Research Article  Open Access
Design of an Impulse Radiating Antenna Using a Curved TEMWire Fed Parabola
Abstract
A design procedure for a TEMwire fed parabolic antenna is given for impulse radiation, which is suitable for low cost fabrication. A simple wiretype TEM horn and a parabolic reflector are used to achieve ultrawide bandwidth and high directivity at the same time. Equations for parametric curves of a TEMwire horn are presented and are used to investigate the relation among their shapes, bandwidth, and directivity. It is also found that wire separation near the focal point limits the high frequency directivity.
1. Introduction
Very wide band antennas have been given much interest from commercial and military applications such as communication services, electromagnetic compatibility, radar technologies, and electronic warfare [1]. To accommodate very high speed wireless data demand, ultrawide communication services are proposed and UWB antennas have been hot research topics [2]. Very wide band antennas are utilized to test immunity to electrostatic discharges or wide band interferences. Applications for radars and electronic warfare also need very wide band antennas to radiate or receive short pulse energy into or from the air. In most of the researches, ultrawide band antennas achieve bandwidth requirement using smooth transition from the feed to radiating structures like exponential, polynomial, or linear tapers [3, 4]. At the same time, high directivity has been attained by adopting array structures or utilizing reflectors [5–8]. To attain both requirements, the size and weight of those antennas are very large and heavy and tapering schemes depend on the particular structure of the tapered feed horn antenna, which deserves careful studies [9–12].
In this paper, an ultrawide band antenna with high gain is proposed, which is composed of a TEMwiretype feed horn and a parabolic reflector. Compared with other TEM horn reflector antennas [7–10], the antenna structure is suitable for low cost fabrication in that TEMwire horns can be built by bending copper wires or pipes, and inexpensive parabolas for satellite broadcasting reception can be utilized without any additional components such as balun or power divider. The bandwidth and directivity needed are met through adjusting parameters of the wiretype feed horn structure of a proposed parametric curve equation. Various feed horn tapering schemes by adjusting parameters of the proposed equations as applied to parabolic reflectors are examined through simulations and measurements. The directivities and return losses of combined antenna using TEMwire feed horn are closely related to each other, and compromise is needed to satisfy design requirement.
In the following sections, the whole antenna structure is divided into a coaxial cable to TEMwire horn transition, tapered feed arms, and a reflector. Design considerations of each component and restrictions are outlined.
2. TEMWire Horn Antenna
In Figure 1, a wiretype feed hornfed parabolic reflector antenna is shown in Figure 1. The input signal is applied to the feed horn whose end points are attached to the surface of the parabola supporting itself. The horn is electrically isolated from the parabolic reflector. In order to make the antenna lightweighted, the feed horn is made of copper wires or pipes whose diameter is .
(a) Perspective
(b) Top view
(c) left view
The TEMwire horn is obtained from a combination of two regions, which are the throat region and the tapered feed arm. Throat region is needed to transform the input impedance of a TEMwire horn to the characteristic impedance of a coaxial cable. It also acts as a balun. Figure 2 shows the structure of a TEMwire horn. The origin of the zcoordinate is at point where the coaxial cable is connected. The axis is in the direction of the parabolic surface. The tapered feed arm plays the role of guiding the incident wave to the parabolic surface with tolerable reflection. To smoothly guide the incident wave toward the surface of a parabolic reflector, a set of equations of parametric curves are devised for x(z) and y(z) as in (1). Control parameters for x(z) are , , , , and . Parameters for y(z) are , , and . Parameters and determine the shape of throat region. The width of throat is equal to . The length of the throat is . Parameters and determine asymptotic behaviors of feed arms when becomes large. As the zcoordinate increases, it becomes similar to a polynomial function of order or . Parameters and affect the curve shape when is small. Parameters and determine the length of transition regions along and axes. In (1), and are distances along x and y axes from the feed point to the ends of feed arms. The vertical separation between feed wires is denoted by . Those parameters are used to change the shape of a TEMwire fed horn antenna
(a) xzcut of the TEMwire horn
(b) yzcut of the TEMwire
The input port of the feed horn converts an unbalanced input signal of the coaxial cable into a balanced mode of the TEMwire horn antenna, whose shape is effectively a tapered twowire transmission line. The vertical separation between the copper pipes, which form the feed horn, can be determined in such a way that the parallel combination of the characteristic impedances of twowire transmission lines should be equal to that of coaxial cable when the width of the throat region is assumed to be large where is the separation between the centers of copper pipes and , , and are the radii of the copper pipe, outer, and inner conductor of the coaxial cable, respectively However, (3) does not hold when the width of the throat is small, in which case two arms of the TEMhorn can be considered as coupled TEM transmission lines. Due to the symmetry about yzplane, even mode of the coupled lines is excited and the input impedance of the TEM horn becomes larger than the value obtained using (2).
Once the input signal goes through the coaxtotwo wire transition, it enters into a tapered section of the feed horn. Due to the increasing separation between copper pipes, the reflections are generated continuously on the way to the parabolic surface. To suppress the reflection under a tolerable level, the rate of increasing separation between two copper wires should be controlled to a predetermined level. To determine the rate of increasing separation, reflection coefficient formula for tapered lines [13] can be used. The shape of the TEMwire horns of (1) becomes asymptotes to polynomial curves of the order of or along x or yaxis as the incident wave goes away from the throat region. The orders of polynomials are closely related to return losses. The higher is the order of the polynomial, the smaller the reflection occurs. At the same time, to make a compact antenna, it is desirable that the length of the throat be minimized. On the other hand, the length should be long enough to suppress the reflections at the input port. With the parametric curve of (1), requirements on the size of throat region as well as the asymptotic shape of the feed horn can be met. Return loss variations according to the order of polynomial will be mentioned again in Section 3 where the TEMwire horn is attached to a parabolic reflector.
Radiation patterns of the TEMwire feed horn are important in that they determine far field patterns of the reflector antenna. To accomplish high directivity when applied to a circular symmetric parabolic reflector, the incident wave should have a rotationally symmetric radiation pattern. The presented TEMwire structure in Figure 1 has asymptotical symmetry about E and H plane in the feed arm region. The feed arms are bent so that they make right angle asymptotically. But the TEMwire structure has nonsymmetric shape in the throat region. When the frequency of the applied input signal is low enough, the currents on the wire structure are formed mainly along the feed arm region whose asymptotically symmetric shape results in symmetric radiation pattern. As the frequency increases, most of the current is concentrated near the throat region where asymmetric structure is located. The asymmetric current induces asymmetry of the radiation field, which becomes the incident wave on the parabolic reflector. Figure 3 shows the 3D radiation pattern of the TEMwire horn detached from a parabolic reflector. Shape parameters for (1) are listed in Table 1.

(a) Narrow throat at 3 GHz
(b) Narrow throat at 5 GHz
(c) Wide throat at 3 GHz
(d) Wide throat at 5 GHz
At low frequency, radiation patterns are invariant after rotating by an angle of 90 degrees. As the frequency increases, the radiation patterns become distinct. With narrow throat, the symmetry of the radiation pattern is kept. With wide throat, the radiation pattern loses invariance after rotation. When this TEMwire horn is attached to a parabolic reflector, the main lobe of the parabolic antenna gets split to have two peaks in radiation pattern due to the asymmetry of the incident wave. This phenomenon lowers directivity and limits operating frequency of the TEMwire feed parabolic reflector antenna. With a narrow throat region, the frequency range in which the main beam has single peak becomes wider.
3. TEMWire Fed Parabola
The incident wave due to the feed horn propagates toward the parabolic reflector through the feed arm region. The shape of feed arms affects return losses and radiation property. Figure 4 shows VSWR’s for TEMwire fed parabolas with , and 4, with the other parameters equal to those of Table 1. As the order of parametric curve increases, the frequency range where VSWR is lower than 2 increases. Thanks to the parabolic reflector, which transforms incident spherical waves into nearly plane waves, impedance matching is achieved over a very wide frequency range. It can be observed that the lower frequency bounds are influenced by . Figure 5 shows the measured return losses and simulated ones, which shows similar results confirming validity of a simulator used for this work. As shown in the figure, impedance matching is done for the frequency band higher than 500 MHz. The upper limit is determined by behaviors of radiation patterns. Figure 6 shows the measured and simulated radiation patterns to confirm the validity of the simulator. With , peak directivities at each frequency increase. Figure 7 shows a fabricated TEMwire fed parabolic antenna with the parabola diameter equal to 1200 mm and its depth equal to 185 mm. The f/D ratio of the chosen parabola is 0.38.
The order of parametric curve also affects radiation pattern. The incident wave from the TEMwire horn is reflected from the parabola. Then, the reflected waves propagate parallel to the axis of the parabola with the equiphase plane perpendicular to the axis. This is the case only if the incident wave can be considered to emanate from the focal point of the parabolic surface. In other words, the phase center of the incident wave should coincide with the focus of the parabola. However, the location of the phase center depends on the shape of the TEMwire horn. Figure 8 compares azimuthal patterns of the TEMwire parabolic antennas with different values at 3 GHz. For equal to unity, the phase center of the TEMwire horn can be found from the intersection of asymptotes of feed arm wires. For larger than one, phase centers cannot be determined simply. From Figure 8, the phase centers of TEMwire horns seem to move closer to the surface of a parabolic reflector from the focus of the parabolic reflector with increasing .
(a) = 1, peak value 28.3 dBi
(b) = 2, peak value 27.9 dBi
(c) = 3, peak value 26.6 dBi
(d) = 4, peak value 25 dBi
Figures 9 and 10 show the radiation patterns of the two TEMwire feed horns with different throat widths attached to the same parabolic reflector as mentioned in Section 2. With a narrow throat width, radiation patterns have one peak and higher directivity at 5 GHz. With a wide throat width, the main lobe is split into two peaks at 5 GHz, thus has lower directivity than a narrow throat width. At this frequency, the asymmetric shape of the throat region of the TEMwire horn limits increase of directivity.
(a) Narrow throat
(b) Wide throat
(c) Radiation pattern at 5 GHz (narrow throat)
(d) Radiation pattern at 5 GHz (wide throat)
(a) Narrow throat, 3 GHz
(b) Narrow throat, 4 GHz
(c) Narrow throat, 5 GHz
(d) Wide throat, 3 GHz
(e) Wide throat, 4 GHz
(f) Wide throat, 5GHz
Figure 11 compares directivities of TEMwire fed parabolas with different throat widths. As mentioned before, the parabola with wide throat has its main lobe split so that its increase of directivities is limited. With a wide throat region, the phase centers of the incident fields along the left and right arms fall apart from the focus of the parabola, of which state is similar to the case of [14].
Figure 12 shows efficiencies of the TEMwire fed parabola. As the frequency increases, total efficiency approaches unity until 4 GHz. The high frequency performance is influenced by a bent region near the coaxial feed point, which has nonsymmetric shape. With a wide throat feed arm, the frequency of peak total efficiency becomes lower.
Figure 13 shows the time domain performance of the antenna. The copolar component of electric fields has the shape of a differentiation of the incident voltage waveform. As shown in Figure 13(c), high frequency responses are limited by the width of throat region. With a narrow throat, magnitudes of voltage peaks are larger than those of a wide throat. Electric fields of a parabola with a conventional standard rectangular feed horn are also drawn in the figure to compare the performance of TEM horn fed parabolic antenna, which preserves a short pulse width. The aperture size of the feed horn used is mm. Compared with the TEM feed horn, the rectangular feed horn does not maintain short pulse width of the incident Gaussian pulse.
(a) Incident voltage waveform
(b) component
(c) Fourier transform of components
4. Conclusion
In this paper, a parametric curve equation for ultrawide band antennas with very high directivity is proposed and the properties like return losses, radiation patterns, and time domain responses are investigated. Although the structure can be built at low cost by bending copper wires or pipes, asymmetric shape near the throat region forces the main lobes to be split, which limit increase of directivity with frequency. By careful design considerations, the frequency range of the ultrawide band antenna can be extended.
References
 C. E. Baum and E. G. Farr, “Impulse radiating antennas,” in Ultra Wideband/Short Pulse Electromagnetics, H. L. Bertoni, C. E. Baum, and L. B. Felsen, Eds., pp. 139–147, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Chen and Y. P. Zhang, “Effects of antennas and propagation channels on synchronization performance of a pulsebased ultrawideband radio system,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research, vol. 115, pp. 95–112, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 R. K. Amineh, A. Trehan, and N. K. Nikolova, “TEM horn antenna for ultrawide band microwave breast imaging,” Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, no. 13, pp. 59–74, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Knott and A. Bell, “Coaxiallyfed tapered slot antenna,” Electronics Letters, vol. 37, no. 18, pp. 1103–1104, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. H. DuHamel, M. E. Armstrong, J. J. Campbell, W. R. Jones, and W. F. Pedler, “Frequency independent conical feeds for lens and reflectors,” in Proceedings of IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, vol. 6, pp. 414–418, 1968. View at: Google Scholar
 H. E. King and J. L. Wong, “Measured RF characteristics of a TEMwire fed reflector,” in Proceedings of the Antennas and Propagation Symposium Digest, vol. 1, pp. 266–269, May 1990. View at: Google Scholar
 C. E. Baum, E.G. Farr, and D. V. Giri, “Review of impulse radiating antennas,” in Review of Radio Science, W. R. Stone, Ed., pp. 403–439, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 L. H. Bowen, E. G. Farr, and W. D. Prather, “A highvoltage cablefed impulse radiating antenna,” Sensor and Simulation Notes 507, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 J. S. Tyo, “Optimization of the TEM feed structure for fourarm reflector impulse radiating antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 607–614, 2001. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Manteghi and Y. RahmatSamii, “A novel Vivaldi fed reflector impulse radiating antenna (IRA),” in Proceedings of IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium and USNC/URSI Meeting, vol. 1A, pp. 549–552, July 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Manteghi and Y. RahmatSamii, “On the characterization of a reflector impulse radiating antenna (IRA): fullwave analysis and measured results,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 812–822, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Zhang, Y. D. Yao, E. Fajanda, H. Moore, and H. Singh, “Impacts of different arm structures of reflector IRA: wire, coplanar plate, and biconical arms,” in Proceedings of IEEE Sarnoff Symposium (SARNOFF '09), pp. 1–5, April 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition, 1998.
 C. Guo, A. X. Zhang, H. Wu, Y. S. Jiang, and W. B. Wang, “A highpower reflector impulse antenna with dualTEM source,” International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 832–838, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Donghyun Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.