Research Article

Effect of Surface Error Distribution and Aberration on Electromagnetic Performance of a Reflector Antenna

Table 2

The result of effect of errors distributed in the normalized Zernike polynomials on EMP.

TermLoss (dB)Offset (″)ΔSLD (dB)Characteristic
0 cut90 cut0 cut90 cut0 cut-L0 cut-R90 cut-L90 cut-R

0.010.01000.40.40.40.4Piston
-0.2800-94.60.60.6-2.63.4Tilt
0-0.28-94.60-2.63.30.60.6Tilt
-0.2-0.200-2-2-2.7-2.7Astigmatism
-0.44-0.44006.86.86.86.8Defocus
-0.19-0.19006.16.13.83.8Astigmatism
-0.17-0.170011-78.3
-0.35-0.31040.82.72.710.80.8Coma
-0.29-0.3340.8010.71.352.52.5Coma
-0.17-0.17008-2.60.60.6
-0.16-0.1600-0.3-0.3-0.1-0.1
-0.29-0.2900-2.35-2.35-2.5-2.52nd-astigm
-0.37-0.37008.058.058.058.05Spherical
-0.28-0.28008.38.39.39.32nd-astigm
-0.16-0.1600554.64.6
-0.14-0.14000.550.552.96.4
-0.26-0.26000.30.38.86.7
-0.34-0.34003.03.08.811.62nd-coma
-0.33-0.33008.611.52.82.82nd-coma
-0.26-0.26007.19-0.8-0.8
-0.14-0.1400-18.86.20.80.8

-L means the sidelobe level degradation on the left side; -R means the sidelobe level degradation on the right side.