Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Volume 2014, Article ID 479154, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/479154
Research Article

Robust Initialization of Active Shape Models for Lung Segmentation in CT Scans: A Feature-Based Atlas Approach

1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
2The Iowa Institute for Biomedical Imaging, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
3Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
4Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA

Received 10 July 2014; Accepted 2 October 2014; Published 21 October 2014

Academic Editor: Guowei Wei

Copyright © 2014 Gurman Gill et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Sun, C. Bauer, and R. Beichel, “Automated 3-D segmentation of lungs with lung cancer in CT data using a novel robust active shape model approach,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 449–460, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Gill, M. Toews, and R. Beichel, “An automated initialization system for robust model-based segmentation of lungs in CT data,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Pulmonary Image Analysis, pp. 111–122, 2013.
  3. M. Wilms, J. Ehrhardt, and H. Handels, “A 4D statistical shape model for automated segmentation of lungs with large tumors,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, vol. 15, part 2, pp. 347–354, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Sofka, J. Wetzl, N. Birkbeck et al., “Multi-stage learning for robust lung segmentation in challenging CT volumes,” Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 667–674, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. van Ginneken, A. F. Frangi, J. J. Staal, B. M. Ter Haar Romeny, and M. A. Viergever, “Active shape model segmentation with optimal features,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 924–933, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. K. Iakovidis, M. A. Savelonas, and G. Papamichalis, “Robust model-based detection of the lung field boundaries in portable chest radiographs supported by selective thresholding,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 10, Article ID 104019, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Wang, S. Guo, J. Wu, Q. Liu, and X. Wu, “Lung region segmentation based on multi-resolution active shape model,” in Proceedings of the 7th Asian-Pacific Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering (APCMBE '08), pp. 260–263, April 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Xu, M. Mandal, R. Long, and A. Basu, “Gradient vector flow based active shape model for lung field segmentation in chest radiographs,” in Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 3561–3564, 2009.
  9. B. Ibragimov, B. Likar, F. Pernuš, and T. Vrtovec, “A game-theoretic framework for landmark-based image segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1761–1776, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. F. Cootes, C. J. Taylor, and A. Lanitis, “Active shape models: evaluation of a multi-resolution method for improving image search,” in Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference, pp. 32.1–32.10, BMVA Press, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Toews and W. M. Wells III, “Efficient and robust model-to-image alignment using 3D scale-invariant features,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 271–282, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Ourselin, A. Roche, G. Subsol, X. Pennec, and N. Ayache, “Reconstructing a 3D structure from serial histological sections,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 19, no. 1-2, pp. 25–31, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Murphy, B. van Ginneken, J. M. Reinhardt et al., “Evaluation of registration methods on thoracic CT: the EMPIRE10 challenge,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1901–1920, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. G. Lowe, “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 91–110, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid, “Scale & affine invariant interest point detectors,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 63–86, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid, “A performance evaluation of local descriptors,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1615–1630, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. M. Toews and W. M. Wells III, “SIFT-rank: Ordinal description for invariant feature correspondence,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPR '09), pp. 172–177, Miami, Fla, USA, June 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Toews, L. Zollei, and W. M. Wells III, “Feature-based alignment of volumetric multi-modal images,” in Information Processing in Medical Imaging, vol. 7917 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 25–36, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2013. View at Google Scholar