Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Volume 2011, Article ID 541734, 8 pages
Research Article

Terahertz Harmonic Operation of Microwave Fresnel Zone Plate Lens and Antenna: Frequency Filtering and Space Resolution Properties

Departamento de Electrónica Engineering, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso, Chile

Received 1 July 2011; Revised 9 September 2011; Accepted 11 September 2011

Academic Editor: Krishnasamy Selvan

Copyright © 2011 Hristo D. Hristov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


This paper examines the binary Fresnel zone plate (FZP) lens frequency-harmonic and space-resolution focusing, and its application as a FZP lens antenna. A microwave FZP lens antenna (FZPA) radiates both at design (90 GHz) and terahertz (THz) odd harmonic frequencies. Frequency and space domain antenna operation are studied analytically by use of the vector diffraction integral applied to a realistic printed FZPA. It is found that all harmonic gain peaks are roughly identical in form, bandwidth, and top values. At each harmonic frequency, the FZPA has a beamwidth that closely follows the Rayleigh resolution criterion. If the lens/antenna resolution is of prime importance and the small aperture efficiency is a secondary problem the microwave-design FZP lens antenna can be of great use at much higher terahertz frequencies. Important feature of the microwave FZP lens is its broader-zone construction compared to the equal in resolution terahertz-design FZP lens. Thus, unique and expensive microtechnology for the microwave FZP lens fabrication is not required. High-order harmonic operation of the FZP lens or lens antenna could find space resolution and frequency filtering applications in the terahertz and optical metrology, imaging tomography, short-range communications, spectral analysis, synchrotron facilities, and so on.

1. Introduction

During the last two decades, a rapid exploration of terahertz waves is taking place [13]. Fresnel zone plate (FZP) lenses, binary and phase correcting, have already turned into essential focusing and imaging elements in the microwave and terahertz electronic systems [413]. At terahertz frequencies, the multilevel phase-correcting dielectric FZP lens shows better efficiency compared to the ordinary dielectric lens, and is easier and cheaper to fabricate because of its planar configuration [46].

If the high lens resolution and small thickness are of prime importance, the binary FZP lens consisting of free-standing or printed skinny metal rings would be preferable. Such lenses have found a lot of applications in the areas of 3D imaging tomography, electron microscopy, sensing and security systems, and synchrotron radiation facilities for beam focusing [11, 1419]. For these purposes, a special lithography process has been developed for fabrication of high aspect ratio gold structures on silicon nitride membranes [19]. Because the classical FZP lens is acting as a diffraction grating of annular elements, it possesses very intriguing spectral periodicity [5, 9, 11, 13, 16].

Main objective of this paper is to clarify the harmonic action of binary FZP lens and antenna, and to examine them numerically in frequency and space domains with for grounding hypothetically their future employment as multiband focusing and filtering devices.

Section 2 provides shortly the FZP lens design and resolution basics and makes physical clarification of the harmonic-mode FZP focusing mechanism.

Section 3 illustrates the microwave FZP antenna radiation geometry used in the vector Kirchoff’s diffraction theory for the axially symmetric FZP lens antenna analysis and optimization. The particular 90 GHz printed FZP lens antenna design described in this section operates in a periodic way at much higher frequencies in accordance with the odd harmonic sequence 𝑓1,3𝑓1,5𝑓1, and so forth, where 𝑓1=90GHz is the antenna design (first order) microwave frequency. For the first time, the FZP antenna space-domain operation is studied for finding antenna vector radiation field and resolution characteristics at the design (microwave) and higher (terahertz) harmonic frequencies.

Section 4 describes FZP lens antenna designed for the terahertz frequency of 1530 GHz. Its radiation, structural, and technological properties are observed and contrasted to those of the same-size 90 GHz microwave FZP lens antenna operating at its 15th terahertz harmonic frequency of 1530 GHz as well.

The paper is completed by a general conclusion, acknowledgement, and list of references.

2. Harmonic-Mode Operation of FZP Lens Illuminated by Plane Wave

2.1. FZP Design

In general, a FZP lens centered in the origin of Cartesian coordinate system is transforming an axially incident spherical wave front of radius 𝑧=𝐹𝑠 into multiple spherical waves focused on the lens axis z at multiple foci with focal distances (lengths) 𝑧=+𝐹𝑛, where 𝑛=1,3,5, are odd numbers. The unusual multiple focusing action of the FZP lens is due to its diffractive nature, and this is its major distinction from the ordinary refractive lens. The first or primary focus for which 𝑛=1 has a focal distance 𝐹1 collects the largest portion of the focused field energy in the forward semispace 𝑧>0. This allows the others or so-called secondary foci at 𝑧=𝐹3=𝐹1/3, 𝑧=𝐹5=𝐹1/5, and so on to be neglected.

Figure 1 illustrates a binary-amplitude FZP lens of diameter 𝐷 illuminated along the axis 𝑧 by a plane wave that corresponds to 𝐹𝑠=. With the secondary foci disregarded, the lens will have a single focus at a focal distance 𝐹=𝐹1. Such a lens is operating in the antenna receive mode. The FZP lens drawn in Figure 1 has odd zones closed (tinted in black).

Figure 1: Plane-wave illuminated binary negative Fresnel zone plate lens.

The normally illuminated by a plane wave planar FZP conmprises concentric half-wave zones with zone radii 𝑏(𝑚) determined by 𝑏(𝑚)=𝑚𝜆𝐹+𝑚𝜆22,(1) where 𝜆 is the design wavelength, 𝑚=1,2,3,,𝑀  is the current zone number, and 𝑀 is the ending zone number.

In optics the following approximation of (1) is usually valid: 𝑏(𝑚)=𝑚𝜆𝐹=𝑏(1)𝑚,(2) where the term (𝑚𝜆/2)2 is neglected because the ratio 𝑚𝜆𝐹(𝑚𝜆/2)2 takes place, and 𝑏(1)=𝜆𝐹 is the first zone radius.

2.2. FZP Lens Resolution

By definition, the so-called Rayleigh resolution criterion for the resolving power of a circular aperture of diameter 𝐷 is typically expressed by the resolving angle 𝛿0, in radians [2022] 𝛿0𝜆=𝜒𝐷,(3) where 𝜒=1.22 is a constant that is valid for every open circular aperture illuminated normally by a plane wave. This can be the aperture of a circular horn, parabolic reflector, ordinary refractive, or phase-correcting FZP lens.

From (3), is evident that if the diameter 𝐷 is maintained constant, the resolving angle is proportional to the wavelength 𝜆 and 𝜒. It is said that the smaller angle 𝛿0 the bigger lens resolution, and vise versa.

In the case of a binary FZP, however, the constant value 1.22 of 𝜒 is valid only if the total number of zones 𝑀 is bigger than about 200. For smaller 𝑀, say 𝑀<50, 𝜒 differs from 1.22 and varies with 𝑀, or 𝜒=𝜒(𝑀) [23, 24]. More exactly, 𝜒(𝑀)>1.22 for the positive FZP lenses (odd zones open), and 𝜒(𝑀)<1.22 for the negative FZP lenses (odd zones closed). In Table 1, several values of 𝜒(𝑀) for positive (pFZP) and negative (nFZP) lenses are listed [22, 23].

Table 1: Values of 𝜒(𝑀) for 𝑀50.

From Table 1, it is concluded that for 𝑀50 and the same normalized aperture diameter 𝐷/𝜆, the negative FZP has a smaller resolving angle 𝛿0 (or bigger resolution) than the positive FZP and ordinary refractive lens by 15% and 9.5%, for 𝑀=10, 8% and 5.5% for 𝑀=20, 5% and 3.5%, for 𝑀=30, 3.5% and 2.5%, for 𝑀=40, and 2.7% and 2%, for 𝑀=50, respectively.

The resolving angle 𝛿0 is directly related to the first null radius 𝑟0 of the FZP Airy diffraction pattern at the focal plane. The radius 𝑟0 measures the space (distance) lens resolution and is opposite to angle 𝛿0 in the corresponding rignt triangle, so that tan𝛿0=𝑟0/𝐹. For a high resolution, the angle 𝛿0 is small enough, or 𝛿0𝑟0/𝐹. Thus, taking into account (3) the resolving lens 𝑟0 can be expressed as 𝑟0=𝜒(𝑀)𝜆𝐹𝐷.(4)

The ending zone width Δ𝑏 is related to the resolving lens radius as follows [11, 23, 24]: 𝑟0=𝜒(𝑀)Δ𝑏(5) or vice versa 𝑟Δ𝑏=0𝜒(𝑀).(6)

2.3. Multifrequency Focusing of FZP Lens: Physical Justification

Next, we clarify the multiple frequency-domain behavior of the binary FZP lens illuminated by a plane wave. This phenomenon is analogious to the axial multiple focusing of the same lens. Both phenomena are linked by (1) and can be easier explained by its approximation (2). From (2), it follows that for a given FZP diameter 𝐷=2𝑏(𝑀), the change of the focal distance 𝐹 for 𝜆=𝜆1=const., or the wavelength 𝜆 for 𝐹=const. will raise a multifocal or multifrequency effect, respectively, if the total number of zones 𝑀 somehow changes. Here 𝜆1 is the design wavelength. This statement might be confusing having in mind that for a realistic FZP design, 𝐷 and 𝑀 are both constant quantities.

Next, it is clarified that the multifrequency phenomenon taking as an example a binary FZP lens of four Fresnel (or half-wave) zones designed for a focal length 𝐹 at a frequency 𝑓1 (or wavelength 𝜆1). Consider first this FZP lens illuminated by a plane wave of frequency equal to the third harmonic frequency 𝑓3=3𝑓1, corresponding to the free-space wavelength 𝜆3=𝜆1/3. The radius (2) could be rewritten for the FZP diameter as follows: 𝐷𝑀3=2𝑀3𝐹𝜆3.(7)

The maintenance of same aperture diameter 𝐷 and focal length 𝐹 for the three times smaller wavelength 𝜆3 requires three times bigger number of zones, or 𝑀3=3𝑀. This means that in each real zone corresponding to the design wavelength 𝜆1 three virtual 𝜆3-subzones should be enclosed: two positive (in white) and one negative (in grey). Thus, the virtual subzone radii can be calculated by the equation 𝑏(𝑚3)=𝑚3𝜆3𝐹=3𝑚𝜆3𝐹, where 𝑚3 is the current subzone number. The above suggestion is illustrated by Figure 2(a), where in each open realistic zone, three virtual subzones are included. The fields produced by the 2nd subzone and 3rd subzone will be canceled leaving only the 1st subzone to contribute at the focus.

Figure 2: Harmonic-action FZP lens at (a) 3rd harmonic frequency 𝑓3 and (b) 5th harmonic frequency 𝑓5.

Similarly, for an illuminating plane wave with a frequency 𝑓5=5𝑓1, or wavelength 𝜆5=𝜆1/5, each real open zone should contain five virtual subzones: three positive and two negative, with radii found by 𝑏(𝑚5)=5𝑚𝜆5𝐹. The two positive (3rd and 5th) and two negative (2nd and 4th) subzones will cancel at the primary focus leaving again only one, the 1st positive half-wave subzone to be productive. The above considerations are valid for all higher harmonic frequencies.

The field intensities provided at the primary focal point by all real open zones corresponding to 𝑓1 and by all virtual constructive subzones related to any odd harmonic frequency are expected to be roughly equal. This is because the total constructive areas, the real 𝐴1 and the virtual 𝐴3,𝐴5,, normalized by corresponding squared wavelengths 𝜆21,𝜆23,𝜆25,, respectively, are about the same (or 𝐴1/𝜆21𝐴3/𝜆23𝐴5/𝜆23const.). In other words, the focusing gain 𝐺𝑓 of all constructive zones, actually related to the design frequency, and virtually related to any harmonic frequency, could be considered equal.

Taking into account the basic lens/antenna relation between the focusing gain and radiating aperture 𝐺𝑓=4𝜋𝐴𝜂/𝜆2, the radiation aperture efficiency for each frequency is expressed as follows: 𝜂1=𝐺𝑓𝜆21/4𝜋𝐴1, 𝜂3=𝐺𝑓𝜆23/4𝜋𝐴1, 𝜂5=𝐺𝑓𝜆25/4𝜋𝐴1,, and so forth. It is seen that the efficiency values 𝜂1,𝜂3,𝜂3, … are directly proportional to the respective ratios 𝜆21/𝐴1,𝜆23/𝐴1,𝜆25/𝐴1,. Because the physical aperture area of the lens 𝐴1 and the focusing gain 𝐺𝑓 are considered constant quantities, the FZP aperture efficiencies for the 3rd, 5th, and so forth harmonics are diminishing rapidly compared to the efficiency for the design frequency, or 𝜂3=𝜂1(1/3)2, 𝜂5=𝜂1(1/5)2, and so on.

3. Microwave FZP Lens Antenna Operation at Terahertz Harmonic Frequencies

3.1. Radiation Characteristics Computed by Use of Vector Kirchhoff’s Diffraction Theory

Consider the geometry of binary FZP lens antenna consisting of feed-horn and positive binary FZP of concentric metal rings (in grey) obstructing the even zones (Figure 3). The feed phase center coincides with the lens focal point 𝑃1(0,0,𝐹). In antenna transmit mode, the spherical wave that originated from 𝑃1 illuminates the FZP lens which odd open Fresnel zones radiate constructively along the lens axis (𝜃=0).

Figure 3: Radiation geometry of FZP lens antenna.

The antenna radiation characteristics have been computed by use of the vector Kirchhoff’s diffraction integral solved explicitly for the axially symmetric binary FZP lens antenna [5, 8, 9].

The feed-horn field is approximated theoretically by the broadly used aperture directive gain function 𝐺𝑓(𝜓,𝑛)=𝐺𝑓(0,𝑛)cos𝑛𝜓 for 0𝜓𝜋/2, where 𝐺𝑓(0,𝑛)=2(𝑛+1), and 𝐺𝑓(𝜓,𝑛)=0 for 𝜋/2<𝜓𝜋. The lens aperture field is tapered to the edge level equal to −10 dB, or 10 dB down to the center field magnitude, 𝑛=8.32 and 𝐺𝑓(0)=12.7 dBi.

The microwave FZP lens antenna design studied in this paper is marked by the acronym FZPA-M-10, which stands for FZP Antenna designed at the Microwave frequency 𝑓1=90GHz and by having a FZP lens with 10 Fresnel zones in total (Figure 4). The lens has a diameter 𝐷=100mm and focal length 𝐹=66.7mm, so the lens aspect ratio is 𝐹/𝐷=0.67.

Figure 4: Binary FZP lens of FZPA-M-10 designed at microwave frequency of 90 GHz with all even zones covered by thin metal (in grey) printed on dielectric substrate (in light brown).

The FZP lens is made as a printed construction with metal rings of thickness 𝑡 printed on a dielectric substrate of width 𝑤 and a complex permittivity ̃𝜀𝑟(𝑓)=𝜀𝑟[1𝑗tan𝛿(𝑓)], which is a function of frequency 𝑓. In the frequency band Δ𝑓=𝑓max𝑓min, the loss tangent tan𝛿 of typical microwave dielectrics is roughly increased as a linear function of 𝑓 in the range Δtan𝛿=tan𝛿maxtan𝛿min and can be approximated by the next simple equation:tan𝛿(𝑓)tan𝛿min+kΔ𝑓𝑓min,(8) where tan𝛿min corresponds to 𝑓min, and 𝑘Δ=Δtan𝛿/Δ𝑓 is a constant specific for a given dielectric substrate. Equation (7) is an author’s approximation for dielectrics with a linear conduct of the loss tangent versus frequency and is based on published measurements for some dielectrics in the millimeter-submillimer frequency bands [6]. For instance, in the 90÷1500 GHz frequency band (8) matches well the loss tangent behavior of Teflon, chosen here as a FZP substrate dielectric, if 𝑘Δ=0.0104. The Teflon real permittivity 𝜀𝑟 is approximately equal to 2.05 in the whole band. According to (8), for the working FZP frequencies 90, 270, and 1350 GHz, for instance, tan𝛿 has values 5104, 6.8104, and 17.9104, respectively.

In the studied FZP lens structure, the Teflon substrate plate is 1 mm thick, while the metal rings have a width of 0.1 mm and are supposed infinitely conductive.

The outmost (10th) zone is obstructed by a metal ring of width Δ𝑏𝑀=2.83 mm, which is slightly less than the wavelength corresponding to the design frequency of 90 GHz but is about 10–15 times bigger than the wavelengths related to highest harmonic frequencies in the band for which the FZP-M-10 is studied here.

3.2. Frequency-Domain Performance of FZP Antenna

Frequency analysis of the FZP lens antenna is based on the variation of far-field directive gain versus frequency in the normal direction 𝑓=90 along the 𝑧-axis (or at 𝜃=0deg). The main frequency characteristics of interest are the antenna directive peak gain (𝐺𝑝, dBi) and the 3-dB gain bandwidth (B) around the design and harmonic frequencies.

The FZPA-M-10 has been examined numerically in the frequency band 50–1550 GHz. Figure 5 illustrates the characteristic multiband comblike FZP focusing/radiation behavior with gain peaks at the microwave frequency of 90 GHz and its odd terahertz harmonics of 270,450,630,,1350, and 1530 GHz.

Figure 5: Frequency-domain harmonic action of binary FZP antenna: directive gain versus frequency.

The multiband FZP antenna is considered as a multitude of individual harmonic-frequency antennas radiating all or each at a time. The analysis is made on the assumption that each individual harmonic antenna is fed by a feed located at the same focal point 𝑃1 and radiating at the respective odd harmonic. These imaginary feeds are supposed to have the same shape radiation patterns and directive gains. In fact, such an enclosure of several different sizes of feeds (feed horns, for example) in the small focal area is a very challenging construction.

Practically, the harmonic-frequency feeds could be also located off axis on a circular arc, which is the scan curve of the FZP lens antenna [20]. Another pragmatic feed might be a single frequency independent feed like the Archimedean or equiangular spiral antenna having a radiation pattern and input impedance match roughly preserved for a number of microwave/THz harmonic frequencies. And finally, same configuration narrowband feedantennas, designed for the basic and harmonic frequencies, might be positioned each at a time in the FZP focal area by a simple electromechanical device. Thus, every feedantenna will illuminate the FZP lens each at a time, or consecutively.

The essential frequency-domain parameters of the antenna FZPA-M-10 are listed in Table 2 for the design frequency 𝑓1=90GHz and for the two harmonic frequencies 𝑓3=270GHz and 𝑓15=1350GHz. It is seen that the peak gain 𝐺𝑝 (dB) has a slight fluctuation with the frequency due to the multiray transmission and absorption through the dielectric substrate, and the absolute bandwidth 𝐵 (GHz) is kept almost constant or 16.5 GHz, respectively. The normalized (relative) bandwidth 𝐵 (%) and aperture efficiency 𝑒 quickly go down with the frequency rise.

Table 2: Frequency-domain radiation parameters of FZP lens antennas: microwave (M) and terahertz (T) designs.
3.3. Space-Domain or Radiation Pattern Study

Here by a space-domain antenna study, the FZP lens radiation pattern analysis at the design and harmonic frequencies is understood. Figure 6 illustrates the radiation characteristics of microwave antenna FZPA-M-10, namely: (a) copolar radiation pattern and (b) cross-polar radiation pattern in the small angular interval 𝜃=0÷3deg at the diagonal cut plane 𝜑=45, for the same three harmonic frequencies chosen in the previous section: 90, 270, and 1350 GHz. In addition to the peak gain value of about 29 dBi, other basic pattern parameters can be found: main lobe beamwidth 𝐵𝑊(deg) read at a level 3 dB down to the peak gain value, first side lobe level 𝐿𝑠(dB), and maximum cross-polarization 𝐿cr measured within the main lobe beamwidth.

Figure 6: Radiation characteristics of FZPA-M-10 versus angle 𝜃: (a) copolar radiation patterns, (b) cross-polar radiation patterns. Red, blue, and green lines correspond to 90, 270, and 1350 GHz, respectively.

The half-power (or −3 dB) antenna beamwidth 𝐵𝑊 is approximately equal to the lens aperture resolving angle 𝛿0 [22], or 𝐵𝑊𝛿0.(9)

For the FZP design wavelength 𝜆1 and for the harmonic wavelengths 𝜆3,𝜆5,, and so on, (3) for the resolving angle can be rewritten as follows: 𝛿0𝑖𝜆=𝜒(𝑀)𝑖𝐷,(10) where 𝑖=1,3,5, is an odd integer number.

Thus, for a known design FZP resolving angle 𝛿01, the 𝑖𝑡 resolving angle 𝛿0𝑖 is in a reverse proportion to 𝛿01, or 𝛿0𝑖=𝛿01𝑖,(11) where 𝑖=𝑓𝑖/𝑓1 is the harmonic scale ratio.

Similarly, for the 𝑖th harmonic resolving distance 𝑟0𝑖, (4) and (6) can be rewritten, respectively, as follows:𝑟0𝑖𝜆=𝜒(𝑀)𝜄𝐹𝐷,𝑟(12)0𝑖=𝜒(𝑀)Δ𝑏𝑖.(13)

Table 3 summarizes the radiation (space) pattern characteristics of microwave antenna FZPA-M-10 at the design frequency of 90 GHz, and at its 3rd and 15th harmonics, found from Figures 6(a), and 6(b). From Table 3 several essential features of the FZP antenna space-domain behavior are discovered.(i)Theoretical beamwidth matches very well the Rayleigh resolution criterion for all working frequencies. For example, at 𝑓=𝑓1=90GHz the FZP lens antenna has a main lobe beamwidth 2.4deg that is roughly equal to the lens resolving angle 𝛿01=2.43deg. At the 3rd harmonic (270 GHz) and 15th harmonic (1350 GHz) the beamwidth is 3  and 15 times much narrow: 𝐵𝑊3=0.78 deg and 𝐵𝑊15=0.15 deg. The same harmonic ratio 1315 is valid for the corresponding values of resolving angle 𝛿0 and resolving distance 𝑟0.(ii)At all microwave and terahertz harmonics, the studied FZP lens antenna preserves roughly constant the peak gain values (𝐺𝑝= 29 dBi), first sidelobe level (𝐿𝑠=11dB), and cross-polar level within the mainlobe beamwidth (𝐿cr=25dB).

Table 3: Radiation pattern parameters of FZP lens antennas: microwave (M) and terahertz (T) designs.

The quick drop of the FZP lens/antenna focusing/radiation efficiency with the rise of harmonic frequency deserves more discussions. The aperture antenna radiation efficiency less than 40–50% is not satisfactory, and less than 10–20% is considered small. In principle, the binary FZP lens/antenna belongs to the latter efficiency category because of noneffective amplitude and phase aperture utilization. By exploiting a proper phase correction of the aperture field like in the grooved dielectric or multidielectric FZP lenses, for instance, the corresponding FZP lens antenna easy reaches at its design (first-order) frequency the radiation efficiency of the classical aperture antennas (horn, parabolic-reflector, etc.), though in a rather smaller frequency band.

The low efficiency might be considered as a price for the unique features of the binary FZP lens or antenna: precise harmonic filtering and resolution characteristics that the usual directive-aperture antennas do not possess. Especially valuable is the big potential resolution at the much higher harmonic frequencies as it is discussed above. Similar “give and take” is met in many natural phenomena, and also in many other radioelectronic devices. Very appropriate example with a similar to the FZP multifrequency action is the harmonic-frequency multiplier. In particular, a big power-efficiency loss is produced in the process of harmonic-frequency multiplication of microwave frequencies to much higher terahertz frequencies. The output of the solid-state terahertz generators based on the frequency multiplication drops with harmonic frequency increase as about (1/𝑓)3 [3]. As is found here, the FZP lens/antenna radiation efficiency goes down like (1/𝑓)2.

It is clear that at THz harmonic frequencies, the microwave FZP lens/antenna aperture is not utilized efficiently for a focusing or radiation. Such low aperture radiation efficiency, however, is also typical for all planar frequency-independent antennas like the Archimedean and equiangular. For example, the Archimedean spiral antenna, which can radiate in a frequency band greater than 201 also shows very unproductive use of its radiation structure (aperture). At each frequency 𝑓 (or wavelength 𝜆) only a narrow annular zone in the whole circular aperture radiates actively. This radiation zone has a radius of 𝜆/2𝜋 and a circumference equal to 𝜆. The rough calculation confirms that an Archimedean antenna designed for the microwave band 1–20 GHz at the working frequency of 10 GHz has less than 0.5% aperture utilization or efficiency of radiation [22].

4. Terahertz-Design FZP Lens Antenna: Electromagnetic and Structural Evaluation

Next are described terahertz FZP lens and antenna, designed at the terahertz frequency of 1350 GHz (Figure 7), or at the 15th harmonic of the 90 GHz microwave FZP lens. Both, terahertz-design and microwave-design lenses are equal in size, or they have 𝐷=100 mm, 𝐹=66.7 mm, and lens aspect ratio 𝐹/𝐷=0.67. The 1350 GHz terahertz FZP lens encloses 150 Fresnel zones totally or 15 times much more than the 90 GHz microwave FZP lens. Thus, their zone number scale ratio is 15 : 1 and is equal to the design frequency ratio 1350 : 90 GHz. The outmost zone of the terahertz FZP lens has a width Δ𝑏=185μm.

Figure 7: Terahertz-design FZP lens of FZPA-T-150 lens antenna designed at 1350 GHz.

The computed copolar and cross-polar radiation patterns of terahertz-design FZPA-T-150 versus angle 𝜃 are drawn in Figure 8, red line and blue line, respectively. The main frequency and radiation-pattern parameters of the 1350 GHz antenna FZPA-T-150 are also listed in Tables 1 and 2, below the analogous parameters of the 90 GHz microwave antenna FZPA-M-10.

Figure 8: Radiation patterns of terahertz-design FZPA-T-150 versus angle 𝜃: copolar radiation pattern (red line) and cross-polar radiation pattern (blue line).

At the same working terahertz frequency of 1350 GHz, both antennas, the microwave antenna FZPA-M-10 and terahertz antenna FZPA-T-150, have the following radiation parameters: (a)similar absolute and relative bandwidths of about 16.5 GHz (absolute) and 1.2% (relative), respectively; (b)comparable radiation pattern beamwidths (or angular resolutions) of about 0.15 degrees;

Naturally, the terahertz-design antenna FZPA-T-150 has a much higher gain and aperture efficiency, but a similar radiation to those of FZPA-M-10 at its design frequency of 90 GHz. At FZPA-T-150 harmonic frequencies like 4.05 THz (3rd terahertz harmonic) and 20.25 THz (15th harmonic, located in the low-infrared band), the aperture utilization efficiency of the FZPA-T-150 will again become low, about 1% and 0.05%, correspondingly.

With regards to the structural, technological, and other lens qualities, the contrast between the microwave- and terahertz-design FZP lenses shows: (i)FZP lens used in the FZPA-T-150 antenna has very narrow ending zones. As was pointed out above, the last or the 150th zone is only 185 μm wide. For comparison, the last zone of the microwave-design FZP lens in FZPA-M-10 is 2830 μm width or about 15 times broader; (ii)microwave-design FZP lens in the FZPA-M-10 antenna working at high-terahertz harmonics has a much simpler construction and can be easily fabricated, while the terahertz-design FZP lens needs sophisticated, precise, and costly microtechnology for its production; (iii)narrow-zone terahertz-design FZP lenses are more fragile electrically and might not withstand high-energy illumination [18, 19].

It is fascinating that the big microwave-design antenna FZPA-M-10 could operate at frequency harmonics much higher than the terahertz frequencies or in the infrared band, for instance, for which the antenna aperture efficiency will be really extremely low (at about 104÷105%). By all criteria and applications, such efficiency values will not be pragmatic.

Instead, the terahertz lens/antenna FZPA-T-150 could be chosen for reaching the low infrared range. As is pointed out above, its 15th harmonic is the infrared frequency of 20250 GHz (or 20.25 THz) that corresponds to wavelength of 14.81 μm. For a normal operation at this infrared wavelength, the thickness of the 1350 GHz FZP has to be very thin, less than about 0.1–0.15 wavelengths, or less than 1.5–2.0 μm. The linear transverse resolution 𝑟0 of such terahertz lens/antenna operating at the infrared frequency will be around 12 μm.

5. Conclusion

The study exposes for the first time a number of intriguing features related to the binary microwave FZP lens and antenna operating at harmonic terahertz frequencies. The harmonic gain versus frequency pattern shows a strict appearance of the peak gains in proportion to the frequency harmonic sequence 90270450,,1530 GHz. This antenna property makes the FZP lens antenna a frequency-domain filtering device. For a given microwave FZP design all harmonic gain peaks have roughly identical shapes, bandwidths, and top values. If the lens/antenna resolution is of major importance and the aperture efficiency is a secondary problem, or might be improved if necessary by additional amplification, the microwave-design FZP lens antenna can be of big importance. Unique and expensive microtechnology is not required for fabrication of simple and large in size microwave-design FZP lenses running at high-terahertz frequencies. Similarly, the terahertz-design FZP lens designs can be used for focusing in the infrared or higher optical bands. Also, the narrow-zone terahertz FZP lens designs are more fragile electrically if illuminated by high-energy fields.

The high-order harmonic operation of the FZP lens and antenna could find space resolution and frequency filtering applications in terahertz and optical metrology, imaging tomography, spectral analysis, short-range communications, synchrotron radiation and focusing facilities, and radio astronomy, among others.


The author acknowledges the Support received from the Chilean Science Agency CONICYT within the Fondecyt Project 1095012/2009 and Anillos ACT-53/2010 Project.


  1. I. Hosako, N. Sekine, M. Patrashin et al., “At the dawn of a new era in terahertz technology,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 1611–1623, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Piesiewicz, T. Kleine-Ostmann, N. Krumbholz et al., “Short-range ultra-broadband terahertz communications: concepts and perspectives,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 24–39, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. Y.-S. Lee, Principles of Terahertz Science and Technology, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008.
  4. F. Sobel, F. Wentworth, and J. Wiltse, “Quasi-optical surface waveguide and other components for the 100- to 300 Gc region,” IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 9, pp. 512–518, 1961. View at Google Scholar
  5. L. Leyten and M. H. A. J. Herben, “Vectorial far-field analysis of the fresnel-zone plate antenna: a comparison with the parabolic reflector antenna,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 49–56, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Smith, Quasioptical Systems, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  7. M. A. Gouker and G. S. Smith, “A millimeter-wave integrated-circuit antenna based on the Fresnel zone plate,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 968–977, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. D. Hristov and M. H. A. J. Herben, “Millimeter-wave Fresnel-zone plate lens and antenna,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 2779–2785, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. D. Hristov, Fresnel Zones in Wireless Links, Zone Plate Lenses and Antennas, Artech House, 2000.
  10. J. C. Wiltse, “Zone plate designs for terahertz frequencies,” in Terahertz for Military and Security Applications III, Proceeding of SPIE, pp. 167–179, March 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. I. Minin and O. Minin, Diffractional Optics of Millimeter Waves, Institute of Physics, Bristol, UK, 2004.
  12. J. C. Wiltse, “Diffraction optics for terahertz waves,” in Terahertz for Military and Security Applications II, Proceeding of SPIE, pp. 127–135, April 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. C. Wiltse, “Dual-band Fresnel zone plate antennas,” in Targets and Backgrounds: Characterization and Representation III, Proceeding of SPIE, pp. 181–185, April 1997. View at Scopus
  14. S. Wang, T. Yuan, E. D. Walsby et al., “Characterization of T-ray binary lenses,” Optics Letters, vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 1183–1185, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. X. C. Zhang, Q. Hu, H. Roskos, and P. Haring Bolívar, “Three-dimensional terahertz wave imaging,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 362, no. 1815, pp. 283–299, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. V. Minin and O. V. Minin, “THz quasioptics applications in security,” in Terahertz for Military and Security Applications IV, Proceedings of SPIE, April 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Schonbrun, W. N. Ye, and K. B. Crozier, “Scanning microscopy using a short-focal-length Fresnel zone plate,” Optics Letters, vol. 34, no. 14, pp. 2228–2230, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. CERN Courier Note, “Fresnel plate sharpens focus of helium beam,” March 2000.
  19. Xradia Application Note, “Fresnel zone plate lenses,”
  20. L. C. J. Baggen, C. J. J. Jeronimus, and M. H. A. J. Herben, “Scan performance of the Fresnel-zone plate antenna: a comparison with the parabolic reflector antenna,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 6, no. 13, pp. 769–774, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. O. Meyers Jr., “Studies of transmission zone plates,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 359–365, 1951. View at Google Scholar
  22. J. D. Kraus and R. J. Marethka, Antennas for All Applications, McGraw-Hill, 2002.
  23. D. J. Stigliani Jr., R. Mittra, and R. G. Semonin, “Resolving power of a zone plate,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 610–613, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  24. P. D. Kearney and A. G. Klein, “Resolving power of zone plates,” Journal of Modern Physics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 361–367, 1989. View at Google Scholar