Research Article

Single-Layer Planar Monopole Antenna-Based Artificial Magnetic Conductor (AMC)

Table 3

Comparison between proposed designs with several relevant previous studies.

RefFreq (GHz)Substrate materialGain (dB)Proposed techniqueArea (mm2)/ ApplicationsDesign complexity

[20]3.5FR-46.04Complementary split-ring resonator (CSRR)35 × 40/0.85 × 0.98WLAN/WiMAXSimple
[29]2.4Rogers RO3003C5.1Artificial magnetic conductor (AMC)130.8 × 130.8/2.64 × 2.64Indoor/outdoor wireless body area network (WBAN)Simple
[30]10FR-42 to 5.8Split-ring resonator (SRR)48 × 35/1.17 × 0.855GComplex
[32]4.3Rogers RT/Duroid 58804.85Defected ground plane (DGS)58 × 22/1 × 0.38GPSSimple
[33]0.9 to 2.6FR-42.6–4.6Stepped cut at four corners51 × 40/1.25 × 0.98LTESimple
[34]2.45, 3.5, 4.6, 5.8FR-44.93, 5.92, 5.54, 4.95Artificial magnetic conductor (AMC)50 × 50/1.22 × 1.22WLAN, WiMAX, and 5GComplex
This work3.5Rogers RT/Duroid 5880LZ6.0Artificial magnetic conductor (AMC)40 × 30/0.69 × 0.515GSimple