Research Article
Automatic Labeling of Vertebral Levels Using a Robust Template-Based Approach
Table 1
Acquisition parameters for the tested spine MRIs. Voxel size was
mm
3.
| Contrast | Image size (voxel) | Visible vertebrae (range) | Subject |
| T1 | (#) | C1–L3 | Subject 1 | T1 | (#) | C1–L2 | Subject 2 | T1 | (#) | C1–L3 | Subject 3 | T1 | (#) | C1–L3 | Subject 4 | T1 | (#) | C1–L3 | Subject 5 | T1 | (#) | C1–L3 | Subject 6 | T1 | | C1–T7 | Subject 7 | T1 | | C1–T6 | Subject 8 | T2 | | C1–T5 | Subject 8 | T2 | | C1–T3 | Subject 9 | T2 | (#) | C1–L3 | Subject 5 | T2 | | C1–T2 | Subject 3 | T2 | | C1–T3 | Subject 7 | T2 | (#) | C1–L1 | Subject 6 | T2 | (#) | C1–T6 | Subject 10 | T2 | | C1–T7 | Subject 11 |
|
|
(#) Two fields of view were acquired sequentially and then images were stitched together using offline reconstruction tools from the console.
|