Research Article

Three Configurations of Compact Planar Multistub Microstrip Antennas for mmW Mobile Applications

Table 5

Comparison of the proposed antenna with other references.

Antenna typeSubstrateBW (GHz)Relative size (Size reduction (%)

[24]Quasi-Yagi-UdaRogers 400330.7–431.14  1.03  0.1884%
33.4–42

[25]Quasi-YagiRogers 588026–30.12.14 × 1.87 × 0.07589%
[26]5G antenna based on the Franklin modelRogers 588027.9–33.21.18 × 2.8 × 0.07586%
34–39.1

[27]5G antennaRogers 588022.5–38.70.71 × 5.6 × 0.14794%
[28]Microstrip folded dipole antennaGaAs34–37.52.34 × 2.34 × 0.06891%
Proposed antenna 1Planar multistubRogers 588027–29.50.61 × 1.5 × 0.036
Microstrip

Proposed antenna 2Planar multistubRogers 588027–29.50.61 × 1.5 × 0.036
Microstrip

Proposed antenna 3Planar multistubRogers 588027–29.50.61 × 1.5 × 0.036
Microstrip