Pretension Design and Analysis of Deployable Mesh Antenna considering the Effect of Gravity

<div>The comparison between two pretension design methods. (a) General method. (b) Method in this paper. The deviation between <svg height="15.0221pt" id="M1" style="vertical-align:-3.9083pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -11.1138 13.9283 15.0221" width="13.9283pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M600 480C600 590 528 650 384 650H143L137 622C222 614 225 607 210 531L130 127C113 41 106 36 23 28L17 0H294L300 28C204 36 195 42 212 127L243 284L314 263C327 263 339 263 352 264C465 271 600 337 600 480ZM508 481C508 351 402 304 329 304C289 304 265 311 250 317L295 559C302 594 310 606 323 611C335 616 350 619 367 619C455 619 508 573 508 481Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.026,-6.899)"><path d="M554 433L549 437C539 437 513 441 503 443C481 447 456 451 436 451C354 451 268 415 216 368C150 308 99 205 99 106C99 24 136 -12 165 -12C196 -12 243 14 268 33C318 70 374 118 415 181H419L395 39C374 -84 332 -149 295 -175C269 -193 245 -197 212 -197C137 -197 93 -156 76 -102C71 -87 61 -87 51 -96C36 -110 24 -130 24 -147C24 -183 76 -257 171 -257C226 -257 285 -227 323 -200C387 -155 455 -76 480 94C499 225 538 391 554 433ZM460 386C457 361 438 287 426 254C408 218 373 176 332 133C294 93 246 61 217 61C198 61 186 80 186 122C186 167 206 250 231 294C262 349 288 375 317 387C334 394 358 400 381 400C413 400 439 393 460 386Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.656,3.858)"><path d="M389 0V32C297 38 291 46 291 118V635C234 613 175 595 109 583V556L161 554C203 552 207 547 207 497V118C207 46 201 38 110 32V0H389Z"></path></g></svg> and <svg height="15.0221pt" id="M2" style="vertical-align:-3.9083pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -11.1138 13.9283 15.0221" width="13.9283pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M600 480C600 590 528 650 384 650H143L137 622C222 614 225 607 210 531L130 127C113 41 106 36 23 28L17 0H294L300 28C204 36 195 42 212 127L243 284L314 263C327 263 339 263 352 264C465 271 600 337 600 480ZM508 481C508 351 402 304 329 304C289 304 265 311 250 317L295 559C302 594 310 606 323 611C335 616 350 619 367 619C455 619 508 573 508 481Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.026,-6.899)"><path d="M554 433L549 437C539 437 513 441 503 443C481 447 456 451 436 451C354 451 268 415 216 368C150 308 99 205 99 106C99 24 136 -12 165 -12C196 -12 243 14 268 33C318 70 374 118 415 181H419L395 39C374 -84 332 -149 295 -175C269 -193 245 -197 212 -197C137 -197 93 -156 76 -102C71 -87 61 -87 51 -96C36 -110 24 -130 24 -147C24 -183 76 -257 171 -257C226 -257 285 -227 323 -200C387 -155 455 -76 480 94C499 225 538 391 554 433ZM460 386C457 361 438 287 426 254C408 218 373 176 332 133C294 93 246 61 217 61C198 61 186 80 186 122C186 167 206 250 231 294C262 349 288 375 317 387C334 394 358 400 381 400C413 400 439 393 460 386Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.656,3.858)"><path d="M414 144C384 79 371 75 317 75H135L276 221C367 316 408 376 408 465C408 570 327 635 237 635C179 635 131 609 100 575L42 494L67 471C94 510 138 565 205 565C277 565 321 517 321 435C321 348 258 270 195 195C146 137 88 81 33 26V0H411C423 44 433 88 446 135L414 144Z"></path></g></svg> increases as the antenna aperture increases.</div>

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Pretension Design and Analysis of Deployable Mesh Antenna considering the Effect of Gravity 