Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Volume 2009, Article ID 902326, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/902326
Review Article

Modern Breast Cancer Detection: A Technological Review

1Department of Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
2Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
3School of Biomedical Engineering, Science & Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Received 21 May 2009; Accepted 15 September 2009

Academic Editor: Haim Azhari

Copyright © 2009 Adam B. Nover et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Kamangar, G. M. Dores, and W. F. Anderson, “Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 14, pp. 2137–2150, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  2. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, E. Ward, Y. Hao, J. Xu, and M. J. Thun, “Cancer statistics, 2009,” CA: Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 225–249, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  3. T. Ratanachaikanont, “Clinical breast examination and its relevance to diagnosis of palpable breast lesion,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 505–507, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. P. Kosters and P. C. Gotzsche, “Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD003373, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Howard and S. Scott-Findlay, “Breast self-examination: when research contradicts accepted practice,” AWHONN Lifelines, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 66–70, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Demirkiran, N. A. Balkaya, S. Memis, G. Turk, S. Ozvurmaz, and P. Tuncyurek, “How do nurses and teachers perform breast self-examination: are they reliable sources of information?” BMC Public Health, vol. 7, article 96, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. E. Heyman, R. Tyner, C. Phipps, L. Cave, and D. C. Owen, “Is the hospital setting the place for teaching breast self-examination?” Cancer Nursing, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 35–40, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. I. Mushlin, R. W. Kouides, and D. E. Shapiro, “Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 143–153, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. A. Carney, D. L. Miglioretti, B. C. Yankaskas et al., “Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 168–175, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. M. Johnson, R. R. Dalton, S. M. Wester, J. Landercasper, and P. J. Lambert, “Histological correlation of microcalcifications in breast biopsy specimens,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 134, no. 7, pp. 712–716, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Armstrong, E. Moye, S. Williams, J. A. Berlin, and E. E. Reynolds, “Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 146, no. 7, pp. 516–526, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. F. A. Mettler, A. C. Upton, C. A. Kelsey, R. N. Ashby, R. D. Rosenberg, and M. N. Linver, “Benefits versus risks from mammography: a critical reassessment,” Cancer, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 903–909, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  13. E. D. Pisano and M. Yaffe, “Digital mammography,” Breast Disease, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 127–135, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. U. Fischer, F. Baum, S. Obenauer et al., “Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography,” European Radiology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 2679–2683, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Planche and S. Vinnicombe, “Breast imaging in the new era,” Cancer Imaging, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 39–50, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. M. Lewin, C. J. D'Orsi, R. E. Hendrick et al., “Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 671–677, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Obenauer, S. Luftner-Nagel, D. von Heyden, U. Munzel, E. Baum, and E. Grabbe, “Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions,” European Radiology, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1697–1702, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  18. E. D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis, E. Hendrick et al., “Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 17, pp. 1773–1783, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. R. A. Castellino, “Computer aided detection (CAD): an overview,” Cancer Imaging, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–19, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. W. Freer and M. J. Ulissey, “Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center,” Radiology, vol. 220, no. 3, pp. 781–786, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. J. Warren Burhenne, S. A. Wood, C. J. D'Orsi et al., “Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography,” Radiology, vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 554–562, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. F. Brem, J. A. Rapelyea, G. Zisman, J. W. Hoffmeister, and M. P. DeSimio, “Evaluation of breast cancer with a computer-aided detection system by mammographic appearance and histopathology,” Cancer, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 931–935, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  23. C. M. Sehgal, S. P. Weinstein, P. H. Arger, and E. F. Conant, “A review of breast ultrasound,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 113–123, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. T. M. Kolb, J. Lichy, and J. H. Newhouse, “Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US—diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics,” Radiology, vol. 207, no. 1, pp. 191–199, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Rahbar, A. C. Sie, G. C. Hansen et al., “Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation,” Radiology, vol. 213, no. 3, pp. 889–894, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Huber, M. Wagner, M. Medl, and H. Czembirek, “Real-time spatial compound imaging in breast ultrasound,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 155–163, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Y. Kwak, E.-K. Kim, J. K. You, and K. K. Oh, “Variable breast conditions: comparison of conventional and real-time compound ultrasonography,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 85–96, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. L. del Cura, E. Elizagaray, R. Zabala, A. Legórburu, and D. Grande, “The use of unenhanced Doppler sonography in the evaluation of solid breast lesions,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 184, no. 6, pp. 1788–1794, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. O. Cosgrove, R. P. Kedar, J. C. Bamber et al., “Breast diseases: color Doppler US in differential diagnosis,” Radiology, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 99–104, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Raza and J. K. Baum, “Solid breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US,” Radiology, vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 164–168, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. K. Moon, J.-G. Im, D.-Y. Noh, and M. C. Han, “Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent-initial experience,” Radiology, vol. 217, no. 1, pp. 240–246, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. D. Lehman and M. D. Schnall, “Imaging in breast cancer: magneitc resonance imaging,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 215–219, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  33. S. G. Orel and M. D. Schnall, “MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer,” Radiology, vol. 220, no. 1, pp. 13–30, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. D. P. Gorczyca, S. Sinha, C. Y. Ahn et al., “Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 185, no. 2, pp. 407–410, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. T. Hata, H. Takahashi, K. Watanabe et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 198, no. 2, pp. 190–197, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  36. M. Kriege, C. T. M. Brekelmans, C. Boetes et al., “Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 5, pp. 427–437, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. R. M. Mann, Y. L. Hoogeveen, J. G. Blickman, and C. Boetes, “MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. D. A. Bluemke, C. A. Gatsonis, M. H. Chen et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 292, no. 22, pp. 2735–2742, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  39. S. Orel, “Who should have breast magnetic resonance imaging evaluation?” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 703–711, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  40. S. C. Partridge, J. E. Gibbs, Y. Lu, L. J. Esserman, D. Sudilovsky, and N. M. Hylton, “Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 179, no. 5, pp. 1193–1199, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. L. Lalonde, J. David, and I. Trop, “Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: current indications,” Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 301–308, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. Y. Bilimoria, A. Cambic, N. M. Hansen, and K. P. Bethke, “Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 142, no. 5, pp. 441–445, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  43. F. Bénard and E. Turcotte, “Imaging in breast cancer: single-photon computed tomography and positron-emission tomography,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 153–162, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  44. D. Gopalan, J. B. Bomanji, D. C. Costa, and P. J. Ell, “Nuclear medicine in primary breast cancer imaging,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 565–574, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. F. S. Sampalis, R. Denis, D. Picard et al., “International prospective evaluation of scintimammography with t99mechnetium sestamibi,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 182, no. 4, pp. 399–403, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Liberman, F. Sampalis, D. S. Mulder, and J. S. Sampalis, “Breast cancer diagnosis by scintimammography: a meta-analysis and review of the literature,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 115–126, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  47. R. Tiling, I. Khalkhali, H. Sommer et al., “Role of technetium-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of indeterminate mammograms,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1221–1229, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. A. J. Klaus, W. C. Klingensmith III, S. H. Parker, A. T. Stavros, J. D. Sutherland, and K. D. Aldrete, “Comparative value of 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography and sonography in the diagnostic workup of breast masses,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 174, no. 6, pp. 1779–1783, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. B. Cwikla, J. R. Buscombe, B. Holloway et al., “Can scintimammography with 99mTc-MIBI identify multifocal and multicentric primary breast cancer?” Nuclear Medicine Communications, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1287–1293, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. B. E. Hillner, “Decision analysis: MIBI imaging of nonpalpable breast abnormalities,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1772–1778, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. I. Khalkhali and E. Itti, “Functional breast imaging using the single photon technique,” Nuclear Medicine Communications, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 609–611, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. C. N. Brzymialkiewicz, M. P. Tornai, R. L. McKinley, S. J. Cutler, and J. E. Bowsher, “Performance of dedicated emission mammotomography for various breast shapes and sizes,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 51, no. 19, pp. 5051–5064, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  53. G. K. von Schulthess, “Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system,” European Radiology, vol. 10, supplement 3, pp. S377–S380, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. R. R. Raylman, S. Majewski, M. F. Smith et al., “The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 637–653, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  55. P. Lind, I. Igerc, T. Beyer, P. Reinprecht, and K. Hausegger, “Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 31, supplement 1, pp. S125–S134, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. A. R. Boerner, M. Weckesser, H. Herzog et al., “Optimal scan time for fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in breast cancer,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 226–230, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. H. Kaida, M. Ishibashi, T. Fujii et al., “Improved detection of breast cancer on FDG-PET cancer screening using breast positioning device,” Annals of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 95–101, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  58. E. A. Levine, R. I. Freimanis, N. D. Perrier et al., “Positron emission mammography: initial clinical results,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 86–91, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. L. T. Niklason, B. T. Christian, L. E. Niklason et al., “Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging,” Radiology, vol. 205, no. 2, pp. 399–406, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. Smith, “Full-field breast tomosynthesis,” Radiology Management, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 25–31, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. E. Rafferty, “Tomosynthesis: new weapon in breast cancer fight,” Imaging Economics, April 2004. View at Google Scholar
  62. W. F. Good, G. S. Abrams, V. J. Catullo et al., “Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 190, no. 4, pp. 865–869, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  63. J. T. Dobbins III, “Tomosynthesis imaging: at a translational crossroads,” Medical Physics, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1956–1967, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. F. Diekmann and U. Bick, “Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography,” European Radiology, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 3086–3092, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  65. S. C. Chen, A.-K. Carton, M. Albert, E. F. Conant, M. D. Schnall, and A. D. A. Maidment, “Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis,” Academic Radiology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 229–238, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  66. G. Scaperrotta, C. Ferranti, C. Costa et al., “Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions,” European Radiology, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2381–2389, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  67. K. T. Szopinski, A. M. Pajk, M. Wysocki, D. Amy, M. Szopinska, and W. Jakubowski, “Tissue harmonic imaging: utility in breast sonography,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 479–487, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. H. Azhari and D. Sazbon, “Volumetric imaging with ultrasonic spiral CT,” Radiology, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 270–275, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. S. Sinha and U. Sinha, “Functional magnetic resonance of human breast tumors: diffusion and perfusion imaging,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 980, pp. 95–115, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. P. Stanwell and C. Mountford, “In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of the breast,” Radiographics, vol. 27, supplement 1, pp. S253–S266, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  71. F. Sardanelli, A. Fausto, and F. Podo, “MR spectroscopy of the breast,” La Radiologia Medica, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  72. A. L. McKnight, J. L. Kugel, P. J. Rossman, A. Manduca, L. C. Hartmann, and R. L. Ehman, “MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 178, no. 6, pp. 1411–1417, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. M. Boone, A. L. C. Kwan, K. Yang, G. W. Burkett, K. K. Lindfors, and T. R. Nelson, “Computed tomography for imaging the breast,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 103–111, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  74. T. R. Nelson, L. I. Cerviño, J. M. Boone, and K. K. Lindfors, “Classification of breast computed tomography data,” Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1078–1086, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. A. Bravin, J. Keyriläinen, M. Fernández et al., “High-resolution CT by diffraction-enhanced X-ray imaging: mapping of breast tissue samples and comparison with their histo-pathology,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 2197–2211, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  76. B. Chen and R. Ning, “Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study,” Medical Physics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 755–770, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. E. L. Rosen, T. G. Turkington, M. S. Soo, J. A. Baker, and R. E. Coleman, “Detection of primary breast carcinoma with a dedicated, large-field-of-view FDG PET mammography device: initial experience,” Radiology, vol. 234, no. 2, pp. 527–534, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  78. W. A. Berg, I. N. Weinberg, D. Narayanan et al., “High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with compression (“positron emission mammography”) is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer,” Breast Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 309–323, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  79. L. Tafra, “Positron emission mammography: a new breast imaging device,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 372–373, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  80. M. Hayashi, K. Murakami, T. Oyama et al., “PET/CT supports breast cancer diagnosis and treatment,” Breast Cancer, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 224–230, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  81. S. Ueda, H. Tsuda, H. Asakawa et al., “Utility of 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in combination with ultrasonography for axillary staging in primary breast cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 8, article 165, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  82. D. Chapman, W. Thomlinson, R. E. Johnston et al., “Diffraction enhanced X-ray imaging,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2015–2025, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. C. Liu, X. Yan, X. Zhang et al., “Evaluation of X-ray diffraction enhanced imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 419–427, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  84. E. D. Pisano, R. E. Johnston, D. Chapman et al., “Human breast cancer specimens: diffraction-enhanced imaging with histologic correlation—improved conspicuity of lesion detail compared with digital radiography,” Radiology, vol. 214, no. 3, pp. 895–901, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. M. Z. Kiss, D. E. Sayers, Z. Zhong, C. Parham, and E. D. Pisano, “Improved image contrast of calcifications in breast tissue specimens using diffraction enhanced imaging,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 49, no. 15, pp. 3427–3439, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. V. Changizi, M. A. Oghabian, R. Speller, S. Sarkar, and A. A. Kheradmand, “Application of small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) for differentiation between normal and cancerous breast tissue,” International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 118–121, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. M. Fernández, J. Keyriläinen, R. Serimaa et al., “Human breast cancer in vitro: matching histo-pathology with small-angle X-ray scattering and diffraction enhanced X-ray imaging,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 50, no. 13, pp. 2991–3006, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  88. M. Fernández, J. Keyriläinen, R. Serimaa et al., “Small-angle X-ray scattering studies of human breast tissue samples,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 577–592, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. A. R. Round, S. J. Wilkinson, C. J. Hall et al., “A preliminary study of breast cancer diagnosis using laboratory based small angle X-ray scattering,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 50, no. 17, pp. 4159–4168, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  90. A. S. Haka, K. E. Shafer-Peltier, M. Fitzmaurice, J. Crowe, R. R. Dasari, and M. S. Feld, “Diagnosing breast cancer by using Raman spectroscopy,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 35, pp. 12371–12376, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  91. N. Stone and P. Matousek, “Advanced transmission Raman spectroscopy: a promising tool for breast disease diagnosis,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 11, pp. 4424–4430, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  92. R. E. Kast, G. K. Serhatkulu, A. Cao et al., “Raman spectroscopy can differentiate malignant tumors from normal breast tissue and detect early neoplastic changes in a mouse model,” Biopolymers, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 235–241, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  93. P. Matousek and N. Stone, “Prospects for the diagnosis of breast cancer by noninvasive probing of calcifications using transmission Raman spectroscopy,” Journal of Biomedical Optics, vol. 12, no. 2, Article ID 024008, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  94. D. R. Leff, O. J. Warren, L. C. Enfield et al., “Diffuse optical imaging of the healthy and diseased breast: a systematic review,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 9–22, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  95. V. Ntziachristos and B. Chance, “Probing physiology and molecular function using optical imaging: applications to breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. L. V. Wang, “Ultrasound-mediated biophotonic imaging: a review of acousto-optical tomography and photo-acoustic tomography,” Disease Markers, vol. 19, no. 2-3, pp. 123–138, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. S. G. Demos, A. J. Vogel, and A. H. Gandjbakhche, “Advances in optical spectroscopy and imaging of breast lesions,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 165–181, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  98. A. Stojadinovic, A. Nissan, Z. Gallimidi et al., “Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women: preliminary results of a multicenter prospective clinical trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 2703–2715, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  99. T. A. Hope and S. E. Iles, “Technology review: the use of electrical impedance scanning in the detection of breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 69–74, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  100. B. H. Brown, “Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): a review,” Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 97–108, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  101. A. Stojadinovic, O. Moskovitz, Z. Gallimidi et al., “Prospective study of electrical impedance scanning for identifying young women at risk for breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 179–189, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  102. M. Melloul, A. Paz, G. Ohana et al., “Double-phase 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography and trans-scan in diagnosing breast cancer,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 376–380, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. A. Malich, T. Fritsch, R. Anderson et al., “Electrical impedance scanning for classifying suspicious breast lesions: first results,” European Radiology, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1555–1561, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. P. J. Kneeshaw, P. J. Drew, and A. Hubbard, “Electrical impedance scanning: a new imaging technique for evaluating microcalcification in the breast?” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 4, supplement 1, p. 20, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  105. A. Wersebe, K. Siegmann, U. Krainick et al., “Diagnostic potential of targeted electrical impedance scanning in classifying suspicious breast lesions,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 65–72, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. G. Martín, R. Martín, M. J. Brieva, and L. Santamaría, “Electrical impedance scanning in breast cancer imaging: correlation with mammographic and histologic diagnostic,” European Radiology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1471–1478, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  107. B. K. Szabó, A. Saracco, B. Wilczek, B. Boné, and P. Aspelin, “Adjunctive diagnostic value of targeted electrical impedance imaging to conventional methods in the evaluation of breast lesions,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 782–790, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. A. Stojadinovic, A. Nissan, C. D. Shriver et al., “Electrical impedance scanning as a new breast cancer risk stratification tool for young women,” Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 112–120, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  109. R. J. Halter, A. Hartov, and K. D. Paulsen, “A broadband high-frequency electrical impedance tomography system for breast imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 650–659, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  110. E. Y.-K. Ng, S. C. Fok, Y. C. Peh, F. C. Ng, and L. S. J. Sim, “Computerized detection of breast cancer with artificial intelligence and thermograms,” Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 152–157, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  111. T. Yahara, T. Koga, S. Yoshida, S. Nakagawa, H. Deguchi, and K. Shirouzo, “Relationship between microvessel density and thermographic hot areas in breast cancer,” Surgery Today, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 243–248, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  112. Y. R. Parisky, A. Sardi, R. Hamm et al., “Efficacy of computerized infrared imaging analysis to evaluate mammographically suspicious lesions,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 263–269, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. F. Arena, C. Barone, and T. DiCicco, “Use of digital infrared imaging in enhanced breast cancer detection and monitoring of the clinical response to treatment,” in Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, vol. 2, pp. 1129–1132, Cancun, Mexico, 2003. View at Scopus
  114. J. F. Head, F. Wang, C. A. Lipari, and R. L. Ellioft, “The important role of infrared imaging in breast cancer,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 52–57, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. N. Arora, D. Martins, D. Ruggerio et al., “Effectiveness of a noninvasive digital infrared thermal imaging system in the detection of breast cancer,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 196, no. 4, pp. 523–526, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  116. H. O. Yegingil, W. Y. Shin, W. Anjum, A. D. Brooks, and W.-H. Shih, “Soft tissue elastic modulus measurement and tumor detection using piezoelectric fingers,” in Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, vol. 898, pp. 1–6, Boston, Mass, USA, November-December 2005. View at Scopus
  117. H. Yegingil, W. Y. Shih, and W.-H. Shih, “All-electrical indentation shear modulus and elastic modulus measurement using a piezoelectric cantilever with a tip,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 101, no. 5, Article ID 054510, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. H. Yegingil, W. Y. Shih, and W.-H. Shih, “Probing elastic modulus and depth of bottom-supported inclusions in model tissues using piezoelectric cantilevers,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 78, no. 11, Article ID 115101, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  119. V. Egorov and A. P. Sarvazyan, “Mechanical imaging of the breast,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1275–1287, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  120. V. J. James, “A place for fiber diffraction in the detection of breast cancer?” Cancer Detection and Prevention, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 233–238, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  121. G. L. Corino and P. W. French, “Diagnosis of breast cancer by X-ray diffraction of hair,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 847–856, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  122. M. Phillips, R. N. Cataneo, B. A. Ditkoff et al., “Volatile markers of breast cancer in the breath,” Breast Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 184–191, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. M. McCulloch, T. Jezierski, M. Broffman, A. Hubbard, K. Turner, and T. Janecki, “Diagnostic accuracy of canine scent detection in early- and late-stage lung and breast cancers,” Integrative Cancer Therapies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  124. R. T. Gordon, C. B. Schatz, L. J. Myers et al., “The use of canines in the detection of human cancers,” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus