Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Breast Cancer
Volume 2016, Article ID 9301061, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9301061
Clinical Study

Modified Lower Pole Autologous Dermal Sling for Implant Reconstruction in Women Undergoing Immediate Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy

Nuffield Department of Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK

Received 24 April 2016; Accepted 4 September 2016

Academic Editor: Owen A. Ung

Copyright © 2016 Pankaj G. Roy. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. Dietz, P. Lundgren, A. Veeramani et al., “Autologous inferior dermal sling (autoderm) with concomitant skin-envelope reduction mastectomy: an excellent surgical choice for women with macromastia and clinically significant ptosis,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 3282–3288, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. W. Irwin, A. Black, S. E. Refsum, and S. A. McIntosh, “Skin-reducing mastectomy and one-stage implant reconstruction with a myodermal flap: a safe and effective technique in risk-reducing and therapeutic mastectomy,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 1188–1194, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. E. Rusby, B. L. Smith, and G. P. H. Gui, “Nipple-sparing mastectomy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 305–316, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. De La Cruz, A. M. Moody, E. E. Tappy, S. A. Blankenship, and E. M. Hecht, “Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple–areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 3241–3249, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. I. C. C. King, J. R. Harvey, and P. Bhaskar, “One-stage breast reconstruction using the inferior dermal flap, implant, and free nipple graft,” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 358–364, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. K. Al-Ghazal, L. Sully, L. Fallowfield, and R. W. Blamey, “The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 17–19, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. Khoo, S. S. Kroll, G. P. Reece et al., “A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 964–970, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. L. Spear, M. Seruya, M. W. Clemens, S. Teitelbaum, and M. Y. Nahabedian, “Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 1047–1058, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K.-T. Lee and G.-H. Mun, “Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 600–610, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Bostwick, “Prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction,” in Plastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery, J. Bostwick, Ed., pp. 1369–1373, Quality Medical, St. Louis, Mo, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. B. Nava, J. Ottolenghi, A. Pennati et al., “Skin/nipple sparing mastectomies and implant-based breast reconstruction in patients with large and ptotic breast: oncological and reconstructive results,” Breast, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 267–271, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. E. Rusby and G. P. H. Gui, “Nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with large or ptotic breasts,” Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. e754–e755, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. G. Forsberg, D. A. Kelly, B. C. Wood et al., “Aesthetic outcomes of acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction,” Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. S116–S120, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. X. Zhao, X. Wu, J. Dong, Y. Liu, L. Zheng, and L. Zhang, “A meta-analysis of postoperative complications of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix,” Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 892–901, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Goyal, J. M. Wu, V. P. Chandran, and M. W. R. Reed, “Outcome after autologous dermal sling-assisted immediate breast reconstruction,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 1267–1272, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. A. Hudson and P. J. Skoll, “Single-stage, autologous breast restoration,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1163–1173, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus