | 1.547 | 1.609 | 3.85 | 2 | 3.99 | 0.5834 | 0.5903 | 1.16 | 0.752 | 0.773 | 2.61 | 6.02 | 0.673 | 0.6831 | 1.47 | 1.148 | 1.184 | 3.01 | 2.5 | 4.01 | 0.5181 | 0.5134 | 0.92 | 0.648 | 0.676 | 4.1 | 6.05 | 0.5874 | 0.5971 | 1.61 | 1.011 | 1.055 | 4.17 | 4 | 4.03 | 0.3808 | 0.3931 | 3.12 | 0.502 | 0.532 | 5.49 | 6.08 | 0.4359 | 0.4539 | 3.95 | 0.829 | 0.881 | 5.88 |
|
|