The Effect of Fabrication Method on Passive UHF RFID Tag Performance

<table>Calculated PRC’s according to simulated antenna impedances with <svg height="11.125" id="M32" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 18.262501 11.125" width="18.262501" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,10.862)"><path d="M535 230h-483v50h483v-50z" id="x2212"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,10.041,10.862)"><path d="M285 378v-2q65 -13 102 -54.5t37 -97.5q0 -57 -30.5 -104.5t-74 -75t-85.5 -42t-72 -14.5q-31 0 -59.5 11t-40.5 23q-19 18 -16 36q1 16 23 33q13 10 24 0q58 -51 124 -51q55 0 88 40t33 112q0 64 -39 96.5t-88 32.5q-29 0 -64 -11l-6 29q77 25 118 57.5t41 84.5
q0 45 -26.5 69.5t-68.5 24.5q-67 0 -120 -79l-20 20l43 63q51 56 127 56h1q66 0 107 -37t41 -95q0 -42 -31 -71q-22 -23 -68 -54z" id="x33"></path></g>
</svg> <svg height="11.425" id="M33" style="vertical-align:-0.0pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 12.9875 11.425" width="12.9875" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.363)"><path d="M719 146l-18 -146h-243l-5 18q2 4 17 25t24 36l25 42t26.5 52.5t21 56.5t16 65t5.5 68q0 121 -55.5 194.5t-149.5 73.5q-95 0 -150 -72t-55 -199q0 -54 18.5 -114t36.5 -94t48.5 -82.5t32.5 -51.5l-7 -18h-244l-17 146l27 1q17 -49 31.5 -62t45.5 -13h89l-21 21t-26 26.5
l-26 29t-28 35.5l-23 37.5t-20.5 43t-12 45.5t-5.5 51q0 133 88 218.5t219 85.5q132 0 218 -83t86 -218q0 -40 -11.5 -78t-33 -71.5t-39 -56t-44 -51t-32.5 -35.5h84q35 0 48 12t31 63z" id="x3A9"></path></g>
</svg> (red dashed curve) and <svg height="11.125" id="M34" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 18.262501 11.125" width="18.262501" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,10.862)"><path d="M535 230h-212v-233h-58v233h-213v50h213v210h58v-210h212v-50z" id="x2B"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,10.041,10.862)"><path d="M285 378v-2q65 -13 102 -54.5t37 -97.5q0 -57 -30.5 -104.5t-74 -75t-85.5 -42t-72 -14.5q-31 0 -59.5 11t-40.5 23q-19 18 -16 36q1 16 23 33q13 10 24 0q58 -51 124 -51q55 0 88 40t33 112q0 64 -39 96.5t-88 32.5q-29 0 -64 -11l-6 29q77 25 118 57.5t41 84.5
q0 45 -26.5 69.5t-68.5 24.5q-67 0 -120 -79l-20 20l43 63q51 56 127 56h1q66 0 107 -37t41 -95q0 -42 -31 -71q-22 -23 -68 -54z" id="x33"></path></g>
</svg> <svg height="11.425" id="M35" style="vertical-align:-0.0pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 12.9875 11.425" width="12.9875" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,11.363)"><path d="M719 146l-18 -146h-243l-5 18q2 4 17 25t24 36l25 42t26.5 52.5t21 56.5t16 65t5.5 68q0 121 -55.5 194.5t-149.5 73.5q-95 0 -150 -72t-55 -199q0 -54 18.5 -114t36.5 -94t48.5 -82.5t32.5 -51.5l-7 -18h-244l-17 146l27 1q17 -49 31.5 -62t45.5 -13h89l-21 21t-26 26.5
l-26 29t-28 35.5l-23 37.5t-20.5 43t-12 45.5t-5.5 51q0 133 88 218.5t219 85.5q132 0 218 -83t86 -218q0 -40 -11.5 -78t-33 -71.5t-39 -56t-44 -51t-32.5 -35.5h84q35 0 48 12t31 63z" id="x3A9"></path></g>
</svg> (black dashed curve) tolerances for chip reactance.</table>

International Journal of Antennas and Propagation

The Effect of Fabrication Method on Passive UHF RFID Tag Performance

Figure 6