Research Article

Image Quality of Digital Direct Flat-Panel Mammography Versus an Indirect Small-Field CCD Technique Using a High-Contrast Phantom

Figure 3

(a) Box plot presenting the interrater variability of the 4 radiologists’ from the experimentally preset gold standard as a function of size and number of simulated microcalcifications scattered on the 48 films. Statistical outliers are labeled with an asterisk ( ) or a dot ( ). Criterion: “Number" of detectable microcalcifications as a function of the experimentally preset size of silica beads. (b) Box plot presenting the interrater variability of the 4 radiologists’ from an experimentally preset gold standard as a function of size and number of simulated microcalcifications scattered on the 48 films. Statistical outliers are labeled with an asterisk ( ) or dots ( ). Criterion: “Size’’ of detectable microcalcifications as a function of the experimentally preset size of the silica beads.
701054.fig.003a
(a)
701054.fig.003b
(b)