The Effect of Fabrication Method on Passive UHF RFID Tag Performance

<table class="table-group" id="tab2"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left">Manufacturer’s description</td><td align="center">Curing conditions (<svg height="12.9375" id="M22" style="vertical-align:-0.0pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 5.1624999 12.9375" width="5.1624999" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.012,-0,0,-.012,.062,4.712)"><path d="M326 255q0 -56 -41 -96t-99 -40t-99 40t-41 96t41 96t99 40t99 -40t41 -96zM274 255q0 38 -25.5 65t-62.5 27t-62.5 -27t-25.5 -65t25.5 -65t62.5 -27t62.5 27t25.5 65z" id="x2218"></path></g>
</svg>C, min)</td><td align="center">Viscosity (P)</td><td align="center">Conductivity (MS/m)</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">Single component silver ink consisting of polyester resin and silver particles.</td><td align="center">120, 20</td><td align="center">200–300</td><td align="center">1.25</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="4"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

International Journal of Antennas and Propagation

tab2

Table 2

Table 2: The Effect of Fabrication Method on Passive UHF RFID Tag Performance 