Endoatmospheric Ascent Optimal Guidance with Analytical Nonlinear Trajectory Prediction

<div>Comparison between <svg height="17.427pt" id="M186" style="vertical-align:-5.5289pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -11.8981 30.6399 17.427" width="30.6399pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M619 670C619 686 593 712 555 712S459 686 410 634S335 504 320 430H250L219 400L222 388H312L258 73C223 -133 201 -166 187 -180C175 -191 158 -199 140 -199C123 -199 88 -188 74 -172C68 -166 63 -164 54 -171C38 -185 23 -201 23 -215C23 -236 60 -261 93 -261C122 -261 161 -247 207 -200C268 -138 300 -71 337 94C365 220 376 277 394 387L501 399L521 430H401C432 623 464 665 501 665C524 665 544 651 567 627C577 617 583 618 592 625C601 631 619 651 619 670Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,6.721,3.132)"><path d="M525 275C525 381 464 451 380 451C338 451 289 439 241 405C158 347 127 277 106 152C51 -168 37 -216 24 -242L28 -257C42 -256 92 -247 117 -222C126 -213 134 -193 150 -69L166 32C184 10 211 -12 245 -12C276 -12 332 8 384 46C458 100 525 176 525 275ZM436 260C436 131 366 41 267 41C246 41 208 51 175 82C181 125 187 162 195 200C220 322 257 400 328 400C398 400 436 338 436 260Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,12.234,0)"><path d="M300 -147C201 -63 143 98 143 270S200 602 300 686L282 710C136 610 70 450 70 271V270C70 89 136 -72 282 -170L300 -147Z"></path></g><rect height="0.65243" width="9.25158" x="16.7317" y="-11.1958"></rect><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,16.732,0)"><path d="M697 650H468L461 623L492 619C539 613 547 605 518 546C481 471 367 264 278 116H276C239 278 197 500 186 567C180 604 185 613 226 619L252 623L260 650H24L17 623C78 617 92 613 108 533L216 -11H247C365 200 515 462 560 529C616 612 624 615 689 623L697 650Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,25.983,0)"><path d="M275 270C275 450 212 609 64 710L45 686C145 604 203 442 203 270S147 -63 45 -147L64 -170C213 -68 275 89 275 270Z"></path></g></svg> and the corresponding approximate polynomial.</div>

International Journal of Aerospace Engineering

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Endoatmospheric Ascent Optimal Guidance with Analytical Nonlinear Trajectory Prediction 