Wideband, Multiband, Tunable, and Smart Antenna Systems for Mobile and UWB Wireless Applications 2014
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
ChiehSen Lee, ChiLin Tsai, ChinLung Yang, "Novel CrossType Network for WideTuningRange Reconfigurable Multiband Antennas", International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2014, Article ID 741960, 9 pages, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/741960
Novel CrossType Network for WideTuningRange Reconfigurable Multiband Antennas
Abstract
This paper presents a crosstype network design with a novel reconfigurable functionality to realize a tunable multiband antenna. By attaching a reconfigurable network at the feeding port of a broadband antenna, multiinput impedance adjustment enables the production of multimatching operating bands. Each band can be independently controlled by a single component with a considerably wide tuning range and high selectivity. The experiments in this study involved using an ultrawideband (UWB) antenna connected to the proposed crosstype network. The tunable antenna operates in a dual band of (1.39 to 2.34 GHz) and (2.1 to 3.6 GHz) with tunable frequency ratios of 168% and 132%, respectively. The average bandwidths at and are approximately 50 MHz and 148 MHz, respectively, implying narrowband operation. The measured radiation pattern revealed that the tunable antenna exhibits a nearly omnidirectional radiation pattern at both 1.8 and 3.5 GHz. The network circuit architecture can be extended to the multiband function type by adopting this matching approach. The amount of shunt matches determines the number of operation bands.
1. Introduction
Because of the fast development of wireless communication technologies, multifunctional platforms and their quality of service have become a research focus [1]. Wireless frontend antennas with reconfigurable functions can improve the flexibility of channel reuse and capacity and also reduce the noise and the mutual interference between adjacent channels [2]. Frequencyreconfigurable antennas have been explored as an alternative to multiband antennas [3].
Numerous studies have analyzed reconfigurable and multiband structures, such as the microstrip patch antenna [4–7], PIFA [8, 9], and slot antenna [10–12]. Reconfigurable antennas can manipulate the current distribution of the structure and vary resonance frequencies. Switches and varactors, such as radiofrequency microelectromechanical systems and pin diodes, have also been studied and directly incorporated into antenna structures to form frequencyreconfigurable antennas. Frequency tuning can also be achieved using tunable filters in a filterbased reconfiguration. A tunable filter embedded in an antenna can be also regarded as a tunable antenna [13–16]. The use of reconfigurable antennas has always been hindered by the need for a large number of switches, complex dc wiring, and the limitation of serving one frequency band at a time [2].
This paper introduces a novel and complete method for the design and full characterization of a reconfigurable multiband structure with a crosstype frontend network circuit to achieve a tunable mechanism [17, 18]. The proposed crosstype network is based on a Ttype impedancematching network. As indicated in Figure 1, this frontend network can be embedded in any broadband system or antenna and expanded from a single tunable band to a dualband network. The crosstype network exhibits an additional frequencyselection ability. The functionality of network to create a tunable antenna was verified in this study. The design flow of the tunable network can be analyzed on an network, which provides powerful and quick electronic design automation (EDA) tools such as SPICE and ADS. This tunable network features controllable operation band numbers, continuous tuning with a single corresponding control, independent control with a wide range in each band, high selectivity, and easy minimization after integration.
2. A Tunable CrossType Network for Multiband Operation Design
According to the matching theorem, one network reactance corresponds to one matching operating frequency. Dualband operation uses the unique characteristics of a crosstype matching network to simultaneously create two distinct matching reactance values within one frequency spectrum interval [18]. The multiband operation then exhibits multiband matching. Figure 1 presents the proposed network circuit topology, which is similar to a crossarchitecture. The term represents the selfimpedance of each element part in the network. A crossnetwork allows a set of shunt branches to extend into a crossshaped multiband matching network architecture. Because the various shunts of separately control distinct reactance values, the matching multifrequencies can be separately and simultaneously controlled:
During matching, (1) expresses the corresponding impedance transformation in a crosstype network between the source and load. The term represents the impedance of the shunt parallel part, as expressed in (2). The two impedance values of and with the same capacitance value (), in Figure 1, serve as two capacitorreactance components in series to simplify the analysis. These series capacitances can also determine the matching band quality factor.
In a traditional (capacitance)(inductance)(capacitance) Ttype network, the load impedance of a wideband antenna can be used to approximate the system impedance, leading to (=50 Ω), and, with the two same series capacitances and one shunt inductance , the matching single operating frequency is as follows:
The theory and numerical analysis of complete impedance matching are firmly established [17]. Crosstype networks can be designed using a simple Ttype network with the desired value. A graphical method of tracing the impedance trajectory has been proposed to achieve the selectivity [17]. The selectivity in the proposed architecture can be determined by preselecting the and values. The bandwidth can be estimated using circuit values. In dualband operation, the CLC crosstype network simultaneously creates two matching impedance values by introducing a second branch. A tunable crosstype network uses the dual shunt of branch stubs which corresponds to the tunable match of the dual operation bands. The network design also allows simultaneous band selection and sheltering, both of which are based on the impedancematching theorem.
The number of operation bands can be dependent on the shunt matching parts of the network. To implement a crosstype network with triple bands, each part of the network is constructed as indicated in Figure 2. In this study, an UWB [19] antenna was employed as the matching target. The antenna input impedance represents the load conditions for the numerical analysis of the crosstype network. The original broadband bandwidth of the antenna can serve as the maximal tunable range. The reflection coefficient of the original operating band affects the results; the tunable network reshapes the target band.
Based on the proposed network (Figure 2), this section introduces the element selected for each term topology in the three operation frequencies, , , and . The variable inductance value can be implemented by combining a series varactor diode with a fixed inductor in series. For a shunt branch in a tripleband network of , , and , to the control of the highfrequency operating band branch is represented by the shunt branch C_{6}L_{7}C_{8}. The term C_{8} is the variable capacitance for controlling the variable inductance of the shunt branch. The placement of enables the lowfrequency barrier component to isolate lowfrequency signals; to the control of the lowfrequency operating band branch is represented by the shunt branch L_{1}L_{2}C_{3}. The term is also a varactor for controlling the variable inductance of the shunt branch. The placement of enables highfrequency barrier components to isolate highfrequency signals. The terms and control the inductance of the matching low and highfrequency operating bands. Exerting on varactor to control and exerting on varactor to control enable independent adjustment of the two operating bands. The term to the control of the middlefrequency operating band branch is represented by the shunt branch C_{4}L_{3}C_{5}. The function of each element is the same as previously described, except that of middlefrequency operation.
2.1. Tunable DualBand Operation
The networks were integrated with a broadband antenna to simulate the frequency matching and the dualband tunable performance of antennas. In dualband operation, the network is connected with and two shunt branches, as indicated in Figure 2. The capacitance and inductance devices in the network were assumed to have ideal and noloss conditions, such that pF, nH, nH, pF, and nH. Two adjustable capacitive components, () and (), were configured for two distinct control terminals, where and correspond to high and lowfrequency bands, respectively.
By employing the input impedance from the tested UWB antenna as the targetmatching load, the changing capacitance of the matching network can be used to simulate a controllable operating dual band that includes a tunable lowfrequency band, , and a tunable highfrequency band, . Figure 3 presents the control of and values with various capacitance values, which enables the and operation bands to independently adjust the frequency range from 1.72 to 6.09 GHz (354%) and from 7.45 to 14 GHz (188%), respectively. This design produces an extremely wide and independently tunable frequency band.
(a)
(b)
2.2. Tunable TripleBand Operation
As indicated in Figure 2, the objective values of the components used can be divided and fixed as follows: nH, nH, pF, nH, pF, and nH. However, is the lowfrequency band with the control component, is the middlefrequency band with the control component, and is the highfrequency band with the control component. These three components can independently control the three frequency bands. The performance results of the tunable tripleband antenna are presented in Figure 3, which indicates that only the values of the control capacitive component need to be adjusted to achieve independent control of the related multibands. The tuning ranges of , , and are 1.35–5.69 GHz (421%) ( tuning from 2 to 0.02 pF), 3.96–8.82 GHz (223%) ( tuning from 0.5 to 0.01 pF), and 5.75–12.54 GHz (218%) ( tuning from 0.3 to 0.01 pF), respectively (Figure 4). An extension of this architecture generates additional operation bands by joining additional shunt branches to the network. A backend network system is incorporated to create multiple matching impedances, which turn the antenna into a tunable multiband antenna. The network circuit architecture can be extended to the multiband function type through this approach to increase the number of shunt matches.
(a)
(b)
(c)
3. Analysis of a Tunable CrossType Network
A theoretical equation model is presented to analyze the effectiveness of a dualband operation network and the performance of in real operation conditions based on the two limiting factors: network structural limitations and component losses. For simplification, the analysis is conducted using dualband ( and ) matching as an example.
3.1. Matching Operation Band Performance
Equation (2) expresses the overall shunt impedance of . Because the required matching reactance of dualfrequency matching is the same as that for singlefrequency matching, both can be expressed by (3) under lossless conditions. The condition pF by (3) obtains the required reactance values for the desired dualmatching frequencies, which are two distinct inductive values. The required reactance provided by ( nH, nH, pF, and nH) is also considered. The two curves plotted in accordance with (2) and (3) are presented in Figure 5. The two curves in (3) and (2) that intersect at two points represent the tunable lowband and the highband points, respectively. The interconnecting point of the curve with matching reactance indicates that when is between two distinct intervals bands the matching inductance value appears at the matching point. This determines whether the matching condition can occur simultaneously at dual frequencies and also the matching performance at these dualband networks.
In Figure 5, where , the capacitance value of is fixed at 5 pF to achieve a fixed highfrequency . Adjusting from 0.5 to 5 pF illustrates the limitations placed on the dual band by the two parallel matching architectures (Figure 5). To achieve perfect dualband matching, the reactance function curve must match the inductance obtained using (3) to match the frequency function curve at the two intersecting points. However, within the partial band interval, when the corresponding values of (5 pF) decrease, the inductive range cannot intersect the matching curve, in which case the matching conditions deteriorate. When (0.5 pF) decreases, full capacitance appears with no matching effect, implying that the lower frequencymatching band has disappeared.
Dual matching is affected not only by , but also by the relative relationship between and , as (2) indicates. When two operating frequency bands are close to each other and the ratio of to is small, the inductive reactance of the lowfrequency portion drops and the dualmatching results deteriorate.
3.2. Optimization Architecture for Lossy Devices
Considering the practical component loss, an investigation of the relationship between loss and the slightly dissimilar capacitance of and , which affects matching performance, is required. The design of the crosstype dualband network requires SMD components. The shunt branch equivalent series resistances (ESR), and , represent the losses occurring at the junctions in the branch components. Because of asymmetry, it is assumed that to explain and compute the effects of associated losses, where is the total equivalent resistance of shunt branches and . The previous derivation must also incorporate these resistance terms into the overall shunt branch as follows:
Under loss conditions, the original matching analysis is no longer applicable. A crosstype matching network for can only be matched perfectly under an unrealistic lossless condition, and this must be considered in calculations. Consider with loss resistance , by (4) and (1), to determine the relationships among system impedance, loss resistance, and the series capacitance value for the matching frequency as follows:
This calculation indicates that it is necessary to select and by (5) to ensure appropriate matching conditions. Therefore, the network has improved insertion loss and transmission coefficient . In this study, the situation with 0402 SMD capacitance and inductance components with an equivalent loss of 4.3 Ω at V bias in the proposed dualband network topology was simulated (Figure 2). As indicated in Figure 6, improved by approximately 10 dB by setting to 0.68 pF and to 0.43 pF. This explains why is slightly larger than in the practical fabricated dualband crosstype network. This design improves by approximately 1 dB, indicating that appropriate lowloss components and a careful fabrication process can reduce insertion loss.
3.3. Group Delay of CrossType Network
Figure 7 shows the simulated twoport group delay of the proposed crosstype network. The simulation results indicate that the group delay is near constant over a wide range of bands for two narrow matching bands, 1.8 and 3.5 GHz. Quasilinear group delay except form nonmatching bands, these may originate from the mixed multiple modes or several lumped element in shunt branch. Generally, the operation band has a linear phase response. The simulation group delay implies optimal performance of linear phase and low dispersion that ensures constant values of group delay.
4. Fabrication and Measurement of a Tunable CrossType Network
The right side of Figure 8 presents the fabricated circuit, which has a total circuit size of 2 cm^{2}. The circuit substrate is Rogers RO4003C with thickness of 0.8182 mm, , and dielectric loss tangent of 0.0021. The varactor, a GaAs hyperabrupt varactor diode (model number MGV12525E28) obtained from the Aeroflex/Metelics Company, continuously changes the capacitance from 0.4 pF to 5 pF. The value for the diode component is 3000, and the series loss resistance is approximately 1 Ω [20]. Tables 1 and 2 list the results of the crosstype network with a 50 Ω load connecting the two ports, as well as the related parameters. To estimate the energy loss in this twoport network, (6) defines the transducer power gain as follows [21]:


(a)
(b)
Tables 1 and 2 indicate that the bandwidth of is relatively narrow. This is deduced from Figure 8 and explained by (2), which indicates that the reactance change in the inductance magnitude of was considerably steeper than that in the highfrequency and, therefore, has a narrower bandwidth. The network gained , which is related to the loss in components and the network power transmission efficiency. The practical SMD components are lossy. Furthermore, various biases on a varactor have different values [12] and result in varying . The bias choke of the varactor is another factor affecting and the matching band selection performance. The circuit size indicated in Figure 2 can be decreased because it requires only a small area for its components. Additional transmission lines are designed to facilitate measurements.
5. Results and Discussion of the Tunable DualBand CrossType Network Integrated with a Wideband Antenna
The crosstype network was connected to a 1.2–4 GHz UWB antenna to create a tunable dualband antenna. The performance of the proposed dualband tunable antenna was verified by measuring the change in various capacitance values when various biases (0, 5, 11, and 23 V) were applied to the first and second varactors separately. This tunable antenna can be used for multiple communication standards. Using the results of the measurements presented in Figure 8(a) as an example, the lowfrequency band can be fixed in the DCS 1.8 GHz band, whereas the other band can be independently controlled to adjust to the WiMAX band. Conversely, Figure 8(b) indicates that the highfrequency band is fixed for WiMAX, allowing to be individually controlled and applications in other frequency bands to be adjusted. The ranges for the tunable antenna bands and are 1.39 to 2.34 GHz (168%) and 2.83 to 3.72 GHz (132%), and the average bandwidths of and are 51 MHz and 148 MHz, respectively. Other frequency bands can be controlled by large variations in capacitance value after analytic calculation, allowing the antenna to have a wide tuning range. Multiple frequency bands can be expanded and adjusted similarly.
The crosstype network transferred the frequency dependence of to result in variation of , as indicated in Figure 9. After the independent adjustment of by the dualband crosstype network has been verified, the wireless transmission performance between antennas must also be verified by measuring . A horn antenna was used at a distance of 60 cm (far field) to compare the effects of in changing dualfrequency operations with and without the proposed matching network. Figure 9 presents the operating condition and wireless measurement results of the UWB antenna and this dualband tunable matching network when the dualband is tuned to 3.5 GHz ( V) and to 1.8 GHz ( V).
At identical source signal strengths, the transmission signal in the network is highly frequencyselective compared with the original UWB antenna ; therefore, the signaltonoise ratio (SNR) can be improved because of reduced noise and interference. Figure 9 presents two operated communication bands at 3.5 GHz (datalink) and 1.8 GHz (voicelink) simultaneously. Compared with the original broadband characteristics, the experiment indicated that the selectivity of this dualband antenna increased substantially and demonstrated an excellent adjacent signal suppression capability of to −8 dB for and of −17 to −5 dB for , thereby enhancing the selectivity of the main signal and enabling higherquality communication transmission. This dualband antenna can transmit signals to other antennas effectively at an improved SNR. Such crosstype dualband matching in practical implementation and design has already been optimized for matching network components, the insertion loss of which is approximately −2.1 dB and −2.6 dB for individual frequency bands and in the network, respectively.
Figure 10 presents the measured radiation patterns of the crosstype network integrated with the UWB antenna. Figure 8 indicates that the tunable antenna exhibits a nearly omnidirectional radiation pattern at both 1.8 and 3.5 GHz. Although the measurement results are comparable to the radiation patterns of the original UWB antenna (solid lines), the tunable antenna can still maintain the same electrical characteristics to the original antenna at these desired operational frequencies when a crosstype feeding network is included. The tunable crosstype network can be regarded as part of the antenna feeding network line to adjust the incident strength, so that the matching functionality at 1.8 and 3.5 GHz can retain the natural electrical characteristics of the antenna, such as the current distributions in the radiator. The addon crosstype network implies a negligible impact on the antenna patterns, but the frequency response network. Therefore, the antenna return loss is modified because the tunable crosstype frequency selectivity can be improved and dualband tuning operation can be achieved. This omnidirectional pattern is verified to be suitable for most applications in general wireless environments and provides a tuning functionality for modifying the operation bands.
(a)
(b)
6. Conclusion
This paper proposes a crosstype network to fabricate a tunable multiband antenna. Adding an extra shunt branch to a network creates an additional independently tunable operating band. A minimalcontrol element reduces the problem of loss from variable components such as varactors and also simplifies the control units of the system. The operating frequency bands can be adjusted continuously and individually with an extremely wide tuning range. The measurements for the tunable range for this dualband antenna were 1.39 GHz to 2.34 GHz (168%) for and 2.83 GHz to 3.72 GHz (132%) for . The average bandwidth for and was 51 MHz and 148 MHz, respectively. Therefore, the proposed novel crosstype network can be used successfully in tunable dualband functions to decrease the processing time and analytical complexity of tunablefrequency devices. The radiation pattern of the tunable antenna exhibits a nearly omnidirectional characteristic. More than three bands can be easily extended with independent adjustment in tunable multiband antennas, based on a modified crosstype matching network with an increased number of shunt branches corresponding to independently controlled bands.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
References
 K. Rawat, M. S. Hashmi, and F. M. Ghannouchi, “Dualband RF circuits and components for multistandard software defined radios,” IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 12–32, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Zhang, S. Yang, H. K. Pan, A. E. Fathy, S. ElGhazaly, and V. Nair, “Reconfigurable antenna for simultaneous multiservice wireless applications,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS ’07), pp. 543–546, Long Beach, Calif, USA, January 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Yang, C. Zhang, H. Pan, A. Fathy, and V. Nair, “Frequencyreconfigurable antennas for multiradio wireless platforms,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 66–83, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. S. Yang, A. A. Kishk, and K. F. Lee, “Frequency reconfigurable Uslot microstrip patch antenna,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 7, pp. 127–129, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. Bhartia and I. Bahl, “Frequency agile microstrip antennas,” Microwave Journal, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 67–70, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
 Z. Jin and A. Mortazawi, “An Lband tunable microstrip antenna using multiple varactors,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Antennas and Propagation Symposium and USNC/CNC/URSI North American Radio Science Meeting, pp. 524–527, June 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 S. V. Shynu, G. Augustin, C. K. Aanandan, P. Mohanan, and K. Vasudevan, “Design of compact reconfigurable dual frequency microstrip antennas using varactor diodes,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research, vol. 60, pp. 197–205, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. Nguyen, R. Bhatti, and S. Park, “A simple PIFAbased tunable internal antenna for personal communication handsets,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 7, pp. 130–133, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Oh, Y. Shin, and S. Park, “A novel PIFA type varactor tunable antenna with Ushaped slot,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Antennas, Propagation and EM Theory (ISAPE '06), pp. 1–3, October 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 N. Behdad and K. Sarabandi, “Dualband reconfigurable antenna with a very wide tunability range,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 409–416, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Li, J. Xiong, Y. Yu, and S. He, “A simple compact reconfigurable slot antenna with a very wide tuning range,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 3725–3728, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. CarrasquilloRivera, R. A. R. Solis, and J. G. ColomUstáriz,, “Tunable and dualband rectangular SlotRing antenna,” in Proceedings of the Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, vol. 4, pp. 4308–4311, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Lugo Jr. and J. Papapolymerou, “Sixstate reconfigurable filter structure for antenna based systems,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 479–483, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Zamudio, Y. Tawk, J. Costantine, J. Kim, and C. G. Christodoulou, “Integrated cognitive radio antenna using reconfigurable band pass filters,” in Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP '11), pp. 2108–2112, April 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 J. PerruisseauCarrier and P. PardoCarrera, “Recent developments on reconfigurable bandfiltering antennas,” in Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP '10), pp. 1–4, April 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 C. Chuang and S. Chung, “Synthesis and design of a new printed filtering antenna,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1036–1042, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C.L. Yang and C.S. Lee, “Matching network using a single control element for improving selectivity of antennas with low ringing in return loss,” Progress in Electromagnetic Research C, vol. 26, pp. 29–42, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C.L. Yang, “Novel high selective bandtunable antennas over ultrawide ranges using reconfigurable matching network,” in Proceeding of the IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting (APSURSI ’09), pp. 149–4, Charleston, Sc, USA, June 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Tsai and C. Yang, “Novel compact eyeshaped UWB antennas,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 11, pp. 184–187, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 http://www.datasheetarchive.com/MGV12525datasheet.html.
 C. Hoarau, N. Corrao, J. D. Arnould, P. Ferrari, and P. Xavier, “Complete design and measurement methodology for a tunable RF impedancematching network,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 2620–2627, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 ChiehSen Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.