Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Volume 2006, Article ID 87567, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IJBI/2006/87567

Comparison of Lesion Detection and Quantification in MAP Reconstruction with Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Priors

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA

Received 21 December 2005; Revised 13 April 2006; Accepted 19 April 2006

Copyright © 2006 Jinyi Qi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Shepp and Y. Vardi, “Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 113–122, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  2. J. A. Fessler and A. O. Hero III, “Penalized maximum-likelihood image reconstruction using space-alternating generalized EM algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1417–1429, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. C. A. Bouman and K. Sauer, “A unified approach to statistical tomography using coordinate descent optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 480–492, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. K. Lange and R. Carson, “EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 306–316, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Geman and D. McClure, “Bayesian image analysis: an application to single photon emission tomography,” in Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section of the American Statistical Association, pp. 12–18, Washington, DC, USA, 1985.
  6. P. J. Green, “Bayesian reconstructions from emission tomography data using a modified EM algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 84–93, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. H. C. Gifford, T. H. Farncombe, and M. A. King, “Ga-67 tumor detection using penalized-EM with nonanatomical regularizers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS-MIC '02), vol. 3, pp. 1397–1401, Norfolk, Va, USA, November 2002.
  8. J. Nuyts and C. Michel, “Performance of the relative difference prior for hot lesion detection in whole-body PET/CT: an evaluation with numerical and real observers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS-MIC '05), pp. 2155–2159, Wyndham El Conquistador, Puerto Rico, USA, October 2005.
  9. J. Qi, “Investigation of lesion detection and quantitation in MAP reconstruction with non-Gaussian priors,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS-MIC '05), pp. 1704–1708, Wyndham El Conquistador, Puerto Rico, USA, October 2005.
  10. P. J. Huber, Robust Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
  11. K. Lange, “Convergence of EM image reconstruction algorithms with Gibbs smoothing,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 439–446, 1990, correction: vol. 10, no. 2, p. 228, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. T. Hara, N. Kosaka, and H. Kishi, “PET imaging of prostate cancer using carbon-11-choline,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 990–995, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. P. Rolland and H. H. Barrett, “Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 649–658, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  14. H. H. Barrett, J. Yao, J. Rolland, and K. Myers, “Model observers for assessment of image quality,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 21, pp. 9758–9765, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. C. K. Abbey, H. H. Barrett, and D. W. Wilson, “Observer signal-to-noise ratios for the ML-EM algorithm,” in Medical Imaging 1996: Image Perception, vol. 2712 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 47–58, Newport Beach, Calif, USA, February 1996.
  16. D. de Vries, M. A. King, E. Soares, B. Tsui, and C. Metz, “Effects of scatter subtraction on detection and quantitation in hepatic SPECT,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1011–1023, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  17. T. Narayan and G. Herman, “Prediction of human observer performance by numerical observers: an experimental study,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 679–693, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. S. D. Wollenweber, B. M. W. Tsui, D. S. Lalush, E. C. Frey, K. J. LaCroix, and G. T. Gullberg, “Comparison of Hotelling observer models and human observers in defect detection from myocardial SPECT imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2098–2103, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. H. Gifford, M. A. King, D. de Vries, and E. Soares, “Channelized Hotelling and human observer correlation for lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 514–521, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  20. J. Yao and H. H. Barrett, “Predicting human performance by a channelized Hotelling observer model,” in Mathematical Methods in Medical Imaging, vol. 1768 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 161–168, San Diego, Calif, USA, July 1992.
  21. M. A. King, D. de Vries, and E. Soares, “Comparison of the channelized Hotelling and human observers for lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging,” in Medical Imaging 1997: Image Perception, vol. 3036 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 14–20, Newport Beach, Calif, USA, February 1997.
  22. J. Oldan, S. Kulkarni, Y. Xing, P. Khurd, and G. Gindi, “Channelized hotelling and human observer study of optimal smoothing in SPECT MAP reconstruction,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 733–741, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. S. Geman and D. Geman, “Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 721–741, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  24. R. G. Wells, H. C. Gifford, and M. A. King, “Impact of ROI definition on estimator performance on FBP reconstructed Ga-67 SPECT images,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1210–1217, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar