Impact of Antenna and Propagation on Wireless Communication Technology: Terminal, Base Station, and Channel Modeling
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
Fengyu Luan, Yan Zhang, Limin Xiao, Chunhui Zhou, Shidong Zhou, "Fading Characteristics of Wireless Channel on HighSpeed Railway in Hilly Terrain Scenario", International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2013, Article ID 378407, 9 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/378407
Fading Characteristics of Wireless Channel on HighSpeed Railway in Hilly Terrain Scenario
Abstract
This paper focuses on the fading characteristics of wireless channel on HighSpeed Railway (HSR) in hilly terrain scenario. Due to the rapid speed, the fading characteristics of HSR channel are highly correlated with time or TransmitReceive distance and have their own special property. To investigate the fading characteristics, the measurement is conducted on the GuangzhouShenzhen passengerdedicated line in China with the speed of 295 km/h in the datacollection area at 2.4 GHz. From the measured data, the amplitude of each path is estimated by using the SubspaceAlternating Generalized ExpectationMaximization (SAGE) algorithm along with other parameters of channel impulse responses. Then the fading parameters, including path loss, shadow fading, and Kfactor, are analysed. With the numerical results in the measurement and analysis, the fading characteristics have been revealed and modelled. It is supposed that this work has a promotion for HSR communication system design and improvement.
1. Introduction
HighSpeed Railway (HSR) has the properties of large conveying capacity, good security, lowenergy consumption, and vast economic benefits [1, 2]. With rail speed designed to travel at no less than 200 km/h [1], HSRs are widely deployed around the world. For example, the Japanese Shinkansen started in the year of 1963, at a maximum speed of 320 km/h, while the Eurostar is running across the European continent with the speed reaching 300 km/h. In recent years, China has paid more attention to the HSR and has made great progress. Upon the end of year 2011, the operating mileages surpassed 1300 kilometers, making HSR an increasingly important form of transportation.
However, there is a great difference for wireless channel between the HSR scenario and the typical scenario, especially in fading characteristics. In general, communication systems are very sensitive to the fading of the wireless channel, which causes intercarrier interfaces and degrades system performance [3]. The HSR scenario has the special property of high velocity and rapidly changing environment. So the channel exhibits great positionbased fading characteristics, which introduces problems to increase the wireless communication capacity and improve the wireless communication quality. On the other hand, the fading characteristics play an important role in system simulation. Only the influence of fast smallscale fading is considered in most communication simulation methods. But in HSR scenario, path loss and shadow fading are also changed in a continuous simulation process with a long distance caused by high moving speed. For these reasons, having a good knowledge of the HSR wireless channel fading characteristics will help to give a reference for the HSR communication system simulation.
It is significant to get reliable and realistic fading characteristics of the HSR wireless channel through the wideband channel measurements. The HSR scenarios can be divided into different types, including hilly terrain, viaduct, tunnel, cutting, and station. Several HSR channel measurements have been performed by researchers worldwide. The viaduct, tunnel, cutting, and hilly terrain scenarios are measured and modeled, respectively. Liu et al. give the positionbased measurement result of HSR channel fading parameters at 2.35 GHz in viaduct scenario [4]. The measurements of path loss and delay spread in tunnels of different sizes at 2.154 GHz are performed by Helsinki University of Technology [5]. Cichon et al. also build up a rayoptical propagation model for tunnel channel [6]. The Rice Kfactor in cutting scenario is presented in [7] with the measurement frequency of 930.2 MHz. Some channel parameters including delay spread and Kfactor in different scenarios and different railways are compared [8]. The nonstationary MIMO channel model based on the spacetimefrequency correlation function for HSR communication system is proposed for modeling the timevariant property of different taps [9].
To the best of our knowledge, existing researches seldom pay attention to the positionbased property of the hilly terrain HSR channel. The hilly terrain occupies 69.1% of the area in China. And the newly built lines of China, such as the ChengduGuiyang passengerdedicated line and GuangzhouShenzhen passengerdedicated line, run through vast area of hilly terrain. The HSR hilly terrain channel measurement and modeling are of great significance. Compared with other scenarios, the scattering and positionbased property of the multipath propagation is more complicated and more obvious in hilly terrain. Both largescale fading and smallscale fading are changed with the train fast moving. In this paper, the fading characteristics of the wireless channel in hilly terrain scenarios are analyzed from the actual channel measurement data. We also attempt to give out the models which describe the positionbased statistic property of different channel parameters which reveal the characteristics, such as path loss, shadow fading, and Kfactor. The reliable and realistic model serves as the foundation for designing and improving the HSR communication systems.
The main contributions of our works consist of the measurement newly conducted in the HSR hilly terrain scenario, the proposition of the positionbased models of different channel parameters, and the application of the SubspaceAlternating Generalized ExpectationMaximization (SAGE) algorithm. SAGE algorithm is regarded as a highresolution channel parameter estimation method and fits for dealing with the several positionbased channel parameters by jointing the time and frequency domains. The properties of path loss, the lognormal shadowing, and Kfactor are concluded in this paper. These properties are compared with the current models and explained in detail by investigating the TransmitReceive (TR) distance and actual measurement scenario.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the description of hilly terrain scenario and the arrangement of the measurement are outlined. And in Section 3, the details of the SAGE algorithm application are laid out. In Section 4, statistic results of positionbased channel parameters which are used for building the channel fading models are discussed and analyzed. The paper is concluded in Section 5.
2. Measurement Setup
The measurement in this paper is taken on the GuangzhouShenzhen passengerdedicated line. The main terrains along the railway are hilly terrain and plain with viaducts. These two types of scenarios are almost distributed alternatively. Here the paper focuses on the hilly terrain scenario. Figure 1 shows satellite map of our measured hilly terrain scenario. It is generated using the Google Maps tool [10]. The white line is referred to as the railway from West to East. And the base station is located at the position which is 63 km from Guangzhou and 41 km from Shenzhen as the green arrow shows along the railway with the GPS coordinates of 22.830558 N, 113.860235 E. In the datacollection area, many kinds of scattering objects are observed around the railway at the foot of hills. Besides hills, there is a big pond near the railway in the distance of about 600 m from the base station. The areas with an abundance of buildings, factories, and warehouses appear in the distance of about 800 m and 2200 m, respectively. It can be seen that an expressway intersects with the railway from far to near. In this scenario, the relative altitudes of these main scattering objects are mostly below 200 m. In summary, there are several significant properties which have huge effect on the channel fading characteristics in the HSR hilly terrain scenario during the signal transmission. (1) With the highaltitude transmit antenna and lowaltitude obstacles, the Line of Sight (LOS) is observable and can be detected along the entire railway.(2) In hilly terrain, the propagation environment is high density scattered, and scattering objects are distributed irregularly and nonuniformly. The constructive and destructive interference among different multipath components (MPCs) with similar delay is serious. This phenomenon has influence on the channel fading characteristics. (3) The high speed will not only cause the large Doppler frequency shift, but also bring the rapid change to the channel parameters. When the train moves quickly, both the propagation environment and the angles of incidence vary quickly. The signal will go through different propagation paths. At the same time, the channel parameters are changed.
Our measurement is conducted by using the THU channel sounder. The parameters of the measurement setup are listed in Table 1. The center frequency is 2.4 GHz, and the bandwidth is 40 MHz. The transmit antenna is mounted on the base station tower (Figure 2(a)). It is a directional antenna pointing at the direction of train travelling with the gain of 17 dBi. The receive antenna is fixed on the window of the highspeed moving train carriage (Figure 2(b)). It is vertically polarized and omnidirectional with the gain of 7 dBi. The transmitter and the receiver are both locked to GPSderived 10 MHz references, thereby eliminating frequency offsets between the two time bases. In the transmitter, the test signal is fed through the power amplifier to the transmit antenna with the total power of 20 dBm. After receiving the test signal, the receiver does the lownoise amplification and down conversation. Then the signal is sampled with the sample rate of 100 MHz and stored to the disk array of a server for offline analysis [11].

(a)
(b)
The test signal is regarded as a linear frequency modulated (LFM) sequence. Its length is 12.8 μs. Due to the good autocorrelation property of the LFM sequences, the measurement principle of LFM signal is that the received sequence is correlated with the local copy of the sequence at the receiver to produce the measured channel impulse response. Then the offline and broadband features simplify the system operation. After the measurement data is stored in the server, the channel parameter estimation method such as SAGE algorithm is utilized to search and separate the different multipath components, according to the different delay and Doppler frequency of each component. Furthermore, the calibrations of the response of radio frequency (RF) at both Tx side and Rx side and the measurement of the penetration loss of the carriage window are also conducted in each measurement.
In the measured hilly terrain, the height of transmit antenna is 30 m, and the height of receive antenna is 1.2 m. The minimum distance between transmit antenna and the railway is 10 m. The GPS system of the train shows the speed of the train in the datacollection area remains 295 km/h. The total length of the measured route is 2600 m from the base station. Beyond this distance, the train will rush into a tunnel. The main reflections of the electromagnetic wave come from ground, hill, buildings, ponds, and plantings as mentioned above.
Providing the wireless signal coverage for HSR is a very important and tremendous task, which is related to both the channel fading characteristics and coverage scheme. There are two schemes for HSR wireless signal coverage. One scheme is using a moving relay station mounted on the roof of the carriage. The mobile terminals are linked to base station via the relay station indirectly. This scheme has been detailed in [4, 12]. The other scheme of realizing HSR communication is that the mobile terminals in the carriage are linked directly to the base stations on the ground. In this scheme, the electromagnetic waves suffer a penetration loss from the carriage windows [9]. The second scheme is adopted in this measurement.
3. Analysis Method
SAGE algorithm is proposed as a lowcomplexity approximation of the Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation and successfully applied in different application purposes [13]. With this algorithm, accurate estimations of channel parameters from the measured data can be obtained. In the SAGE algorithm, the received and transmitted signals can be described as a finite number of plane waves [14]: where is the total number of extracted MPCs and , , and are, respectively, the complex amplitude, delay, and Doppler frequency of the th MPC. The advantage of SAGE algorithm is that it can achieve the joint estimation of the complex amplification, delay, and Doppler frequency of the MPCs through iteration process. Based on the estimated value of delay and Doppler frequency, the LOS component is separated from the NonLine of Sight (NLOS) components. At the second step with the achieved complex amplitude of each MPC, the path loss, shadow fading, and Kfactor are calculated according to the definitions to give a description of the positionbased fading characteristics of the HSR channel.
During the data analysis, the starting point of distance and time is chosen as the point of HSR train just passing by the base station with the 0 Doppler frequency shift. The TR distance is proportional to time in the measurement.
4. Measurement Results
4.1. Path Loss
Path loss as a largescale fading parameter is analyzed to help make a link budget for system design and base station site selection. To obtain the path loss, the traditional method usually averages snapshots corresponding to 5~40 wavelengths for removing the effects of smallscale fading. The SAGE algorithm has the ability to separate each MPC according to different delays, Doppler shifts, and amplitudes. With the method of just summing up the power of each MPC, the path loss can be calculated after removing the gain of antennas (Tx 17 dBi, Rx 7 dBi), penetration loss of carriage window (12.4 dB) and other influencing factors.
The statistical model is often expressed by where is the path loss exponent, is the distance between the transmitter and receiver, is the intercept, and denotes the shadow fading with the standard deviation. Path loss depends on the distance between transmitter and receiver. Figure 3 shows the measured path loss and the fitting curve. It is noticed that there is a breakpoint within positionbased measurement data. So the fitting broken curve is obtained by using the linear least square method in near and far regions relative to the base station, respectively. The breakpoint of the fitting curve is 788.6 m of TR distance. At 788.6 m, the value of path loss is 100.9 dB. The equation of the path loss model with standard deviation for this scenario is modeled by
The fitting curve can be regard as a twoslope model. For this model, the LOS path between transmitter and receiver is strong, and the contributions from all the scatters are small in a short distance. However, beyond the breakpoint distance, the scatters start to play an important role. In the twoslope model, the breakpoint distance [15] depending on the clearance of the first Fresnel zone is defined as where and are the heights of the transmit antenna and receive antenna, respectively, and is the wavelength. The is calculated as 1152 m. This distance is assumed that there are no high obstacles around the propagation route. The measured distance 788.6 m is smaller than . Our result is due to two fitting lines’ intersection. This situation is attributed to certain scattering objects. The hills and huge buildings with similar height of the transmit antenna at the distance of 800 m–1000 m are all responsible for this phenomenon, where MPCs suffer complex constructive and destructive interference due to diffractions.
The free space path loss and the path loss model in the WINNER II HSR scenario [15] are also showed for comparison. The measured path loss suffers greater loss than the value in free space fading. The WINNER II path loss model is also described by the twoslope model with a breakpoint distance. From Figure 3, the fitting curve is very close to the WINNER II path loss model. The main differences exist not only in the aspect of breakpoint distance, but also in the aspect of slopes of the two segments. The slopes of the two segments of WINNER II path loss model are 21.5 and 40, respectively. There is a visible gap between the slopes of WINNER II path loss model and the measured path loss in HSR hilly terrain scenario. The reason leading to the difference is that the scatters in hilly terrain scenario are richer than those in WINNER II HSR scenario. In short TR distance, these scattering waves have cancellation impact on the received signal energy. For long TR distance, there is more scattered energy in this scenario than that in WINNER II HSR scenario.
4.2. Shadow Fading
Shadow fading is the variation of the path loss. After the path loss is obtained, shadow fading can be extracted from the calculated path loss after removing the distancedependency fitting curve. This channel fading parameter is a variable caused by obstruction. It arises as slow fading, when the coherence time is large relative to the delay constraint of the channel. In most literatures, such as [15–17], the value of shadow fading is often regarded as a random variable conforming to the lognormal distribution. This is certified over a large number of measurement positions along the railway by Table 2.

The comparison results of different distribution fitting methods are presented in Table 2. The Gamma distribution and the Nakagamim distribution are also used to model the shadow fading [16]. Compared with the other two distributions, the lognormal distribution fitting shows the maximum log likelihood value. It is indicated that lognormal distribution fits the measured shadow fading well.
Figure 4 gives out the statistical characteristics of shadow fading in magnitude of dB. In this figure, the blue bars are the probability distribution function, and the red curve is the normal fitting curve. The standard deviation of the fitting normal distribution is 3.99 dB. Most values in this scenario range from −10 dB to 10 dB. The shadow fading in this scenario is mainly caused by the strong signal reflection from ground, hills, ponds, and buildings.
Shadow fading is often considered roughly constant over the symbol period. But in the HSR scenario, the rapid speed leads to the high Doppler frequency shift and small coherence time, which will influence the design of symbol period. Besides, the long TR distance caused by rapid speed has a relationship with the change of shadow fading.
Figure 5 shows the relationship between the standard deviation of shadow fading in hilly terrain and the TR distance. There are two turning points in the blue curve. One is around the position with the TR distance of 650 m. This position is between the water pond and the measured breakpoint with the distance of 788.6 m. The distance of water pond from the base station is approximately 600 m. The mirror refection from the water pond is highly powered, which makes the received energy in this region concentrated. So this leads to a deep drop in the curve with the position of 650 m. But with the increasing distance, the opportunity for collecting the different scattering energy also increases. Consequently, the standard deviation of shadow fading is getting larger after this turning point. Another turning point is around the 1050 m similar to the calculated the breakpoint distance in a twoslope model. Beyond the last turning point, the energy of many MPCs is under the noise floor which is discarded in the data process. Then the standard deviation of shadow fading decreases with the increasing distance.
The autocorrelation of shadow fading is often investigated for power control and base station location designing. It is defined as the correlation of shadow fading in different positions under the same base station. The Spatial Channel Model (SCM) [18], 802.16J [19], and M.2135 [20] also give out the reference value and distancedependent model of autocorrelation of shadow fading. The autocorrelation is described by the correlation coefficient in these documents. The definition is as follows: where and are the values of shadow fading in the position with distance and and and are the standard deviations of shadow fading and , respectively.
Figure 6 shows the autocorrelation coefficient of the shadow fading between the position with TR distance of 200 m and the positions behind. When the autocorrelation coefficient is less than 0.5, the decorrelation distance is determined. In Figure 6, the decorrelation distance is 10.28 m. This value is smaller than the value of 20 m suggested in 802.16J for vehicular test environment and is also smaller than the value of about 40 m for LOS scenario of RMa in M. 2135. The red dotted line is on the basis of 802.16J model with where is the distance between the two observed positions. It seems that there is a little difference between the measured autocorrelation coefficient and the published model, due to large fluctuations with which is from 100 m to 400 m. These fluctuations are caused by the wave reflection from ground and other scattering objects.
Figure 7 depicts the decorrelation distance of all the positions in the whole route. Each value of decorrelation distance is calculated between the certain position and other positions with the range of 200 m behind. In most cases, the value of decorrelation distance is around 10 m. Due to the observable LOS, the effects of scatters in these locations are small. There are also many positions with decorrelation distance of more than 30 m which is similar to the correlation distance for LOS scenario of RMa in M. 2135. The phenomenon reflects the nonstationary characteristics of largescale fading parameters. This is the difference between the HSR hilly terrain scenario and custom outdoor scenarios. These positions with larger decorrelation distance often appear before, around, or behind the positions of huge scattering objects, such as the water pond with the distance of 600 m and the huge building with the distance of 1400 m. It is verified that the reflected waves received by different positions from the same scattering object experience the similar fading, when these receiving positions are at the same direction relative to the same scattering object.
Table 3 shows the statistical results of decorrelation distance. The mean value of decorrelation distance is 14.81 m. In the measured route, 90% of all locations exhibit decorrelation distance less than 32.31 m, and 50% of all positions exhibit decorrelation distance less than 10.28 m. But there are also an amount of positions with a larger decorrelation distance of more than 30 m which exceeds 10%. Therefore, most of the decorrelation distance values are around 10.28 m, but the phenomenon that there is a great difference of the decorrelation distance in different positions is not ignored. The propagation environment with large scattering objects needs special attention for communication system design.

4.3. KFactor
Fast fading represents a rapid amplitude variation of received signal for movements in the order of a wavelength [21]. For LOS scenario, Kfactor is an important parameter for describing the fast fading characteristic of the channel. It is used for describing the ratio of the power of dominant LOS component to the power of Rayleigh NLOS components. The traditional definition is as follows: where is the power of LOS component and is the total power of NLOS components [22]. It is assumed that the LOS component is the first arrival of MPCs with the smallest delay. Therefore, these two parameters and can be easily calculated with the amplitudes of extracted MPCs in SAGE algorithm. According to the definition, the broadband Kfactor is achieved.
Since Kfactor is related to the probability of a fade of certain depth, it is critical for improving the communication quality. In traditional view, the highspeed problem can be solved in some degree either through increasing the SNR by 2 dB or through increasing the Kfactor by 6 dB [23]. For HSR scenario, the relationship between the Kfactor and the TR distance is worth investigating for system designing.
The relationship between the Kfactor and the TR distance is shown in Figure 8. It is obvious that there are also 2 segments of measured Kfactor. The fitting curve is obtained by using the linear least square method in near and far regions. In this figure, the breakpoint of fitting curve might be set as the calculated breakpoint with the TR distance of 1152 m which is mentioned in the twoslope model of Section 4.1 as well. The expression of the red fitting curve is as follows:
In the near region, the phenomenon that median of Kfactor decreases linearly with increasing TR distance is verified as depicted in [21]. The traditional explanation is that the signal power decay is logarithmic with distance, and the decreasing power of multipath components is much smaller than the decreasing power of LOS one when the distance increases. The standard deviation between the measured Kfactor and fitting curve is approximately limited to 3 dB. In the far region, the values of the red fitting curve lie between −1.5 and −2.5 dB. It is indicated that Kfactor suffers fluctuation which is often estimated as a Gaussian variable [23] with the mean value of −1.85 dB and the standard deviation of 5.05 dB. The Kfactor value for 10%, 50%, and 90% points of the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the Ricean Kfactor in far region can be found in Table 4. From Table 4, the Kfactor values of 50% and 90% positions are lower than −1.42 dB and 4.51 dB, respectively. The mean Kfactor value of all positions is −1.85 dB. Most of Kfactor values are near 0 dB. There are also 10% of positions in far region with a Kfactor less than −9 dB. This means that the power of LOS path remains at a low level in the measured route. Actually in some cases, the LOS signal is not the strongest signal. These cases include the impact of the main scattering objects and the long distance transmission. The results are statistically significant.

This result of Kfactor is different from the WINNER II HSR result of measured Kfactor. In WINNER II HSR result, the Kfactor is constant over the measured distance. As Figure 8 indicates, the Kfactor has its own special characteristic in different positions of the hilly terrain scenario. For example, the water pond which caused the strong specular reflection in the TR distance of about 600 m is mentioned once again. The Kfactor has an extreme low value.
4.4. Comparison with Viaduct Scenario
Viaduct is another typical scenario in HSR scenarios. Table 5 compares the results of the channel fading parameters in viaduct scenario and the results in hilly terrain scenario. The viaduct measurement is conducted in the BeijingTianjin HSR by the Beijing Jiaotong University with an EB CS radio channel sounder Propsound at a frequency of 2.35 GHz with 10 MHz band width [4]. The second is the measured hilly terrain scenario in this paper.

Although differences exist in measurement frequency and other aspects, the comparison between two measurements is still meaningful. In Table 5, the distinction of channel parameters between two scenarios is obvious. Compared with the viaduct scenario, the measured path loss in hilly terrain is divided into two parts with a breakpoint. The path loss component of the first region in hilly terrain is smaller than the value in viaduct, but the value of second region in hilly terrain is larger than that in viaduct. Due to the rapidly changing propagation environment along the measured route, the standard deviation of shadow fading in hilly terrain is larger than that in viaduct. The rich scattering environment of hilly terrain also leads to smaller Kfactor, compared with viaduct. The difference of fading characteristics between viaduct and hilly terrain indicates that the work on HSR hilly terrain measurement and modeling is necessary for general applicability of HSR.
5. Conclusions
Through the use of the highresolution SAGE algorithm in HSR hilly terrain scenario, the statistical fading characteristic of wireless channel parameters has been analyzed in this paper. The HSR hilly terrain scenario is characterized by an obvious LOS component, complex scattering propagation environment, and rapid change of propagation condition due to high speed. On the whole, our measurement results are supported by the fact that the values of fading parameters are changing with time or TR distance.
In the analysis, the path loss, shadow fading, and Kfactor are investigated. Compared with the free space path loss model, the measured path loss value in hilly terrain scenario suffers greater decay and shows the property of having a breakpoint distance as the WINNER HSR model shows. The shadow fading is a parameter for describing the slow fading characteristic. It is lognormal fitting and changed with two turning points. As an important point of interest, the autocorrelation of shadow fading is investigated. It is exhibited that the mean value of decorrelation distance is around 14 m. But the value will rise up when the train gets near to the huge reflectors. The Kfactor as a fast fading parameter is also influenced by the breakpoint distance. Within the breakpoint distance, Kfactor decreases as the TR distance increases. Beyond the break point distance, the value of Kfactor fluctuates dramatically. These results are compared with the published results in viaduct scenario, and the difference between viaduct and hilly terrain is summarized. The results of this paper can be utilized to build a positionbased channel fading model and amend the existing channel models for HSR hilly terrain scenario. And this is also hoped to serve as a reference for future HSR communication system design, evaluation, and improvement.
Acknowledgments
This work has been partially supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB316002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (61201192), Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program (2011081025), National S&T Major Project (2013ZX03001024), International S&T Cooperation Program (2012DFG12010), TsinghuaQualcomm Joint Research Program, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, and Open Research Fund of National Mobile Communication Research Laboratory, Southeast University. The authors also would like to thank Mr. Zhenghui Li, Wenzhen Pang, and Yuejian Zhou for their help in the basic work of channel measurement.
References
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highspeed_rail.
 P. Lukasazewics and E. Anderson, “Green train energy consumption, estimation on highspeed rail operation,” Tech. Rep. 9789174152579, KTH Railway Group, Stockholm, Sweden, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Li and M. Kavehrad, “Effects of time selective multipath fading on OFDM systems for broadband mobile applications,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 332–334, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Liu, C. Tao, J. Qiu et al., “Positionbased modeling for wireless channel on highspeed railway under a viaduct at 2.35 GHz,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 30, pp. 834–845, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 P. Aikio, R. Gruber, and P. Vainikainen, “Wideband radio channel measurements for train tunnels,” in Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '98), pp. 460–464, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, May 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 D. J. Cichon, T. Zwick, and W. Wiesbeck, “Ray optical modeling of wireless communications in highspeed railway tunnels,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 46th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '96), pp. 546–550, Atlanta, Ga, USA, May 1996. View at: Google Scholar
 L. Gao, Z. Zhong, B. Ai, and L. Xiong, “Estimation of the Ricean K factor in the high speed railway scenarios,” in Proceedings of the 5th International ICST Conference on Communications and Networking in China (ChinaCom '10), Beijing, China, August 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Qiu, C. Tao, L. Liu, and Z. Tan, “Broadband channel measurement for the highspeed railway based on WCDMA,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '12Spring), pp. 1–5, Yokohama, Japan, May 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Ghazal, C. X. Wang, H. Haas, M. A. Beach, X. Lu, and D. Yuan, “A nonstationary MIMO channel model for high speed train communication systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 75th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '12Spring), pp. 347–351, Yokohma, Japan, May 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 Google Maps, http://maps.google.com.hk/.
 Y. Rui, Y. Zhang, S. Liu, and S. Zhou, “3.52 GHz MIMO radio channel sounder,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems (ICCCAS '08), pp. 79–83, May 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 WINNER2 WP1, “Measurement results and analysis items,” Internal Report IR1.1.230.9.2006, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 B. H. Fleury, M. Tschudin, R. Heddergott, D. Dahlhaus, and K. I. Pedersen, “Channel parameter estimation in mobile radio environments using the SAGE algorithm,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 434–450, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Wyne, A. F. Molisch, P. Almers, G. Eriksson, J. Karedal, and F. Tufvesson, “Outdoortoindoor office MIMO measurements and analysis at 5.2 GHz,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1374–1386, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 WINNER2 WP1, “Radio channel measurement and analysis results,” Deliverable D 1.1.2, ver 1.0. 30.9.2007, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Salo, L. Vuokko, and P. Vainikainen, “Why is shadow fading lognormal?” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications, pp. 522–526, Aalborg, Denmark, September 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 I. Forkel, M. Schinnenburg, and M. Ang, “Generation of twodimmensional correlated shadowing for mobile radio network simulation,” in Proceedings of the Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC '04), pp. 314–319, Abano Terme, Italy, September 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 3GPP TR 25.996, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; technical specification group radio access networks; spatial channel model for MIMO simulations (release 6),” V6.1.0. View at: Google Scholar
 “Multihop relay systemevaluation methodology (Channel model and performance metrics),” IEEE802.16j06/013r3, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 ITUR , “Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMTAdvanced,” Tech. Rep. ITUR M.2135, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Wang, E. K. Tameh, and A. R. Nix, “Statistical peertopeer channel models for outdoor urban environments at 2 GHz and 5 GHz,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC '04Fall), pp. 5101–5105, September 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 W. H. Jeong, J. S. Kim, M. Jung, and K. Kim, “MIMO channel measurement and analysis for 4G mobile communication,” Computer Science, vol. 7425, pp. 678–682, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Goller, “Application of GSM in high speed trains: measurement and simulations,” IEEE Colloquium on Radio communications in Transportation, pp. 5/1–5/7, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Fengyu Luan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.