Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Volume 2006, Article ID 79862, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IJBI/2006/79862

Reciprocal Benefits of Mass-Univariate and Multivariate Modeling in Brain Mapping: Applications to Event-Related Functional MRI, H215O-, and FDG-PET

1New York State Psychiatric Institute, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
2Cognitive Neuroscience Division, Taub Institute, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
3Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
4Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA

Received 9 February 2006; Revised 17 August 2006; Accepted 18 August 2006

Copyright © 2006 James R. Moeller and Christian G. Habeck. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Zarahn, “Using larger dimensional signal subspaces to increase sensitivity in fMRI time series analyses,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. K. J. Worsley, J.-B. Poline, K. J. Friston, and A. C. Evans, “Characterizing the response of PET and fMRI data using multivariate linear models,” NeuroImage, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 305–319, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. R. Moeller, S. C. Strother, J. J. Sidtis, and D. A. Rottenberg, “Scaled subprofile model: a statistical approach to the analysis of functional patterns in positron emission tomographic data,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 649–658, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. J. McKeown and T. J. Sejnowski, “Independent component analysis of fMRI data: examining the assumptions,” Human Brain Mapping, vol. 6, no. 5-6, pp. 368–372, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. A. R. McIntosh, W. K. Chau, and A. B. Protzner, “Spatiotemporal analysis of event-related fMRI data using partial least squares,” NeuroImage, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 764–775, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. A. R. McIntosh, F. L. Bookstein, J. V. Haxby, and C. L. Grady, “Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares,” NeuroImage, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 143–157, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. C. G. Habeck, J. W. Krakauer, C. Ghez et al., “A new approach to spatial covariance modeling of functional brain imaging data: ordinal trend analysis,” Neural Computation, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1602–1645, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. D. Hu, L. Yan, Y. Liu et al., “Unified SPM-ICA for fMRI analysis,” NeuroImage, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 746–755, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. K. J. Friston, A. P. Holmes, J.-B. Poline et al., “Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited,” NeuroImage, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. K. J. Friston and J. Ashburner, “Generative and recognition models for neuroanatomy,” NeuroImage, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 21–24, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. C. F. Beckmann and S. M. Smith, “Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis,” NeuroImage, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 294–311, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. G. E. Alexander, M. J. Mentis, J. D. Van Horn et al., “Individual differences in PET activation of object perception and attention systems predict face matching accuracy,” NeuroReport, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1965–1971, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. D. Fernandez-Duque, J. A. Baird, and M. I. Posner, “Executive attention and metacognitive regulation,” Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 288–307, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. K. Friston, “Learning and inference in the brain,” Neural Networks, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1325–1352, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. W. Penny, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Friston, “Bilinear dynamical systems,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, vol. 360, no. 1457, pp. 983–993, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. A. Petrov, B. A. Dosher, and Z.-L. Lu, “The dynamics of perceptual learning: an incremental reweighting model,” Psychological Review, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 715–743, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. D. C. Van Essen, “Corticocortical and thalamocortical information flow in the primate visual system,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 149, pp. 173–185, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. Zeki, “The Ferrier Lecture 1995 behind the seen: the functional specialization of the brain in space and time,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, vol. 360, no. 1458, pp. 1145–1183, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. D. Eidelberg, J. R. Moeller, K. Kazumata et al., “Metabolic correlates of pallidal neuronal activity in Parkinson's disease,” Brain, vol. 120, no. 8, pp. 1315–1324, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. P. M. Thompson, T. D. Cannon, K. L. Narr et al., “Genetic influences on brain structure,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1253–1258, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. S. M. Kosslyn, J. T. Cacioppo, R. J. Davidson et al., “Bridging psychology and biology: the analysis of individuals in groups,” American Psychologist, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 341–351, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Fan, J. Fossella, T. Sommer, Y. Wu, and M. I. Posner, “Mapping the genetic variation of executive attention onto brain activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 12, pp. 7406–7411, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. J. R. Gray, C. F. Chabris, and T. S. Braver, “Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 316–322, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. J. R. Moeller and S. C. Strother, “A regional covariance approach to the analysis of functional patterns in positron emission tomographic data,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. A121–A135, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  25. D. Eidelberg, J. R. Moeller, V. Dhawan et al., “The metabolic topography of parkinsonism,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 783–801, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  26. A. R. McIntosh, “Mapping cognition to the brain through neural interactions,” Memory, vol. 7, no. 5-6, pp. 523–548, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. F.-H. Lin, A. R. McIntosh, J. A. Agnew, G. F. Eden, T. A. Zeffiro, and J. W. Belliveau, “Multivariate analysis of neuronal interactions in the generalized partial least squares framework: simulations and empirical studies,” NeuroImage, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 625–642, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. J. Cohen, P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 2003.
  29. C. G. Habeck, H. J. Hilton, E. Zarahn, T. Brown, and Y. Stern, “An event-related fMRI study of the neural networks underlying repetition suppression and reaction time priming in implicit visual memory,” Brain Research, vol. 1075, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. D. L. Schacter, E. Reiman, A. Uecker, M. R. Polster, L. S. Yun, and L. A. Cooper, “Brain regions associated with retrieval of structurally coherent visual information,” Nature, vol. 376, no. 6541, pp. 587–590, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. J. D. Cohen, B. MacWhinney, M. Flatt, and J. Provost, “PsyScope: a new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments,” Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 257–271, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. Talairach and P. Tournoux, A Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of a Human Brain, Stuttgart, Trieme, 1988.
  33. K. J. Friston, P. Fletcher, O. Josephs, A. Holmes, M. D. Rugg, and R. Turner, “Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses,” NeuroImage, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 30–40, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. N. K. Logothetis, J. Pauls, M. Augath, T. Trinath, and A. Oeltermann, “Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal,” Nature, vol. 412, no. 6843, pp. 150–157, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. K. J. Friston, A. Holmes, J.-B. Poline, C. J. Price, and C. D. Frith, “Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power,” NeuroImage, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 223–235, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. E. Zarahn, “Testing for neural responses during temporal components of trials with BOLD fMRI,” NeuroImage, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 783–796, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. Z. Kourtzi and N. Kanwisher, “Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex,” Science, vol. 293, no. 5534, pp. 1506–1509, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. R. J. Dolan, G. R. Fink, E. Rolls et al., “How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context,” Nature, vol. 389, no. 6651, pp. 596–599, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. M. D. Rugg, L. J. Otten, and R. N. A. Henson, “The neural basis of episodic memory: evidence from functional neuroimaging,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, vol. 357, no. 1424, pp. 1097–1110, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. S. M. Kosslyn, O. Koenig, A. Barrett, C. B. Cave, J. Tang, and J. D. Gabrieli, “Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 723–735, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. C. B. Cave and S. M. Kosslyn, “The role of parts and spatial relations in object identification,” Perception, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 229–248, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. B. M. Bly and S. M. Kosslyn, “Functional anatomy of object recognition in humans: evidence from positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. S. P. Ellis, M. D. Underwood, V. Arango, and J. J. Mann, “Mixed models and multiple comparisons in analysis of human neurochemical maps,” Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 111–119, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. C. R. Genovese, N. A. Lazar, and T. Nichols, “Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate,” NeuroImage, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 870–878, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. C. J. Price and K. J. Friston, “Cognitive conjunction: a new approach to brain activation experiments,” NeuroImage, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 261–270, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. K. J. Friston, A. P. Holmes, C. J. Price, C. Büchel, and K. J. Worsley, “Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses,” NeuroImage, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 385–396, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. B. Efron, E. Halloran, and S. Holmes, “Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 23, pp. 13429–13434, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. J. R. Moeller and D. Eidelberg, “Divergent expression of regional metabolic topographies in Parkinson's disease and normal ageing,” Brain, vol. 120, no. 12, pp. 2197–2206, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. M. Trošt, P. C. Su, A. Barnes et al., “Evolving metabolic changes during the first postoperative year after subthalamotomy,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 872–878, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  50. C. G. Habeck, B. C. Rakitin, J. R. Moeller et al., “An event-related fMRI study of the neurobehavioral impact of sleep deprivation on performance of a delayed-match-to-sample task,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 306–321, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. C. G. Habeck, B. C. Rakitin, J. R. Moeller et al., “An event-related fMRI study of the neural networks underlying the encoding, maintenance, and retrieval phase in a delayed-match-to-sample task,” Cognitive Brain Research, vol. 23, no. 2-3, pp. 207–220, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. M. Carbon and D. Eidelberg, “Functional imaging of sequence learning in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, in press.
  53. M. Trošt, S. Su, P. Su et al., “Network modulation by the subthalamic nucleus in the treatment of Parkinson's disease,” NeuroImage, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 301–307, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar