Research Article
Effect of Surface Error Distribution and Aberration on Electromagnetic Performance of a Reflector Antenna
Table 2
The result of effect of errors distributed in the normalized Zernike polynomials on EMP.
| Term | Loss (dB) | Offset (″) | ΔSLD (dB) | Characteristic | 0 cut | 90 cut | 0 cut | 90 cut | 0 cut-L | 0 cut-R | 90 cut-L | 90 cut-R |
| | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | Piston | | -0.28 | 0 | 0 | -94.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | -2.6 | 3.4 | Tilt | | 0 | -0.28 | -94.6 | 0 | -2.6 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Tilt | | -0.2 | -0.2 | 0 | 0 | -2 | -2 | -2.7 | -2.7 | Astigmatism | | -0.44 | -0.44 | 0 | 0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 | Defocus | | -0.19 | -0.19 | 0 | 0 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 3.8 | 3.8 | Astigmatism | | -0.17 | -0.17 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -7 | 8.3 | | | -0.35 | -0.31 | 0 | 40.8 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 10.8 | 0.8 | Coma | | -0.29 | -0.33 | 40.8 | 0 | 10.7 | 1.35 | 2.5 | 2.5 | Coma | | -0.17 | -0.17 | 0 | 0 | 8 | -2.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | | | -0.16 | -0.16 | 0 | 0 | -0.3 | -0.3 | -0.1 | -0.1 | | | -0.29 | -0.29 | 0 | 0 | -2.35 | -2.35 | -2.5 | -2.5 | 2nd-astigm | | -0.37 | -0.37 | 0 | 0 | 8.05 | 8.05 | 8.05 | 8.05 | Spherical | | -0.28 | -0.28 | 0 | 0 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 9.3 | 9.3 | 2nd-astigm | | -0.16 | -0.16 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 4.6 | 4.6 | | | -0.14 | -0.14 | 0 | 0 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 2.9 | 6.4 | | | -0.26 | -0.26 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 8.8 | 6.7 | | | -0.34 | -0.34 | 0 | 0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 8.8 | 11.6 | 2nd-coma | | -0.33 | -0.33 | 0 | 0 | 8.6 | 11.5 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2nd-coma | | -0.26 | -0.26 | 0 | 0 | 7.1 | 9 | -0.8 | -0.8 | | | -0.14 | -0.14 | 0 | 0 | -18.8 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
|
|
-L means the sidelobe level degradation on the left side; -R means the sidelobe level degradation on the right side. |