Research Article  Open Access
F. Venneri, S. Costanzo, G. Di Massa, E. Marozzo, A. Borgia, P. Corsonello, M. Salzano, "BeamScanning Reflectarray Based on a Single VaractorTuned Element", International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2012, Article ID 290285, 5 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/290285
BeamScanning Reflectarray Based on a Single VaractorTuned Element
Abstract
A single varactortuned element is investigated as effective solution for the realization of reconfigurable reflectarray antennas. The proposed configuration is successfully implemented for the design of an Xband reflectarray prototype of radiators. A dedicated electronic control board is designed as an integral part of the antenna. Good performances in terms of beamscanning capabilities are obtained from measurements.
1. Introduction
Microstrip reflectarray antennas have received considerable interests in the last two decades, due to their appealing features in terms of low cost, high efficiency, and reduced mass and volume. Many different implementations of the reflectarray concept have been proposed, ranging from the first simple configurations, based on the use of variable size patches [1] or identical elements with variable length stubs [2], up to more sophisticated structures, such three layers stacked [3] or aperture coupled patches [4]. The success obtained in the realization of passive reflectarray structures has recently attracted the attention towards the application of this technology to the design of reconfigurable reflector antennas. The main advantage deriving from the development of active reflectarrays over traditionalphased arrays is the elimination of complicated beamforming networks, which typically introduce very high losses. Many different configurations have been proposed as phasetunable reflectarray elements such as mechanically reconfigurable patches [5, 6], varactorloaded microstrip radiators [7–9], reflectarrays printed on tunable liquid crystal substrates [10], and MEMSbased structures [11–14].
In this paper, a tunable radiating element based on the use of a single varactor diode [9] is implemented for the realization of a reconfigurable reflectarray antenna. The adopted element consists of a patch aperturecoupled to a varactor loaded line. The phase tuning capabilities of this configuration have been already demonstrated by the authors in [9]. When compared with the existing solutions, the adopted configuration offers a uniform reflecting surface, due to the fact that the tunable element and the biasing circuitries are located on the opposite side below the ground plane. Furthermore, as demonstrated in [9], an optimum phase tuning range of about 320 degrees is obtained by integrating a single diode to each radiating element.
The proposed configuration is properly synthesized for the design of an Xband reflectarray with beamscanning capabilities. A printed electronic circuit is integrated to the antenna in order to actively control the bias voltages across the diodes. The radiation pattern measurements of the reflectarray prototype show the ability to electronically scan the main beam along some prescribed directions.
2. Reflectarray Element Design
The single radiator adopted for the realization of the proposed reconfigurable reflectarray is based on the use of a patch printed on a grounded dielectric substrate and slot coupled to a varactor loaded microstrip line (Figure 1). By changing the bias voltage across the diode, a variable capacitive load is obtained, which in turns introduces a tunable phase shift in the reradiated field. A biasing line is printed on the tuning line substrate, thus the reflectarray surface is simply composed by identical rectangular patches separated by uniform spacings. This last feature makes the proposed reflectarray configuration free from unwanted reflections.
The adopted reflectarray element is designed in order to obtain a full phase tuning range at the operating frequency GHz. A MoMbased infinite array approach is adopted for the simulation and the optimization of the radiating structure. A cell size of is fixed at the operating frequency . Two identical dielectric slabs are chosen as patch and line substrates, having the following features: , mm. A layer of air with a thickness mm is placed between the antenna substrate and the ground plane. The following dimensions are obtained for the different parts composing the antenna: mm, mm, mm, mm, mm (Figure 2(a)). The assumed line width corresponds to a characteristic impedance of value equal to 40 Ω. The input impedance , (Figure 2(a)), evaluated at the center of the slot, results to be perfectly matched to the 40 Ω—line when the stub is fixed at a value of 2 mm (Figure 2(b)).
(a)
(b)
(c)
A Microsemi MV3101189 varactor diode, with a tunable capacitance ranging from 0.2 pF ( Volt) to 2 pF ( Volt), is integrated to the above element in order to obtain the required reconfiguration capabilities. In this case, the two line sections and (see Figure 1) are optimized in order to maximize the phase agility of the element in the assigned varactor capacitance range. At this purpose, the stub is fixed to a value of 7.8 mm, while the length is set to the value of 6.5 mm, in order to move the maximum phase variation within the diode capacitance range.
The reflectarray element is analyzed in order to evaluate the behavior of the reflection phase versus diode capacitance, for different values of the stub length. A normally incident plane wave is assumed.
The reflection phase curves, computed in the case of length equal to 2 mm and 7.8 mm, are reported in Figure 3(a). The curves are computed by varying the diode capacitance in the range between 0.2 pF and 2 pF. From a comparison of the two considered curves, it can be stated that an higher phase tuning range can be obtained by introducing a proper inductive effect in the input impedance , (Figure 2(c)). In this case, more pronounced reflection losses are obtained (Figure 3(b)), which can be reduced by adopting a varactor with a lower series resistance. In the above simulations, a value of 1.36 Ω is assigned for this diode parameter, resulting into a value of 3.7 dB for the losses due to the varactor insertion.
(a)
(b)
The correctness of the simulated design curves has been experimentally verified in [9], where a good agreement between measurements and simulations can be appreciated.
3. Reflectarray Prototype Description and Experimental Results
The synthesized element is adopted as elementary cell of a reflectarray (Figure 4(a)). The array is illuminated by an Xband horn, located at a distance of 34 cm from the reflecting surface, with an offset angle of 15 degrees in the yz plane (Figure 4(b)). The antenna is integrated with an electronic board composed by an array of digital to analog converters (AD5764R DACs) driven by a microcontroller (ATMEL ATmega1284P). Each AD5764R integrated circuit is composed by four 16bit DACs. A photograph of the designed electronic board is illustrated in Figure 5.
(a)
(b)
A metallic plane is placed between the antenna and the DACsboard (Figure 4(b)) in order to reduce the backradiation as well as the occurrence of any undesired interference effect.
The reflectarray antenna can be easily reconfigured by a PC, which communicates with the ATmega1284P microcontroller through an USART interface. The microcontroller sends the desired voltage levels to the DACs array, which is properly connected to the varactor diodes.
The fabricated structure, illustrated in Figure 6, is validated by performing the measurement of the radiation pattern for different configurations of the bias voltages across the diodes. The considered voltage distributions are determined in order to scan the radiation pattern main beam from −20 to 20 degrees in the xz plane (Figure 4). The required bias voltages levels are computed by a synthesis algorithm based on the iterative projection method [15].
A farfield measurement facility is adopted, which is placed into the anechoic chamber of the University of Calabria.
A doubleridged broadband horn, operating within the frequency range equal to () GHz, is adopted as probe at a farfield distance of 5.6 m from the reflectarray.
The measured copolar patterns on the xz plane, reported under Figure 7, show the main beam effectively scanned along the assigned directions. A measurement frequency equal to 11.25 GHz is assumed. As the aim of the realized prototype is to simply demonstrate the validity of the proposed scanning technique, a small number of elements is assumed on the yz plane, with no specific tuning, so the characterization of the radiation patterns on this plane has no significant validity and it is not reported.
As a further characterization, the crosspolar patterns on the xz plane are measured for three different main beam conditions, namely, , 10°, 20°, and the comparison with the relative copolar components is reported in Figures 8, 9, and 10. In all cases, a crosspolarization approximately below −40 dB can be observed.
A loss analysis on the reflectarray is performed for a main beam in the broadside direction. The measured gain versus frequency is reported in Table 1. In particular, at the central design frequency of 11.25 GHz, a gain value of 9.3 dBi is obtained. At the same frequency, the maximum directivity for a reflectarray with an aperture area of is calculated as 24.24 dBi. Using the measured gain, the antenna efficiency is estimated as 3.3%. This small value is mainly due to the high spillover in the yz plane.

4. Conclusion
An aperturecoupled patch loaded by a single tunable varactor diode has been adopted for the implementation of a reconfigurable reflectarray prototype. The good phase agility associated to the designed reflectarray element has allowed the realization of a reflectarray antenna with beamscanning capabilities within an angular range of about 40 degrees. The experimental tests on the fabricated antenna have demonstrated the validity of the implemented reflectarray configuration.
References
 D. M. Pozar and T. A. Metzler, “Analysis of a reflectarray antenna using microstrip patches of variable size,” Electronics Letters, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 657–658, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Huang, “Microstrip reflectarray,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, pp. 612–615, Ontario, Canada, June 1991. View at: Google Scholar
 J. A. Encinar and J. Agustín Zornoza, “Broadband design of threelayer printed reflectarrays,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1662–1664, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Carrasco, M. Barba, and J. A. Encinar, “Reflectarray element based on aperturecoupled patches with slots and lines of variable length,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 820–825, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Huang and R. J. Pogorzelski, “A kaband microstrip reflectarray with elements having variable rotation angles,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 650–656, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 M. E. Cooley, J. F. Walker, D. G. Gonzalez, and G. E. Pollon, “Novel reflectarray element with variable phase characteristics,” IEE Proceedings, vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 149–151, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 S. V. Hum, M. Okoniewski, and R. J. Davies, “Realizing an electronically tunable reflectarray using varactor diodetuned elements,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 422–424, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Riel and J. J. Laurin, “Design of an electronically beam scanning reflectarray using aperturecoupled elements,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1260–1266, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Venneri, S. Costanzo, and G. Di Massa, “Reconfigurable aperturecoupled reflectarray element tuned by single varactor diode,” Electronics Letters, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 68–69, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Moessinger, S. Dieter, W. Menzel, S. Mueller, and R. Jakoby, “Realization and characterization of a 77 GHz reconfigurable liquid crystal reflectarray,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Antenna Technology and Applied Electromagnetics and the Canadian Radio Sciences Meeting (ANTEM/URSI '09), February 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. P. Gianvittorio and Y. RahmatSamii, “Reconfigurable patch antennas for steerable reflectarray applications,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1388–1392, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Sorrentino, R. V. Gatti, L. Marcaccioli, and B. Mencagli, “Electronic steerable mems antennas,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP '06), November 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 J. PerruisseauCarrier and A. K. Skrivervik, “Monolithic MEMSbased reflectarray cell digitally reconfigurable over a 360° phase range,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 7, pp. 138–141, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 O. Bayraktar, O. A. Civi, and T. Akin, “Beam switching reflectarray monolithically integrated with RF MEMS switches,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 2, part 2, Article ID 6056550, pp. 854–862, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Venneri, S. Costanzo, G. Di Massa, and G. Angiulli, “An improved synthesis algorithm for reflectarrays design,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 258–261, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 F. Venneri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.