International Journal of Antennas and Propagation

International Journal of Antennas and Propagation / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 210254 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/210254

Backward Surface Wave Propagation and Radiation along a One-Dimensional Folded Cylindrical Helix Array

Academic Editor: Diego Masotti
Received28 Apr 2015
Accepted30 Jul 2015
Published10 Sep 2015

Abstract

Wave propagation along a closely spaced folded cylindrical helix (FCH) array is investigated for the purpose of designing compact array for energy transport and antenna radiation. It is found that the height of this surface wave guiding structure can be decreased from 0.24 to 0.06 by replacing the monopole element with the FCH. Both the propagation constant and the mode distribution of the dominant wave mechanism are extracted by ESPRIT algorithm, which indicates that a backward propagating surface wave is supported by the array structure. A compact backfire FCH antenna array is designed and measured based on the identified dominant wave mechanism.

1. Introduction

Wave propagation and radiation along a one-dimensional metal wire array has long been of interest since the invention of the Yagi-Uda antenna [1]. With carefully selected monopole wire height (0.2 to 0.25, with being the free space wavelength) and spacing (0.2 to 0.35), a surface wave with an optimum phase velocity can be supported by the structure and can be radiated in the end-fire direction [2]. More recently, there is an emerging interest in minimizing the size of the array for two important applications: electromagnetic (EM) energy transport and compact antenna array design. It was found in [3] that the transmission loss of EM energy along a 1D metal rod array is smaller than 1.5 dB/, which can be attributed to the strong coupling between closely spaced rods (0.054). For the second application, a closely spaced, multiple-element parasitic antenna array was designed and implemented, with its interelement spacing being as small as 0.02 [4].

In spite of the above success in reducing the spacing between wires, there still remains a challenge to minimize the height of each array element. It was found that the height of metal wire should be close to a quarter-wavelength to ensure the dominant surface wave is strongly excited. One idea to minimize the element size is to substitute the metal wire with electrically small elements such as a folded spherical helix (FSH) [5] or a folded cylindrical helix (FCH) [6], the size of which can be as small as 0.06. The effects of mutual coupling between two closely spaced FSHs or FCHs have been studied recently for wireless power transfer applications [7, 8]. However, wave propagation along a 1D closely spaced array with electrically small element is not well understood and still needs to be investigated. Previously we have simulated surface wave propagation along a 1D FCH array and compared the results with that of a 1D metal cut wire array [9]. In this paper, we extend our study to simulate and measure surface wave propagation and radiation along a 1D closely spaced FCH array.

The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, a 21-element FCH array is first designed and fabricated. Broadband transmission data and near electric field distributions are simulated and measured along the array. In Section 3, the dominant propagation mechanism and its associated propagation characteristics, such as propagation constant and mode distribution, are extracted using a super resolution estimation algorithm. A parametric study is performed to figure out correlation between the propagation constant and array geometrical parameters. In Section 4, a compact backfire parasitic antenna array is designed based on the identified dominant wave mechanism. Both simulation and measurement results are presented. Section 5 concludes the paper.

2. Wave Propagation along a 1D FCH Array

First, a single 4-arm FCH element centered at 400 MHz is designed by using formulas provided in [6]. The helix radius , height , and number of turns are 0.0317 m, 0.047 m, and 1, respectively. The height of the folded helix corresponds to 0.063, which is much shorter than that of a quarter-wavelength monopole antenna. Next, 21 identical elements are placed along a straight line in the -axis to form the FCH array. The interelement spacing is equal to 0.08 m, corresponding to 0.11 at 400 MHz. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) show the simulation and measurement setup of the FCH array. While a finite sized metal ground plane is used in the measurement, an infinitely large perfect electric conductor (PEC) ground is assumed in the simulation to save computational time. A voltage source is placed at the bottom of the left-most element and a field probe is moved in between parasitic elements to sample the near electric fields at the ground plane level for different frequencies. Numerical software FEKO [10] is used for simulation and a vector network analyzer (Agilent PNL N5230C) is applied for measurement.

Figure 2 compares the simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the source antenna. They exhibit similar trend and both are significantly different from the sharp resonance behavior of a single FCH antenna, as presented in [6]. This is due to the strong coupling between closely spaced helixes. The resonance band in the measurement shifts downward by approximately 20 MHz comparing to the simulation data, which can be attributed to manufacturing errors.

Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the normalized transmission data for both simulations and measurements on a dB scale. The antenna mismatches have been removed by normalizing to and . The horizontal axis represents the frequency from 300 MHz to 500 MHz with an interval of 2.5 MHz, and the vertical axis represents the distance between transmitting and receiving antennas along the -axis from 0.4 m to 1.6 m with a spacing of 0.08 m. As shown in Figure 3(a), the receiving field strengths are much stronger between 355 MHz and 415 MHz, and within the pass band wave propagation exhibits negligible decay along the -axis. Outside of this pass band, field strengths are much weaker and attenuate much faster. The measurement results in Figure 3(b) show good agreement with simulation results, except the pass band shifts downward by approximately 20 MHz, similar to the above observation for Figure 2.

To further reveal the wave propagation along the FCH array, we simulate the near field distributions in the plane at a sample frequency of 390 MHz. Figure 4 plots the normalized near electric field components and on a dB scale. The horizontal axis represents the distance along the -axis from 0.4 to 1.6 m with a 0.08 m interval. The vertical axis represents height in the direction from 0 to 0.2 m with an interval of 0.002 m. In Figure 4(a), a standing wave pattern can be clearly observed along the direction, implying the interference between and traveling waves due to the finite size of the array. Along the direction, the magnitude of peaks at the height of the helix and decays rapidly away from the interface between the FCH and the air. A similar interference pattern can be observed in Figure 4(b) for the component, except its strength is much weaker than .

3. Extraction of Dominant Wave Mechanism Using ESPRIT

To better understand how wave propagates along the 1D FCH array, we extract the dominant wave mode and its associated propagation characteristics from the above transmission and near field data. First we model the transmission data as a summation of different wave modes, each with a unique propagation constant , attenuation constant , and magnitude , which can then be extracted using ESPRIT algorithm. ESPRIT is a super resolution spectrum estimation algorithm which was originally developed for estimation of sinusoid signals in noise [11]. More recently, it has been successfully applied to both wave propagation and antenna radiation problems [12]. The extraction process has been explained in detail in [4] and will not be repeated here. Consider the following:As an example, Figures 5(a) and 5(b) plot the ESPRIT fitted magnitude and phase curves at 390 MHz by adding the first two dominant terms. The results show excellent agreement with the original simulated transmission data, and the propagation constants of the two dominant terms are found to be −2.236 and 2.236 ( is the free space wave number), implying the superposition of incident and reflected components of a single slow wave mode. It is found that the dominant mode is a backward traveling surface wave for the following two reasons: first, the amplitude of the mode with a propagation constant is stronger than other modes extracted from the ESPRIT; second, the unwrapped phase increases as distance increases, as shown in Figure 5(b), implying that the dominant mode is a backward traveling wave. The ESPRIT algorithm is also applied to the measured transmission data at 370 MHz and the comparison between original and fitted data is shown in Figures 5(c) and 5(d). We intentionally shift the frequency downward by 20 MHz to make a fair comparison between simulation and measurement, as stated in Section 2. Table 1 shows the propagation constants of the dominant backward surface wave, and the results are very similar between simulation and measurement.


Dominant mode//

Simulation (390 MHz)−2.2360.0089

Measurement (370 MHz)−2.44850.1584

Furthermore, we extract the mode distribution of the dominant surface wave from the simulated near electric field data in Figures 6(a) and 6(b). Figures 6(a) and 6(b) plot the extracted and mode distributions versus height at 390 MHz. It can be seen that the magnitude of peaks around the height of the FCH element (0.047 m) and decays exponentially away from the interface, a typical characteristic of surface wave propagation. The distribution is more complicated below the interface between the FCH and the air but is similar to above the FCH height. We also map out the frequency dispersion behavior of the backward traveling surface wave and show the results in Figure 7. It is seen that, except for the 20 MHz frequency shift along the horizontal axis, the values of increase as frequency increases for both simulations and measurements.

Finally, a parametric study is conducted to correlate the propagation constant with array geometrical parameters. The first parameter we examined is the radius . Both the height and the spacing between elements are fixed. Figure 8(a) shows that increases as increases. The second varying parameter is the height of the helix, as shown in Figure 8(b). The phase constant varies slightly since the total length of the helix does not change much. Finally, in Figure 8(c) we explored the effect of spacing and it was found that by increasing the interval of the adjacent element from 0.07 m to 0.1 m the propagation constant drops from −1.83 to −2.49 due to the variation of coupling between array elements. It is concluded that by carefully selecting a combination of radius , height , and spacing we can achieve a desired propagation constant for a fixed length FCH array. This observation is rather important for the surface wave antenna design, as will be explained in the next section.

4. Backfire Surface Wave Antenna Design

In this section, a compact 1D, closely spaced parasitic antenna array centered at 400 MHz is designed based on the above identified dominant surface wave mechanism. The total length of the array is assumed to be 0.5. Given this fixed array size, the propagation constant of the surface wave has to be carefully determined to maximize the directivity of the array, which is similar to the 1D metal wire antenna array design [4]. The optimum phase constant for this half-wavelength array is found to be −1.98. Then the radius , height , and spacing are selected to be 0.03115 m, 0.049 m, and 0.104 m to achieve this . Other combinations of array geometrical parameters can also result in this optimum propagation constant, as discussed in the previous parametric study. Figure 9 plots the final array design setup, which consists of four FCH elements. The height of the source antenna is tuned to be 0.042 m to match the input impedance to 50 ohms at the center frequency.

Figure 10 shows the antenna reflection coefficients versus frequency. The center resonance frequencies are found to be 400 MHz and 386 MHz for simulation and measurement. The −10 dB bandwidthes are both 3 MHz. Figure 11 compares the simulated and measured gain in the backward end-fire direction (, ). The maximum gain values are 10.99 dBi for simulation and 10.33 dBi for measurement. Finally, Figure 12 plots the simulated antenna array radiation patterns in both the azimuth plane (i.e., plane) and the elevation plane (i.e., plane) at the center frequency, which clearly shows the backward radiation pattern. The simulated front-to-back ratio is found to be 9.4 dB, while in measurement it is 12.8 dB.

To provide more physical insights into our FCH array operation, we compare its interelement phase delay with the well-known Hansen-Woodyard end-fire array condition [13]. Given the extracted propagation constant (−1.98) and spacing (0.138), the phase delay between adjacent FCH elements is found to beAccording to the Hansen-Woodyard end-fire array condition, the theoretical optimum phase delay between adjacent array elements should be close towhere is speed of light and is number of elements. It can be seen thatthe phase delay of our FCH array is close to that of Hansen-Woodyard end-fire condition , resulting in its maximum radiation in the direction.

Finally, we compare our FCH antenna array performance with other small antenna arrays in the literatures [1417]. The comparison is shown in Table 2. It can be clearly seen that our FCH array exhibits the lowest height, highest gain, and best front-to-back (F/B) ratio among all antennas. The tradeoffs we made include one more element and slightly larger spacing. The −10 dB input bandwidth of our antenna is the smallest, which can be attributed to the lowest height of the FCH element.


ReferenceNumber of elementsSpacingHeightGainF/BBW

Our antenna40.1380.0610.3 dBi12.8 dB0.75%
[14]30.110.2757.14 dBi8.6 dB2.28%
[15]30.060.0928.5 dBi7 dB2.7%
[16]30.090.18.43 dBi6.63 dB1.2%
[17]30.0530.219.9 dBin/a12.44%

5. Conclusion

In this paper, surface wave propagation and radiation along a 1D FCH array is investigated from both simulation and measurement perspectives. It is found that a backward traveling surface wave can be supported by this structure. The propagation characteristics of this dominant wave mechanism are extracted and discussed. Furthermore, a backfire surface wave antenna is designed and implemented based on the identified wave mechanism. The study presented in this paper opens a new door for low-profile parasitic surface wave antenna array design. For future work, we will expand the study to array structures with other electrically small elements such as the folded spherical helix or the meander line. We will also look into the possibility of applying the FCH antenna array for wireless power transfer.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. G. Thiele, “Analysis of yagi-uda-type antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 1969. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. W. Ehrenspéck and H. Poehler, “A new method for obtaining maximum gain from yagi antennas,” IRE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 379–386, 1959. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. A. Maier, M. L. Brongersma, and H. A. Atwater, “Electromagnetic energy transport along arrays of closely spaced metal rods as an analogue to plasmonic devices,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 16–18, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. Xue and Y. Li, “Design of a closely-spaced, multiple-element parasitic antenna array,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 2374–2377, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. R. Best, “The radiation properties of electrically small folded spherical helix antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 953–960, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. R. Best, “A comparison of the cylindrical folded helix Q to the Gustafsson limit,” in Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP '09), pp. 2554–2557, Berlin, Germany, March 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  7. M. Škiljo and Z. Blažević, “Spherical helices for resonant wireless power transfer,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2013, Article ID 426574, 12 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. J. Lee and S. Nam, “Fundamental aspects of near-field coupling small antennas for wireless power transfer,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 3442–3449, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. B. Xu, R. Jean, and Y. Li, “Investigation of surface wave propagation along a folded cylindrical helix array,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Texas Symposium on Wireless and Microwave Circuits and Systems (WMCS '15), Waco, Tex, USA, April 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  10. https://www.feko.info/.
  11. A. Paulraj, R. Roy, and T. Kailath, “Estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques—ESPRIT,” in Proceedings of the 19th Asilomar Conference on Circuits, Systems and Computers, pp. 83–89, November 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  12. Y. Li and H. Ling, “Extraction of wave propagation mechanisms in a cut-wire array using the ESPRIT algorithm,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 8, pp. 744–747, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. L. Stutzman and G. A. Thiele, Antenna Theory and Design, John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
  14. Z. Bayraktar, P. L. Werner, and D. H. Werner, “The design of miniature three-element stochastic Yagi-Uda arrays using particle swarm optimization,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Lim and H. Ling, “Design of electrically small, pattern reconfigurable Yagi antenna,” Electronics Letters, vol. 43, no. 24, pp. 1326–1327, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Yu, Y. Le, and S. Lim, “Design of a dual-band, electrically small, parasitic array antenna,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 13, pp. 1453–1456, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Arceo and C. A. Balanis, “A compact Yagi-Uda antenna with enhanced bandwidth,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 10, pp. 442–445, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Bin Xu and Yang Li. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

858 Views | 366 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.